Romans 7:7
What shall we say then? Is the law sin? May it never be! However, I would not have known sin except through the law. For I would not have known coveting unless the law had said, “You shall not covet.”
Çfarë të themi, pra? Se ligji është mëkat? Ashtu mos qoftë! Mëkatin unë nuk do ta kisha njohur, veç se me anë të ligjit; sepse unë nuk do ta kisha njohur lakminë, po të mos thoshte ligji: “Mos lakmo!”.
Ani iyari tima belle nene? Ani uduk kulapiari litime? Na uwa so nanin b. Vat nin nan, na inwa na yinin kulapi ba, sasana uduka b. Na inwa yiru iyiru iyari kunaniyizi sasa na uduke na bellin b, “Naubasu kunaniyizi ba,”
| فَمَاذَا نَقُولُ؟ هَلِ ٱلنَّامُوسُ خَطِيَّةٌ؟ حَاشَا! بَلْ لَمْ أَعْرِفِ ٱلْخَطِيَّةَ إِلَّا بِٱلنَّامُوسِ. فَإِنَّنِي لَمْ أَعْرِفِ ٱلشَّهْوَةَ لَوْ لَمْ يَقُلِ ٱلنَّامُوسُ: «لَا تَشْتَهِ». |
| إِذَنْ، مَاذَا نَقُولُ؟ هَلِ الشَّرِيعَةُ خَطِيئَةٌ؟ حَاشَا! وَلكِنِّي مَا عَرَفْتُ الْخَطِيئَةَ إِلاَّ بِالشَّرِيعَةِ. فَمَا كُنْتُ لأَعْرِفَ الشَّهْوَةَ لَوْلاَ قَولُ الشَّرِيعَةِ: «لاَ تَشْتَهِ!» |
| ܡܢܐ ܗܟܝܠ ܐܡܪܝܢܢ ܢܡܘܤܐ ܚܛܝܬܐ ܗܘ ܚܤ ܐܠܐ ܠܚܛܝܬܐ ܠܐ ܝܠܦܬ ܐܠܐ ܒܝܕ ܢܡܘܤܐ ܠܐ ܓܝܪ ܪܓܬܐ ܝܕܥ ܗܘܝܬ ܐܠܘ ܠܐ ܢܡܘܤܐ ܕܐܡܪ ܕܠܐ ܬܪܓ |
Ուրեմն ի՞նչ ըսենք. Օրէնքը մե՞ղք է: Ամե՛նեւին: Նոյնիսկ ես պիտի չգիտնայի մեղքը, եթէ Օրէնքը չըլլար. նաեւ պիտի չգիտնայի ցանկութիւնը, եթէ Օրէնքը ըսած չըլլար. «Մի՛ ցանկար»:
তেনেহলে আমি কি ক’ম? বিধানেই পাপ নে? এনে নহওক। কিন্তু পাপনো কি, সেই মই বিষয়ে আগতে নাজানিছিলোঁ; কেৱল বিধানৰ যোগেদিহে জানিবলৈ পালোঁ৷ “কিয়নো তুমি লোভ নকৰিবা,” বিধানে ইয়াক নোকোৱা হ’লে, লোভ নো কি সেই বিষয়ে নাজানিলোহেঁতেন৷
Bəs nə deyə bilərik? Qanun günahdırmı? Əsla! Qanun olmasaydı, günahın nə olduğunu bilməzdim. Əgər Qanun «tamah salma» deməsəydi, tamahın nə olduğunu anlamazdım.
Ye ba tok ti take? werfundo ki bwici bwiranke ka? A yilare nyo, miki nyom bo bwiranke, nō kebo dor werfuner ri, nō miki nyom bo nung-nung, na kebo wo werfundo ki,” mare nung-nunge di.”
Cer erranen dugu beraz? Leguea bekatu da? Guertha eztadila. Aitzitic bekatua eztut eçagutu vkan Legueaz baicen. Ecen eznuqueen eçagutu guthiciá baldin legueac erran ezpalu, Eztuc guthiciaturen.
Amaiba: le, ninia da Sema huluane da wadela: i fawane sia: ma: bela: ? Hame mabu! Sema dedei dawa: beba: le, na da wadela: i hou ea bai dawa: Sema da, “Eno dunu ea liligi hanaiwane lamusa: mae dawa: ma!” Amo sema na da hame dawa: loba, na da amo wadela: i hou hamoi dagoi na da hame dawa: la: loba.
আমরা তবে কি বলব? আইন কি নিজেই পাপ? তা কোনদিন ই না; বরং পাপকে আমি জানতাম না যদি কি না আইন না থাকত; কারণ “লোভ কর না,” এই কথা যদি আইনে না বলত, তবে লোভ কি তা জানতে পারতাম না;
তাহলে, আমরা কী বলব? বিধানই কি পাপ? নিশ্চিতরূপে তা নয়! প্রকৃতপক্ষে বিধান না থাকলে পাপ কী, আমি তা জানতেই পারতাম না, কারণ বিধান যদি না বলত, “লোভ কোরো না,” তাহলে লোভ প্রকৃতপক্ষে কী, তা আমি জানতে পারতাম না।
त अस कुन ज़ोम? कुन मूसेरो कानून पापे? नईं, कधी नईं! बल्के बगैर मूसेरे कानूने अवं पापे न पिशैनी, अगर मूसेरो कानून न ज़ोथो कि “लालच़ न केर” त अवं लालच़े न ज़ैनेथो।
तां असां क्या बोलणा? क्या व्यवस्था पाप है? नी बिलकुल भी नी! पर व्यवस्था ने मिंजो पता चला की पाप क्या है। मिंजो समझ आया की लालच करणा पाप है क्योंकि ऐ व्यवस्था च लिखया है, की लालच मत कर।
ତଃବେ ଅଃମିମଃନ୍ କାୟ୍ରି କଃଉଆ? ବିଦି କାୟ୍ ହାହ୍? ସେରି କଃବେ ହେଁ ନଃଉଅ । ଗଟ୍ବାଟ୍ ହାହ୍ କାୟ୍ରି, ସେରି ବିଦି ଚାଡି ମୁୟ୍ଁ ନଃଜାଣ୍ଲେ ହୁଣି, କାୟ୍ତାକ୍ବଃଲେକ୍ ଲଃବ୍ କଃରା ନାୟ୍, ବିଦି ଇରି କୟ୍ ନଃରିଲେକ୍ ଲଃବ୍ କାୟ୍ରି ସେରି ମୁୟ୍ଁ ନଃଜାଣ୍ଲେ ହୁଣି ।
Eshe eebi no eteti? Nemo b́tookon morreya? woteratse! ernmó morro eeg b́ wotok'o nodanish woshtso nemoniye. Nemo «Tewunk'aye» eto b́k'azik'e tewuno eeg b́wotok'o danawuk'e b́teshi.
Ziza khi tere de geh? wawu turon tuma a hi illa tere? Ana he naki na, nakima, anita na he ni tu turon na khina toh na ituron a hla mba ime mide na gaire ikpi idi na.
Тогава що? Да речем ли, че законът е грях? Да не бъде! Но напротив, не бих познал греха освен чрез закона, защото не бих познал, че пожеланието е грях, ако законът не беше казвал: "Не пожелавай".
Unya unsa man ang atong ikasulti? Ang balaod ba mismo sala? Dili kini mahimo. Apan, wala unta ako makaila sa sala, kung dili pa kini pinaagi sa balaod. Kay wala ko unta masayran ang hakog nga pangibog kondili pa sa gisulti sa balaod, “Dili gayod kamo maibog.”
Nan, unsa may atong ikasulti? Nga ang kasugoan mao ang sala? Palayo kana! Ngani, kon dili pa ang kasugoan, dili unta ako makailag sala. Dili unta ako makailag unsay pangibog kon ang kasugoan wala pa mag-ingon, "Dili ka /x magkaibog."
ᎦᏙᎨᏃ ᏓᏓᏛᏂ? ᏥᎪ ᏗᎧᎿᎭᏩᏛᏍᏗ ᎠᏍᎦᏂᏉ? ᎬᏩᏟᏍᏗ. ᎥᏝᏍᎩᏂ ᎠᏍᎦᏂ ᏱᎬᎩᎦᏙᎥᏎ ᎥᏝ ᏗᎧᎿᎭᏩᏛᏍᏗ; ᎥᏝᏰᏃ ᏱᎦᏥᎦᏔᎮ ᎤᏲ ᎠᏚᎸᏅᏗ ᎨᏒᎢ, ᎢᏳᏃ ᏗᎧᎿᎭᏩᏛᏍᏗ ᎯᎠ ᏄᏪᏒᎾ ᏱᎨᏎᎢ, ᏞᏍᏗ ᏣᏓᏚᎸᎡᎸᎩ.
Nanga ife tinene chiyani? Kodi Malamulo ndi oyipa? Ayi. Nʼkosatheka! Kunena zoona, popanda Malamulo, ine sindikanazindikira tchimo. Pakuti sindikanadziwa kuti kusirira ndi tchimo ngati Malamulo sakananena kuti, “Usasirire.”
Acunüng, Thum a mät kung hin mkhyekatnaka kyaki mi ti khai aw? Am ni! Cunsepi, Mkhyekatnak na ksingsaki cun Thum ni. “Khyanga ka käh na hnaihei vai,” tia Thum naw am a pyen üng ta acuna hnaiheinak ta ini tia am ksing veng.
To tih nahaeloe kawbangmaw a tih o han boeh? Kaalok ah zaehaih oh maw? Zaehaih om ai. Toe kaalok rang hoiah ni, zaehaih to ka panoek: Kaalok mah khit hmah, tiah thui ai nahaeloe, khithaih loe timaw, tito ka panoek mak ai.
Te koinih balae n'thui eh? Olkhueng te tholhnah a? Tlam te om mahpawh. Tedae olkhueng lamkah pawt koinih tholhnah te ka ming mahpawh. Olkhueng loh nai boeh ti pawt koinih hoehhamnah khaw ka ming mahpawh.
Te koinih balae n'thui eh? Olkhueng te tholhnah a? Tlam te om mahpawh. Tedae olkhueng lamkah pawt koinih tholhnah te ka ming mahpawh. Olkhueng loh nai boeh ti pawt koinih hoehhamnah khaw ka ming mahpawh.
Cawhtaw ikawmyihna nu ni ti lah voei? Anaa awi ve thawlhnaak nu? Am ni! Cehlai anaa awi awhkawng simsakna ama awm man thawlh am sim voei nyng; Anaa awi ing, “Koeh nai,” ama ti man nai ve am sim hly hlai hynyng.
Tabang hile bang i son tu ziam? Thukham maw ziam? maw ngawl hi. Thukham om bale, mawna thu i he batu hi: banghangziam cile thukham in ngual neisa dungawk heak in, ci bale, ngual neisa dungawk na sia bangziam ci ka he batu hi.
Chuti ahileh aphai, keiman Pathen Danthu chu chonsea ahitia kaseina ham? Ahipoi! Tahbeh in Dan chun kachonsetna eimusah ahin, keiman mi thilnei thangset aphapoi ti kana hepon, Danthu chun, “Minei thangse hih in,” ti eihet dohsah ahibouve.
Pawiteh bangtelamaw dei han. Kâlawk teh dawk a yon maw. Awm hoeh. Hateiteh kâlawk ni yon na panuek sak hoeh pawiteh yon tie panuek mahoeh. Kâlawk ni hno noe hanh tet hoe pawiteh hno noenae lungthin tie panuek mahoeh.
这样，我们可说什么呢？律法是罪吗？断乎不是！只是非因律法，我就不知何为罪。非律法说“不可起贪心”，我就不知何为贪心。
這樣，我們可說甚麼呢？律法是罪嗎？斷乎不是！只是非因律法，我就不知何為罪。非律法說「不可起貪心」，我就不知何為貪心。
那么我们可以得出什么结论呢？律法是罪吗？当然不是！除非法律定义罪，否则我不会知道何为罪。如果律法没有说“不要渴望拥有属于别人的东西”，我就无法意识到想拥有他人之物为错。
那麼，我們能說法律本身罪嗎？絕對不能! 然而藉著法律，我才知道罪是什麼。如果不是法律說：「不可貪戀! 」我就不知道什麼是貪情。
Nipele, ana tujileje uli? Malajisyo gali sambi? Ngwamba! Nambo pangali Malajisyo ngangasimanyilile sambi sili chichi. Pakuŵa ngangaimanye kuti kulajila kuli kuleŵa, iŵaga Malajisyo ngagakasale, “Kasinlajila.”
ⲟⲩ ϫⲉ ⲡⲉ ⳿ⲉⲧⲉⲛⲛⲁϫⲟϥ ⳿ⲫⲛⲟⲙⲟⲥ ⳿ⲫⲛⲟⲃⲓ ⲡⲉ ⳿ⲛⲛⲉⲥϣⲱⲡⲓ ⲁⲗⲗⲁ ⳿ⲫⲛⲟⲃⲓ ⲛⲉ ⳿ⲙⲡⲓⲥⲟⲩⲱⲛϥ ⲡⲉ ⳿ⲉⲃⲏⲗ ϫⲉ ⲁⲓⲥⲟⲩⲱⲛϥ ⳿ⲉⲃⲟⲗ ϩⲓⲧⲉⲛ ⲡⲓⲛⲟⲙⲟⲥ ϯ⳿ⲉⲡⲓⲑⲩⲙⲓ⳿ⲁ ⲅⲁⲣ ⲛⲁⲓⲥⲱⲟⲩⲛ ⳿ⲙⲙⲟⲥ ⲁⲛ ⲡⲉ ⳿ⲉⲃⲏⲗ ϫⲉ ⲁ ⳿ⲫⲛⲟⲙⲟⲥ ϫⲟⲥ ϫⲉ ⳿ⲛⲛⲉⲕⲉⲣ⳿ⲉⲡⲓⲑⲩⲙⲓⲛ.
