Galatians 3:21
Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could make alive, most certainly righteousness would have been of the law.
A thua atëherë ligji është kundër premtimeve të Perëndisë? Kurrsesi jo! Sepse po të ishte dhënë një ligj që mund të jepte jetë, drejtësia do të ishte me të vërtetë prej ligjit.
Nane uduka din serzu tikot nin sunu tinu Kutellẹ? Na nanere ba! Andi iwa ni uduka ule na uwasa una ulai, kidegen fiu Kutellẹ wa dak unuzun dukari une.
| فَهَلِ ٱلنَّامُوسُ ضِدُّ مَوَاعِيدِ ٱللهِ؟ حَاشَا! لِأَنَّهُ لَوْ أُعْطِيَ نَامُوسٌ قَادِرٌ أَنْ يُحْيِيَ، لَكَانَ بِٱلْحَقِيقَةِ ٱلْبِرُّ بِٱلنَّامُوسِ. |
| فَهَلْ تُنَاقِضُ الشَّرِيعَةُ وُعُودَ اللهِ؟ حَاشَا! فَلَوْ أُعْطِيَتْ شَرِيعَةٌ قَادِرَةٌ أَنْ تُحْيِيَ، لَكَانَ الْبِرُّ بِالْحَقِيقَةِ عَلَى مَبْدَأِ الشَّرِيعَةِ. |
| ܢܡܘܤܐ ܗܟܝܠ ܤܩܘܒܠܐ ܗܘ ܕܡܘܠܟܢܐ ܕܐܠܗܐ ܚܤ ܐܠܘ ܓܝܪ ܐܬܝܗܒ ܗܘܐ ܢܡܘܤܐ ܐܝܢܐ ܕܡܫܟܚ ܗܘܐ ܠܡܚܝܘ ܫܪܝܪܐܝܬ ܡܢ ܢܡܘܤܐ ܗܘܝܐ ܗܘܬ ܙܕܝܩܘܬܐ |
Ուրեմն Օրէնքը հակառա՞կ է Աստուծոյ խոստումներուն: Ամե՛նեւին. քանի որ եթէ տրուած ըլլար այնպիսի Օրէնք մը՝ որ կարենար կեանք տալ, այն ատեն ի՛րապէս արդարութիւնը Օրէնքով կ՚ըլլար:
তেনেহলে বিধান ঈশ্বৰৰ প্ৰতিজ্ঞাবোৰৰ বিৰুদ্ধে নেকি? নিশ্চয় নহয়! যদি এনে এক বিধান থাকিলহেঁতেন যিয়ে জীৱন দিব পাৰে, তেনেহলে ধাৰ্মিকতা অৱশ্যেই সেই বিধান পালন কৰাৰ দ্বাৰাই হ’লহেতেন।
Deməli, Qanun Allahın vədlərinə ziddirmi? Əsla! Çünki əgər həyat verməyə qadir olan bir Qanun verilsəydi, salehlik, həqiqətən, Qanunla gələrdi.
La bolangko ki ma kiye kange nor Kwamar ka? Kebo nyo, kibi duware ce! Nano ki ciin ne bolangko kange wo ane dume tiyeri, lano cak-cakeu an bou ki bolang ko wuro nin.
Leguea beraz Iaincoaren promessén contra eratchequi içan da? Guertha eztadila. Ecen eman içan baliz Leguea ceinec viuifica ahal leçan, segur Leguetic liçate iustitiá.
Amaiba: le, dilia adi dawa: bela: ? Gode Ea Sema da Gode Ea hahawane dogolegele iasu amoma gegesala: ? Hame mabu! Be Gode da osobo bagade fi dunuma eso huluane mae bogole Fifi Ahoanusu imunu Sema i dagoi ganiaba, dunu huluane ili Gode Ea moloidafa hamoi ba: ma: ne, Sema nababeba: le, ilisu ilia hou hahamona: noba.
তবে নিয়ম কি ঈশ্বরের প্রতিজ্ঞা কলাপের বিরুদ্ধে? একেবারেই না! ফলে যদি এমন নিয়ম দেওয়া হত, যা জীবন দান করতে পারে, তবে ধার্ম্মিকতা অবশ্য নিয়মমূলক হত।
তাহলে বিধান কি ঈশ্বরের সব প্রতিশ্রুতির বিরোধিতা করেছিল? একেবারেই নয়! কারণ জীবনদানের জন্য যদি কোনো বিধান দেওয়া হত, তাহলে বিধানের দ্বারা অবশ্যই ধার্মিকতা উপলব্ধ হত।
कुन कानून परमेशरेरे वादां केरे खलाफे? नईं, कधी नईं! किजोकि अगर एरो कानून दित्तो गाथो ज़ै हमेशारी ज़िन्दगी देइ बटेथो, त सच़्च़े धार्मिकता कानून मन्ने सेइं भोथी।
तां क्या इदा मतलब ऐ है की मूसा दी व्यवस्था परमेश्वरे दे बायदे दे खिलाफ है? नी कदी भी नी! क्योंकि अगर व्यवस्था सांझो हमेशा दी जिन्दगी देई सकदी, तां असां इदा पालन करिरी परमेश्वरे सामणे धर्मी होई सकदे थे।
ତଃବେ ମସାର୍ ବିଦି କାୟ୍ ଇସ୍ୱରାର୍ ସଃୟ୍ତାର୍ ବିରଦ୍ କଃରେଦ୍? ସେରି କଃବେହେଁ ନଃୟ୍, କାୟ୍ତାକ୍ବଃଲେକ୍ ଜଦି ମାନାୟ୍କେ ଜିବନ୍ ଦେଉଁକ୍ ହାରେ ଅଃନ୍କାର୍ ମସାର୍ ବିଦି ଦିଆ ଅୟ୍ରିଲି ହୁଣି, ତଃବେ ଦଃର୍ମି ସଃତ୍କଃରି ମସାର୍ ବିଦି ହର୍ ଅୟ୍ଲି ହୁଣି ।
Eshe nemo Ik' jangits keewo k'efitwa? B́ jamon k'eferatse! kasho daatsit nemo imere wotink'e kááw woto nemi weerone b́ datseyak'oni b́ teshi.
Itron ani sen nyu'u ni chu yu'u Irji nakima? Ana he nakina! Inde ba no tron wa ani iya no dri, gbigbi ndindi ani ye ni tron i.
Тогава, законът противен ли е на Божиите обещания? Да не бъде! Защото, ако беше даден закон, който да може да оживотвори, то наистина правдата щеше да бъде от закона.
Busa ang balaod ba supak sa mga saad sa Dios? Sa pagkatinuod dili gayod! Kay kung ang balaod nga gihatag makahimo sa paghatag ug kinabuhi, ang pagkamatarong moabot gayod pinaagi niana nga balaod.
Nan, ang kasugoan kasupak ba diay sa mga saad sa Dios? Dili gayud; kay kon may gikahatag pang kasugoan nga arang makapabuhi, nan, ang pagkamatarung mapinaagi gayud unta sa kasugoan.
ᏗᎧᎿᎭᏩᏛᏍᏗᏍᎪᏃ ᏓᏡᏗᎭ ᎤᏁᎳᏅᎯ ᏚᏚᎢᏍᏔᏅᎢ? ᎬᏩᏟᏍᏗ, ᎢᏳᏰᏃ ᏗᎧᎿᎭᏩᏛᏍᏗ ᏴᏫ ᎨᏥᏁᎸᎯ ᏱᎨᏎ, ᎾᏍᎩ ᏰᎵ ᎬᏂᏛ ᎬᏩᏓᏁᏗ ᎨᏒᎢ, ᎤᏙᎯᏳᎯᏯ ᏗᎧᎿᎭᏩᏛᏍᏗ ᎠᎲ ᎠᏚᏓᎴᏍᏗ ᎨᏒ ᏴᏗᏓᎴᎲᏍᎨᎢ.
Kodi ndiye kuti lamulo limatsutsana ndi malonjezo a Mulungu? Ayi. Nʼkosatheka! Pakuti ngati tikanapatsidwa malamulo opatsa moyo ndiye kuti mwa lamulo tikanakhala olungama.
Am acunüng Thum naw Pamhnama khyütam he jah tuki aw? Am jah tu! Nghngicim naw xünak a yahnak vai Thum yahkia akya vai sü, khyang naküt naw Thum läklam lü Pamhnama veia ngdüngdai khai su.
Kaalok mah Sithaw lokkamhaih to aek maw? Aek ai: kaalok mah hinghaih paek thai nahaeloe, toenghaih doeh kaalok rang hoiah angzo tih boeh.
Te koinih olkhueng loh Pathen kah olkhueh te a kingkalh a? Tlam te om mahpawh. Olkhueng a paek loh hing sak thai koinih olkhueng dongah duengnah rhep n'dang ni.
Te koinih olkhueng loh Pathen kah olkhueh te a kingkalh a? Tlam te om mahpawh. Olkhueng a paek loh hing sak thai koinih olkhueng dongah duengnah rhep n'dang ni.
Cedawngawh, anaa awi ing Khawsa awikamnaak ce ak oelh nu? Am oelh qoe qoe hy! Hqingnaak ak pe thai anaa awi ce peek na a awm awhtaw, dyngnaak awm anaa awi ak caming law hawh kaw.
Tabang ahile thukham in Pathian kamciam te langpan a hi ziam? Langpan ngawl hi: banghangziam cile nuntakna a pia thei thukham om hile, thutang suana sia thukham tungtawn vateak in hongpai tu hi.
Chuti ahileh Pathen Danthu le Pathen Athutep kikah a akikalna ipi umem? Aum hihbeh e! Danthun hinkho thah eipehtheiyu hihen lang hileh, hichu juijal a eihon Pathen to kilungtona ineithei dingu ahitai.
Hottelah pawiteh, kâlawk teh Cathut e lawkkam hoi a kâtaran maw. Kâtaran roeroe hoeh. Poe lah kaawm e kâlawk ni na hring sak thai katang pawiteh, lanae teh hote kâlawk lahoi coe e lah doeh awm ti.
这样，律法是与 神的应许反对吗？断乎不是！若曾传一个能叫人得生的律法，义就诚然本乎律法了。
這樣，律法是與上帝的應許反對嗎？斷乎不是！若曾傳一個能叫人得生的律法，義就誠然本乎律法了。
那么律法是否违背了上帝的承诺？当然不是！因为如果有哪个律法可以赋予生命，我们就可以通过遵守它而成为正义。
那麼，法律相反天主的恩許嗎﹖絕對不是。如果立定的法律能賜與人生命，正義就的確是出於法律了。
Uli, Malajisyo gakukanilana ni chilanga cha Akunnungu? Ngwamba! Pakuŵa, naga gakakopweswe malajisyo gagakukombola kwapa ŵandu umi, nipele, tukakombwele kutendekwa ŵambone paujo pa Akunnungu kwa litala lya kugajitichisya malajisyo.
