< Exodus 21:36 >

Or if it is known that the bull was in the habit of goring in the past, and its owner has not kept it in, he shall surely pay bull for bull, and the dead animal shall be his own.
Por në qoftë se dihet se ky ka e kishte zakon prej kohe të godiste me brirët, dhe i zoti nuk e ka mbajtur të mbyllur, ky do të paguajë ka për ka dhe kafsha e ngordhur do të jetë e tij”.
لَكِنْ إِذَا عُلِمَ أَنَّهُ ثَوْرٌ نَطَّاحٌ مِنْ قَبْلُ وَلَمْ يَضْبِطْهُ صَاحِبُهُ، يُعَوِّضُ عَنِ ٱلثَّوْرِ بِثَوْرٍ، وَٱلْمَيْتُ يَكُونُ لَهُ.
وَأَمَّا إِذَا كَانَ مَعْرُوفاً مِنْ قَبْلُ، أَنَّ الثَّوْرَ نَطَّاحٌ وَلَمْ يَكْبَحْهُ صَاحِبُهُ، فَإِنَّهُ يُعَوِّضُ ثَوْراً بِثَوْرٍ، وَيَكُونُ الثَّوْرُ الْمَيْتُ لَهُ.
Իսկ եթէ նախկինում էլ գիտէին, որ ցուլը հարուածող է եղել, եւ այդ մասին դրա տիրոջը բողոքած են եղել, բայց նա իր ցուլը մէջտեղից չի վերացրել, թող ցուլ հատուցուի ցուլի փոխարէն, իսկ սպանուած ցուլը թող տրուի տիրոջը»:
কিন্তু যদি সেই গৰুৱে আগেও খোঁচাৰ অভ্যাস আছে, আৰু সেই কথা গৰাকীয়ে জানিবলৈ পায়ো গৰুটোক সাৱধানে নেৰাখে, তেনেহ’লে তেওঁ সেই গৰুৰ সলনি আন গৰু দি ক্ষতিপূৰণ কৰিব লাগিব, আৰু মৰা গৰুটো তেওঁৰ নিজৰ হ’ব।”
Amma heyvanın o vaxta qədər vurağan olduğu məlum olanda onun qarşısını almayan sahibi heyvanın əvəzinə heyvan verib zərəri ödəsin; ölən heyvan isə ona qalmalıdır.
Be amo bulamagau gawali da musa: mae fisili, eno bulamagau doagala: musa: dawa: lala ganiaba amola ea ouligisu dunu da gagoi ganodini hame ouligisu, amo dunu da bogoi bulamagau ouligisu dunuma bulamagau gawali esala imunu. Be e da bulamagau bogoi amo manusa: lamu.
কিন্তু এটা যদি জানা যায় যে, সেই গরুটি আগে থেকে শিং দিয়ে আঘাত করত এবং তার মালিক তাকে সাবধানে রাখেনি, তবে সে গরুর পরিবর্ত্তে অন্য গরু দেবে, কিন্তু মৃত গরুটি তারই হবে।
অবশ্য, যদি জানা ছিল যে সেই বলদটির ঢুঁ মারার অভ্যাস ছিল, অথচ মালিক সেটিকে খোঁয়াড়ে বেঁধে রাখেনি, তবে সেই মালিক অবশ্যই পশুর জন্য পশু দেবে, এবং পরিবর্তে মৃত পশুটি নিয়ে নেবে।
Но ако се е знаело от по-напред, че волът е бил бодлив, и стопанинът му не го е ограничил, то непременно ще плати вол за вол, а мършата ще бъде негова.
Apan kung ilado na nga gapanungag ang maong torong baka kaniadto, ug wala kini bantayi sa tag-iya, bayran gayod niya ang torong baka alang sa torong baka, ug maiya ang patay nga mananap.
Apan kong hibaloan nga ang vaca nga nakasungay adunay taras sa pagpanungay sukad pa sa miaging panahon, ug ang iyang tag-iya wala magabantay niini, magabayad siya ug vaca tungod sa vaca, ug ang patay maiya.