ⲟⲩ ϭⲉ ⲡⲉⲧⲛⲛⲁϫⲟⲟϥ ⲡⲛⲟⲙⲟⲥ ⲡⲉ ⲡⲛⲟⲃⲉ ⲛⲛⲉⲥϣⲱⲡⲉ ⲁⲗⲗⲁ ⲙⲡⲓⲥⲟⲩⲛ ⲡⲛⲟⲃⲉ ⲉⲓ ⲙⲏⲧⲓ ⲉⲃⲟⲗ ϩⲓⲧⲙ ⲡⲛⲟⲙⲟⲥ ⲛⲉⲓⲥⲟⲟⲩⲛ ⲅⲁⲣ ⲁⲛ ⲡⲉ ⲛⲧⲉⲡⲓⲑⲩⲙⲓⲁ ⲛⲥⲁⲃⲏⲗ ϫⲉ ⲁⲡⲛⲟⲙⲟⲥ ϫⲟⲟⲥ ϫⲉ ⲛⲛⲉⲕⲉⲡⲓⲑⲩⲙⲓ
ⲟⲩ ϭⲉ ⲡⲉⲧⲛⲛⲁϫⲟⲟϥ ⲡⲛⲟⲙⲟⲥ ⲡⲉ ⲡⲛⲟⲃⲉ ⲛ̅ⲛⲉⲥϣⲱⲡⲉ. ⲁⲗⲗⲁ ⲙ̅ⲡⲓⲥⲟⲩⲛ̅ⲡⲛⲟⲃⲉ ⲉⲓⲙⲏⲧⲉⲓ ⲉⲃⲟⲗ ϩⲓⲧⲙ̅ⲡⲛⲟⲙⲟⲥ. ⲛⲉⲓ̈ⲥⲟⲟⲩⲛ ⲅⲁⲣ ⲁⲛ ⲡⲉ ⲛ̅ⲧⲉⲡⲓⲑⲩⲙⲓⲁ ⲛ̅ⲥⲁⲃⲏⲗ ϫⲉ ⲁⲡⲛⲟⲙⲟⲥ ϫⲟⲟⲥ ϫⲉ ⲛ̅ⲛⲉⲕⲉⲡⲓⲑⲩⲙⲓ.
ⲞⲨ ϪⲈ ⲠⲈⲦⲈⲚⲚⲀϪⲞϤ ⲪⲚⲞⲘⲞⲤ ⲪⲚⲞⲂⲒ ⲠⲈ ⲚⲚⲈⲤϢⲰⲠⲒ ⲀⲖⲖⲀ ⲪⲚⲞⲂⲒ ⲚⲈⲘⲠⲒⲤⲞⲨⲰⲚϤ ⲠⲈ ⲈⲂⲎⲖ ϪⲈ ⲀⲒⲤⲞⲨⲰⲚϤ ⲈⲂⲞⲖ ϨⲒⲦⲈⲚ ⲠⲒⲚⲞⲘⲞⲤ ϮⲈⲠⲒⲐⲨⲘⲒⲀ ⲄⲀⲢ ⲚⲀⲒⲤⲰⲞⲨⲚ ⲘⲘⲞⲤ ⲀⲚ ⲠⲈ ⲈⲂⲎⲖ ϪⲈ ⲀⲪⲚⲞⲘⲞⲤ ϪⲞⲤ ⲚⲚⲈⲔⲈⲢⲈⲠⲒⲐⲨⲘⲒⲚ.
Što ćemo dakle reći? Je li Zakon grijeh? Nipošto! Nego: grijeha ne spoznah doli po Zakonu jer za požudu ne bih znao da Zakon nije govorio: Ne poželi!
Což tedy díme? Že zákon jest hříchem? Nikoli; nýbrž hříchu jsem nepoznal, než skrze zákon. Nebo i o žádosti byl bych nevěděl, kdyby byl zákon neřekl: Nepožádáš.
Což tedy díme? Že Zákon jest hříchem? Nikoli; nýbrž hříchu jsem nepoznal, než skrze Zákon. Nebo i o žádosti byl bych nevěděl, aby hříchem byla, by byl Zákon neřekl: Nepožádáš.
Tím však nechceme říci, že zákon není dobrý. Vždyť právě zákon nám říká, co je hřích. Kdyby zákon nezakazoval touhu po cizím vlastnictví, ani bych nevěděl, že je to něco špatného.
Hvad skulle vi da sige? er Loven Synd? Det være langt fra! Men jeg kendte ikke Synden uden ved Loven; thi jeg kendte jo ikke Begæringen, hvis ikke Loven sagde: "Du må ikke begære."
Hvad skulle vi da sige? er Loven Synd? Det være langt fra! Men jeg kendte ikke Synden uden ved Loven; thi jeg kendte jo ikke Begæringen, hvis ikke Loven sagde: „Du maa ikke begære.‟
Hvad skulle vi da sige? er Loven Synd? Det være langt fra! Men jeg kendte ikke Synden uden ved Loven; thi jeg kendte jo ikke Begæringen, hvis ikke Loven sagde: „Du maa ikke begære.‟
ତେବେ ଆମେ କାଇଟା ବଲି କଉଁ, ନିୟମେସେ ପାପ୍ ଆଚେ କି? ସେଟା ସତଇସେ ନଏଁ । ମାତର୍ ପାପ୍ କାଇଟା? ସେଟା, ମକେ ନିୟମ୍ ଜାନାଇଦେଲା ଆଚେ । “ବିନ୍ ଲକର୍ ଦିନ୍ସୁ ଲବାଇବାର୍ ନାଇ ।” ଏ ଆଦେସ୍ ଜଦି ନିୟମ୍ତେଇ ନ ରଇତା, ଲବାଇବାଟା କାଇଟା ବଲି ମୁଇ ନାଜାନ୍ତି ।
Kare koro wanyalo wacho angʼo? Chik en richo koso? Ok kamano ngangʼ! Adiera, dine ok angʼeyo gima richo en ka dine onge chik. Nimar bende dine ok angʼeyo gima chik en ka dine ok owacho niya, “Kik igombi gir wadu.”
Tulatyeni kabi? Mulawo imawo mubina? Kutabi bobo. Nikubabobo, tendali kunoziba chibi, nikwatanoli kwinda mumulawo. Nkambo ndanoli nkintazi ibbivwe kutali kuti mulawo wakamba, “Mutabi abbivwe.”
Wat zullen wij dan zeggen? Is de wet zonde? Dat zij verre. Ja, ik kende de zonde niet dan door de wet; want ook had ik de begeerlijkheid niet geweten zonde te zijn, indien de wet niet zeide: Gij zult niet begeren.
Wat besluiten we hieruit? Is de Wet zonde? Zeer zeker niet! Maar toch, ik kende de zonde niet, tenzij door de Wet. Immers ik zou de begeerlijkheid niet hebben gekend, als de Wet niet had gezegd: "Ge zult niet begeren."
Wat zullen wij dan zeggen? Is de wet zonde? Dat zij verre. Ja, ik kende de zonde niet dan door de wet; want ook had ik de begeerlijkheid niet geweten zonde te zijn, indien de wet niet zeide: Gij zult niet begeren.
What will we say then? The law is sin? May it not happen! Yet I did not know sin except through law. For likewise I would not have known lust, if the law did not say, Thou shall not covet.
What shall we say then? Is the law sin? May it never be! However, I would not have known sin except through the law. For I would not have known coveting unless the law had said, “You shall not covet.”
What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Howbeit, I had not known sin, except through the law: for I had not known coveting, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet:
What, then, shall we say? Is the law sin? It can not be. Indeed, I had not known sin, except through law. For I had not known evil desire, unless the law had said: You shall not have any evil desire.
What then shall we say? Is the law sin? Certainly not! Indeed, I would not have been mindful of sin if not for the law. For I would not have been aware of coveting if the law had not said, “Do not covet.”
What then is to be said? is the law sin? in no way. But I would not have had knowledge of sin but for the law: for I would not have been conscious of desire if the law had not said, You may not have a desire for what is another's.
What then shall we say? Is the law sin? Certainly not! Yet I would not have known sin except through the law. For I would not have known covetousness if the law had not said, “Yoʋ shall not covet.”
What should we say next? Is the law sin? Let it not be so! But I do not know sin, except through the law. For example, I would not have known about coveting, unless the law said: “You shall not covet.”
What shall we say then? [is] the law sin? Far be the thought. But I had not known sin, unless by law: for I had not had conscience also of lust unless the law had said, Thou shalt not lust;
What shall we say, then? Is the law sin? God forbid. But I do not know sin, but by the law; for I had not known concupiscence, if the law did not say: Thou shalt not covet.
So what shall we say then? Is the law sin? Of course not! Indeed, I would not have come to know the sin except through the law: I would not have recognized covetousness if the law had not said, “You must not covet.”
So what do we conclude? That the law is sin? Of course not! I wouldn't have known what sin was unless the law defined it. I wouldn't have realized that wanting to have other people's things for myself was wrong without the law that says, “Don't desire for yourself what belongs to someone else.”
What shall we say then? Is the Lawe sinne? God forbid. Nay, I knewe not sinne, but by the Lawe: for I had not knowen lust, except the Lawe had sayd, Thou shalt not lust.
Then what shall we say? is the law sin? It could not be so; but I did not know sin except through the law: for indeed I had not known lusts, unless the law said, Thou shalt not covet.
What then shall we say? Is the law sin? God forbid. Yea, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not even known concupiscence, unless the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.
What shall we say then? is the law sin? God forbid! Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust to be sinful, if the law had not said, "Thou shalt not covet."
What shall we say then? [Is] the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.
What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. No, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, You shall not covet.
What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.
What shall we say then? Is the law sin? By no means. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.
What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.
What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, You shall not covet.
What, then, will we say? The Law [is] sin? Let it not be! But I did not know sin except through law, for also the covetousness I had not known if the Law had not said:
What shall we say then? Is the Law sin? Certainly not. On the contrary I should not have become acquainted with sin had it not been for the Law; for except the Law had repeatedly said, "Thou shalt not lust," I should never have known the sin of lust.
What shall we say then? Is the law sin? Absolutely not. However, I would not have known sin, except through the law. For I would not have known covetousness, unless the law had said, "You shall not covet."
What should we say then? Is the law sin? Absolutely not. However, I would not have known sin, except through the law. For I would not have known covetousness, unless the law had said, "Do not covet."
What should we say then? Is the law sin? Absolutely not. However, I would not have known sin, except through the law. For I would not have known covetousness, unless the law had said, "Do not covet."
What should we say then? Is the law sin? Absolutely not. However, I would not have known sin, except through the law. For I would not have known covetousness, unless the law had said, "Do not covet."
What should we say then? Is the law sin? Absolutely not. However, I would not have known sin, except through the law. For I would not have known covetousness, unless the law had said, "Do not covet."
What shall we say then? Is the law sin? Absolutely not. However, I would not have known sin, except through the law. For I would not have known covetousness, unless the law had said, "You shall not covet."
What then shall we say? Is the Law sin? God forbid! But I should not have known sin, except by the Law; for I should not have known sinful desire, unless the Law had said, “Thou shalt not covet.”
What are we to say, then? That Law and sin are the same thing? Heaven forbid! On the contrary, I should not have learned what sin is, had not it been for Law. If the Law did not say “You must not covet,” I should not know what it is to covet.
What are we to say, then? That Law and sin are the same thing? Heaven forbid! On the contrary, I should not have learned what sin is, had not it been for Law. If the Law did not say ‘You must not covet,’ I should not know what it is to covet.
What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Howbeit, I had not known sin, except through the law: for I had not known coveting, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet:
What, then, shall we say? Is the law sin? Far be it! On the contrary, I had not discovered, sin, save through law, for even, of coveting, I had not been aware if, the law, had not kept on saying—Thou shall not covet;
What then will we say? [Is] the law sin? Never would it be! But sin not I have known only except through law; then for covetousness not I had known, only except the law was saying; Not you will covet;
which? therefore/then to say the/this/who law sin not to be but the/this/who sin no to know if not through/because of law the/this/who and/both for desire no to perceive: know if not the/this/who law to say no to long for
What then, say we the law is sin? Not so. But sin I had not learned (to know) but by the law: for I had not known concupiscence (to be sinful), but (by) the law, which hath said, Thou shalt not covet.
What shall we say then? Is the law sin?, Far be it. For I had not learned sin, except by means of the law: for I had not known concupiscence, had not the law said, Thou shalt not covet:
[Someone might object], saying, “(The laws [that God gave Moses] must be evil [if our sinful desires] are increased because of our knowing those laws. [MTY]/Are not the laws [that God gave Moses] evil [if they stir up our sinful desires]?)” [MTY, RHQ] [I would reply] that they certainly are not [evil, even though our sinful desires are increased]. What I would reply is that I, [for example], realized that [what I was doing] was sinful only because [of what is written] {[Moses wrote]} [in] those laws. For example, I realized that coveting [is sinful] only because he wrote in those laws [PRS], “You must not covet.”
What are we to say, then? That Law and sin are the same thing? Heaven forbid! On the contrary, I should not have learned what sin is, had not it been for Law. If the Law did not say ‘Thou shalt not covet,’ I should not know what it is to covet.
What shall we saye then? is ye lawe synne? God forbid: but I knewe not what synne meant but by the lawe. For I had not knowne what lust had meant excepte the lawe had sayde thou shalt not lust.
What will we say then? Is the law itself sin? May it never be. However, I would never have known sin, if it were not through the law. For I would not have known covetousness unless the law said, “You must not covet.”
What shall we say then? [Is] the law sin? By no means. No, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.