⳿ⲫⲛⲟⲙⲟⲥ ⲟⲩⲛ ⲁϥϯ ⲟⲩⲃⲉ ⲛⲓⲱϣ ⳿ⲛⲧⲉ ⲫϯ ⳿ⲛⲛⲉⲥϣⲱⲡⲓ ⲉⲛ⳿ⲉⲁⲩϯ ⲛⲟⲙⲟⲥ ⲅⲁⲣ ⲡⲉ ⳿ⲉⲟⲩⲟⲛ ⳿ϣϫⲟⲙ ⳿ⲙⲙⲟϥ ⲉⲧⲁⲛϧⲟ ⲟⲛⲧⲱⲥ ⲛⲉ ϯⲙⲉⲑⲙⲏⲓ ⲟⲩ⳿ⲉⲃⲟⲗ ϧⲉⲛ ⲡⲓⲛⲟⲙⲟⲥ ⲧⲉ.
ⲡⲛⲟⲙⲟⲥ ϭⲉ ⲉϥϯ ⲟⲩⲃⲉ ⲛⲉⲣⲏⲧ ⲙⲡⲛⲟⲩⲧⲉ ⲛⲛⲉⲥϣⲱⲡⲉ ⲉⲛⲉⲛⲧⲁⲩϯ ⲡⲛⲟⲙⲟⲥ ⲅⲁⲣ ⲉⲩⲛ ϭⲟⲙ ⲙⲙⲟϥ ⲉⲧⲁⲛϩⲟ ⲟⲛⲧⲱⲥ ⲛⲉⲣⲉⲧⲇⲓⲕⲁⲓⲟⲥⲩⲛⲏ ⲛⲁϣⲱⲡⲉ ⲡⲉ ⲉⲃⲟⲗ ϩⲙ ⲡⲛⲟⲙⲟⲥ
ⲡⲛⲟⲙⲟⲥ ϭⲉ ⲉϥϯ ⲟⲩⲃⲉⲛⲉⲣⲏⲧ ⲙ̅ⲡⲛⲟⲩⲧⲉ ⲛ̅ⲛⲉⲥϣⲱⲡⲉ. ⲉⲛⲉⲛⲧⲁⲩϯⲡⲛⲟⲙⲟⲥ ⲅⲁⲣ ⲉⲩⲛ̅ϭⲟⲙ ⲙ̅ⲙⲟϥ ⲉⲧⲁⲛϩⲟ. ⲟⲛⲧⲱⲥ ⲛⲉⲣⲉⲧⲇⲓⲕⲁⲓⲟⲥⲩⲛⲏ ⲛⲁϣⲱⲡⲉ ⲡⲉ ⲉⲃⲟⲗ ϩⲙ̅ⲡⲛⲟⲙⲟⲥ.
ⲪⲚⲞⲘⲞⲤ ⲞⲨⲚ ⲀϤϮ ⲞⲨⲂⲈ ⲚⲒⲰϢ ⲚⲦⲈⲪⲚⲞⲨϮ ⲚⲚⲈⲤϢⲰⲠⲒ ⲈⲚⲈⲀⲨϮ ⲚⲞⲘⲞⲤ ⲄⲀⲢ ⲠⲈ ⲈⲞⲨⲞⲚ ϢϪⲞⲘ ⲘⲘⲞϤ ⲈⲦⲀⲚϦⲞ ⲞⲚⲦⲰⲤ ⲚⲈϮⲘⲈⲐⲘⲎⲒ ⲞⲨⲈⲂⲞⲖ ϦⲈⲚⲠⲒⲚⲞⲘⲞⲤ ⲦⲈ.
Zar je dakle Zakon protiv obećanja Božjih? Nipošto! Jer da je dan Zakon koji bi mogao oživljavati, pravednost bi doista proizlazila iz Zakona.
Tedy zákon jest proti slibům Božím? Odstup to. Nebo kdyby byl zákon dán, kterýž by mohl obživiti, jistě z zákona byla by spravedlnost.
Tedy Zákon jest proti slibům Božím? Odstup to. Nebo kdyby byl Zákon dán, kterýž by mohl obživiti, jistě z Zákona byla by spravedlnost.
Znamená to snad, že Boží sliby a Boží zákony jsou navzájem v rozporu? Ovšem že nikoliv! Kdyby byl zákon stačil zachránit člověka z moci zla (a podle Písma jsme všichni v jeho područí), nenabízel by Bůh jiné východisko – víru v Ježíše Krista.
Er da Loven imod Guds Forjættelser? Det være langtfra! Ja, hvis der var givet en Lov, som kunde levendegøre, da var Retfærdigheden virkelig af Lov.
Er da Loven imod Guds Forjættelser? Det være langtfra! Ja, hvis der var givet en Lov, som kunde levendegøre, da var Retfærdigheden virkelig af Lov.
Er da Loven imod Guds Forjættelser? Det være langtfra! Ja, hvis der var givet en Lov, som kunde levendegøre, da var Retfærdigheden virkelig af Lov.
ନିୟମ୍ କାଇ ପରମେସରର୍ ସପତ୍ ବିରଦ୍ କଲାନି କି? ନାଇ କେବେ ନାଇ! କାଇକେବଇଲେ ଲକ୍କେ ଜିବନ୍ ଦେଲାପାରା ଗଟେକ୍ ନିୟମ୍ କରା ଅଇତା, ତେବେ ସେଟା ମାନ୍ଲେସରି ସେ ପରମେସରର୍ ମୁଆଟେ ଦସ୍ ନ କଲାଲକ୍ ବଲାଇ ଅଇତା ।
Wanyalo wacho ni Chik mane Nyasaye ochiwo ogwenyore gi singruok ma notimo gi joge koso? Ooyo, ok nyal bet kamano. Nimar kapo ni Chik mane ochiwno ne nyalo chiwo ngima to mano nyiso ni Chik ne nyalo miyo dhano bedo kare.
Akaako mulawu ulakazyanya na azisyomezyo zyaLeza? Chanchobeni pe! Na mulawu wakali wapegwa kuti upe bumi, akaako bululami chanchoonzyo ninga bwakasika a mulawu.
Is dan de wet tegen de beloftenissen Gods? Dat zij verre; want indien er een wet gegeven ware, die machtig was levend te maken, zo zou waarlijk de rechtvaardigheid uit de wet zijn.
Is dan soms de Wet met Gods Belofte in strijd? Onmogelijk! Zeker, wanneer er een Wet was gegeven, die het Leven kon schenken, dan zou de gerechtigheid inderdaad afhankelijk zijn van de Wet;
Is dan de wet tegen de beloftenissen Gods? Dat zij verre; want indien er een wet gegeven ware, die machtig was levend te maken, zo zou waarlijk de rechtvaardigheid uit de wet zijn.
Is the law therefore against the promises of God? May it not happen! For if a law was given that could make alive, truly righteousness would be from law.
Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could make alive, most certainly righteousness would have been of the law.
Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could make alive, verily righteousness would have been of the law.
Is the law, then, against the promises of God? It can not be. For if a law had been given which could have given life, surely righteousness would have been by law.
Is the law, then, opposed to the promises of God? Certainly not! For if a law had been given that could impart life, then righteousness would certainly have come from the law.
Is the law then against the words of God? in no way; because if there had been a law which was able to give life, truly righteousness would have been by the law.
Is the law then opposed to the promises of God? Certainly not! For if a law had been given that was able to give life, truly righteousness would have come through the law.
So then, was the law contrary to the promises of God? Let it not be so! For if a law had been given, which was able to give life, truly justice would be of the law.
[Is] then the law against the promises of God? Far be the thought. For if a law had been given able to quicken, then indeed righteousness were on the principle of law;
Was the law then against the promises of God? God forbid. For if there had been a law given which could give life, verily justice should have been by the law.
Is the law then against the promises of God? Of course not! Rather, if a law had been given that was capable of imparting life, truly righteousness would have been by the law.
So does the law work against God's promises? Of course not! For if there was a law that could give life, then we could be made right by keeping it.
Is the Lawe then against the promises of God? God forbid: For if there had bene a Lawe giuen which coulde haue giuen life, surely righteousnes should haue bene by the Lawe.
Then was the law against the promises of God? it could not be so. For if the law was given being able to create life, truly justification would have been by law:
Is the law then contrary to the promises of God? God forbid. For if there had been a law given which was capable of procuring life, verily righteousness would have been by the law.
Is the law then contrary to the promises of God? not at all: for if a law had been given, which could have confered life, certainly righteousness would have been by the law.
[Is] the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, truly righteousness should have been by the law.
Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
Is the law then against the promises of YHWH? By no means: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
[Is] the Law, then, against the promises of God? Let it not be! For if a law was given that was able to make alive, truly there would have been righteousness by law,
Is the Law then opposed to the promises of God? Certainly not; for if a law had been given which could make alive, then righteousness would actually have come from law;
Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not. For if there had been a law given which could give life, most certainly righteousness would have been of the law.
Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not. For if there had been a law given which could give life, most certainly righteousness would have been of the law.
Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not. For if there had been a law given which could give life, most certainly righteousness would have been of the law.
Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not. For if there had been a law given which could give life, most certainly righteousness would have been of the law.
Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not. For if there had been a law given which could give life, most certainly righteousness would have been of the law.
Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not. For if there had been a law given which could give life, most certainly righteousness would have been of the law.
Is then the Law against the promises of God? Far be it! For if a law had been given which was able to give life, righteousness would indeed have been by the Law;
Does that set the Law in opposition to God’s promises? Heaven forbid! For, if a Law had been given capable of bestowing life, then righteousness would have actually owed its existence to Law.
Does that set the Law in opposition to God’s promises? Heaven forbid! For, if a Law had been given capable of bestowing life, then righteousness would have actually owed its existence to Law.
Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could make alive, verily righteousness would have been of the law.
Is, the law, then, against the promises [of God]? Far be it! For, if a law had been given, which had been able to give life, verily, in law, would have been our righteousness;
The therefore Law [is] contrary to the promises of God? Never would it be! If for was given a law which is being able to impart life, indeed (from [the] law *NK+o) then would was emerging righteousness;
the/this/who therefore/then law according to the/this/who promise the/this/who God not to be if for to give law the/this/who be able to make alive really (out from law *NK+o) if to be the/this/who righteousness
Is the law therefore against the promise of Aloha? Impossible: for if a law had been given which could make to live, certainly righteousness would have been by the law.
Is the law then opposed to the promise of God? Far be it. For if a law had been given, which could make alive, certainly, righteousness would have been by the law.
[If someone should ask, “When God gave his] laws [to Moses] long [after he told Abraham] what he was promising [to give to him, was he] changing his mind?” [I would reply that God] certainly did not [change his mind when he did that]! If God had given a law that could enable people to live [eternally], then it actually would be because of people [obeying that] law that God would erase the record of their sins.
Does that set the Law in opposition to God’s promises? Heaven forbid! For, if a Law had been given capable of bestowing Life, then righteousness would have actually owed its existence to Law.
So is the law against the promises of God? Absolutely not! For if a law had been given that could give life, then righteousness would certainly have come by the law.
[Is] the law then against the promises of God? By no means: for if there had been a law given which could give life, verily righteousness would have been by the law.