Koma zikadziwika kuti ngʼombeyo inali ndi khalidwe logunda, ndipo mwini wake samayitsekera mʼkhola, mwini ngʼombeyo alipire ngʼombe ina yamoyo koma atenge yakufayo.”
Toe to ih maitaw tae loe hmawhsaeng parai moe, canghnii ah doeh maitawnawk daeng tuektuek boeh, tiah panoek boeh, toe tawnkung mah pathlet ai ah suem sut nahaeloe, kadueh maitaw to angmah la ueloe, maitaw tae hoiah rong pae let tih.
Tedae hlaem hlavai ah khaw vaito kah a toh noek te a ming lalah a kungmah loh te te a khoem pawt atah vaito yueng te vaito neh thuung rhoe thuung saeh lamtah aka duek te anih hut la om saeh.
Tedae hlaem hlavai ah khaw vaito kah a toh noek te a ming lalah a kungmah loh te te a khoem pawt atah vaito yueng te vaito neh thuung rhoe thuung saeh lamtah aka duek te anih hut la om saeh.
“Ahinlah hiche bongchal chun masang jeng'ajong gancha dang ana pihlih jeng'a ahile, aneipa jeng in jong ahilchahsa ahi a chule ngaisah'a akoi louva ahile, anei pan jong bongchal thi chu bongchal khat mama'a alesah ding, bongchal thisa vang chu ama chang teitei ding ahiye.”
Hot patetvanlah, maito ni ouk a deng tie katawnkung ni a panue nahlangva, pâkhit laipalah paktha pawiteh, maito ro ama ni a la han. Hote maito buet touh e a yueng lah maito buet touh a rawng han.
人若知道这牛素来是触人的,主人竟不把牛拴着,他必要以牛还牛,死牛要归自己。”
人若知道這牛素來是觸人的,主人竟不把牛拴着,他必要以牛還牛,死牛要歸自己。」
但若查明這隻牛從前牴死過牛,牛主又不加以防範,牛主應該賠償,以牛還牛,死牛歸自己。偷竊賠償法
Ali ako se zna da je to goveče i prije bolo, a njegov ga gospodar nije čuvao, onda mora nadoknaditi goveče za goveče, dok će uginulo živinče biti njegovo.”
Pakli vědíno bylo, že vůl byl trkavý prvé, a nezavřel ho pán jeho: bez výmluvy ať dá vola za vola, a zabitý ať mu zůstane.
Pakli vědíno bylo, že vůl byl trkavý prvé, a nezavřel ho pán jeho: bez výmluvy ať dá vola za vola, a zabitý ať mu zůstane.
Men hvis det er vitterligt, at Oksen tidligere har villet stange, og dens Ejer ikke har passet på den, da skal han erstatte Okse med Okse, men det døde Dyr skal tilfalde ham.
Eller var det vitterligt, at den Okse plejede tilforn at stange, og dens Ejermand ikke vilde passe paa den, da skal han visselig betale Okse for Okse, og den døde skal han have.
Men hvis det er vitterligt, at Oksen tidligere har villet stange, og dens Ejer ikke har passet paa den, da skal han erstatte Okse med Okse, men det døde Dyr skal tilfalde ham.
To kata kamano, kane ongʼere ni rwadhno ne nigi kido mar chwopo, kendo wuon-gi ne osesiem to ne ok otweye, wuon-gi nyaka chul, chiayo kar chiayo kendo chiayo mothono nobed mare.
Of is het kennelijk geweest, dat die os van te voren stotig was, en zijn heer heeft hem niet bewaard, zo zal hij in alle manier os voor os vergelden; doch de dode zal zijns wezen.
Maar was het bekend, dat de stier reeds langere tijd stotig was, en heeft de eigenaar hem toch niet bewaakt, dan moet hij hem de volle waarde vergoeden, een stier voor een stier; maar het dode beest mag hij behouden.