What shall we say then? Is the law sin? By no means. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.
What follows? Is the Law itself a sinful thing? No, indeed; on the contrary, unless I had been taught by the Law, I should have known nothing of sin as sin. For instance, I should not have known what covetousness is, if the Law had not repeatedly said, "Thou shalt not covet."
What shall we say then? Is the law sin? May it never be! However, I wouldn’t have known sin except through the law. For I wouldn’t have known coveting unless the law had said, “You shall not covet.”
What shall we say then? Is the law sin? May it never be! However, I wouldn’t have known sin except through the law. For I wouldn’t have known coveting unless the law had said, “You shall not covet.”
What shall we say then? Is the law sin? May it never be! However, I wouldn’t have known sin except through the law. For I wouldn’t have known coveting unless the law had said, “You shall not covet.”
What shall we say then? Is the law sin? May it never be! However, I wouldn’t have known sin except through the law. For I wouldn’t have known coveting unless the law had said, “You shall not covet.”
What shall we say then? Is the law sin? May it never be! However, I wouldn’t have known sin except through the law. For I wouldn’t have known coveting unless the law had said, “You shall not covet.”
What shall we say then? Is the law sin? May it never be! However, I wouldn’t have known sin except through the law. For I wouldn’t have known coveting unless the law had said, “You shall not covet.”
What therfor schulen we seie? The lawe is synne? God forbede. But Y knew not synne, but bi lawe; for Y wiste not that coueitynge was synne, but for the lawe seide, Thou schalt not coueyte.
What, then, shall we say? the law [is] sin? let it not be! but the sin I did not know except through law, for also the covetousness I had not known if the law had not said:
Kion do ni diru? Ĉu la leĝo estas peko? Nepre ne! Tamen mi ne konus pekon, krom per la leĝo; ĉar mi ne konus deziron, se la leĝo ne dirus: Ne deziru;
Mida me siis järeldame? Et seadus on patt? Muidugi mitte! Ma ei oleks teadnud, mis on patt, kui seadus ei oleks seda määratlenud. Ma ei oleks mõistnud, et teiste inimeste asjade endale tahtmine on vale, kui ei oleks seadust, mis ütleb: „Ära ihalda endale seda, mis kuulub kellelegi teisele.“
Azɔ nya ka gblɔ ge míala? Ɖe se la nye nu vɔ̃ mahã? Gbeɖe! Ne se la meli o la, nyemate ŋu anya nu si nu vɔ̃ nye la o. Elabena nyemanya nu si nye ŋubiabiã ne womegblɔe le se la me o be, “Mègabiã ŋu o.”
Mitäs me siis sanomme? Onko laki synti? Pois se! Mutta en minä muutoin syntiä olisi tuntenut, ellei lain kautta; sillä en minä olisi himoistakaan mitään tiennyt, ellei laki olisi sanonut: ei sinun pidä himoitseman.
Mitä siis sanomme? Onko laki syntiä? Pois se! Mutta syntiä en olisi tullut tuntemaan muuten kuin lain kautta; sillä en minä olisi tiennyt himosta, ellei laki olisi sanonut: "Älä himoitse".
Wat zullen wij dan zeggen? — Is de wet zonde? — In het geheel niet! — Maar ik kende de zonde niet dan door de wet. Want ik had ook van de begeerlijkheid niet geweten, als de wet niet zeide: gij zult niet begeeren!
Que dirons-nous donc? La loi est-elle péché? Loin de là! Mais je n'ai connu le péché que par la Loi; par exemple, je n'aurais pas connu la convoitise, si la Loi ne disait: " Tu ne convoiteras point. "
Que dirons-nous alors? La loi est-elle un péché? Qu'elle ne le soit jamais! Cependant, je n'aurais pas connu le péché si ce n'était par la loi. Car je n'aurais pas connu la convoitise si la loi n'avait dit: « Tu ne convoiteras pas. »
Que dirons-nous donc? La loi est-elle péché? – Qu’ainsi n’advienne! Mais je n’aurais pas connu le péché, si ce n’avait été par [la] loi; car je n’aurais pas eu conscience de la convoitise, si la loi n’avait dit: « Tu ne convoiteras point ».
Que dirons-nous donc? La Loi est-elle péché? à Dieu ne plaise! au contraire je n'ai point connu le péché, sinon par la Loi: car je n'eusse pas connu la convoitise, si la Loi n'eût dit: tu ne convoiteras point.
Que dirons-nous donc? La loi est-elle péché? Point du tout. Mais je n’ai connu le péché que par la loi; car je ne connaîtrais pas la concupiscence si la loi n’eût dit: Tu ne convoiteras point.
Que dirons-nous donc? La loi est-elle péché? Loin de là! Mais je n’ai connu le péché que par la loi. Car je n’aurais pas connu la convoitise, si la loi n’eût dit: Tu ne convoiteras point.
Que dirons-nous donc? La loi est-elle péché? Loin de là! Mais je n’ai connu le péché que par la Loi; par exemple, je n’aurais pas connu la convoitise, si la Loi ne disait: « Tu ne convoiteras pas. »
Que dirons-nous donc? La loi est-elle péché? — Non, sans doute; mais je n'aurais certainement pas connu le péché, si une loi ne me l'avait fait connaître: par exemple, je n'aurais pas connu la convoitise, si la loi n'avait dit: «Tu ne convoiteras point.»
Que dirons-nous donc? La loi est-elle la cause du péché? Nullement! Au contraire, je n'ai connu le péché que par la loi; car je n'eusse point connu la convoitise, si la loi n'eût dit: Tu ne convoiteras point.
Que dirons-nous donc? Que la loi est un principe de péché? Loin de nous cette pensée! Cependant je n'aurais pas connu le péché sans l'entremise de la loi; et en effet je ne connaîtrais pas la convoitise, si la loi ne disait: « Tu ne convoiteras point. »
Eh bien, comment conclure? en disant que la Loi c'est le péché? Non certes, mais que par la Loi seule je connais le péché. Par exemple, je n'aurais rien su de la convoitise, si la Loi n'avait dit: «Tu ne convoiteras pas!»
Que dirions-nous donc? La loi est-elle une puissance de péché? Non certes! Mais je n'ai connu le péché que par la loi; car je n'aurais pas connu la convoitise, si la loi n'eût dit: «Tu ne convoiteras point!»
Histin nu ay ginoo? Be hu7es wogay naragaa? muleka gidena. wogaa bagara gidonttako nagaray azakone nu erokoko shin. wogay “amotofa” gonttako amoy azakone tumupe ta erikke.
Was folgt hieraus? Ist das Gesetz Sünde? Nimmermehr! Aber ich hätte die Sünde nie erkannt ohne das Gesetz. Was zum Beispiel böse Begierde ist, davon wüßte ich nichts, wenn das Gesetz nicht immer wieder spräche: Du sollst nicht begehren!
Was weiter? Ist das Gesetz etwa Sünde? Durchaus nicht. Aber wenn das Gesetz nicht wäre, dann wäre ich mit der Sünde nicht bekannt geworden. Ich wüßte auch nichts von der Begierde, wenn das Gesetz nicht sagte: "Du sollst nicht begehren!"
Was sollen wir nun sagen? Ist das Gesetz Sünde? Das sei ferne! Aber die Sünde hätte ich nicht erkannt, als nur durch Gesetz. Denn auch von der Lust hätte ich nichts gewußt, wenn nicht das Gesetz gesagt hätte: "Laß dich nicht gelüsten".
Was sollen wir nun sagen? Ist das Gesetz Sünde? Das sei ferne! Aber die Sünde hätte ich nicht erkannt, als nur durch Gesetz. Denn auch von der Lust hätte ich nichts gewußt, wenn nicht das Gesetz gesagt hätte: “Laß dich nicht gelüsten”.
Was wollen wir nun sagen? Ist das Gesetz Sünde? Nimmermehr. Aber die Sünde wäre mir nicht zur Erkenntnis gekommen, wenn nicht durch das Gesetz. Hätte ich doch auch von der Lust nichts gewußt, wenn das Gesetz nicht gesagt hätte: Laß dich nicht gelüsten;
Was wollen wir denn nun sagen? Ist das Gesetz Sünde? Das sei ferne! Aber die Sünde erkannte ich nicht ohne durchs Gesetz. Denn ich wußte nichts von der Lust, wo das Gesetz nicht hätte gesagt: Laß dich nicht gelüsten!
Was wollen wir denn nun sagen? Ist das Gesetz Sünde? Das sei ferne! Aber die Sünde erkannte ich nicht, außer durchs Gesetz. Denn ich wußte nichts von der Lust, wo das Gesetz nicht hätte gesagt: “Laß dich nicht gelüsten!”
Was folgt nun daraus? Ist das Gesetz (selbst) Sünde? Nimmermehr! Aber ich hätte die Sünde nicht kennengelernt außer durch das Gesetz; denn ich hätte auch von der bösen Lust nichts gewußt, wenn das Gesetz nicht gesagt hätte: »Laß dich nicht gelüsten!«
Was wollen wir nun sagen? Ist das Gesetz Sünde? Das sei ferne! Aber die Sünde hätte ich nicht erkannt, außer durch das Gesetz; denn von der Lust hätte ich nichts gewußt, wenn das Gesetz nicht gesagt hätte: Laß dich nicht gelüsten!
Was sollen wir nun sagen? Ist das Gesetz Sünde? Das sei ferne! Aber ich erkannte die Sünde nur durch das Gesetz; denn ich wußte nichts von der Sündhaftigkeit der Lust, wenn das Gesetz nicht sagte: Laß dich nicht gelüsten!
Rĩu rĩ, tũkiuge atĩa? Watho ũkĩrĩ wĩhia? Aca ti ũguo! Ti-itherũ tiga nĩ ũndũ wa watho ndingĩamenyire wĩhia nĩ kĩĩ. Nĩgũkorwo ndingĩamenyire ũhoro wa gũcumĩkĩra korwo watho ndwoigĩte, “Ndũkanacumĩkĩre kĩndũ kĩene.”
Yaatin, nuuni woyganee? Higgey ba huu7en nagaree? Gidenna! Shin higgey nagari aybeekko tana erisis. Higgey, “Amottofa” goonnako, amotethi aybeekko taani erikke.
Lanwani ti ba yedi lede? li balimaama tie tuonbiadi bii? yeni ka, n kan den bandi ti tuonbiadi ntie yaal kali li balimaama n den waani nni. n kan den faami ke li nunponbiadili tie tagili li yaa tie ke li balimaama den yedi: ŋan da pia li nunponbiadili.
Ti ji ba yedi be? Yiko tie bonbiili yaa? N n, ya yogunu k n bandi ti biidi ki dugni mi ñɔmaama po i. Tii den bani nunponli li bo ya ki tie ñɔmaama nni ka. Ki da pia nunponli a lielo po.
τι ουν ερουμεν ο νομος αμαρτια μη γενοιτο αλλα την αμαρτιαν ουκ εγνων ει μη δια νομου την τε γαρ επιθυμιαν ουκ ηδειν ει μη ο νομος ελεγεν ουκ επιθυμησεις
Τι λοιπόν θέλομεν ειπεί; ο νόμος είναι αμαρτία; Μη γένοιτο. Αλλά την αμαρτίαν δεν εγνώρισα, ειμή διά του νόμου· διότι και την επιθυμίαν δεν ήθελον γνωρίσει, εάν ο νόμος δεν έλεγε· Μη επιθυμήσης.
τι ουν ερουμεν ο νομος αμαρτια μη γενοιτο αλλα την αμαρτιαν ουκ εγνων ει μη δια νομου την τε γαρ επιθυμιαν ουκ ηδειν ει μη ο νομος ελεγεν ουκ επιθυμησεις
τι ουν ερουμεν ο νομοσ αμαρτια μη γενοιτο αλλα την αμαρτιαν ουκ εγνων ει μη δια νομου την τε γαρ επιθυμιαν ουκ ηδειν ει μη ο νομοσ ελεγεν ουκ επιθυμησεισ
Τί οὖν ἐροῦμεν; ὁ νόμος ἁμαρτία; μὴ γένοιτο· ἀλλὰ τὴν ἁμαρτίαν οὐκ ἔγνων εἰ μὴ διὰ νόμου· τήν τε γὰρ ἐπιθυμίαν οὐκ ᾔδειν εἰ μὴ ὁ νόμος ἔλεγεν, οὐκ ἐπιθυμήσεις·
Τί οὖν ἐροῦμεν; ὁ νόμος ἁμαρτία; μὴ γένοιτο· ἀλλὰ τὴν ἁμαρτίαν οὐκ ἔγνων εἰ μὴ διὰ νόμου· τήν τε γὰρ ἐπιθυμίαν οὐκ ᾔδειν εἰ μὴ ὁ νόμος ἔλεγεν Οὐκ ἐπιθυμήσεις·
Τί οὖν ἐροῦμεν; ὁ νόμος ἁμαρτία; μὴ γένοιτο· ἀλλὰ τὴν ἁμαρτίαν οὐκ ἔγνων εἰ μὴ διὰ νόμου, τήν τε γὰρ ἐπιθυμίαν οὐκ ᾔδειν εἰ μὴ ὁ νόμος ἔλεγεν· Οὐκ ἐπιθυμήσεις·
τι ουν ερουμεν ο νομος αμαρτια μη γενοιτο αλλα την αμαρτιαν ουκ εγνων ει μη δια νομου την τε γαρ επιθυμιαν ουκ ηδειν ει μη ο νομος ελεγεν ουκ επιθυμησεις
Τί οὖν ἐροῦμεν; Ὁ νόμος ἁμαρτία; Μὴ γένοιτο! Ἀλλὰ τὴν ἁμαρτίαν οὐκ ἔγνων, εἰ μὴ διὰ νόμου, τήν τε γὰρ ἐπιθυμίαν, οὐκ ᾔδειν, εἰ μὴ ὁ νόμος ἔλεγεν, “Οὐκ ἐπιθυμήσεις.”