Is the law then against the promises of God? By no means: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
God, however, is only one. Is the Law then opposed to the promises of God? No, indeed; for if a Law had been given which could have conferred Life, righteousness would certainly have come by the Law.
Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could make alive, most certainly righteousness would have been of the law.
Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could make alive, most certainly righteousness would have been of the law.
Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could make alive, most certainly righteousness would have been of the law.
Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could make alive, most certainly righteousness would have been of the law.
Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could make alive, most certainly righteousness would have been of the law.
Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could make alive, most certainly righteousness would have been of the law.
Is thanne the lawe ayens the biheestis of God? God forbede. For if the lawe were youun, that myyte quikene, verili were riytfulnesse of lawe.
the law, then, [is] against the promises of God? — let it not be! for if a law was given that was able to make alive, truly by law there would have been the righteousness,
Ĉu do la leĝo kontraŭstaras al la promesoj de Dio? Nepre ne! ĉar se estus donita leĝo, kiu povus vivigi, efektive justeco estus per la leĝo.
Ekema ɖe se la tsi tsitre ɖe Mawu ƒe ŋugbedodowo ŋutia? Gbeɖe! Elabena ne se si wona la ana agbe la, ekema dzɔdzɔenyenye ava to se la me.
Onko siis laki Jumalan lupauksia vastaan? Pois se! Sillä jos laki olis annettu eläväksi tekemään, niin tosin vanhurskaus tulis laista.
Onko sitten laki vastoin Jumalan lupauksia? Pois se! Sillä jos olisi annettu laki, joka voisi eläväksi tehdä, niin vanhurskaus todella tulisi laista.
Is dan de wet tegen de beloftenissen Gods? In het geheel niet! Want als er een wet was gegeven die machtig was om levend te maken, dan zou waarlijk de rechtvaardigheid uit de wet zijn,
La Loi va-t-elle donc contre les promesses de Dieu? Loin de là! S'il eût été donné une loi capable de procurer la vie, la justice viendrait réellement de la loi.
La loi est-elle donc contre les promesses de Dieu? Certainement pas! Car s'il avait été donné une loi qui pût faire vivre, très certainement la justice aurait été de la loi.
La loi est-elle donc contre les promesses de Dieu? Qu’ainsi n’advienne! Car s’il avait été donné une loi qui ait le pouvoir de faire vivre, la justice serait en réalité sur le principe de [la] loi.
La Loi donc [a-t-elle été ajoutée] contre les promesses de Dieu? nullement. Car si la Loi eût été donnée pour pouvoir vivifier, véritablement la justice serait de la Loi.
La loi est donc contraire aux promesses de Dieu? Nullement. Car si une loi eût été donnée qui pût vivifier, la justice viendrait vraiment de la loi.
La loi est-elle donc contre les promesses de Dieu? Loin de là! S’il eût été donné une loi qui pût procurer la vie, la justice viendrait réellement de la loi.
La Loi va-t-elle donc contre les promesses de Dieu? Loin de là! S’il eût été donné une loi capable de procurer la vie, la justice viendrait réellement de la loi.
La Loi va-t-elle donc contre les promesses de Dieu? — Non, sans doute. Il est vrai que, si une loi capable de donner la vie, eût été donnée, la justice s'obtiendrait par la loi;
La loi est-elle donc contraire aux promesses de Dieu? Nullement; car s'il eût été donné une loi qui pût donner la vie, la justice viendrait véritablement de la loi.
La loi est-elle donc contre les promesses? Loin de nous cette pensée! En effet, si une loi eut été donnée, qui fût capable de procurer la vie, c'est réellement dans la loi qu'existerait la justice;
Y aurait-il alors une contradiction entre la Loi et les promesses? Pas le moins du monde. Ah! sans doute, s'il avait été donné une Loi capable de produire la vie,
La loi est-elle donc contraire aux promesses de Dieu? Non, certes! Car, s'il avait été donné une loi qui pût produire la vie, la justice viendrait réellement de la loi.
Histin Muse wogay inthafe Xoosi wothina qaala digizaze? Cirasheka digena. Muse woga imetiday asi izan deyo demanas gididako tumuka xiilotethi bistanakoshin.
Steht nun das Gesetz im Widerspruch mit den Verheißungen Gottes? Nimmermehr! Denn wäre ein Gesetz gegeben worden mit der Fähigkeit, lebendig zu machen, so käme die Gerechtigkeit wirklich aus dem Gesetz.
So stünde also das Gesetz im Widerspruch zu dem, was Gott verheißen hat? Gewiß nicht. Wenn ein Gesetz gegeben worden wäre, das Leben hätte schaffen können, dann käme in der Tat die Rechtfertigung aus dem Gesetze.
Ist denn das Gesetz wider die Verheißungen Gottes? Das sei ferne! Denn wenn ein Gesetz gegeben worden wäre, das lebendig zu machen vermöchte, dann wäre wirklich die Gerechtigkeit aus [O. auf dem Grundsatz des [der]; so auch nachher] Gesetz.
Ist denn das Gesetz wider die Verheißungen Gottes? Das sei ferne! Denn wenn ein Gesetz gegeben worden wäre, das lebendig zu machen vermöchte, dann wäre wirklich die Gerechtigkeit aus Gesetz.
Ist also das Gesetz wider die Verheißungen Gottes? Nimmermehr. Ja, wenn das Gesetz gegeben wäre, mit dem Vermögen Leben zu schaffen, so wäre in Wirklichkeit die Gerechtigkeit aus dem Gesetz.
Wie? Ist denn das Gesetz wider Gottes Verheißungen? Das sei ferne! Wenn aber ein Gesetz gegeben wäre, das da könnte lebendig machen, so käme die Gerechtigkeit wahrhaftig aus dem Gesetze.
Wie? Ist denn das Gesetz wider Gottes Verheißungen? Das sei ferne! Wenn aber ein Gesetz gegeben wäre, das da könnte lebendig machen, so käme die Gerechtigkeit wahrhaftig aus dem Gesetz.
Steht demnach das Gesetz mit den Verheißungen Gottes in Widerspruch? Nimmermehr! Ja, wenn ein Gesetz gegeben worden wäre, das die Kraft besäße, Leben zu verleihen, dann käme die Gerechtigkeit tatsächlich aus dem Gesetz.
Ist nun das Gesetz wider die Verheißungen Gottes? Das sei ferne! Denn wenn ein Gesetz gegeben wäre, das Leben schaffen könnte, so käme die Gerechtigkeit wirklich aus dem Gesetz.
Ist nun das Gesetz wider die Verheißungen Gottes? Das sei ferne! Wenn ein Gesetz gegeben wäre, das lebendig machen könnte, so käme allerdings aus dem Gesetz die Gerechtigkeit.
Nĩ ũndũ ũcio-rĩ, kaĩ watho ũreganĩte na ciĩranĩro cia Ngai? Aca ti ũguo! Tondũ korwo kwarĩ na watho waheanirwo nĩguo andũ magĩe na muoyo-rĩ, ti-itherũ o naguo ũthingu nĩ ũngĩakĩrehirwo nĩ watho.
Yaatin, higgey Xoossaa ufayssa qaalara eqettiyye? Akkay, gidenna! Higgey imettiday asas de7o immanaw gidiyakko, xillotethi higge baggara benttanashin.
Naani li balimaama nia leni U Tienu ñoanianu bi? A-a. Li yaa tie ke li den pia yaa balimaama n baa fidi ki pa li miali, lanwani li balimaama den baa fidi ki cuani li moamoansaali.
Naani ke li balimaama nia yeni U Tienu ñɔniani bi? kalama. Li ya tie ke li den pia ya balmaama n baa fidi ki pa li miali, lanwani, li balmaama den baa fidi ki cua yeni li mɔmɔsaali.
ο ουν νομος κατα των επαγγελιων του θεου μη γενοιτο ει γαρ εδοθη νομος ο δυναμενος ζωοποιησαι οντως αν εκ νομου ην η δικαιοσυνη
Ο νόμος λοιπόν εναντίος των επαγγελιών του Θεού είναι; Μη γένοιτο. Διότι εάν ήθελε δοθή νόμος δυνάμενος να ζωοποιήση, η δικαιοσύνη ήθελεν είσθαι τωόντι εκ του νόμου·
ο ουν νομος κατα των επαγγελιων του θεου μη γενοιτο ει γαρ εδοθη νομος ο δυναμενος ζωοποιησαι οντως αν εκ νομου ην η δικαιοσυνη
ο ουν νομοσ κατα των επαγγελιων του θεου μη γενοιτο ει γαρ εδοθη νομοσ ο δυναμενοσ ζωοποιησαι οντωσ αν εκ νομου ην η δικαιοσυνη
ὁ οὖν νόμος κατὰ τῶν ἐπαγγελιῶν τοῦ Θεοῦ; μὴ γένοιτο. εἰ γὰρ ἐδόθη νόμος ὁ δυνάμενος ζωοποιῆσαι, ὄντως ἂν ἐκ νόμου ἦν ἡ δικαιοσύνη·
ὁ οὖν νόμος κατὰ τῶν ἐπαγγελιῶν τοῦ Θεοῦ; μὴ γένοιτο. εἰ γὰρ ἐδόθη νόμος ὁ δυνάμενος ζωοποιῆσαι, ὄντως ἐκ νόμου ἂν ἦν ἡ δικαιοσύνη·
Ὁ οὖν νόμος κατὰ τῶν ἐπαγγελιῶν τοῦ θεοῦ; μὴ γένοιτο· εἰ γὰρ ἐδόθη νόμος ὁ δυνάμενος ζῳοποιῆσαι, ὄντως ⸂ἐκ νόμου ἂν ἦν ἡ δικαιοσύνη.
ο ουν νομος κατα των επαγγελιων του θεου μη γενοιτο ει γαρ εδοθη νομος ο δυναμενος ζωοποιησαι οντως αν εκ νομου ην η δικαιοσυνη
Ὁ οὖν νόμος κατὰ τῶν ἐπαγγελιῶν τοῦ ˚Θεοῦ; Μὴ γένοιτο! Εἰ γὰρ ἐδόθη νόμος ὁ δυνάμενος ζῳοποιῆσαι, ὄντως ἐκ νόμου ἂν ἦν ἡ δικαιοσύνη.
ο ουν νομος κατα των επαγγελιων του θεου μη γενοιτο ει γαρ εδοθη νομος ο δυναμενος ζωοποιησαι οντως αν εκ νομου ην η δικαιοσυνη
Ὁ οὖν νόμος κατὰ τῶν ἐπαγγελιῶν τοῦ Θεοῦ; Μὴ γένοιτο. Εἰ γὰρ ἐδόθη νόμος ὁ δυνάμενος ζῳοποιῆσαι, ὄντως ἂν ἐκ νόμου ἦν ἡ δικαιοσύνη.
ο ουν νομος κατα των επαγγελιων του θεου μη γενοιτο ει γαρ εδοθη νομος ο δυναμενος ζωοποιησαι οντως αν εκ νομου ην η δικαιοσυνη
Ὁ οὖν νόμος κατὰ τῶν ἐπαγγελιῶν τοῦ Θεοῦ; Μὴ γένοιτο. Εἰ γὰρ ἐδόθη νόμος ὁ δυνάμενος ζῳοποιῆσαι, ὄντως ἂν ἐκ νόμου ἦν ἡ δικαιοσύνη.