Of is het kennelijk geweest, dat die os van te voren stotig was, en zijn heer heeft hem niet bewaard, zo zal hij in alle manier os voor os vergelden; doch de dode zal zijns wezen.
Maar was het bekend, dat de stier reeds langere tijd stotig was, en heeft de eigenaar hem toch niet bewaakt, dan moet hij hem de volle waarde vergoeden, een stier voor een stier; maar het dode beest mag hij behouden.
Or if it be known that the ox was accustomed to gore in time past, and its owner has not kept it in, he shall surely pay ox for ox, and the dead beast shall be his own.
Or if it is known that the bull was in the habit of goring in the past, and its owner has not kept it in, he shall surely pay bull for bull, and the dead animal shall be his own.
Or if it be known that the ox was wont to gore in time past, and its owner hath not kept it in; he shall surely pay ox for ox, and the dead [beast] shall be his own.
But if it was known that the ox had a habit of goring, yet its owner failed to restrain it, he shall pay full compensation, ox for ox, and the dead animal will be his.
But if it is common knowledge that the ox has frequently done such damage in the past, and its owner has not kept it under control, he will have to give ox for ox; and the dead beast will be his.
But if the bull be known to have been given to goring in time past, and they have testified to his owner, and he have not removed him, he shall repay bull for bull, but the dead shall be his own.
But if the bull be known to have been given to goring in time past, and they have testified to his owner, and he have not removed him, he shall repay bull for bull, but the dead shall be his own.
But if he knew that his ox had pushed with its horns, yesterday and the day before, and its owner did not confine it, then he shall repay an ox for an ox, and he will receive the whole carcass.”
Or if it be known that the ox have gored heretofore, and its owner have not kept him in, he shall in any case restore ox for ox; and the dead shall be his.
But if he knew that his ox was wont to push yesterday and the day before, and his master did not keep him in: he shall pay ox for ox, and shall take the whole carcass.
But if it was known that the ox had repeatedly hurt people with its horns, and its owner had been warned but still didn't keep it under control, full compensation must be paid, ox for ox, but the owner can keep the dead animal.”
Or if it bee knowen that the oxe hath vsed to push in times past, and his master hath not kept him, he shall pay oxe for oxe, but the dead shall be his owne.
Or if it be known that the ox was wont to gore in time past, and its owner hath not kept it in; he shall surely pay ox for ox, and the dead beast shall be his own.
Or if it be known that the ox hath used to push in time past, and his owner hath not kept him in; he shall surely pay ox for ox; and the dead shall be his own.
Or if it be known that the ox has used to push in time past, and his owner has not kept him in; he shall surely pay ox for ox; and the dead shall be his own.
Or if it be known that the ox hath used to push in time past, and his owner hath not kept him in; he shall surely pay ox for ox; and the dead shall be his own.
Or if it be known that the ox hath used to push in time past, and his owner hath not kept him in; he shall surely pay ox for ox; and the dead shall be his own.
Or if it be known that the ox hath used to push in time past, and his owner hath not kept him in; he shall surely pay ox for ox; and the dead shall be his own.
Or if it be known that the ox has used to push in time past, and his owner has not kept him in; he shall surely pay ox for ox; and the dead shall be his own.
But if the bull be known to have been given to goring in time past, and they have testified to his owner, and he have not removed him, he shall repay bull for bull, but the dead shall be his own.
But if it be known that the ox was wont to gore in time past, and his owner hath not kept him in: he shall surely pay ox for ox; and the dead shall belong to him.
or, [if] it has been known that the ox is [one] accustomed to gore before, and its owner does not watch it, he certainly repays ox for ox, and the dead is his.
Or if it is known that the bull was in the habit of goring in the past, and its owner has not kept it in, he shall surely pay bull for bull, and the dead animal shall be his own.
Or if it is known that the bull was in the habit of goring in the past, and its owner has not kept it in, he shall surely pay bull for bull, and the dead animal shall be his own.