τι ουν ερουμεν ο νομος αμαρτια μη γενοιτο αλλα την αμαρτιαν ουκ εγνων ει μη δια νομου την τε γαρ επιθυμιαν ουκ ηδειν ει μη ο νομος ελεγεν ουκ επιθυμησεις
Τί οὖν ἐροῦμεν; Ὁ νόμος ἁμαρτία; Μὴ γένοιτο· ἀλλὰ τὴν ἁμαρτίαν οὐκ ἔγνων, εἰ μὴ διὰ νόμου· τήν τε γὰρ ἐπιθυμίαν οὐκ ᾔδειν, εἰ μὴ ὁ νόμος ἔλεγεν, Οὐκ ἐπιθυμήσεις·
τι ουν ερουμεν ο νομος αμαρτια μη γενοιτο αλλα την αμαρτιαν ουκ εγνων ει μη δια νομου την τε γαρ επιθυμιαν ουκ ηδειν ει μη ο νομος ελεγεν ουκ επιθυμησεις
Τί οὖν ἐροῦμεν; Ὁ νόμος ἁμαρτία; Μὴ γένοιτο· ἀλλὰ τὴν ἁμαρτίαν οὐκ ἔγνων, εἰ μὴ διὰ νόμου· τήν τε γὰρ ἐπιθυμίαν οὐκ ᾔδειν, εἰ μὴ ὁ νόμος ἔλεγεν, Οὐκ ἐπιθυμήσεις·
τι ουν ερουμεν ο νομος αμαρτια μη γενοιτο αλλα την αμαρτιαν ουκ εγνων ει μη δια νομου την τε γαρ επιθυμιαν ουκ ηδειν ει μη ο νομος ελεγεν ουκ επιθυμησεις
τι ουν ερουμεν ο νομος αμαρτια μη γενοιτο αλλα την αμαρτιαν ουκ εγνων ει μη δια νομου την τε γαρ επιθυμιαν ουκ ηδειν ει μη ο νομος ελεγεν ουκ επιθυμησεις
Τί οὖν ἐροῦμεν; ὁ νόμος ἁμαρτία; μὴ γένοιτο· ἀλλὰ τὴν ἁμαρτίαν οὐκ ἔγνων, εἰ μὴ διὰ νόμου· τήν τε γὰρ ἐπιθυμίαν οὐκ ᾔδειν, εἰ μὴ ὁ νόμος ἔλεγεν, Οὐκ ἐπιθυμήσεις·
τι ουν ερουμεν ο νομος αμαρτια μη γενοιτο αλλα την αμαρτιαν ουκ εγνων ει μη δια νομου την τε γαρ επιθυμιαν ουκ ηδειν ει μη ο νομος ελεγεν ουκ επιθυμησεις
τι ουν ερουμεν ο νομος αμαρτια μη γενοιτο αλλα την αμαρτιαν ουκ εγνων ει μη δια νομου την τε γαρ επιθυμιαν ουκ ηδειν ει μη ο νομος ελεγεν ουκ επιθυμησεις
Τί οὖν ἐροῦμεν; ὁ νόμος ἁμαρτία; μὴ γένοιτο· ἀλλὰ τὴν ἁμαρτίαν οὐκ ἔγνων εἰ μὴ διὰ νόμου, τήν τε γὰρ ἐπιθυμίαν οὐκ ᾔδειν εἰ μὴ ὁ νόμος ἔλεγεν, οὐκ ἐπιθυμήσεις.
ତେସା ନେ ମେଁ ନେବାସଙ୍ଗ୍ଏ? ନିୟମ୍ ମେଃନେ ପାପ୍? ଆତେନ୍ ଅଃନାଡିଗ୍ ଆଡିଙ୍ଗ୍ଲେ । ମାତର୍ ପାପ୍ ମେଃନେ ଆତେନ୍ ନିୟମ୍ ମାଲେଃଲା ନେଙ୍ଗ୍ ନ୍ନାମ୍ୟା ପାଡିଙ୍ଗ୍; ମେଁ ଡାଗ୍ଲା କଟିଙ୍ଗ୍ ଆଡିଙ୍ଗ୍ପା ନିୟମ୍ ଆକେନ୍ ବାସଙ୍ଗ୍ ଆବଲା ଲବ୍ଡିଙ୍ଗ୍ନେ ମେଃନେ ଆତେନ୍ ନେଙ୍ଗ୍ ନ୍ନାମ୍ୟା ପାଡିଙ୍ଗ୍ ।
ત્યારે આપણે શું કહીએ? શું નિયમશાસ્ત્ર પાપરૂપ છે? ના, એવું ન થાઓ; પરંતુ નિયમશાસ્ત્ર ન હોત તો મેં પાપ જાણ્યું ન હોત; કેમ કે નિયમશાસ્ત્રે જો કહ્યું ન હોત કે લોભ ન રાખ, તો હું લોભ વિષે સમજ્યો ન હોત.
Nan kondisyon sa a, kisa n'a di? Eske lalwa se peche? Non, wete sa nan tèt ou. Men, se lalwa a ki fè m' konnen sa peche ye. Se konsa mwen pa ta janm konnen kisa ki rele gen lanvi, si lalwa pa t' di m': Piga ou janm pote lanvi sou sak pa pou nou.
Donk kisa nou kapab di? Èske Lalwa se peche? Pa janm kite nou panse sa! Okontrè, mwen pa t ap konnen peche sof ke Lalwa te montre m li. Mwen pa t ap konnen anyen sou “lanvi” si se pa Lalwa ki di m “Ou pa pou gen lanvi”.
तो हम के कह्वां? के मूसा नबी के नियम-कायदे पाप सै? न्ही! बिलकुल न्ही! बल्के नियम-कायदा ए सै, जो मेरे ताहीं बतावै सै, के पाप के सै! जै नियम-कायदे न्ही कहन्दे, के लालच मतना करै तो मै लालच नै जाण ए न्ही पान्दा।
Me za mu ce ke nan? Dokar zunubi ce? Sam, ko kaɗan! Tabbatacce ai, da ban san mene ne zunubi ba in ba ta wurin doka ba. Gama da ban san mene ne ƙyashi yake ba tabbatacce in ba don doka ta ce, “Kada ka yi ƙyashi ba.”
To me zamu ce kenan? ita shari'ar kanta zunubi ce? ba zai taba faruwa ba. Duk da haka. Idan ba ta wurin shari'a ba, ba zan taba sanin zunubi ba, in ba ta wurin shari'a ba. Ba zan taba kyashin abin wani ba, har sai da shari'a tace, “Kada kayi kyashi.”
Heaha hoi ka kakou e olelo nei? He hewa anei ke kanawai? Aole loa; aka, ma ke kanawai wale no i ike ai au i ka hewa; no ka mea, ina aole i papa mai ke kanawai, Mai kuko wale aku oe, ina aole au i ike i ke kuko ana.
| האם אני מנסה לומר שתורת אלוהים היא חטא? חס וחלילה! התורה עצמה אינה בגדר חטא, אבל היא גילתה לי את חטאי. לדוגמה: לעולם לא הייתי מודה בחטא החמדה והתאווה שבלבי אלמלא אמרה התורה:”לא תחמוד!“ |
| אם כן מה נאמר הכי התורה חטא היא חלילה אלא לא ידעתי את החטא בלתי על ידי התורה כי לא הייתי יודע החמוד לולי אמרה התורה לא תחמד׃ |
तो हम क्या कहें? क्या व्यवस्था पाप है? कदापि नहीं! वरन् बिना व्यवस्था के मैं पाप को नहीं पहचानता व्यवस्था यदि न कहती, “लालच मत कर” तो मैं लालच को न जानता।
तब क्या इससे यह सिद्ध होता है कि व्यवस्था दोषी है? नहीं! बिलकुल नहीं! इसके विपरीत, व्यवस्था के बिना मेरे लिए पाप को पहचानना ही असंभव होता. मुझे लोभ के विषय में ज्ञान ही न होता यदि व्यवस्था यह आज्ञा न देता: लोभ मत करो.
Mit mondunk tehát? A törvény bűn? Semmiképpen! Hiszen a bűnt csak a törvény által ismertem meg, mert a gonosz kívánságról sem tudtam volna, ha a törvény nem mondaná: „Ne kívánd!“
Mit mondunk tehát? A törvény bűn-é? Távol legyen: sőt inkább a bűnt nem ismertem, hanem csak a törvény által; mert a kívánságról sem tudtam volna, ha a törvény nem mondaná: Ne kívánjad.
En er ég þá að segja að þessi lög Guðs séu vond? Nei, auðvitað ekki. Lögin eru ekki syndsamleg, en þau sýndu mér synd mína. Ef lögin hefðu ekki sagt: „Þú skalt ekki girnast…“þá hefði ég aldrei komið auga á syndina í hjarta mínu, þær illu hvatir og girndir sem þar leynast.
Ugbu a, gịnị ka anyị ga-ekwu? Iwu ahụ ọ bụ mmehie? Nʼezie, mbaa! Agaraghị m ama ihe mmehie bụ ma ọ bụghị site nʼiwu. Ọ bụrụ na iwu asịghị, “Enwela anya ukwu,” agaraghị m ama na ọ bụ mmehie.
Ania ngarud ti ibagatayo? Ti linteg kadi ket basol? Saan koma. Nupay kasta, saanko koma a naammoan ti basol, no saan a babaen iti linteg. Ta saanko koma a naammoan ti panagagum no saan nga imbaga ti linteg a, “Saanka nga agag-agum.”
Kalau begitu, apakah yang dapat kita katakan? Bahwa hukum agama Yahudi jahat? Tentu tidak! Tetapi hukum itulah yang mengajar saya tentang dosa. Saya tidak akan tahu tamak itu apa, kalau hukum agama tidak mengatakan, "Janganlah tamak."
Jadi apa yang kita simpulkan? Bahwa hukum adalah dosa? Tentu saja tidak! Saya tidak akan mengenal arti dosa sampai hukum Taurat memberitahukan artinya. Saya tidak akan menyadari bahwa mengingini milik sesamaku adalah salah jika hukum Taurat tidak berkata, “Jangan mengingini bagimu milik sesamamu.”
Jika demikian, apakah yang hendak kita katakan? Apakah hukum Taurat itu dosa? Sekali-kali tidak! Sebaliknya, justru oleh hukum Taurat aku telah mengenal dosa. Karena aku juga tidak tahu apa itu keinginan, kalau hukum Taurat tidak mengatakan: "Jangan mengingini!"
Mungkin ada di antara kalian yang berpikir bahwa saya bermaksud mengatakan, “Hukum Taurat tidak baik.” Maksud saya bukan seperti itu! Kalau hukum Taurat tidak pernah ada, saya tidak akan pernah mengerti dan menyadari dosa-dosa saya. Contohnya, kalau hukum Taurat tidak menuliskan, “Jangan menginginkan milik orang lain,” saya tidak akan tahu bahwa saya bersalah waktu melakukan itu.
Kulunge uligwa? Imiko iza milandu? Kutile. Angainihite kulinga imilandu, angaizesinga kunzila amiko. Kululo singa ainezelinga kulowa anga imiko aihite kulunga leka kutula nuulowa nuubi.
Che diremo adunque? che la legge sia peccato? [Così] non sia; anzi, io non avrei conosciuto il peccato, se non per la legge; perciocchè io non avrei conosciuta la concupiscenza, se la legge non dicesse: Non concupire.
Che diremo dunque? Che la legge è peccato? No certamente! Però io non ho conosciuto il peccato se non per la legge, né avrei conosciuto la concupiscenza, se la legge non avesse detto: Non desiderare.
Che diremo dunque? La legge è essa peccato? Così non sia; anzi io non avrei conosciuto il peccato, se non per mezzo della legge; poiché io non avrei conosciuto la concupiscenza, se la legge non avesse detto: Non concupire.
Nyanini ti di buki nani u'inko utize me imum ima dini mani? Ane ani, i da cukuno inda rusa me imum be sa izi ima dini sarki u'inko utize ba. Inda taa me ni'eru, sarki u'inko utize ba, u'inko utize wa gu kati ti wuzi ni'eru ba.
さらば何をか言はん、律法は罪なるか、決して然らず、律法に由らでは、われ罪を知らず、律法に『貪る勿れ』と言はずば、慳貪を知らざりき。
それでは、わたしたちは、なんと言おうか。律法は罪なのか。断じてそうではない。しかし、律法によらなければ、わたしは罪を知らなかったであろう。すなわち、もし律法が「むさぼるな」と言わなかったら、わたしはむさぼりなるものを知らなかったであろう。
それでは、どういうことになりますか。律法は罪なのでしょうか。絶対にそんなことはありません。ただ、律法によらないでは、私は罪を知ることがなかったでしょう。律法が、「むさぼってはならない。」と言わなかったら、私はむさぼりを知らなかったでしょう。
第二款 堕落者に於る律法 然らば我等何をか云はん、律法は罪なるか、然らず。然りながら律法に據らずしては我罪を知らざりき。蓋律法が「貪ること勿れ」と云はざれば我貪を知らざりしに、
ଇନି ଗାମ୍ବୋ, ମୋସାନ୍ ଆ ବନାଁୟ୍ବର୍ ଇନି ଇର୍ସେ ପଙ୍? ତିଆତେ ଆଙ୍ଗିୟ୍ ଡେଡଙ୍ ତଡ୍ । ବନ୍ଡ ଇର୍ସେନ୍ ଇନି, ତିଆତେ ମୋସାନ୍ ଆ ବନାଁୟ୍ବର୍ ତଡ୍ ନଙ୍ ଞେନ୍ ଅଃଜ୍ଜନାଇଁୟ୍ ବନ୍ । ଇନିଆସନ୍ଗାମେଣ୍ଡେନ୍ “ଏଲୋବଡଙ୍ନେ” ମୋସାନ୍ ଆ ବନାଁୟ୍ବର୍ କେନ୍ଆତେ ଅଃବ୍ବର୍ରିଁୟ୍ ନଙ୍ ଲୋବନ୍ ଇନି ଞେନ୍ ଅଃଜ୍ଜନାଇଁୟ୍ ବନ୍ ।
¿Jas kꞌu ri kaqabꞌij? ¿La are kꞌu mak ri taqanik? Man are taj. Xwi kaqabꞌij chi we ta mat rumal ri taqanik mat xinwil ri numak, mat xinwetaꞌmaj jas riꞌ ri urayixik chi jun jastaq chik ri man rech ta jun, we ta mat kubꞌij ri taqanik: “Marayij ri man awech taj.”