ο ουν νομος κατα των επαγγελιων του θεου μη γενοιτο ει γαρ εδοθη νομος ο δυναμενος ζωοποιησαι οντως αν εκ νομου ην η δικαιοσυνη
ο ουν νομος κατα των επαγγελιων του θεου μη γενοιτο ει γαρ εδοθη νομος ο δυναμενος ζωοποιησαι οντως αν εκ νομου ην η δικαιοσυνη
ὁ οὖν νόμος κατὰ τῶν ἐπαγγελιῶν τοῦ θεοῦ; μὴ γένοιτο. εἰ γὰρ ἐδόθη νόμος ὁ δυνάμενος ζωοποιῆσαι, ὄντως ἐκ νόμου ἂν ἦν ἡ δικαιοσύνη·
ο ουν νομος κατα των επαγγελιων [του θεου] μη γενοιτο ει γαρ εδοθη νομος ο δυναμενος ζωοποιησαι οντως {VAR1: εν νομω } {VAR2: εκ νομου } αν ην η δικαιοσυνη
ο ουν νομος κατα των επαγγελιων του θεου μη γενοιτο ει γαρ εδοθη νομος ο δυναμενος ζωοποιησαι οντως αν εκ νομου ην η δικαιοσυνη
ὁ οὖν νόμος κατὰ τῶν ἐπαγγελιῶν τοῦ θεοῦ; μὴ γένοιτο· εἰ γὰρ ἐδόθη νόμος ὁ δυνάμενος ζῳοποιῆσαι, ὄντως ἐκ νόμου ἦν ἂν ἡ δικαιοσύνη·
ନିୟମ୍ ମେଃନେ ଇସ୍ପର୍ନେ ପାର୍ମାନ୍କେ ବିରଦ୍ ଡିଙ୍ଗ୍ଏ? ଣ୍ଡୁ ଅଃନା ଣ୍ଡୁ! ମେଁ ଡାଗ୍ଲା ରେମୁଆଁକେ ଜିବନ୍ ବିଡିଙ୍କେ ରକମ୍ ଜଦି ମୁଇଂ ନିୟମ୍ ପାଡିଙ୍ଗ୍ ତେଲା ଆତେନ୍ ପାଲେନେ ବାନ୍ ଆଃ ରେମୁଆଁ ଇସ୍ପର୍ନେ ସାର୍ମୁଆଃନ୍ନିଆ ଦସ୍ ଣ୍ଡୁ ଡାଗ୍ଚେ ପାବାବେଆର୍ ।
ત્યારે શું નિયમશાસ્ત્ર ઈશ્વરનાં આશાવચનોથી વિરુદ્ધ છે? કદી નહિ, કેમ કે જીવન આપી શકે એવો કોઈ નિયમ જો આપવામાં આવ્યો હોત, તો નિશ્ચે નિયમશાસ્ત્રથી ન્યાયીપણું મળત.
Eske lalwa Moyiz la kont pwomès Bondye yo? Men non. Si zanj yo te bay yon lalwa ki te kapab bay moun lavi, enben, lalwa sa a ta kapab fè Bondye fè moun gras.
Konsa, èske Lalwa a vin kont pwomès a Bondye yo. Ke sa pa ta janm fèt! Paske si te gen yon lwa ki ta kapab bay lavi, alò, ladwati ta vrèman baze sou Lalwa.
तो के मूसा नबी के नियम-कायदे परमेसवर के वादे कै बिरोध म्ह सै? न्ही बिल्कुल न्ही! क्यूँके जै इसे नियम-कायदे सै, जो परमेसवर की नजर म्ह हमनै धर्मी बणावै, तो सदा का जीवन मूसा नबी के नियम-कायदा के मानण तै हम पा सकां सां।
To, Dokar ce tana gāba da alkawaran Allah ke nan? Sam, ko kaɗan! Gama da a ce an ba da Dokar da tana iya ba da rai, tabbatacce, da sai a sami adalci ta wurin Doka.
Shari'a tana tsayayya da alkawaran Allah kenan? Ko kadan! Domin idan da an ba da shari'a da ke iya bayar da rai, babu shakka da adalci ya zo ta wurin wannan shari'a.
Ua ku e no anei ke kanawai i na olelo a ke Akua? Aole loa: no ka mea, ina i haawiia mai ke kanawai e hiki ia ia ke hoola, ina no ma ke kanawai ka pono.
| האם יש סתירה בין תורתו של ה׳ לבין הבטחותיו? ודאי שלא! אילו יכלה התורה להושיע אותנו, לא היה צריך אלוהים לתת לנו מוצא אחר מהשעבוד לחטא – שהרי כתבי־הקודש אומרים שכולנו עבדים לחטא. הדרך היחידה להשתחרר מהשעבוד לחטא, דרך הפתוחה לכל אחד, היא אמונה בישוע המשיח! |
| ועתה הכי התורה סתרת את הבטחות האלהים חלילה כי אלו נתנה תורה אשר בכחה להחיות אז באמת היתה הצדקה על ידי התורה׃ |
तो क्या व्यवस्था परमेश्वर की प्रतिज्ञाओं के विरोध में है? कदापि नहीं! क्योंकि यदि ऐसी व्यवस्था दी जाती जो जीवन दे सकती, तो सचमुच धार्मिकता व्यवस्था से होती।
तो क्या व्यवस्था परमेश्वर की प्रतिज्ञाओं के विपरीत है? बिलकुल नहीं! यदि कोई ऐसी व्यवस्था दी गई होती, जो जीवन प्रदान कर सकती थी, तब निश्चयतः उस व्यवस्था के पालन करने पर धार्मिकता प्राप्त हो जाती.
A törvény tehát az Isten ígéretei ellen van-e? Távol legyen! Mert ha olyan törvény adatott volna, amely képes megeleveníteni, valóban a törvényből volna az igazság.
A törvény tehát az Isten ígéretei ellen van-é? Távol legyen! Mert ha olyan törvény adatott volna, a mely képes megeleveníteni, valóban a törvényből volna az igazság.
Eru þá lög Guðs í andstöðu við loforð hans? Nei, vissulega ekki! Ef við gætum frelsast með því að halda lögin, þá hefði Guð ekki þurft að opna okkur aðra leið til að losna úr klóm syndarinnar – en Biblían leggur áherslu á að allir séu fangar hennar. Eina undankomuleiðin er trúin á Jesú Krist og hún er öllum opin.
Iwu ahụ ọ na-emegide nkwa nke Chineke? Mba. Nʼezie ọ dịghị. Nʼihi na a sị na e nwere iwu dị nke pụrụ inye mmadụ ndụ, mgbe ahụ, ezi omume gaara abịara mmadụ site nʼiwu.
Ngarud, maibusor kadi ti linteg kadagiti karkari ti Dios? Pudno a saan! Ta no naited ti linteg a nakaited iti biag, pudno nga immay koma ti kinalinteg babaen iti dayta a linteg.
Apakah itu berarti bahwa hukum agama berlawanan dengan janji Allah? Tentu saja tidak! Sebab kalau hukum agama diberikan untuk menganugerahkan hidup kepada manusia, maka manusia dapat berbaik dengan Allah melalui hukum agama.
Jadi apakah hukum Taurat bertentangan dengan janji Allah? Tentu saja tidak! Karena jika ada hukum Taurat yang bisa memberi kehidupan, maka kita bisa dibenarkan dengan menaatinya.
Kalau demikian, bertentangankah hukum Taurat dengan janji-janji Allah? Sekali-kali tidak. Sebab andaikata hukum Taurat diberikan sebagai sesuatu yang dapat menghidupkan, maka memang kebenaran berasal dari hukum Taurat.
Sekarang pasti kalian bertanya, “Kalau begitu apakah hukum Taurat bertentangan dengan janji-janji Allah kepada Abraham?” Tentu saja tidak! Kita harus memahami bahwa hukum Taurat tidak mempunyai kekuatan untuk memberikan hidup kekal kepada siapa pun. Berarti, cara untuk dibenarkan di hadapan Allah bukanlah melalui hukum Taurat.
Ku lulo iti gwa ilagiilyo likoli nsuta ni ilagiilyo ni la ng'wi Itunda? A! a! kunsoko anga ize ilagiilyo nai atulaa ipumugwe ai atulaa nu uhumi nu akuleta u upanga, tai ane ai iziigela ki ilagiilyo.
La legge [è] ella dunque [stata data] contro alle promesse di Dio? [Così] non sia; perciocchè, se fosse stata data la legge, che potesse vivificare, veramente la giustizia sarebbe per la legge.
La legge è dunque contro le promesse di Dio? Impossibile! Se infatti fosse stata data una legge capace di conferire la vita, la giustificazione scaturirebbe davvero dalla legge;
La legge è essa dunque contraria alle promesse di Dio? Così non sia; perché se fosse stata data una legge capace di produrre la vita, allora sì, la giustizia sarebbe venuta dalla legge;
Anime ani u dungurko wa Asere uzin ti kara nan nu inko utize ta sere? anime ba, inka a nya udungurko sa udi urai, tanu tilau ti da aye anyimo udungurka.
さらば律法は神の約束に悖るか、決して然らず。もし人を生かすべき律法を與へられたらんには、實に義とせらるるは律法に由りしならん。
では、律法は神の約束と相いれないものか。断じてそうではない。もし人を生かす力のある律法が与えられていたとすれば、義はたしかに律法によって実現されたであろう。
とすると、律法は神の約束に反するのでしょうか。絶対にそんなことはありません。もしも、与えられた律法がいのちを与えることのできるものであったなら、義は確かに律法によるものだったでしょう。
然れば律法は神の約束に反するか、否々、蓋若人を能く活かすべき律法を與へられたらんには、義は實に律法により出づべし
ବନାଁୟ୍ବରନ୍ ଇନି ଇସ୍ୱରନ୍ ଆ ସନିବ୍ଡେୟ୍ବରନ୍ ସଙ୍ଗତ୍ତାତେ ପଙ୍? ଇଜ୍ଜା, ଏତ୍ତେଲେ ତଡ୍, ଇନିଆସନ୍ଗାମେଣ୍ଡେନ୍ ମନ୍ରାନ୍ଆଡଙ୍ ଅନମେଙନ୍ ତନିୟନ୍ ଆସନ୍ ମୋସାନ୍ ଆ ବନାଁୟ୍ବର୍ ଡକୋଏନ୍ ନଙ୍, ଏତ୍ତେଲ୍ଡେନ୍ ମନ୍ରାନ୍ ତିଆତେ ମାନ୍ନେଡାଲେ ଇସ୍ୱରନ୍ ଆଗନିୟ୍ଗିୟ୍ଲୋଙ୍ ଡରମ୍ମମରନ୍ ଡେତେ ବନ୍ ।
We jeriꞌ ubꞌanik we jastaq riꞌ, ¿la ukꞌulel kꞌu ri taqanik ri utzujum loq ri Dios? Man je ta riꞌ. We ta kakwin ri taqanik, ri xyaꞌtajik, chuyaꞌik kꞌaslemal ri maj ukꞌisik, are ta bꞌa ri taqanik riꞌ kayoꞌw sukꞌal.