Or if it is known that the bull was in the habit of goring in the past, and its owner has not kept it in, he shall surely pay bull for bull, and the dead animal shall be his own.
Or if it is known that the bull was in the habit of goring in the past, and its owner has not kept it in, he shall surely pay bull for bull, and the dead animal shall be his own.
Or if it is known that the bull was in the habit of goring in the past, and its owner has not kept it in, he shall surely pay bull for bull, and the dead animal shall be his own.
Or if it is known that the bull was in the habit of goring in the past, and its owner has not kept it in, he shall surely pay bull for bull, and the dead animal shall be his own.
Or if it is known that the bull was in the habit of goring in the past, and its owner has not kept it in, he shall surely pay bull for bull, and the dead animal shall be his own.
Or if it be known that the ox was wont to gore in time past, and his owner hath not kept him in; he shall surely pay ox for ox, and the dead [beast] shall be his own.
Or if it was known that, an ox, was, wont to gore, before that time, and his owner proceeded not to put him under guard, he shall surely make good, —an ox for the ox, and, the dead one, shall be his.
Or it is known that [is] an ox prone to gore it from yesterday three days ago and not he guarded it owner its certainly he will make compensation an ox in place of the ox and the dead [animal] it will be[long] to him.
or to know for cattle goring he/she/it from yesterday three days ago and not to keep: look at him master his to complete to complete cattle underneath: instead [the] cattle and [the] to die to be to/for him
However, if people know that the bull often attacked other animals previously, and its owner did not keep it inside a fence, then the owner of that bull must give the owner of the bull that died one of his own bulls, but he can take away the animal that died [and do with it whatever he wants to do].”
But if it was known that the ox had a habit of goring in time past, and its owner has not kept it in, he must surely pay ox for ox, and the dead animal will become his own.
Or if it shall be known that the ox hath used to push in time past, and his owner hath not restrained him; he shall surely pay ox for ox, and the dead shall be his own.
Or if it shall be known that the ox was accustomed to push in time past, and his owner hath not restrained him; he shall surely pay ox for ox; and the dead shall be his own.
Or if it is known that the bull was in the habit of goring in the past, and its owner has not kept it in, he shall surely pay bull for bull, and the dead animal shall be his own.
Or if it is known that the bull was in the habit of goring in the past, and its owner has not kept it in, he shall surely pay bull for bull, and the dead animal shall be his own.
Or if it is known that the bull was in the habit of goring in the past, and its owner has not kept it in, he shall surely pay bull for bull, and the dead animal shall be his own.
Or if it is known that the bull was in the habit of goring in the past, and its owner has not kept it in, he shall surely pay bull for bull, and the dead animal shall be his own.
Or if it is known that the bull was in the habit of goring in the past, and its owner has not kept it in, he shall surely pay bull for bull, and the dead animal shall be his own.
Or if it is known that the bull was in the habit of goring in the past, and its owner has not kept it in, he shall surely pay bull for bull, and the dead animal shall be his own.
Forsothe if his lord wiste, that the oxe was a puttere fro yistirdai and the thridde dai ago, and kepte not him, he schal yelde oxe for oxe, and he schal take the hool carkeys.
or, it hath been known that the ox is [one] accustomed to gore heretofore, and its owner doth not watch it, he certainly repayeth ox for ox, and the dead is his.
Sed se oni sciis, ke la bovo estis kornobatema antaŭe, kaj ĝia mastro ĝin ne gardis, tiam ili pagu bovon pro la bovo, kaj la kadavro apartenu al li.
Ke ne amewo nya be nyi la tua dzo nyi bubuwo, eye wona nyitɔ la nya, gake mekpɔ nyi la dzi nyuie o la, ekema nyitɔ la maxɔ ga si wokpɔ tso nyi gbagbe la dzadzra me ƒe ɖeke o, ke boŋ axe fe ɖe nyi kuku la ta, eye wòazu etɔ.”
Elikkä jos se oli tiettävä, että härkä on ennen tottunut kuokkimaan, ja hänen isäntänsä ei korjannut häntä, niin hänen pitää antaman härjän härjästä, ja se kuollut pitää hänen oleman.