Hagi na'ane hugahune, nagra kasegemo'a kumi me'ne nehufi? I'o. Tamage kasegea kumira omnene. Hianagi kasegemo kumira tamaveri nehie. Nagrama rumofo zanku'ma kenunu hu'zana, kumire hu'na antahi amara osuanagi, kasegemo eriama hige'na keama nehue.
ಹಾಗಾದರೆ ನಾವು ಏನು ಹೇಳೋಣ? ನಿಯಮವೇ ಪಾಪವಾಗಿದೆಯೋ? ಎಂದಿಗೂ ಇಲ್ಲ. ಆದರೂ ನಿಯಮವನ್ನು ಬಿಟ್ಟು ಬೇರಾವುದರ ಮೂಲಕವೂ ಪಾಪವೆಂದರೆ ಏನೆಂದು ನನಗೆ ತಿಳಿದುಕೊಳ್ಳಲು ಸಾಧ್ಯವಿರಲಿಲ್ಲ. ನಿಯಮವು, “ದುರಾಶೆ ಪಡಬೇಡ,” ಎಂದು ಹೇಳದೆ ಇರುತ್ತಿದ್ದರೆ ದುರಾಶೆ ಎಂದರೆ ಏನೆಂದು ನಾನು ತಿಳಿಯಲು ಸಾಧ್ಯವಿರಲಿಲ್ಲ.
ಹಾಗಾದರೆ ಏನು ಹೇಳೋಣ? ಧರ್ಮಶಾಸ್ತ್ರವು ಪಾಪಸ್ವರೂಪವೋ? ಎಂದಿಗೂ ಅಲ್ಲ. ಧರ್ಮಶಾಸ್ತ್ರವಿಲ್ಲದಿದ್ದರೆ ಪಾಪವೆಂದರೆ ಏನೆಂದು ನನಗೆ ಗೊತ್ತಾಗುತ್ತಿರಲಿಲ್ಲ. ದೃಷ್ಟಾಂತವಾಗಿ “ದುರಾಶೆ ಪಾಪವೆಂದು” ಎಂದು ಧರ್ಮಶಾಸ್ತ್ರವು ಹೇಳದಿದ್ದರೆ ದುರಾಶೆಯಂದರೆ ಏನೆಂದು ನನಗೆ ತಿಳಿಯುತ್ತಿರಲಿಲ್ಲ.
Chaikeki woli? Echilagilo ni chibhibhi? Uli nakatyali. Nitakamenyele chibhibhi, jichilema okumenyekana ku njila ye chilagilo. Kulwo kubha nitakamenyele kuligila echilagilo chichilema okwaika ati, “Wasiga ligila.”
Tutekhekhi? ululagero ulwa mbivi? La hasha. Inave evoo, sananikhulumanya imbivi, waleusite ukhuva munjila iya lulagero. ulwakhuva sananikhulumanya ukhuno gwa inave ululagero salwalwinchoova, “Olekhe okhonogwa.”
Tujobhajhi bhuli henu? Sheria ndo dhambi? La hasha. Hata naha nganijhimanyilepi dhambi, ngajhibeli kujha kwa njela jha sheria. Kwa kujha nganilimanyilepi kunoghela kama sheria ngajhijobhi lepi, “Usinogheli.”
그런즉 우리가 무슨 말 하리요 율법이 죄냐 그럴 수 없느니라 율법으로 말미암지 않고는 내가 죄를 알지 못하였으니 곧 율법이 탐내지 말라 하지 아니하였더면 내가 탐심을 알지 못하였으리라
그런즉 우리가 무슨 말 하리요 율법이 죄냐 그럴 수 없느니라 율법으로 말미암지 않고는 내가 죄를 알지 못하였니 곧 율법이 탐내지 말라 하지 아니하였더면 내가 탐심을 알지 못하였으리라
Na mea, kut ac fahk mu Ma Sap uh koluk? Mo, tia ouinge! Tusruktu pwaye lah Ma Sap pa oru nga etu lah mea ma koluk uh. Ma Sap funu tia fahk, “Nik kom rapku,” nga lukun tia etu ngan rapku.
Katuwambe nzi linu? Kana mulao uwo wine chive? Kanzi nikubebulyo hape. Nihakubabulyo, ninisana nibezibi chive, heba nikusana kubabi chamulao. Mukuti ninisana nibezibi kuti kulakaza chive hesi mulao hawuwamba, “kanzi ulakazi.”
| کەواتە چی بڵێین؟ ئایا تەورات خۆی سەرچاوەی گوناهە؟ حاشا! چونکە لە ڕێگەی شەریعەتی تەوراتەوە نەبووایە، گوناهم نەدەناسی. هەروەها واتای تەواوی چاوچنۆکیم نەدەزانی ئەگەر تەورات نەیگوتایە [چاو مەبڕە هیچ شتێک کە هی کەسێکی دیکە بێت.] |
ଆତିହିଁ ଏ଼ନାଆଁ ଇନାୟି, ମେ଼ରା ପା଼ପୁ ଗାଟାୟି? ଏ଼ଦି ଏଚେଲାୱା ଆ଼ଏ । ସାମା ପା଼ପୁ ଏ଼ନାୟି, ଏ଼ଦାଆଁ ମେ଼ରା ନାଙ୍ଗେ ୱେସା ମାଞ୍ଜାନେ, “ଏଟ୍କା ଲ଼କୁତି ଦିଣ୍ସୁ ଜୂପ୍କା ଆ଼ଆଦୁ,” ଈ ହୁକୁମି ମେ଼ରା ୱେସା ମାଞ୍ଜାଆତିହିଁମା, ଜୂପ୍କା ଏ଼ନାୟି, ନା଼ନୁ ପୁନାଆତେଏଁମା ।
Quid ergo dicemus? lex peccatum est? Absit. Sed peccatum non cognovi, nisi per legem: nam concupiscentiam nesciebam, nisi lex diceret: Non concupisces.
Quid ergo dicemus? Lex peccatum est? Absit. Sed peccatum non cognovi, nisi per legem: nam concupiscentiam nesciebam, nisi lex diceret: Non concupisces.
Quid ergo dicemus? lex peccatum est? Absit. Sed peccatum non cognovi, nisi per legem: nam concupiscentiam nesciebam, nisi lex diceret: Non concupisces.
Quid ergo dicemus? lex peccatum est? Absit. Sed peccatum non cognovi, nisi per legem: nam concupiscentiam nesciebam, nisi lex diceret: Non concupisces.
quid ergo dicemus lex peccatum est absit sed peccatum non cognovi nisi per legem nam concupiscentiam nesciebam nisi lex diceret non concupisces
Quid ergo dicemus? lex peccatum est? Absit. Sed peccatum non cognovi, nisi per legem: nam concupiscentiam nesciebam, nisi lex diceret: Non concupisces.
Ko nu lai sakām? Vai bauslība ir grēks? Nemaz ne! Bet grēku es nepazinu kā vien caur bauslību. Jo iekārošanu es nezinātu, ja bauslība nesacītu: tev nebūs iekāroties.
Boye toloba nini? Mobeko ekomi nde lisumu? Soki moke te! Soki Mobeko ezalaki te, nalingaki mpe koyeba lisumu te. Pamba te soki Mobeko elobaki te: « Okolulaka te, » nalingaki mpe koyeba te soki kolula ezali penza nini.
त हम का कहबो? का व्यवस्था पाप हय? कभीच नहीं! बल्की बिना व्यवस्था को मय पाप ख नहीं पहिचानू: व्यवस्था यदि नहीं कहती, कि लालच मत कर त मय लालच ख नहीं जानतो।
Kale tunaayogera ki? Amateeka kye kibi? Kikafuuwe. Singa tewaali mateeka, sanditegedde kibi. N’okwegomba kw’omubiri sandikutegeeredde ddala singa amateeka tegaagamba nti, “Teweegombanga.”
तो आसे क्या बोलूँ? क्या बिधान पाप ए? कदी पनि, बल्कि बिना बिधानो ते आऊँ पापो खे नि पछयाणदा। जे बिधान नि बोलदा, “लाल़च नि कर,” तो आऊँ ये नि जाणदा कि लाल़च क्या ए।
Inona ary no holazaintsika? Ota va ny lalàna? Sanatria izany! Kanefa tsy nahalala ny ota aho, raha tsy tamin’ ny lalàna, satria tsy fantatro akory ny fitsiriritana, raha tsy ny lalàna no nanao hoe: Aza mitsiriritra.
Aa le inoñe ty ho asan-tikañe? Hakeo hao t’i Hake? Sondo’e! Fa tsy ho napotako ty atao tahiñe naho tsy t’i Hake, le tsy ho nihaiko ze atao fitsikirihañe naho tsy nafè’ i Hake ty hoe, Ko mihàñe.
ആകയാൽ നാം എന്ത് പറയേണ്ടു? ന്യായപ്രമാണം പാപം എന്നോ? ഒരുനാളും അല്ല. എങ്കിലും ന്യായപ്രമാണത്താൽ അല്ലാതെ ഞാൻ പാപത്തെ അറിഞ്ഞില്ല; “നീ മോഹിക്കരുത്” എന്നു ന്യായപ്രമാണം പറയാതിരുന്നെങ്കിൽ ഞാൻ മോഹത്തെ അറിയുകയില്ലായിരുന്നു.
ആകയാൽ നാം എന്തു പറയേണ്ടു? ന്യായപ്രമാണം പാപം എന്നോ? ഒരുനാളും അരുതു. എങ്കിലും ന്യായപ്രമാണത്താൽ അല്ലാതെ ഞാൻ പാപത്തെ അറിഞ്ഞില്ല; മോഹിക്കരുതു എന്നു ന്യായപ്രമാണം പറയാതിരുന്നെങ്കിൽ ഞാൻ മോഹത്തെ അറികയില്ലായിരുന്നു.
എന്താണ് ഇതിന്റെ അർഥം? ന്യായപ്രമാണം പാപമെന്നോ? ഒരിക്കലുമല്ല. എങ്കിലും ന്യായപ്രമാണം ഇല്ലായിരുന്നു എങ്കിൽ പാപം എന്തെന്നു ഞാൻ അറിയുമായിരുന്നില്ല. “മോഹിക്കരുത്,” എന്നു ന്യായപ്രമാണം പറഞ്ഞിരുന്നില്ലെങ്കിൽ മോഹിക്കുന്നത് പാപമോ അല്ലയോ എന്നു ഞാൻ അറിയുകയില്ലായിരുന്നു.
Adu oirabadi eikhoina kari haisige? Wayel yathang adu papki masak oibra? Madu tasengnamak natte! Adubu Wayel Yathanggi mapanna nattanadi, eina pap masak khanglamloidabani. Maramdi “Nahak kaaramloidabani” haina Wayel Yathangna hairamdrabadi, kaaramba karino haiba eina khanglamloi.
मग काय म्हणावे? नियमशास्त्र पाप आहे काय? कधीच नाही. पण मला नियमशास्त्राशिवाय पाप समजले नसते कारण ‘लोभ धरू नको’ असे नियमशास्त्राने सांगितल्याशिवाय मला लोभ कळला नसता.
ତାବ୍ଦ ଚିନାଃବୁ କାଜିୟା, ଆନ୍ଚୁଗି ପାପ୍ତାନାଃ? କାହାଗି, ଏନାଦ ନାହାଁଲାଃ । ମେନ୍ଦ ପାପ୍ ଚିନାଃ ତାନାଃ ଏନା ଆନ୍ଚୁ ଆଇଙ୍ଗ୍କେ ଉଦୁବ୍କାଦିୟାଁ, “ଏଟାଃନିୟାଃ ଜିନିଷ୍କେ ଆଲ୍ପେ ହାୟାଃଅଃଆ,” ନେ ଆନାଚୁ ଆନ୍ଚୁରେ କା ଏମାକାନ୍ରେ, ହାୟା ଚିନାଃ ତାନାଃ, ଏନା ଆଇଙ୍ଗ୍ କାଇଙ୍ଗ୍ ସାରିତେୟାଃ ।
Bhai, tujile bhuli? Shaliaji ni yambi? Ng'oo! Pabha gwangali shalia nganaimanye yambi shili bhuli, nganakumanye kulokolila kaliji shalia jikanalugule, “Nnalokolile yangali ya mmbone.”