Kasegemo'a Anumzamo huvempa hu'nea kene mago zanarimpa osu'napi? A'o, anara osu'ne! Hagi maka kasegemo'ma kasefa tasimuma tamisiana, tagra ana kasegege amage'nenteta Anumzamofo avurera fatgo vahera manusine.
ಹಾಗಾದರೆ ನಿಯಮವು ದೇವರ ವಾಗ್ದಾನಗಳಿಗೆ ವಿರುದ್ಧವೋ? ಹಾಗೆ ಎಂದಿಗೂ ಆಗಬಾರದು! ಕೊಡಲಾಗಿದ್ದ ನಿಯಮವು ಒಂದು ವೇಳೆ ಜೀವವನ್ನು ನೀಡುವುದಕ್ಕೆ ಶಕ್ತಿಯುಳ್ಳದ್ದಾಗಿದ್ದರೆ, ನಿಶ್ಚಯವಾಗಿಯೂ ಮೋಶೆಯ ನಿಯಮದಿಂದ ನೀತಿವಂತರಾಗುತ್ತಿದ್ದೆವು.
ಹಾಗಾದರೆ ಮೋಶೆಯ ಧರ್ಮಶಾಸ್ತ್ರವು ದೇವರ ವಾಗ್ದಾನಗಳಿಗೆ ವಿರುದ್ಧವೋ? ಹಾಗೆ ಎಂದಿಗೂ ತಿಳಿದುಕೊಳ್ಳಬಾರದು. ಬದುಕಿಸುವುದಕ್ಕೆ ಶಕ್ತವಾಗಿರುವ ಧರ್ಮಶಾಸ್ತ್ರವು ಕೊಡಲ್ಪಟ್ಟಿದ್ದರೆ ಅದನ್ನು ಅನುಸರಿಸುವುದರ ಮೂಲಕ ನಿಸ್ಸಂದೇಹವಾಗಿ ನೀತಿಯುಂಟಾಗುತ್ತಿತ್ತು.
Kulwejo angu ebhilagilo bhitasikene no mulago gwa Nyamuanga? Na katyali uli! Lwa kutyo ebhilagilo bhyaliga bhisosibhwe bhwaliga no bhutulo bhwo kuleta obhuanga, obhulengelesi bhwakabhonekene mu bhilagilo.
Ulwa khuva indagilo njilivunge nu lwidihano lwa Nguluve? Bakho! Ulwa kuva ululagilo ulwa huminje lwale na makha aga khumya uwomi, wa lweli uvuvu vonekha mundagilo.
Kwa ele ko sheria iyele kinyume ni ahadi sa K'yara? La hasha! kwa ndabha sheria yaiyele ipisibhu iyele ni ubhueso wa kuleta usima, haki ngaipatikene kwa sheria.
그러면 율법이 하나님의 약속들을 거스리느냐 결코 그럴 수 없느니라 만일 능히 살게 하는 율법을 주셨더면 의가 반드시 율법으로 말미암았으리라
그러면 율법이 하나님의 약속들을 거스리느냐? 결코 그럴 수 없느니라 만일 능히 살게 하는 율법을 주셨더면 의가 반드시 율법으로 말미암았으리라
Ya kalmac pa Ma Sap uh lain wulela lun God? Mo, tiana ouinge! Tuh fin oasr ma sap su ku in asang moul nu sin mwet, na mwet nukewa lukun ku in aksuwosyeyuk ye mutun God ke elos akos ma sap sac.
Kana mulao ulwisanisa insepo ya Ireeza? Sanzi kuwamba vulyo! Cwale mulao heva u bahewa u va kuwola kuha buhalo, valukite vava kuswanela cheniti kwiza cha mulao.
| ئایا تەورات لە دژی بەڵێنەکانی خودایە؟ حاشا! چونکە ئەگەر شەریعەتێک هەبووایە بتوانێت ژیان ببەخشێت، ئەوا ڕاستودروستی بە شەریعەتی تەورات دەبوو. |
ଇଚିହିଁ ମେ଼ରା ମାହାପୂରୁ ଆ଼ଞ୍ଜାମାନାଣି କ଼ପାଟି କାତା ୱେ଼କ୍ନେ? ଏ଼ଦି ଏଚେଲାୱା ଆ଼ଆପେ; ଇଚିହିଁ ଲ଼କୁତାକି ଜୀୱୁ ହୀହାଲି ଆ଼ଡିନି ଇଲେତି ମେ଼ରା ହୀପ୍କି ଆ଼ହାମାଚିହିଁମା, ଆତିହିଁ ମେ଼ରା ସାତେଏ ତୀରି ଗାଟାୟି ଆ଼ତେମା ।
Lex ergo adversus promissa Dei? Absit. Si enim data esset lex, quæ posset vivificare, vere ex lege esset justitia.
Lex ergo adversus promissa Dei? Absit. Si enim data esset lex, quæ posset vivificare, vere ex lege esset iustitia.
Lex ergo adversus promissa Dei? Absit. Si enim data esset lex, quæ posset vivificare, vere ex lege esset iustitia.
Lex ergo adversus promissa Dei? Absit. Si enim data esset lex, quæ posset vivificare, vere ex lege esset justitia.
lex ergo adversus promissa Dei absit si enim data esset lex quae posset vivificare vere ex lege esset iustitia
Lex ergo adversus promissa Dei? Absit. Si enim data esset lex, quae posset vivificare, vere ex lege esset iustitia.
Vai tad nu bauslība ir pretī Dieva apsolīšanām? Nemaz. Jo ja kāda bauslība būtu dota, kas spētu dot dzīvību, tad patiesi taisnība nāktu no bauslības.
Boni, Mobeko eyaki mpo na kotelemela bilaka ya Nzambe? Ata moke te! Soki mobeko moko epesamaki, mobeko oyo ezali na makoki ya kopesa bato bomoi, bato balingaki penza kokoma sembo na nzela ya mobeko yango.
त का व्यवस्था परमेश्वर की प्रतिज्ञावों को विरोध म हय? कभीच नहीं! कहालीकि यदि असी व्यवस्था दी जाती जो जीवन दे सकती, त सचमुच सच्चायी व्यवस्था को पालन को द्वारा मिलय हय।
Amateeka galwanagana n’ebyo Katonda bye yasuubiza? Kikafuuwe. Kubanga singa amateeka gaali galeeta obulamu, ddala ddala amateeka gandituwadde obutuukirivu.
तो क्या बिधान परमेशरो रे वादे रे बिरोदो रे ए? कदी पनि, कऊँकि जे एड़ी बिधान देंदे जो जीवन देई सको, तो सच्ची तेसा बिधानो खे मानणे ते धार्मिकता मिली जांदी।
Ka moa manohitra ny teny fikasan’ Andriamanitra va ny lalàna? Sanatria izany! Fa raha nisy lalàna mahavelona nomena, dia avy tamin’ ny lalàna tokoa ny fahamarinana
Aa vaho mifandietse amo fampitamàn’ Añahareo hao t’i Hake? Sondo’e! Fa naho eo ty hake nitolorañe ze ho nahaveloñe, le i hake zay ty ho nahavantañe.
അതുകൊണ്ട് ന്യായപ്രമാണം ദൈവവാഗ്ദത്തങ്ങൾക്ക് വിരോധമോ? ഒരിക്കലും അല്ല; ജീവിപ്പിപ്പാൻ കഴിയുന്നൊരു ന്യായപ്രമാണം നല്കിയിരുന്നു എങ്കിൽ നീതി വാസ്തവമായി ആ ന്യായപ്രമാണത്താൽ വരുമായിരുന്നു.
എന്നാൽ ന്യായപ്രമാണം ദൈവവാഗ്ദത്തങ്ങൾക്കു വിരോധമോ? ഒരുനാളും അല്ല; ജീവിപ്പിപ്പാൻ കഴിയുന്നോരു ന്യായപ്രമാണം നല്കിയിരുന്നു എങ്കിൽ ന്യായപ്രമാണം വാസ്തവമായി നീതിക്കു ആധാരമാകുമായിരുന്നു.
അങ്ങനെയെങ്കിൽ ന്യായപ്രമാണം ദൈവികവാഗ്ദാനങ്ങൾക്ക് എതിരാണോ? ഒരിക്കലും അല്ല. ന്യായപ്രമാണം ജീവൻ പ്രദാനംചെയ്യാൻ കഴിവുള്ളത് ആയിരുന്നു എങ്കിൽ ന്യായപ്രമാണംമുഖേന നീതീകരണം തീർച്ചയായും ലഭ്യമാകുമായിരുന്നു.
Adu oirabadi Wayel Yathang asi Tengban Mapugi wasaksing adugi maiyoktara? Madu khak oidasanu! Maramdi hingba piba ngamba wayel yathang ama mioibana phanglamlabadi madu injaduna Tengban Mapuna makhoibu chumhanbiramgadabani.
तर काय नियमशास्त्र हे देवाच्या वचनाविरुद्ध आहे? कधीच नाही कारण जीवन देण्यास समर्थ असलेले नियमशास्त्र देण्यात आले असते तर, नीतिमत्त्व खरोखरच नियमशास्त्राने प्राप्त झाले असते.
ଆନ୍ଚୁ ଚିନାଃ ପାର୍ମେଶ୍ୱାର୍ ଏମାକାଦ୍ ବାନାର୍ସାକେ ବିରୁଧ୍ ରିକାଃଏ? କାହାଗି, ଚିଉଲାଅ କା ହବାଅଃଆ! ଚିଆଃଚି ମାନୱାକେ ଜୀଦାନ୍ ଏମେ ଲେକା ମିଆଁଦ୍ ଆନ୍ଚୁ ବାଇୟାକାନ୍ ରେଦ, ଏନାକେ ମାନାତିଙ୍ଗ୍ ହରାତେଗି ମାନୱା ପାର୍ମେଶ୍ୱାର୍ଆଃ ଆୟାର୍ରେ ଧାର୍ମାନ୍ନିଃ ମେନ୍ତେ ଉଦୁବ୍କାନ୍ତେୟାଃ ।
“Bhai, bhuli shalia ja a Musha jinataukangana na miadi ja a Nnungu? Nng'oope! Monaga jikapali Shalia ja kombola kwaapanganga bhandunji gumi, bhai tukakwete aki kwa Shalia ja a Musha.