Jos taas oli tunnettua, että se härkä ennenkin oli puskenut eikä sen isäntä ollut sitä vartioinut, niin antakoon härän härästä, mutta kuollut olkoon hänen."
Mais s'il est reconnu que le bœuf frappait de la corne depuis longtemps, et que son maître ne l'ait pas surveillé, celui-ci indemnisera en donnant bœuf pour bœuf, et le bœuf tué sera pour lui.
Ou si l'on sait que le taureau avait l'habitude d'encorner dans le passé, et que son propriétaire ne l'a pas gardé, il paiera taureau pour taureau, et l'animal mort lui appartiendra.
Ou s’il était connu que le bœuf frappait de ses cornes auparavant, et que son maître ne l’ait pas tenu sous garde, il fera certainement compensation, bœuf pour bœuf; et le [bœuf] mort lui appartiendra.
[Mais] s'il est connu que le bœuf avait auparavant accoutumé de heurter de sa corne, et que le maître ne l'ait point gardé, il restituera bœuf pour bœuf; mais le bœuf mort sera pour lui.
Mais si le maître savait que le bœuf frappait de la corne depuis hier et avant-hier, et qu’il ne l’ait point gardé, il rendra bœuf pour bœuf, mais il prendra le corps mort tout entier.
Mais s’il est connu que le bœuf était auparavant sujet à frapper, et que son maître ne l’ait point surveillé, ce maître rendra bœuf pour bœuf, et aura pour lui le bœuf mort.
Mais s’il est reconnu que le bœuf frappait de la corne depuis longtemps, et que son maître ne l’ait pas surveillé, celui-ci indemnisera en donnant bœuf pour bœuf, et le bœuf tué sera pour lui.
S'il est notoire qu'auparavant le bœuf avait accoutumé de heurter de sa corne, et que son maître ne l'ait point gardé, il devra rendre bœuf pour bœuf; mais le bœuf mort sera à lui.
Ou s'il est notoire que précédemment ce bœuf était sujet à frapper et que son maître ne l'a pas surveillé, ce maître rendra bœuf pour bœuf, et le bœuf mort lui reviendra.
S'il est reconnu que le taureau avait depuis longtemps l'habitude de frapper de la corne, et qu'on l'avait déclaré au maître sans qu'il l'eût enfermé, celui-ci rendra taureau pour taureau, et la bête morte sera pour lui.
Mais si, notoirement, ce boeuf a déjà heurté à plusieurs reprises et que son maître ne l’ait pas surveillé, il devra restituer boeuf pour boeuf et le boeuf tué lui restera.
Ist es aber bekannt gewesen, daß dieses Rind schon lange stößig war und sein Eigentümer behütete es nicht, so ersetze er das Rind durch ein anderes! Das tote aber sei sein!
Ist es aber bekannt gewesen, daß der Ochse vordem stößig war, und sein Besitzer hat ihn nicht verwahrt, so soll er gewißlich Ochsen für Ochsen erstatten, und der tote soll ihm gehören.
Ist es aber bekannt gewesen, daß der Ochse vordem stößig war, und sein Besitzer hat ihn nicht verwahrt, so soll er gewißlich Ochsen für Ochsen erstatten, und der tote soll ihm gehören.
Wenn es aber bekannt war, daß das Rind schon längst stößig war, und sein Besitzer es nicht sorgfältig gehütet hat, soll er als Ersatz für jenes Rind ein Rind hergeben, das tote aber soll ihm zufallen.
Ist's aber kund gewesen, daß der Ochse stößig vorhin gewesen ist, und sein HERR hat ihn nicht verwahret, so soll er einen Ochsen um den andern vergelten und das Aas haben.
Ist's aber kund gewesen, daß der Ochse zuvor stößig war, und sein Herr hat ihn nicht verwahrt, so soll er einen Ochsen für den andern vergelten und das Aas haben.