သို့ဖြစ်လျှင်ငါတို့မည်သို့ဆိုရမည်နည်း။ ပညတ်တရားသည်ဆိုးယုတ်သည့်အရာဖြစ် သည်ဟုဆိုရမည်လော။ သို့ရာတွင်အပြစ်ဟူ သည်မှာအဘယ်အရာဖြစ်သည်ကို ငါ့အား ပညတ်တရားကသိရှိစေ၏။ အကယ်၍ ပညတ်တော်က ``လောဘလွန်ကူးခြင်းမရှိ နှင့်'' ဟုမဆိုလျှင်လောဘလွန်ကူးခြင်း ဟူသည်မှာအဘယ်အရာဖြစ်ကြောင်းကို ငါသိရှိလိမ့်မည်မဟုတ်။-
သို့ဖြစ်၍ အဘယ်သို့ပြောရမည်နည်း။ ပညတ် တရား၌ အပြစ်ရှိသလော။ အပြစ်မရှိနိုင်ရာ။ သို့ရာတွင် ပညတ်တရားအားဖြင့်သာ အပြစ်သဘောကို ငါသိရ၏။ အဘယ်သို့နည်းဟူမူကား၊ လောဘစိတ်မရှိစေနှင့်ဟု ပညတ်တရားမဆိုလျှင်၊ လောဘသဘောကိုငါမသိ။
သို့ဖြစ်၍ အဘယ်သို့ ပြော ရမည်နည်း။ ပညတ် တရား၌ အပြစ် ရှိသလော။ အပြစ်မ ရှိ နိုင်ရာ။ သို့ရာတွင် ပညတ် တရားအားဖြင့် သာ အပြစ် သဘောကို ငါသိ ရ၏။ အဘယ်သို့နည်းဟူမူကား ၊ လောဘ စိတ်မ ရှိစေနှင့်ဟု ပညတ် တရားမ ဆို လျှင် ၊ လောဘ သဘောကိုငါမ သိ
Kia pehea ra he kupu ma tatou? He hara ranei te ture? Kahore rapea. Engari kihai ahau i matau ki te hara, me i kaua te ture: kahore hoki ahau i mohio ki te hiahia apo, me i kaua te ture te mea mai, Aua koe e hiahia apo.
Tinehoile etiya amikhan pora ki kobo? Kanun to paap ase naki? Kitia bhi nohobi. Hoilebi, jodi etu niyom pora nohoi koile, moi paap to najani bole thakise. Kelemane niyom pora “Apuni lalos nakuribo” eneka likhi nai koile, moi lalos kora ki ase najani bole ase.
Erah ang abah ah, rangdah ah Hootthe ni ejen li tam et ih? Tami liike! Erah nang ih bah rangdah ah tumjih ah ih Hootthe ih thong jatthuk halang. Hootthe ih, “Mih hukkhaak suh nak lungwaang uh,” ih lamok baatta bah, erah likhiik tenthun ah lajat thang ih moktong thengtang.
Ngakho sizakuthini na? Umthetho uyisono na? Ngempela kawusiso! Ngeqiniso mina ngangingasoze ngazi ukuthi isono siyini kungesiwo umthetho. Ngoba ngangingayikwazi ukuthi ukuhawukela ngempela kuyini aluba umthetho ungatshongo ukuthi, “Ungahawukeli.”
Pho-ke sizakuthini? Umthetho uyisono yini? Phinde! Kodwa bengingasazi isono, ngaphandle ngomthetho; ngoba bengingawazi umhawu futhi, uba umthetho ubungatshongo ukuthi: Ungabi lomhawu.
Tulongele buli? seliya sambi? Ataa, Alanyo, mbele kwitangalii sambi, ila kwa ndela ya seliya. Kwa kuwa mbele tangalii tamaniya bila seliya ika kotoka baya, “Uneutamani”.
त्यसो भए, हामी के भनौँ त? के व्यवस्था आफैँ पाप हो? यस्तो कहिल्यै नहोस् । तथापि यदि व्यवस्था नभएको भए मैले कहिल्यै पाप जान्ने थिइनँ । किनकि यदि व्यवस्थाले, “तैँले लोभ नगर्” नभनेसम्म मैले लोभ के हो भनी कहिल्यै जान्ने थिइनँ ।
Hinu tijova wuli? Wu, Malagizu ndi kumbudila Chapanga? Hati padebe! Nambu changali Malagizu, nene nganimanyi lepi kumbudila chapanga ndi chindu kiki. Muni Malagizu pegajovili “Ukoto kunogela, chindu cha muyaku,” Nganimanyi lepi kunogela ndi uhakau.
Hvad skal vi da si? er loven synd? Langt derifra! men jeg kjente ikke synden uten ved loven; for begjærligheten kjente jeg ikke dersom ikke loven hadde sagt: Du skal ikke begjære.
Hva betyr dette? Er Moseloven ond? Nei, naturligvis ikke! Loven oppfordrer ingen til å synde. Det var loven som viste oss hva synd er. Jeg ville ikke ha visst hva det betyr å begjære, dersom ikke loven hadde befalt:”Du skal ikke begjære.”
Kva skal me då segja? Er lovi synd? Nei, langt ifrå! men eg kjende ikkje syndi utan gjenom lovi; for eg kjende ikkje lysti, um ikkje lovi hadde sagt: «Du skal ikkje lysta!»
ତେବେ, ଆମ୍ଭେମାନେ କଅଣ କହିବା? ମୋଶାଙ୍କ ବ୍ୟବସ୍ଥା କଅଣ ପାପ? ତାହା କେବେ ହେଁ ନ ହେଉ। ବରଂ ପାପ କଅଣ, ତାହା ମୋଶାଙ୍କ ବ୍ୟବସ୍ଥା ବିନା ମୁଁ ଜାଣି ନ ଥାଆନ୍ତି; କାରଣ ଲୋଭ କର ନାହିଁ, ମୋଶାଙ୍କ ବ୍ୟବସ୍ଥା ଏହା କହି ନ ଥିଲେ, ଲୋଭ କଅଣ, ତାହା ମୁଁ ଜାଣି ନ ଥାଆନ୍ତି।
Egaa maal jenna ree? Seerri cubbuudhaa? Gonkumaa akkas miti! Garuu ani utuu seeraan taʼuu baatee cubbuun maal akka taʼe hin beeku ture. Utuu seerri “Hin hawwin” jechuu baatee ani silaa hawwiin maal akka taʼe dhugumaan hin beeku ture.
ਹੁਣ, ਅਸੀਂ ਕੀ ਆਖੀਏ? ਕੀ ਬਿਵਸਥਾ ਪਾਪ ਹੈ? ਕਦੇ ਨਹੀਂ! ਸਗੋਂ ਬਿਵਸਥਾ ਤੋਂ ਬਿਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਮੈਂ ਪਾਪ ਨੂੰ ਨਾ ਪਛਾਣਦਾ ਕਿਉਂਕਿ ਜੇ ਬਿਵਸਥਾ ਨਾ ਕਹਿੰਦੀ ਕਿ ਲਾਲਚ ਨਾ ਕਰ ਤਾਂ ਮੈਂ ਲਾਲਚ ਨੂੰ ਨਾ ਜਾਣਦਾ।
ବାଟିଙ୍ଗ୍ ଆପ୍ ଇନାକା ଇନାସ୍? ବିଦି ଇନାକା ପାପ୍? ହେଦାଂ ଇନାୱାଡ଼ାଂ ପା ଆମେତ୍ । ଇଚିସ୍ ପାପ୍ ଇନାକା, ହେଦାଂ ବିଦି ପିସ୍ତି ଆନ୍ ପୁନ୍ୱାତାଂମା; ଇନେକିଦେଂକି ଲବ୍ରା ଆମାଟ୍, ବିଦି ଇଦାଂ ଇନ୍ୱାଦାଂ ମାଚିସ୍, ଲବ୍ରା ଇନାକା, ହେଦାଂ ଆନ୍ ପୁନ୍ୱାତାଂମା ।
| پس چه گوییم؟ آیا شریعت گناه است؟ حاشا! بلکه گناه را جز به شریعت ندانستیم. زیراکه شهوت را نمی دانستم، اگر شریعت نمی گفت که طمع مورز. |
| پس آیا منظور این است که شریعت گناهآلود است؟ مسلماً نه! در واقع، این شریعت بود که گناه مرا به من نشان میداد. برای مثال، اگر شریعت نگفته بود «طمع نَوَرز»، من هرگز پی نمیبردم که طمع ورزیدن گناه است. |
Hashi, su tutakuli handa malagaliru ndo vidoda? Ndala! Kumbiti ndo Malagaliru gantenditi neni kuvimana vidoda vyaviwera. Kumbiti pota Lilagaliru kulonga hangu, “Naguwera na lumatamata muvintu vyaviwera ndiri vyaku,” neni menuvimani ndiri.
Ari, da me kitail en inda? Me dip kapung o? O so! A i pan sasa dip, ma so kapung. Pwe i pan sasa duen inong sued, ma kapung so kalok kidar: Koe der norok!
Ari, da me kitail en inda? Me dip kapun o? O jo! A i pan jaja dip, ma jo kapun. Pwe I pan jaja duen inon jued, ma kapun jo kalok kidar: Koe der norok!
Cóż tedy rzeczemy? Iż zakon jest grzechem? Nie daj tego Boże! I owszemem grzechu nie poznał, tylko przez zakon; bo i o pożądliwości bym był nie wiedział, by był zakon nie rzekł: Nie będziesz pożądał.
Czy można zatem powiedzieć, że Prawo Mojżesza jest grzeszne? Ależ skąd! Gdyby nie ono, nie zrozumiałbym czym jest grzech. Nie wiedziałbym nawet, czym jest grzeszne pragnienie, gdyby Prawo nie mówiło: „Nie pożądaj”.
Cóż więc powiemy? Że prawo [jest] grzechem? Nie daj Boże! Przeciwnie, nie poznałem grzechu [jak] tylko przez prawo, bo i o pożądliwości nie wiedziałbym, gdyby prawo nie mówiło: Nie będziesz pożądał.
Que diremos, pois? É a Lei pecado? De maneira nenhuma! Todavia, eu não teria conhecido o pecado, se não fosse pela Lei; porque não conheceria a cobiça, se a Lei não dissesse: Não cobiçarás.
Que diremos pois? É a lei peccado? De modo nenhum: mas eu não conheceria o peccado senão pela lei; porque eu não conheceria a concupiscencia, se a lei não dissesse: Não cubiçarás.
Que diremos pois? É a lei pecado? De modo nenhum: mas eu não conheceria o pecado senão pela lei; porque eu não conheceria a concupiscência, se a lei não dissesse: Não cobiçaras.
Pode alguém replicar, “A lei que Deus deu a Moisés deve ser má se desperta nossos desejos pecaminosos.” Diria eu, “Com certeza ela não é má, mesmo que desperte nossos desejos pecaminosos. Pelo contrário, eu, por exemplo, me dei conta de ser pecaminoso o que eu fazia só por ter lido o que Moisés escreveu na lei. Por exemplo, descobri que a cobiça é pecado porque ele escreveu naquela lei, “Não se deve cobiçar nada.”
Então, o que podemos concluir? Que a lei é pecado? É claro que não! Eu não saberia o que o pecado é, a não ser que a lei o definisse. Eu não entenderia que desejar para mim as coisas que outras pessoas têm é errado, se a lei não dissesse: “Não deseje para si o que pertence a outra pessoa.”
O que devemos dizer então? A lei é pecado? Que nunca seja! No entanto, eu não teria conhecido o pecado a não ser através da lei. Pois eu não teria conhecido a cobiça se a lei não tivesse dito: “Você não cobiçará”.
Деч че вом зиче? Леӂя есте чева пэкэтос? Ничдекум! Димпотривэ, пэкатул ну л-ам куноскут декыт прин Леӂе. Де пилдэ, н-аш фи куноскут пофта, дакэ Леӂя ну мь-ар фи спус: „Сэ ну пофтешть!”
Ce vom spune atunci? Este legea păcat? Să nu fie niciodată! Cu toate acestea, nu aș fi cunoscut păcatul decât prin lege. Căci nu aș fi cunoscut pofta dacă legea nu ar fi spus: “Să nu poftești”.
Dadꞌi hita tae saa fai? Mbei ma hei duꞌa mae, “Hohoro-lalaneꞌ fo Lamatuaꞌ fee Musa naa, sala!” Hokoꞌ! Huu mete ma au nda uhine hohoro-lalaneꞌ naa sa, neꞌo au o nda uhine dꞌala-dꞌala deꞌulakaꞌ mana sia rala ngga sa. Conto onaꞌ a, hambu hohoro-lalaneꞌ oi, “Afi hii mae haꞌi mala atahori sudꞌiꞌ a saan.” Te taꞌo bee fo au uhine ae au hihii ngga naa, sala, mete ma au nda bubꞌuluꞌ hambu hohoro-lalanen sa? Nda bisa sa!
Что же скажем? Неужели от закона грех? Никак. Но я не иначе узнал грех, как посредством закона. Ибо я не понимал бы и пожелания, если бы закон не говорил: не пожелай.
Tiyajewele eshi? Endajizyo aje mbibhi? Haa. Hata eshi, senezagai manye embibhi, hangasaya hali hwidala lye ndajizyo. Aje saganaheza gama asangwe aje ndajizyo hangasaga eyanjile, “Osinyonye.”