ဤသို့ဆိုရာ၌ပညတ်တရားနှင့်ဘုရား သခင်၏ကတိတော်တို့သည် ဆန့်ကျင်ဘက် ဖြစ်၍နေပါသလော။ အဘယ်နည်းနှင့်မျှ မဟုတ်။ အကယ်၍အသက်ရှင်စေနိုင်သည့် ပညတ်တရားကိုလူသားတို့ရရှိခဲ့ပါ လျှင် လူတိုင်းပင်ထိုပညတ်တရားကိုစောင့် ထိန်းခြင်းဖြင့်ဘုရားသခင်နှင့်မှန်ကန်စွာ ဆက်ဆံခွင့်ကိုရရှိနိုင်ကြမည်သာဖြစ်၏။-
သို့ဖြစ်၍ ပညတ်တရားသည် ဘုရားသခင်၏ ဂတိတော်နှင့် ဆန့်ကျင်ဘက်ဖြစ်သလော။ ထိုသို့ မဖြစ်နိုင်ရာ။ အသက်ရှင်စေနိုင်သော ပညတ်တရားကို ပေးတော်မူသည်မှန်လျှင်၊ အကယ်စင်စစ် ထိုတရားအားဖြင့် ဖြောင့်မတ်ခြင်းကိုရလိမ့်မည်။
သို့ဖြစ်၍ ပညတ် တရားသည် ဘုရားသခင် ၏ ဂတိ တော်နှင့် ဆန့်ကျင်ဘက် ဖြစ်သလော။ ထိုသို့ မ ဖြစ် နိုင်ရာ။ အသက် ရှင်စေနိုင် သော ပညတ် တရားကို ပေး တော်မူသည်မှန်လျှင် ၊ အကယ်စင်စစ် ထိုတရား အားဖြင့် ဖြောင့်မတ် ခြင်းကိုရ လိမ့်မည် ။
He turaki ranei ta te ture i a te Atua kupu whakaari? Kahore rapea: me i homai hoki he ture, he mea kaha ki te whakaora, ina kua puta ake te tika i te ture.
Eneka hoile, niyom to Isor laga kosom pora bhi dangor ase naki? Eneka nohoi! Kelemane jodi niyom pora he jibon pabole parise koile, titia hoile dharmikta bhi niyom pora he ahibole thakise.
Rangte ih kakhamta ah Hootthe damdi miksuk angla ngeh tam liiha? Emah tah angka! Mina loong ih roidong jen choh raangtaan ih Hootthe mok jam rum abah, Hootthe jun ih thoontang Rangte damdoh ejen pun et thengta.
Kambe ngalokho umthetho uphambene lezithembiso zikaNkulunkulu na? Akunjalo lakancane! Ngoba nxa kwakubekwe umthetho onika ukuphila, ukulunga impela kwakuzavela ngomthetho.
Pho umlayo uphambene lezithembiso zikaNkulunkulu yini? Phinde! Ngoba uba wawunikiwe umlayo olamandla okuphilisa, isibili ukulunga ngabe kuvela ngomlayo.
Kwaiyo je saliya ibile kiogo na ahadi za Nnongo/ la hasha! kwa kuwa kati saliya yayapiyilwe yabile na uweso wa leta ukoti, haki mana ipatikikine kwa saliya.
त्यसो भए, के व्यवस्था परमेश्वरका प्रतिज्ञाहरूको विरुद्धमा छ त? कदापि होइन! किनकि यदि जीवन दिन सक्ने व्यवस्था दिइएको भए, निश्चय नै त्यही व्यवस्थाद्वारा धार्मिकता आउने थियो ।
Wu, malagizu gibelana na lilaganu la Chapanga? Lepi hati padebe! Muni kuvya uhumili mu malagizu gegakuvapela vandu wumi, ndi ngatiwonikini vabwina palongolo ya Chapanga kwa kuyidakila malagizu.
Er da loven imot Guds løfter? Langt derifra! for var det gitt nogen lov som kunde gjøre levende, da kom rettferdigheten virkelig av loven;
Finnes det da en konflikt mellom Guds lov og Guds løfter? Nei, naturligvis ikke! Dersom vi kunne ha fått evig liv gjennom det å følge Moseloven, da hadde den virkelig vært veien til å bli skyldfri innfor Gud. Men Gud har erklært i Skriften at vi mennesker er fanger under synden. Derfor finnes det bare en måte å få del i den arven som Gud har lovet oss, og det er ved å tro på Jesus Kristus.
Er so lovi imot Guds lovnader? Langt ifrå! for var det gjeve ei lov som hadde magt til å gjera livande, so kom rettferdi verkeleg av lovi.
ତେବେ ମୋଶାଙ୍କ ବ୍ୟବସ୍ଥା କି ଈଶ୍ବରଙ୍କ ପ୍ରତିଜ୍ଞାସମୂହର ବିରୁଦ୍ଧ? ତାହା କେବେ ହେଁ ନ ହେଉ; କାରଣ ଯଦି ଜୀବନ ଦେବାକୁ ସମର୍ଥ ଏପରି ମୋଶାଙ୍କ ବ୍ୟବସ୍ଥା ଦିଆଯାଇଥାଆନ୍ତା, ତେବେ ଧାର୍ମିକତା ପ୍ରକୃତରେ ମୋଶାଙ୍କ ବ୍ୟବସ୍ଥାମୂଳକ ହୁଅନ୍ତା।
Kanaafuu seerri waadaa Waaqaatiin mormaa ree? Gonkumaa akkas miti! Utuu seerri jireenya kennuu dandaʼu kennamee jiraatee silaa qajeelummaan dhugumaan seeraan argama tureetii.
ਫੇਰ ਭਲਾ, ਬਿਵਸਥਾ ਪਰਮੇਸ਼ੁਰ ਦੇ ਵਾਇਦਿਆਂ ਦੇ ਵਿਰੁੱਧ ਹੈ? ਕਦੇ ਨਹੀਂ ਜੇਕਰ ਅਜਿਹੀ ਬਿਵਸਥਾ ਦਿੱਤੀ ਹੋਈ ਹੁੰਦੀ ਜਿਹੜੀ ਜੀਵਨ ਦੇ ਸਕਦੀ ਤਾਂ ਧਾਰਮਿਕਤਾ ਸੱਚੀ ਮੁੱਚੀ ਬਿਵਸਥਾ ਤੋਂ ਪ੍ਰਾਪਤ ਹੁੰਦਾ।
ଇଦାଂନି ଅରତ୍ ଇନାକା? ବିଦି ଇନାକା ଇସ୍ୱର୍ତି ପାର୍ମାଣ୍ ବିରୁଦ୍ କିନାତ୍? ଆକାୟ୍ ମୁଲେ ଆକାୟ୍! ଇନେକିଦେଂକି ମାନାୟ୍ତିଂ ଜିବୁନ୍ ହିନି ଲାକେ ଜଦି ର ବିଦି କିତିସ୍, ଲାଗିଂ ହେଦାଂ ପାଲି କିଦେଙ୍ଗ୍ ହୁକେ ନେ ମାନାୟ୍ ଇସ୍ୱର୍ତି କାଣ୍କୁତ ଦସ୍ହିଲ୍ୱାକାନ୍ ଆତାନ୍ମା ।
| پس آیا شریعت به خلاف وعده های خداست؟ حاشا! زیرا اگر شریعتی داده میشد که تواند حیاتبخشد، هرآینه عدالت از شریعت حاصل میشد. |
| بنابراین، آیا شریعت خدا با وعدههای او تناقض دارد؟ هرگز! زیرا اگر شریعتی به ما داده میشد که میتوانست به ما حیات ابدی ببخشد، در آن صورت، میسر میگردید که با اطاعت از آن، وارد رابطهای درست با خدا شویم. |
Hashi, Malagaliru Mlungu gakamupananiti Musa gasingana na lagilu lya Mlungu? Ndala nakamu! Toziya Malagaliru Mlungu gakamupananiti Musa gagalaviyitwi megawapanani wantu ukomu, su twenga metuwezi kumfiriziya Mlungu kwa njira ya Malagaliru aga.
A iaduen, kapung o kin palian inau en Kot akan? O so! A ma kapung eu pan wiaui, me pan kak kamaurela, nan melel, pung ap pan tapi sang nan kapung.
A iaduen, kapun o kin palian inau en Kot akan? O jo! A ma kapun eu pan wiaui, me pan kak kamaurela, nan melel, pun ap pan tapi jan nan kapun.
Zakon tedy jestże przeciwko obietnicom Bożym? Nie daj tego Boże! albowiem gdyby był dany zakon, który by mógł ożywiać, prawdziwieć by z zakonu była sprawiedliwość.
Czy to znaczy, że Prawo Mojżesza jest sprzeczne z obietnicą Boga? Skądże! Gdyby ustanowił On Prawo dające ludziom życie, to rzeczywiście dzięki jego przestrzeganiu można byłoby uzyskać uniewinnienie.
Czy więc prawo jest przeciwko obietnicom Boga? Nie daj Boże! Gdyby bowiem zostało dane prawo, które mogłoby ożywiać, sprawiedliwość rzeczywiście byłaby z prawa.
Acaso, pois, a Lei é contra as promessas de Deus? De maneira nenhuma! Pois, se a Lei houvesse sido entregue para que pudesse dar vida, na verdade a justiça teria sido pela Lei.
Logo, a lei é contra as promessas de Deus? De nenhuma sorte; porque, se dada fosse uma lei que podesse vivificar, a justiça, na verdade, seria pela lei.
Logo, a lei é contra as promessas de Deus? De nenhuma sorte; porque, se dada fosse uma lei que pudesse vivificar, a justiça, na verdade, seria pela lei.
[Se alguém perguntasse: ]“[Quando Deus deu suas ]leis [a Moisés ]muito [depois de avisar Abraão ]daquilo que [lhe daria, ele ]estava mudando de ideia?”, [eu responderia que Deus ]com certeza não [mudou de ideia ao proceder assim]! Se tivesse sido dada {se Deus tivesse dado} uma lei que pudesse capacitar as pessoas a viverem [eternamente], seria realmente por elas [obedecerem àquela ]lei que Deus apagaria o registro dos seus pecados.
Então, a lei está contra as promessas de Deus? É claro que não! Pois se houvesse uma lei que pudesse dar vida, então, poderíamos nos tornar justos, ao segui-la.
A lei é então contra as promessas de Deus? Certamente que não! Pois se houvesse uma lei dada que pudesse dar vida, certamente a retidão teria sido da lei.
Атунч оаре Леӂя есте ымпотрива фэгэдуинцелор луй Думнезеу? Ничдекум! Дакэ с-ар фи дат о Леӂе каре сэ поатэ да вяца, ынтр-адевэр, неприхэниря ар вени дин Леӂе.
Este deci Legea împotriva făgăduințelor lui Dumnezeu? Cu siguranță că nu! Căci, dacă ar fi fost dată o lege care să dea viață, mai mult ca sigur că neprihănirea ar fi fost din lege.
Leleꞌ Lamatuaꞌ fee agama hohoro-lalane nara neu baꞌi Musa, naa, balabꞌan no hehelu-fufulin, do? Hokoꞌ! Huu mete ma hambu hohoro-lalaneꞌ, atahori bisa tao tungga fo Lamatuaꞌ simbo e no maloleꞌ ma nasodꞌa, neꞌo atahori Yahudi ra hohoro-lalanen bisa tao taꞌo naa boe. Tao-tao te nda hambu hohoro-lalaneꞌ esa sa boe fo atahori bisa tao tungga, fo tao maꞌasufu Lamatuaꞌ ralan, fo Ana simbo e no maloleꞌ.