War es jedoch bekannt, daß das Rind schon vorher stößig war, und hatte sein Eigentümer trotzdem es nicht gehörig gehütet, so soll er unweigerlich ein Rind für das Rind als Ersatz geben, das tote Tier aber soll ihm gehören.
Wußte man aber, daß der Ochs schon seit etlichen Tagen stößig war und hat sein Herr ihn doch nicht in Verwahrung getan, so soll er den Ochsen ersetzen und das Aas behalten.
Oder, wenn bekannt war, daß der Ochse stößig war seit gestern und ehegestern, und sein Herr ihn nicht verwahrt hatte, so soll er Ochsen für Ochsen erstatten, der tote aber soll ihm gehören.
No rĩrĩ, kũngĩkorwo nĩkũmenyekete atĩ ndegwa ĩyo nĩĩmenyerete gũtheecana na rũhĩa, nake mwene akaaga kũmĩhingĩra-rĩ, no nginya mwene arĩhe, nyamũ ĩrĩhio na nyamũ ĩngĩ, na ĩrĩa ĩkuĩte ĩtuĩke yake.
Εάν όμως ήναι γνωστόν ότι ο βους ήτο κερατιστής από πρότερον, και ο κύριος αυτού δεν εφύλαξεν αυτόν, θέλει εξάπαντος πληρώσει βουν αντί βοός· ο δε θανατωθείς θέλει είσθαι αυτού.
ἐὰν δὲ γνωρίζηται ὁ ταῦρος ὅτι κερατιστής ἐστιν πρὸ τῆς ἐχθὲς καὶ πρὸ τῆς τρίτης ἡμέρας καὶ διαμεμαρτυρημένοι ὦσιν τῷ κυρίῳ αὐτοῦ καὶ μὴ ἀφανίσῃ αὐτόν ἀποτείσει ταῦρον ἀντὶ ταύρου ὁ δὲ τετελευτηκὼς αὐτῷ ἔσται
અથવા બળદના માલિકને જો પહેલેથી જ ખબર હોય કે એ બળદને કેટલાક સમયથી મારવાની ટેવ છે અને એના માલિકે એને કાબૂમાં રાખ્યો ન હોય, તો તેનું નુકસાન ભરપાઈ કરી આપવું. બળદને બદલે બળદ આપવો, અને એ મૃત પશુ પણ તેનું થાય.
Men, si se pa premye fwa bèf la ap bay koutkòn, si yo te pale mèt li men mèt li pa t' fè anyen pou sa, nan ka sa a, mèt bèf la gen pou peye. L'a bay yon bèf vivan pou bèf ki mouri a. Bèf mouri a menm va rete pou li.
Men, si li te deja rekonèt ke bèf la te gen abitid frennen, men mèt li pa t okipe sa, li va vrèman peye bèt pou bèt, e bèt mouri an va vin pou li.
Amma fa, in tun can, an san bijimin yana da wannan halin faɗa, duk da haka mai shi bai ɗaura shi ba, dole mai shi yă biya, dabba domin dabba, matacciyar dabbar kuwa tă zama nasa.
Aka, ina i ikeia ua o no ia bipi mamua, aole nae i hoopaa kona kahu ia ia, alaila, e oiaio no e uku aku no ia i bipi no ka bipi, a e lilo no ka bipi make nana.