Imo ei ti rang ni zoi, Balam ha nunsie mini? nitet mak! Aniatachu balam han mi min riet no rese chu nunsie hih riet no ning. Balam han “Mi ta ôi no roh” ti no rese chu, ôi hi ki riet loi rang ani.
tarhi vayaM kiM brUmaH? vyavasthA kiM pApajanikA bhavati? netthaM bhavatu| vyavasthAm avidyamAnAyAM pApaM kim ityahaM nAvedaM; kiJca lobhaM mA kArSIriti ced vyavasthAgranthe likhitaM nAbhaviSyat tarhi lobhaH kimbhUtastadahaM nAjJAsyaM|
তৰ্হি ৱযং কিং ব্ৰূমঃ? ৱ্যৱস্থা কিং পাপজনিকা ভৱতি? নেত্থং ভৱতু| ৱ্যৱস্থাম্ অৱিদ্যমানাযাং পাপং কিম্ ইত্যহং নাৱেদং; কিঞ্চ লোভং মা কাৰ্ষীৰিতি চেদ্ ৱ্যৱস্থাগ্ৰন্থে লিখিতং নাভৱিষ্যৎ তৰ্হি লোভঃ কিম্ভূতস্তদহং নাজ্ঞাস্যং|
তর্হি ৱযং কিং ব্রূমঃ? ৱ্যৱস্থা কিং পাপজনিকা ভৱতি? নেত্থং ভৱতু| ৱ্যৱস্থাম্ অৱিদ্যমানাযাং পাপং কিম্ ইত্যহং নাৱেদং; কিঞ্চ লোভং মা কার্ষীরিতি চেদ্ ৱ্যৱস্থাগ্রন্থে লিখিতং নাভৱিষ্যৎ তর্হি লোভঃ কিম্ভূতস্তদহং নাজ্ঞাস্যং|
တရှိ ဝယံ ကိံ ဗြူမး? ဝျဝသ္ထာ ကိံ ပါပဇနိကာ ဘဝတိ? နေတ္ထံ ဘဝတု၊ ဝျဝသ္ထာမ် အဝိဒျမာနာယာံ ပါပံ ကိမ် ဣတျဟံ နာဝေဒံ; ကိဉ္စ လောဘံ မာ ကာရ္ၐီရိတိ စေဒ် ဝျဝသ္ထာဂြန္ထေ လိခိတံ နာဘဝိၐျတ် တရှိ လောဘး ကိမ္ဘူတသ္တဒဟံ နာဇ္ဉာသျံ၊
tarhi vayaM kiM brUmaH? vyavasthA kiM pApajanikA bhavati? nEtthaM bhavatu| vyavasthAm avidyamAnAyAM pApaM kim ityahaM nAvEdaM; kinjca lObhaM mA kArSIriti cEd vyavasthAgranthE likhitaM nAbhaviSyat tarhi lObhaH kimbhUtastadahaM nAjnjAsyaM|
तर्हि वयं किं ब्रूमः? व्यवस्था किं पापजनिका भवति? नेत्थं भवतु। व्यवस्थाम् अविद्यमानायां पापं किम् इत्यहं नावेदं; किञ्च लोभं मा कार्षीरिति चेद् व्यवस्थाग्रन्थे लिखितं नाभविष्यत् तर्हि लोभः किम्भूतस्तदहं नाज्ञास्यं।
તર્હિ વયં કિં બ્રૂમઃ? વ્યવસ્થા કિં પાપજનિકા ભવતિ? નેત્થં ભવતુ| વ્યવસ્થામ્ અવિદ્યમાનાયાં પાપં કિમ્ ઇત્યહં નાવેદં; કિઞ્ચ લોભં મા કાર્ષીરિતિ ચેદ્ વ્યવસ્થાગ્રન્થે લિખિતં નાભવિષ્યત્ તર્હિ લોભઃ કિમ્ભૂતસ્તદહં નાજ્ઞાસ્યં|
tarhi vayaṁ kiṁ brūmaḥ? vyavasthā kiṁ pāpajanikā bhavati? netthaṁ bhavatu| vyavasthām avidyamānāyāṁ pāpaṁ kim ityahaṁ nāvedaṁ; kiñca lobhaṁ mā kārṣīriti ced vyavasthāgranthe likhitaṁ nābhaviṣyat tarhi lobhaḥ kimbhūtastadahaṁ nājñāsyaṁ|
tarhi vayaṁ kiṁ brūmaḥ? vyavasthā kiṁ pāpajanikā bhavati? nētthaṁ bhavatu| vyavasthām avidyamānāyāṁ pāpaṁ kim ityahaṁ nāvēdaṁ; kiñca lōbhaṁ mā kārṣīriti cēd vyavasthāgranthē likhitaṁ nābhaviṣyat tarhi lōbhaḥ kimbhūtastadahaṁ nājñāsyaṁ|
tarhi vayaM kiM brUmaH? vyavasthA kiM pApajanikA bhavati? netthaM bhavatu| vyavasthAm avidyamAnAyAM pApaM kim ityahaM nAvedaM; ki ncha lobhaM mA kArShIriti ched vyavasthAgranthe likhitaM nAbhaviShyat tarhi lobhaH kimbhUtastadahaM nAj nAsyaM|
ತರ್ಹಿ ವಯಂ ಕಿಂ ಬ್ರೂಮಃ? ವ್ಯವಸ್ಥಾ ಕಿಂ ಪಾಪಜನಿಕಾ ಭವತಿ? ನೇತ್ಥಂ ಭವತು| ವ್ಯವಸ್ಥಾಮ್ ಅವಿದ್ಯಮಾನಾಯಾಂ ಪಾಪಂ ಕಿಮ್ ಇತ್ಯಹಂ ನಾವೇದಂ; ಕಿಞ್ಚ ಲೋಭಂ ಮಾ ಕಾರ್ಷೀರಿತಿ ಚೇದ್ ವ್ಯವಸ್ಥಾಗ್ರನ್ಥೇ ಲಿಖಿತಂ ನಾಭವಿಷ್ಯತ್ ತರ್ಹಿ ಲೋಭಃ ಕಿಮ್ಭೂತಸ್ತದಹಂ ನಾಜ್ಞಾಸ್ಯಂ|
តហ៌ិ វយំ កិំ ព្រូមះ? វ្យវស្ថា កិំ បាបជនិកា ភវតិ? នេត្ថំ ភវតុ។ វ្យវស្ថាម៑ អវិទ្យមានាយាំ បាបំ កិម៑ ឥត្យហំ នាវេទំ; កិញ្ច លោភំ មា កាឞ៌ីរិតិ ចេទ៑ វ្យវស្ថាគ្រន្ថេ លិខិតំ នាភវិឞ្យត៑ តហ៌ិ លោភះ កិម្ភូតស្តទហំ នាជ្ញាស្យំ។
തർഹി വയം കിം ബ്രൂമഃ? വ്യവസ്ഥാ കിം പാപജനികാ ഭവതി? നേത്ഥം ഭവതു| വ്യവസ്ഥാമ് അവിദ്യമാനായാം പാപം കിമ് ഇത്യഹം നാവേദം; കിഞ്ച ലോഭം മാ കാർഷീരിതി ചേദ് വ്യവസ്ഥാഗ്രന്ഥേ ലിഖിതം നാഭവിഷ്യത് തർഹി ലോഭഃ കിമ്ഭൂതസ്തദഹം നാജ്ഞാസ്യം|
ତର୍ହି ୱଯଂ କିଂ ବ୍ରୂମଃ? ୱ୍ୟୱସ୍ଥା କିଂ ପାପଜନିକା ଭୱତି? ନେତ୍ଥଂ ଭୱତୁ| ୱ୍ୟୱସ୍ଥାମ୍ ଅୱିଦ୍ୟମାନାଯାଂ ପାପଂ କିମ୍ ଇତ୍ୟହଂ ନାୱେଦଂ; କିଞ୍ଚ ଲୋଭଂ ମା କାର୍ଷୀରିତି ଚେଦ୍ ୱ୍ୟୱସ୍ଥାଗ୍ରନ୍ଥେ ଲିଖିତଂ ନାଭୱିଷ୍ୟତ୍ ତର୍ହି ଲୋଭଃ କିମ୍ଭୂତସ୍ତଦହଂ ନାଜ୍ଞାସ୍ୟଂ|
ਤਰ੍ਹਿ ਵਯੰ ਕਿੰ ਬ੍ਰੂਮਃ? ਵ੍ਯਵਸ੍ਥਾ ਕਿੰ ਪਾਪਜਨਿਕਾ ਭਵਤਿ? ਨੇੱਥੰ ਭਵਤੁ| ਵ੍ਯਵਸ੍ਥਾਮ੍ ਅਵਿਦ੍ਯਮਾਨਾਯਾਂ ਪਾਪੰ ਕਿਮ੍ ਇਤ੍ਯਹੰ ਨਾਵੇਦੰ; ਕਿਞ੍ਚ ਲੋਭੰ ਮਾ ਕਾਰ੍ਸ਼਼ੀਰਿਤਿ ਚੇਦ੍ ਵ੍ਯਵਸ੍ਥਾਗ੍ਰਨ੍ਥੇ ਲਿਖਿਤੰ ਨਾਭਵਿਸ਼਼੍ਯਤ੍ ਤਰ੍ਹਿ ਲੋਭਃ ਕਿਮ੍ਭੂਤਸ੍ਤਦਹੰ ਨਾਜ੍ਞਾਸ੍ਯੰ|
තර්හි වයං කිං බ්රූමඃ? ව්යවස්ථා කිං පාපජනිකා භවති? නේත්ථං භවතු| ව්යවස්ථාම් අවිද්යමානායාං පාපං කිම් ඉත්යහං නාවේදං; කිඤ්ච ලෝභං මා කාර්ෂීරිති චේද් ව්යවස්ථාග්රන්ථේ ලිඛිතං නාභවිෂ්යත් තර්හි ලෝභඃ කිම්භූතස්තදහං නාඥාස්යං|
தர்ஹி வயம்’ கிம்’ ப்³ரூம: ? வ்யவஸ்தா² கிம்’ பாபஜநிகா ப⁴வதி? நேத்த²ம்’ ப⁴வது| வ்யவஸ்தா²ம் அவித்³யமாநாயாம்’ பாபம்’ கிம் இத்யஹம்’ நாவேத³ம்’; கிஞ்ச லோப⁴ம்’ மா கார்ஷீரிதி சேத்³ வ்யவஸ்தா²க்³ரந்தே² லிகி²தம்’ நாப⁴விஷ்யத் தர்ஹி லோப⁴: கிம்பூ⁴தஸ்தத³ஹம்’ நாஜ்ஞாஸ்யம்’|
తర్హి వయం కిం బ్రూమః? వ్యవస్థా కిం పాపజనికా భవతి? నేత్థం భవతు| వ్యవస్థామ్ అవిద్యమానాయాం పాపం కిమ్ ఇత్యహం నావేదం; కిఞ్చ లోభం మా కార్షీరితి చేద్ వ్యవస్థాగ్రన్థే లిఖితం నాభవిష్యత్ తర్హి లోభః కిమ్భూతస్తదహం నాజ్ఞాస్యం|
ตรฺหิ วยํ กึ พฺรูม: ? วฺยวสฺถา กึ ปาปชนิกา ภวติ? เนตฺถํ ภวตุฯ วฺยวสฺถามฺ อวิทฺยมานายำ ปาปํ กิมฺ อิตฺยหํ นาเวทํ; กิญฺจ โลภํ มา การฺษีริติ เจทฺ วฺยวสฺถาคฺรนฺเถ ลิขิตํ นาภวิษฺยตฺ ตรฺหิ โลภ: กิมฺภูตสฺตทหํ นาชฺญาสฺยํฯ
ཏརྷི ཝཡཾ ཀིཾ བྲཱུམཿ? ཝྱཝསྠཱ ཀིཾ པཱཔཛནིཀཱ བྷཝཏི? ནེཏྠཾ བྷཝཏུ། ཝྱཝསྠཱམ྄ ཨཝིདྱམཱནཱཡཱཾ པཱཔཾ ཀིམ྄ ཨིཏྱཧཾ ནཱཝེདཾ; ཀིཉྩ ལོབྷཾ མཱ ཀཱརྵཱིརིཏི ཙེད྄ ཝྱཝསྠཱགྲནྠེ ལིཁིཏཾ ནཱབྷཝིཥྱཏ྄ ཏརྷི ལོབྷཿ ཀིམྦྷཱུཏསྟདཧཾ ནཱཛྙཱསྱཾ།
| تَرْہِ وَیَں کِں بْرُومَح؟ وْیَوَسْتھا کِں پاپَجَنِکا بھَوَتِ؟ نیتّھَں بھَوَتُ۔ وْیَوَسْتھامْ اَوِدْیَمانایاں پاپَں کِمْ اِتْیَہَں ناویدَں؛ کِنْچَ لوبھَں ما کارْشِیرِتِ چیدْ وْیَوَسْتھاگْرَنْتھے لِکھِتَں نابھَوِشْیَتْ تَرْہِ لوبھَح کِمْبھُوتَسْتَدَہَں ناجْناسْیَں۔ |
tarhi vaya. m ki. m bruuma. h? vyavasthaa ki. m paapajanikaa bhavati? nettha. m bhavatu| vyavasthaam avidyamaanaayaa. m paapa. m kim ityaha. m naaveda. m; ki nca lobha. m maa kaar. siiriti ced vyavasthaagranthe likhita. m naabhavi. syat tarhi lobha. h kimbhuutastadaha. m naaj naasya. m|
Шта ћемо дакле рећи? Је ли закон грех? Боже сачувај! Него ја греха не познах осим кроз закон; јер не знадох за жељу да закон не каза: Не зажели.
Šta æemo dakle reæi? Je li zakon grijeh? Bože saèuvaj! nego ja grijeha ne poznah osim kroz zakon; jer ne znadoh za želju da zakon ne kaza: ne zaželi.
Mme jalo, a ke raya gore melao e ya Modimo e bosula? Nnyaa ga ke rialo! Molao ga o boleo gonne ke one molao o o mpontshiteng sebe sa me. Nkabo ke ile ka seka ka itse sebe se se mo pelong ya me, dithato tse di bosula tse di fitlhegileng mo go yone fa molao o ne o sa re, “O seka wa nna le dithato tse di bosula mo pelong ya gago.”
Ko zvino tichatii? Murairo chivi here? Ngazvisadaro! Asi handisaiziva chivi, kunze kwekubudikidza nemurairo; nokuti handisaizivawo ruchiva, kana murairo wakange usina kureva kuti: Usachiva.