Итак, закон противен обетованиям Божиим? Никак! Ибо если бы дан был закон, могущий животворить, то подлинно праведность была бы от закона;
Eshi je esheria ehwelishinyume neahadi zwa Ngolobhe? atahashe antele nkashile esheria yehali ifuiziwe yalinamaha agalete owomi, lyoli agapatihene husheria.
Ma anghan nisenla, Pathien chonginkhâm hih balam hin ânkal mo? Inkal mak! Miriemngei'n ring theina rang balam an lei man nisenla chu, mitinin ha balam hah jômin Pathien kôm dik inchangin an om rang ani zoi.
tarhi vyavasthA kim Izvarasya pratijJAnAM viruddhA? tanna bhavatu| yasmAd yadi sA vyavasthA jIvanadAnesamarthAbhaviSyat tarhi vyavasthayaiva puNyalAbho'bhaviSyat|
তৰ্হি ৱ্যৱস্থা কিম্ ঈশ্ৱৰস্য প্ৰতিজ্ঞানাং ৱিৰুদ্ধা? তন্ন ভৱতু| যস্মাদ্ যদি সা ৱ্যৱস্থা জীৱনদানেসমৰ্থাভৱিষ্যৎ তৰ্হি ৱ্যৱস্থযৈৱ পুণ্যলাভোঽভৱিষ্যৎ|
তর্হি ৱ্যৱস্থা কিম্ ঈশ্ৱরস্য প্রতিজ্ঞানাং ৱিরুদ্ধা? তন্ন ভৱতু| যস্মাদ্ যদি সা ৱ্যৱস্থা জীৱনদানেসমর্থাভৱিষ্যৎ তর্হি ৱ্যৱস্থযৈৱ পুণ্যলাভোঽভৱিষ্যৎ|
တရှိ ဝျဝသ္ထာ ကိမ် ဤၑွရသျ ပြတိဇ္ဉာနာံ ဝိရုဒ္ဓါ? တန္န ဘဝတု၊ ယသ္မာဒ် ယဒိ သာ ဝျဝသ္ထာ ဇီဝနဒါနေသမရ္ထာဘဝိၐျတ် တရှိ ဝျဝသ္ထယဲဝ ပုဏျလာဘော'ဘဝိၐျတ်၊
tarhi vyavasthA kim Izvarasya pratijnjAnAM viruddhA? tanna bhavatu| yasmAd yadi sA vyavasthA jIvanadAnEsamarthAbhaviSyat tarhi vyavasthayaiva puNyalAbhO'bhaviSyat|
तर्हि व्यवस्था किम् ईश्वरस्य प्रतिज्ञानां विरुद्धा? तन्न भवतु। यस्माद् यदि सा व्यवस्था जीवनदानेसमर्थाभविष्यत् तर्हि व्यवस्थयैव पुण्यलाभोऽभविष्यत्।
તર્હિ વ્યવસ્થા કિમ્ ઈશ્વરસ્ય પ્રતિજ્ઞાનાં વિરુદ્ધા? તન્ન ભવતુ| યસ્માદ્ યદિ સા વ્યવસ્થા જીવનદાનેસમર્થાભવિષ્યત્ તર્હિ વ્યવસ્થયૈવ પુણ્યલાભોઽભવિષ્યત્|
tarhi vyavasthā kim īśvarasya pratijñānāṁ viruddhā? tanna bhavatu| yasmād yadi sā vyavasthā jīvanadānesamarthābhaviṣyat tarhi vyavasthayaiva puṇyalābho'bhaviṣyat|
tarhi vyavasthā kim īśvarasya pratijñānāṁ viruddhā? tanna bhavatu| yasmād yadi sā vyavasthā jīvanadānēsamarthābhaviṣyat tarhi vyavasthayaiva puṇyalābhō'bhaviṣyat|
tarhi vyavasthA kim Ishvarasya pratij nAnAM viruddhA? tanna bhavatu| yasmAd yadi sA vyavasthA jIvanadAnesamarthAbhaviShyat tarhi vyavasthayaiva puNyalAbho. abhaviShyat|
ತರ್ಹಿ ವ್ಯವಸ್ಥಾ ಕಿಮ್ ಈಶ್ವರಸ್ಯ ಪ್ರತಿಜ್ಞಾನಾಂ ವಿರುದ್ಧಾ? ತನ್ನ ಭವತು| ಯಸ್ಮಾದ್ ಯದಿ ಸಾ ವ್ಯವಸ್ಥಾ ಜೀವನದಾನೇಸಮರ್ಥಾಭವಿಷ್ಯತ್ ತರ್ಹಿ ವ್ಯವಸ್ಥಯೈವ ಪುಣ್ಯಲಾಭೋಽಭವಿಷ್ಯತ್|
តហ៌ិ វ្យវស្ថា កិម៑ ឦឝ្វរស្យ ប្រតិជ្ញានាំ វិរុទ្ធា? តន្ន ភវតុ។ យស្មាទ៑ យទិ សា វ្យវស្ថា ជីវនទានេសមត៌្ហាភវិឞ្យត៑ តហ៌ិ វ្យវស្ថយៃវ បុណ្យលាភោៜភវិឞ្យត៑។
തർഹി വ്യവസ്ഥാ കിമ് ഈശ്വരസ്യ പ്രതിജ്ഞാനാം വിരുദ്ധാ? തന്ന ഭവതു| യസ്മാദ് യദി സാ വ്യവസ്ഥാ ജീവനദാനേസമർഥാഭവിഷ്യത് തർഹി വ്യവസ്ഥയൈവ പുണ്യലാഭോഽഭവിഷ്യത്|
ତର୍ହି ୱ୍ୟୱସ୍ଥା କିମ୍ ଈଶ୍ୱରସ୍ୟ ପ୍ରତିଜ୍ଞାନାଂ ୱିରୁଦ୍ଧା? ତନ୍ନ ଭୱତୁ| ଯସ୍ମାଦ୍ ଯଦି ସା ୱ୍ୟୱସ୍ଥା ଜୀୱନଦାନେସମର୍ଥାଭୱିଷ୍ୟତ୍ ତର୍ହି ୱ୍ୟୱସ୍ଥଯୈୱ ପୁଣ୍ୟଲାଭୋଽଭୱିଷ୍ୟତ୍|
ਤਰ੍ਹਿ ਵ੍ਯਵਸ੍ਥਾ ਕਿਮ੍ ਈਸ਼੍ਵਰਸ੍ਯ ਪ੍ਰਤਿਜ੍ਞਾਨਾਂ ਵਿਰੁੱਧਾ? ਤੰਨ ਭਵਤੁ| ਯਸ੍ਮਾਦ੍ ਯਦਿ ਸਾ ਵ੍ਯਵਸ੍ਥਾ ਜੀਵਨਦਾਨੇਸਮਰ੍ਥਾਭਵਿਸ਼਼੍ਯਤ੍ ਤਰ੍ਹਿ ਵ੍ਯਵਸ੍ਥਯੈਵ ਪੁਣ੍ਯਲਾਭੋ(ਅ)ਭਵਿਸ਼਼੍ਯਤ੍|
තර්හි ව්යවස්ථා කිම් ඊශ්වරස්ය ප්රතිඥානාං විරුද්ධා? තන්න භවතු| යස්මාද් යදි සා ව්යවස්ථා ජීවනදානේසමර්ථාභවිෂ්යත් තර්හි ව්යවස්ථයෛව පුණ්යලාභෝ(අ)භවිෂ්යත්|
தர்ஹி வ்யவஸ்தா² கிம் ஈஸ்²வரஸ்ய ப்ரதிஜ்ஞாநாம்’ விருத்³தா⁴? தந்ந ப⁴வது| யஸ்மாத்³ யதி³ ஸா வ்யவஸ்தா² ஜீவநதா³நேஸமர்தா²ப⁴விஷ்யத் தர்ஹி வ்யவஸ்த²யைவ புண்யலாபோ⁴(அ)ப⁴விஷ்யத்|
తర్హి వ్యవస్థా కిమ్ ఈశ్వరస్య ప్రతిజ్ఞానాం విరుద్ధా? తన్న భవతు| యస్మాద్ యది సా వ్యవస్థా జీవనదానేసమర్థాభవిష్యత్ తర్హి వ్యవస్థయైవ పుణ్యలాభోఽభవిష్యత్|
ตรฺหิ วฺยวสฺถา กิมฺ อีศฺวรสฺย ปฺรติชฺญานำ วิรุทฺธา? ตนฺน ภวตุฯ ยสฺมาทฺ ยทิ สา วฺยวสฺถา ชีวนทาเนสมรฺถาภวิษฺยตฺ ตรฺหิ วฺยวสฺถไยว ปุณฺยลาโภ'ภวิษฺยตฺฯ
ཏརྷི ཝྱཝསྠཱ ཀིམ྄ ཨཱིཤྭརསྱ པྲཏིཛྙཱནཱཾ ཝིརུདྡྷཱ? ཏནྣ བྷཝཏུ། ཡསྨཱད྄ ཡདི སཱ ཝྱཝསྠཱ ཛཱིཝནདཱནེསམརྠཱབྷཝིཥྱཏ྄ ཏརྷི ཝྱཝསྠཡཻཝ པུཎྱལཱབྷོ྅བྷཝིཥྱཏ྄།
| تَرْہِ وْیَوَسْتھا کِمْ اِیشْوَرَسْیَ پْرَتِجْناناں وِرُدّھا؟ تَنَّ بھَوَتُ۔ یَسْمادْ یَدِ سا وْیَوَسْتھا جِیوَنَدانیسَمَرْتھابھَوِشْیَتْ تَرْہِ وْیَوَسْتھَیَیوَ پُنْیَلابھوبھَوِشْیَتْ۔ |
tarhi vyavasthaa kim ii"svarasya pratij naanaa. m viruddhaa? tanna bhavatu| yasmaad yadi saa vyavasthaa jiivanadaanesamarthaabhavi. syat tarhi vyavasthayaiva pu. nyalaabho. abhavi. syat|
Еда ли је дакле закон противан обећањима Божјим? Боже сачувај! Јер да је дан закон који може оживети, заиста би од закона била правда.
Eda li je dakle zakon protivan obeæanjima Božijim? Bože saèuvaj! Jer da je dan zakon koji može oživljeti, zaista bi od zakona bila pravda.
Jalo he, a melao ya Modimo le ditsholofetso tsa one di a ganetsanya? Ga go a nna jalo! Fa re ne re ka bolokwa ka melao ya one, jalo Modimo o ka bo o sa re naya tsela e sele go tswa mo botshwarong jwa sebe, gonne Dikwalo di gatelela gore re magolegwa a sebe. Tsela fela e re ka falolang ka yone ke ka tumelo mo go Jesu Keresete; tsela ya go falola e bulegetse botlhe ba ba dumelang mo go ene.
Ko murairo unopesana nezvivimbiso zvaMwari here? Ngazvisadaro! Nokuti dai pakange pane murairo wakapiwa unogona kuraramisa, zvirokwazvo kururama kungadai kuchibva kumurairo.
Naizvozvo, murayiro unopikisana nechipikirwa chaMwari here? Kwete napaduku! Nokuti kana murayiro wakapiwa wakanga uchigona kupa upenyu, ipapo zvirokwazvo kururama kwaizouyawo nomurayiro.
Закон ли убо противу обетованием Божиим? Да не будет. Аще бо дан бысть закон могий оживити, воистинну от закона бы была правда:
Ali je potem postava zoper Božje obljube? Bog ne daj, kajti če bi bila dana postava, ki bi lahko dala življenje, bi bila pravičnost resnično po postavi.
Jeli je torej postava proti obljubam Božjim? Bog ne daj! kajti ko bi se dala postava, ktera bi bila mogoča oživiti, zares bi bila iz vere pravica.
Sena ekwambeti Milawo ya Mose ikute kutoteka bishomesho bya Lesa? Sobwe. Pakwinga na bantu balatambula Milawo ikute kupa buyumi ekwambeti nshinga nebalalulama pamenso a Lesa kupitila mukukonkela Milawo.
Haddaba sharcigu miyuu ka gees yahay ballamadii Ilaah? Ma suurtowdo, waayo, haddii sharci wax noolayn kara laysa siiyey, sida runta ah, xaqnimada waxaa laga heli lahaa sharciga.
¿Luego la ley es contra las promesas de Dios? En ninguna manera; porque si alguna ley dada pudiera vivificar, la justicia fuera verdaderamente por la ley.
¿De modo que la ley obra en contra de las promesas de Dios? ¡Por supuesto que no! Porque si hubiera una ley que pudiera dar vida, entonces nosotros podríamos ser justificados por el cumplimiento de ella.
¿Es, pues, la ley contraria a las promesas de Dios? Ciertamente no. Porque si se hubiera dado una ley que hiciera vivir, ciertamente la justicia habría sido de la ley.
¿Entonces la Ley está contra las promesas? ¡Claro que no! Porque si una Ley que puede dar vida fue dada, entonces la justicia sería verdaderamente por la Ley.
Entonces ¿la Ley está en contra de las promesas de Dios? De ninguna manera. Porque si se hubiera dado una Ley capaz de vivificar, realmente la justicia procedería de la Ley.
Luego ¿la ley es contra las promesas de Dios? En ninguna manera; porque si se hubiese dado una ley que pudiera vivificar, la justicia verdaderamente habría sido por la ley.
¿Luego la ley es contra las promesas de Dios? En ninguna manera: porque si la ley dada pudiera vivificar, la justicia fuera verdaderamente por la ley.
Luego ¿la ley [es] contra las promesas de Dios? En ninguna manera: porque si la ley dada pudiera vivificar, la justicia fuera verdaderamente por la ley.
¿Es la ley entonces contra las palabras de Dios? de ninguna manera; porque si hubiera habido una ley que pudiera dar vida, la justicia habría sido realmente por la ley.
Kwa hiyo je sheria iko kinyume na ahadi za Mungu? La hasha! Kwa kuwa kama sheria iliyokuwa imetolewa ilikuwa na uwezo wa kuleta uzima, haki ingepatikana kwa sheria.
Je, Sheria inapingana na ahadi za Mungu? Hata kidogo! Maana, kama kungalitolewa sheria ambayo ingeweza kuwapa watu uzima, basi, tungeweza kukubaliwa kuwa waadilifu kwa njia ya Sheria.
Je basi, sheria inapingana na ahadi za Mungu? La hasha! Kwa maana kama sheria iliyotolewa ingeweza kuwapa watu uzima, basi haki ingepatikana kwa njia ya sheria.
Är då lagen emot Guds löften? Bort det! Om en lag hade blivit given, som kunde göra levande, då skulle rättfärdigheten verkligen komma av lagen.
Är då lagen emot Guds löften? Bort det; men om en lag vore gifven, som kunde lefvande göra, så vore rättfärdigheten sannerliga af lagen;
Är då lagen emot Guds löften? Bort det! Om en lag hade blivit given, som kunde göra levande, då skulle rättfärdigheten verkligen komma av lagen.
Ang kautusan nga baga ay laban sa mga pangako ng Dios? Huwag nawang mangyari: sapagka't kung ibinigay sana ang isang kautusang may kapangyarihang magbigay buhay, tunay ngang ang katuwiran sana ay naging dahil sa kautusan.
Kung gayon ang kautusan ba ay laban sa mga pangako ng Diyos? Hinding-hindi! Sapagkat kung ang kautusan ay ibinigay at may kakayahang magbigay ng buhay, tiyak na ang katuwiran ay dumating sa pamamagitan ng kautusan.
Svbv rinam si Pwknvyarnv gv milvpvvnam am nyiru minsu nambv riduai? Maa, vbvma! Holvgabv nyi vv turnam am jinv Pvbv nga laarwk sinv gubolo, vbvrikubolo nyi mvnwng ngv mingkubv vngku lokv Pwknvyarnv gvlo tarwkbak bv dooladakla dunvpv.
அப்படியென்றால் நியாயப்பிரமாணம் தேவனுடைய வாக்குத்தத்தங்களுக்கு எதிரானதா? இல்லையே; நியாயப்பிரமாணம் உயிரைக் கொடுக்கக்கூடியதாக இருந்திருந்தால், நீதியானது நியாயப்பிரமாணத்தினால் உண்டாயிருக்குமே.
அப்படியானால் மோசேயின் சட்டம் இறைவனுடைய வாக்குத்தத்தங்களுக்கு விரோதமானதா? ஒருபோதும் இல்லை. மோசேயின் சட்டம் வாழ்வை அளிக்கும்படி கொடுக்கப்பட்டிருந்தால், நிச்சயமாக மோசேயின் சட்டத்தின் மூலமாகவே நீதி வந்திருக்கும்.
ధర్మశాస్త్రం దేవుని వాగ్దానాలకు వ్యతిరేకమా? కానే కాదు. ఒకవేళ ధర్మశాస్త్రం బతికించగలిగేలా ఉంటే, ధర్మశాస్త్రం వల్లనే నీతి కలిగి ఉండేది.
Pea ka ko ia, pea ʻoku kau kehe ʻae fono mo e ngaahi talaʻofa ʻae ʻOtua? ʻIkai ʻaupito: he ka ne fokotuʻu ha fono ʻe faʻa foaki ʻae moʻui, pehē ʻe hoko moʻoni ʻae fakatonuhia ʻi he fono ko ia.
Öyleyse Kutsal Yasa Tanrı'nın vaatlerine aykırı mıdır? Kesinlikle hayır! Çünkü yaşam sağlayabilen bir yasa verilseydi, elbette insanlar yasayla aklanırdı.
Eyi kyerɛ sɛ Mmara no tia Onyankopɔn bɔhyɛ no ana? Dabi da! Sɛ mmara bi wɔ hɔ a etumi ma nnipa nkwa a, ɛno de anka onipa nam saa mmara no so betumi ateɛ wɔ Onyankopɔn anim.
Yei kyerɛ sɛ Mmara no tia Onyankopɔn bɔhyɛ no anaa? Dabi! Sɛ mmara bi wɔ hɔ a ɛtumi ma nnipa nkwa a, ɛnneɛ anka onipa nam saa mmara no so bɛtumi atene wɔ Onyankopɔn anim.
Тож невже Закон суперечить обітницям Божим? Зовсім ні! Бо якби був даний Закон, який міг би дарувати життя, то праведність була б від Закону.
Отож, чи ж Зако́н проти Божих обі́тниць? Зо́всім ні! Якби бо був да́ний Зако́н, щоб він міг оживляти, то праведність справді була б від Зако́ну!
То хиба закон проти обітувань Божих? Нехай не буде! Бо коли б дано закон, що міг би оживляти, то справдї від закону була б праведність.
पस क्या शरी'अत ख़ुदा के वा'दों के ख़िलाफ़ है? हरगिज़ नहीं! क्यूँकि अगर कोई एसी शरी'अत दी जाती जो ज़िन्दगी बख़्श सकती तो, अलबत्ता रास्तबाज़ी शरी'अत की वजह से होती।
| ئۇنداقتا، تەۋرات قانۇنى خۇدانىڭ ۋەدىلىرىگە زىتمۇ؟ ياق، ھەرگىز! ئەگەر بىرەر قانۇن ئىنسانلارنى ھاياتلىققا ئېرىشتۈرەلەيدىغان بولسا، ئۇنداقتا ھەققانىيلىق جەزمەن شۇ قانۇنغا ئاساسلانغان بولاتتى. |
Ундақта, Тәврат қануни Худаниң вәдилиригә зитму? Яқ, һәргиз! Әгәр бирәр қанун инсанларни һаятлиққа ериштүрәләйдиған болса, ундақта һәққанийлиқ җәзмән шу қанунға асасланған болатти.
Undaqta, Tewrat qanuni Xudaning wedilirige zitmu? Yaq, hergiz! Eger birer qanun insanlarni hayatliqqa érishtüreleydighan bolsa, undaqta heqqaniyliq jezmen shu qanun’gha asaslan’ghan bolatti.
Undaⱪta, Tǝwrat ⱪanuni Hudaning wǝdilirigǝ zitmu? Yaⱪ, ⱨǝrgiz! Əgǝr birǝr ⱪanun insanlarni ⱨayatliⱪⱪa erixtürǝlǝydiƣan bolsa, undaⱪta ⱨǝⱪⱪaniyliⱪ jǝzmǝn xu ⱪanunƣa asaslanƣan bolatti.
Vậy thì luật pháp nghịch cùng lời hứa của Đức Chúa Trời hay sao? chẳng hề như vậy; vì nếu đã ban cho một luật pháp có thể làm cho sống, thì sự công bình chắc bởi luật pháp mà đến.
Vậy thì luật pháp nghịch cùng lời hứa của Ðức Chúa Trời hay sao? chẳng hề như vậy; vì nếu đã ban cho một luật pháp có thể làm cho sống, thì sự công bình chắc bởi luật pháp mà đến.
Như thế, luật pháp của Đức Chúa Trời có mâu thuẫn với lời hứa của Đức Chúa Trời không? Tuyệt đối không! Vì nếu luật pháp có thể cứu rỗi loài người, hẳn Đức Chúa Trời đã không dùng phương pháp khác để giải thoát chúng ta khỏi xiềng xích của tội lỗi.
pe lino indaghilo najijova isa mu lufingo lwa Nguluve? na kwekuuti! ulwakuva nave indaghilo jino jikamumisivue jilyale ni ngufu isa kuleta uvwumi, ikyang'ani jale jipatikana ku ndaghilo.
Buna Mina midi kimbeni ayi zitsila zi Nzambi e? Nana. Bila enati vadi muina wuvanu, wulenda vana luzingu nganu bukiedika ti busonga buntotukilanga mu Mina.
Nítorí náà òfin ha lòdì sí àwọn ìlérí Ọlọ́run bí? Kí a má rí i; nítorí ìbá ṣe pé a ti fi òfin kan fún ni tí ó lágbára láti sọ ni di ààyè nítòótọ́ òdodo ìbá ti tipasẹ̀ òfin wà.
Verse Count = 331