Zvino tichatiiko? Murayiro chivi here? Kwete! Zvirokwazvo ndingadai ndisina kuziva kuti chivi chii dai murayiro wakanga usipo. Nokuti ndingadai ndisina kuziva kuti kuchiva chii kudai murayiro usina kuti, “Usachiva.”
Что убо речем? Закон ли грех? Да не будет: но греха не знах, точию законом: похоти же не ведах, аще не бы закон глаголал: не похощеши.
Kaj bomo torej rekli? Ali je postava greh? Bog ne daj. Ne, nisem spoznal greha, razen po postavi; kajti ne bi spoznal poželenja, razen če postava ne bi rekla: ›Ne boš požêlel.‹
Kaj torej porečemo? postava je greh? Bog ne daj! Ali greha nisem spoznal razen s postavo, kajti za poželenje bi ne bil vedel, ko bi postava ne govorila; "Ne poželi."
Lino ngatwamba aconi? Sena twambeti Milawo yaipa? Sobwe! Milawo eyalandesheti njishibe bwipishi. Pakwinga Milawo neyalabula kwambeti utakumbwa ca munobe, nendalabula kwinshiba kwipa kwa lunkumbwa lwakame.
Haddaba maxaynu nidhaahnaa? Sharcigu ma dembi baa? Ma suurtowdo! Hase ahaatee, dembi ma aanan garteen, sharcigaan ku gartay mooyaane, damaca xun ma aanan garteen haddaan sharcigu i odhan, Waa inaadan wax damcin.
¿Qué pues diremos? ¿La ley es pecado? En ninguna manera. Pero yo no conocí el pecado sino por la ley; porque (tampoco) conocería la concupiscencia, si la ley no dijera: No codiciarás.
¿Qué concluimos entonces? ¿Que la ley es pecado? ¡Por supuesto que no! Pues yo no habría conocido lo que era el pecado si no fuera porque la ley lo define. Yo no me habría dado cuenta de que el deseo de tener las cosas de otras personas estaba mal si no fuera porque la ley dice: “No desees para ti lo que le pertenece a otro”.
¿Qué diremos entonces? ¿Es la ley pecado? ¡Que nunca lo sea! Sin embargo, yo no habría conocido el pecado si no fuera por la ley. Pues no habría conocido la codicia si la ley no hubiera dicho: “No codiciarás”.
Entonces ¿qué diremos? ¿La Ley es pecado? ¡Claro que no! No conocí el pecado sino por medio de la Ley, porque ciertamente no conocería la codicia si [la] Ley no dijera: No codiciarás.
¿Qué diremos, pues? ¿Qué la Ley es pecado? De ningún modo. Sin embargo, yo no conocí el pecado sino por la Ley. Pues yo no habría conocido la codicia si la Ley no dijera: “No codiciarás”.
¿Qué pues diremos? ¿La ley es pecado? En ninguna manera. Antes yo no conociera al pecado, sino por la ley; porque no conociera la concupiscencia, si la ley no dijera: No codiciarás.
¿Qué pues diremos? ¿La ley es pecado? En ninguna manera. Empero yo no conocí el pecado sino por la ley: porque tampoco conociera la concupiscencia, si la ley no dijera: No codiciarás.
¿Qué pues diremos? ¿La ley [es] pecado? En ninguna manera. Empero yo no conocí el pecado sino por la ley; porque tampoco conociera la concupiscencia, si la ley no dijera: No codiciarás.
¿Qué hay que decir? es la ley pecado? de ninguna manera. Pero no habría tenido conocimiento del pecado sino hubiera sido por la ley lo que es pecado: nunca hubiera sabido lo que es codiciar, si la ley no hubiera dicho “No codicies”.
Tusemeje basi? Sheria ni dhambi? La hasha. Hata hivyo, nisingelitambua dhambi, isingelikuwa kwa njia ya sheria. Kwa kuwa nisingelijua kutamani kama sheria isingelisema, “Usitamani.”
Je, tuseme basi, kwamba Sheria ni dhambi? Hata kidogo! Lakini bila Sheria, mimi nisingalijua dhambi ni kitu gani. Maana, nisingalijua ni nini hasa kutamani mabaya, kama Sheria isingalikuwa imesema: “Usitamani.”
Tuseme nini basi? Kwamba sheria ni dhambi? La, hasha! Lakini, isingekuwa kwa sababu ya sheria, nisingalijua dhambi. Nisingalijua kutamani ni nini kama sheria haikusema, “Usitamani.”
Vad skola vi då säga? Är lagen synd? Bort det! Men synden skulle jag icke hava lärt känna, om icke genom lagen; ty jag hade icke vetat av begärelsen, om icke lagen hade sagt: "Du skall icke hava begärelse."
Hvad vilje vi då säga? Är lagen synd? Bort det; men syndena kände jag icke, utan af lagen; ty jag hade intet vetat af begärelsen, hade icke lagen sagt: Du skall icke begära.
Vad skola vi då säga? Är lagen synd? Bort det! Men synden skulle jag icke hava lärt känna, om icke genom lagen; ty jag hade icke vetat av begärelsen, om icke lagen hade sagt: »Du skall icke hava begärelse.»
Ano nga ang ating sasabihin? Ang kautusan baga'y kasalanan? Huwag nawang mangyari. Datapuwa't, hindi ko sana nakilala ang kasalanan, kundi sa pamamagitan ng kautusan: sapagka't hindi ko sana nakilala ang kasakiman, kung hindi sinasabi ng kautusan, Huwag kang mananakim:
Kaya ano ang sasabihin natin? Ang kautusan ba mismo ay kasalanan? Huwag nawa itong mangyari. Gayunpaman, hindi ko sana malalaman ang kasalanan, kung hindi dahil sa kautusan. Sapagkat hindi ko sana malalaman ang tungkol sa kasakiman kung hindi sinabi ng kautusan na, “Huwag kang maging sakim”.
Vbvribolo, Pvbv si rimur vre, vla ngonu minla dunvre? Vbvma! Vbvritola Pvbv si doola rimure ogudw um ngonua chimu pvnv. Pvbv ngv, “kvvbi gv rinam doonamv oguvdw um mvngkakapak yama bvka vmabolo,” vkvnv um ngo chima pvnvpv.
எனவே, என்னசொல்லுவோம்? நியாயப்பிரமாணம் பாவமோ? இல்லையே, பாவம் என்னவென்று நியாயப்பிரமாணத்தினால்தான் நான் தெரிந்துகொண்டேனேதவிர மற்றப்படி இல்லை; “இச்சிக்காமல் இருப்பாயாக” என்று நியாயப்பிரமாணம் சொல்லாதிருந்தால், இச்சை பாவம் என்று நான் தெரியாமல் இருப்பேனே.
அப்படியானால் என்ன சொல்லுவோம்? மோசேயின் சட்டம் பாவமுள்ளது என்று சொல்லலாமா? நிச்சயமாக அல்ல, மோசேயின் சட்டம் இல்லாதிருந்தால், பாவம் என்றால் என்ன என்று எனக்குத் தெரிந்திருக்காது. “பிறருக்குரியவற்றில் ஆசைகொள்ளாதே” என்று மோசேயின் சட்டம் சொல்லியிருக்காவிட்டால், பிறருக்குரியவற்றில் ஆசைகொள்வது பாவம் என்றே நான் அறியாதிருந்திருப்பேன்.
కాబట్టి ఏం చెప్పాలి? ధర్మశాస్త్రం పాపమా? కానే కాదు. ధర్మశాస్త్రం వలన కాకపోతే నాకు పాపమంటే ఏమిటో తెలిసేది కాదు. ఇతరులకు చెందిన దాన్ని ఆశించవద్దని ధర్మశాస్త్రం చెప్పకపోతే దురాశ అంటే ఏమిటో నాకు తెలిసేది కాదు.
Pea ka ko ia, pea te tau pehē ko e hā? Ko e angahala ʻae fono? ʻIkai ʻaupito. He ka ne taʻeʻoua ʻae fono, ne ʻikai te u ʻilo ʻae angahala: he naʻe ʻikai te u ʻilo ʻae holi kovi, ʻo ka ne ʻikai pehē ʻe he fono, “ʻOua naʻa ke manumanu.”
Öyleyse ne diyelim? Kutsal Yasa günah mı oldu? Kesinlikle hayır! Ama Yasa olmasaydı, günahın ne olduğunu bilemezdim. Yasa, “Göz dikmeyeceksin” demeseydi, başkasının malına göz dikmenin ne olduğunu bilemezdim.
Enti asɛm bɛn na yɛnka? Mmara no yɛ bɔne ana? Dabi da! Mmom, ɛnam mmara so na mihuu sɛnea bɔne te. Sɛ ɛnyɛ mmara no na ɛkaa sɛ, “Mma wʼani mmere obi ade” a, anka minnim anibere.
Enti, asɛm bɛn na yɛnka? Mmara no yɛ bɔne anaa? Dabi! Mmom, ɛnam mmara so na mehunuu sɛdeɛ bɔne teɛ. Sɛ ɛnyɛ mmara no na ɛkaa sɛ, “Mma wʼani mmere obi adeɛ” a, anka mennim anibereɛ.
Що ж скажемо? Що Закон є гріхом? Зовсім ні! Якби не Закон, я не знав би, що таке гріх. Я не знав би, [наприклад], що таке пожадливість, якби Закон не сказав: «Не бажай».
Що ж скажемо? Чи Зако́н — то гріх? Зо́всім ні! Але я не пізнав гріха, як тільки через Зако́н, бо я не знав би пожадливости, коли б Закон не наказував: „Не пожада́й“.
Що ж скажемо? закон гріх? Нехай не буде так. Нї, я й не знав гріха, як тільки через закон, і жадоби не відав би, коли б закон не сказав: Не жадай.
पस हम क्या करें क्या शरी'अत गुनाह है? हरगिज़ नहीं बल्कि बग़ैर शरी'अत के मैं गुनाह को न पहचानता मसलन अगर शरी'अत ये न कहती कि तू लालच न कर तो में लालच को न जानता।
| ئۇنداقتا نېمە دېگۈلۈك؟ تەۋرات قانۇنىنىڭ ئۆزى گۇناھمۇ؟ ھەرگىز ئۇنداق ئەمەس! دەرۋەقە، قانۇننىڭ كۆرسەتمىلىرى بولمىسا، گۇناھنىڭ نېمە ئىكەنلىكىنى بىلمەيتتىم. قانۇن «نەپسانىيەتچىلىك قىلما» دېمىگەن بولسا، نەپسانىيەتچىلىكنىڭ نېمە ئىكەنلىكىنى بىلمىگەن بولاتتىم. |
Ундақта немә дегүлүк? Тәврат қануниниң өзи гунаму? Һәргиз ундақ әмәс! Дәрвәқә, қанунниң көрсәтмилири болмиса, гунаниң немә екәнлигини билмәйттим. Қанун «нәпсанийәтчилик қилма» демигән болса, нәпсанийәтчиликниң немә екәнлигини билмигән болаттим.
Undaqta néme dégülük? Tewrat qanunining özi gunahmu? Hergiz undaq emes! Derweqe, qanunning körsetmiliri bolmisa, gunahning néme ikenlikini bilmeyttim. Qanun «nepsaniyetchilik qilma» démigen bolsa, nepsaniyetchilikning néme ikenlikini bilmigen bolattim.
Undaⱪta nemǝ degülük? Tǝwrat ⱪanunining ɵzi gunaⱨmu? Ⱨǝrgiz undaⱪ ǝmǝs! Dǝrwǝⱪǝ, ⱪanunning kɵrsǝtmiliri bolmisa, gunaⱨning nemǝ ikǝnlikini bilmǝyttim. Ⱪanun «nǝpsaniyǝtqilik ⱪilma» demigǝn bolsa, nǝpsaniyǝtqilikning nemǝ ikǝnlikini bilmigǝn bolattim.
Vậy chúng ta sẽ nói làm sao? Luật pháp há là tội lỗi sao? Chẳng hề như vậy! Nhưng tôi chỉ bởi luật pháp mà biết tội lỗi; vì nếu luật pháp không nói: Ngươi chớ tham lam, thì tôi đã không biết sự tham lam.
Vậy chúng ta sẽ nói làm sao? Luật pháp há là tội lỗi sao? Chẳng hề như vậy! Nhưng tôi chỉ bởi luật pháp mà biết tội lỗi; vì nếu luật pháp không nói: Người chớ tham lam, thì tôi đã không biết sự tham lam.
Nói thế, có phải luật pháp là tội lỗi không? Tuyệt đối không! Luật pháp không phải là tội nhưng dạy tôi biết điều gì là tội. Tôi không biết tham muốn là tội, nếu luật pháp không dạy: “Con đừng tham muốn.”
tuti kiki? indaghilo je sambi? Ndali! nambe lino, nanale nikagula isambi najale jivisaghe ku sila ja ndaghilo. ulwakuva nanalejikagula u ndavule indaghilo najale jijova,”nunganoghuaghe”
Buna mbi tutuba e? Mina midi masumu e? Nana. Vayi ndizabila masumu mu diambu di Mina bila nganu ndisia zaba nzinunu ko enati Mina misia tuba ko ti wulendi zinina ko.
Ǹjẹ́ àwa o ha ti wí, nígbà náà? Òfin ha ń ṣe ẹ̀ṣẹ̀ bí? Kí a má rí i! Ṣùgbọ́n èmi kì bá tí mọ ohun tí ẹ̀ṣẹ̀ jẹ́, bí kò ṣe nípa òfin. Èmi kì bá tí mọ ojúkòkòrò, bí kò ṣe bí òfin ti wí pé, “Ìwọ kò gbọdọ̀ ṣe ojúkòkòrò.”
Verse Count = 333