או נודע כי שור נגח הוא מתמול שלשם ולא ישמרנו בעליו--שלם ישלם שור תחת השור והמת יהיה לו
אֹ֣ו נֹודַ֗ע כִּ֠י שֹׁ֣ור נַגָּ֥ח הוּא֙ מִתְּמֹ֣ול שִׁלְשֹׁ֔ם וְלֹ֥א יִשְׁמְרֶ֖נּוּ בְּעָלָ֑יו שַׁלֵּ֨ם יְשַׁלֵּ֥ם שֹׁור֙ תַּ֣חַת הַשֹּׁ֔ור וְהַמֵּ֖ת יִֽהְיֶה־לֹּֽו׃ ס
אוֹ נוֹדַע כִּי שׁוֹר נַגָּח הוּא מִתְּמוֹל שִׁלְשֹׁם וְלֹא יִשְׁמְרֶנּוּ בְּעָלָיו שַׁלֵּם יְשַׁלֵּם שׁוֹר תַּחַת הַשּׁוֹר וְהַמֵּת יִֽהְיֶה־לּֽוֹ׃
או נודע כי שור נגח הוא מתמול שלשם ולא ישמרנו בעליו שלם ישלם שור תחת השור והמת יהיה לו׃
אוֹ נוֹדַע כִּי שׁוֹר נַגָּח הוּא מִתְּמוֹל שִׁלְשֹׁם וְלֹא יִשְׁמְרֶנּוּ בְּעָלָיו שַׁלֵּם יְשַׁלֵּם שׁוֹר תַּחַת הַשּׁוֹר וְהַמֵּת יִֽהְיֶה־לּֽוֹ׃
א֣וֹ נוֹדַ֗ע כִּ֠י שׁ֣וֹר נַגָּ֥ח הוּא֙ מִתְּמ֣וֹל שִׁלְשֹׁ֔ם וְלֹ֥א יִשְׁמְרֶ֖נּוּ בְּעָלָ֑יו שַׁלֵּ֨ם יְשַׁלֵּ֥ם שׁוֹר֙ תַּ֣חַת הַשּׁ֔וֹר וְהַמֵּ֖ת יִֽהְיֶה־לּֽוֹ׃ ס
यदि यह प्रगट हो कि उस बैल की पहले से सींग मारने की आदत पड़ी थी, पर उसके स्वामी ने उसे बाँध नहीं रखा, तो निश्चय वह बैल के बदले बैल भर दे, पर लोथ उसी की ठहरे।
अथवा यदि वह बैल हमेशा ही सबको सींग मारता है और उसके मालिक ने उसे बांधकर नहीं रखा, तो निश्चय वह व्यक्ति बैल के बदले बैल ही दे. तब मृत बैल उसकी संपत्ति हो जाएगी.
Vagy ha tudták, hogy az ökör már azelőtt öklelős volt, és nem őrizte azt annak ura: fizessen ökröt az ökörért, a hulla pedig az övé legyen.
Ha ismeretes volt, hogy öklelős ökör az tegnapról tegnapelőttről és még sem őrzi gazdája, akkor fizessen ökröt ökörért, az elhullott pedig az övé legyen.
Ọ bụrụ na amaara na oke ehi ahụ na-asọ mpi mgbe niile nʼoge gara aga, ma onyenwe ya emeghị ihe ọbụla banyere ya, ọ ga-akwụzu ụgwọ ehi ahụ nwụrụ anwụ. Emesịa ehi ahụ nwụrụ anwụ ga-abụrụ nke ya.
Ngem no nalataken nga ugali ti baka ti mangsangdo iti napalabas a panawen, ken saan nga impupok ti akinkukua daytoy, rumbeng a bayadanna ti baka iti baka, ken kukuananto ti natay nga ayup.
Tetapi kalau sudah diketahui bahwa sapi jantan itu mempunyai kebiasaan menanduk, dan pemiliknya tidak menjaganya, ia harus menggantinya dengan sapi jantan yang masih hidup, dan boleh mengambil ternak yang sudah mati itu untuk dirinya."
Tetapi jikalau lembu itu terkenal telah sering menanduk sejak dahulu, dan walaupun demikian pemiliknya tidak mau menjaganya, maka ia harus membayar ganti kerugian sepenuhnya: lembu ganti lembu, tetapi binatang yang mati itu menjadi kepunyaannya."
Namun, jika sapi jantan itu memang terkenal sering menanduk dan pemiliknya tidak menjaganya dengan baik, maka pemilik sapi ganas itu harus mengganti sapi yang mati dengan uang atau sapi lain, sedangkan sapi yang mati itu menjadi miliknya.”
[Ma], se è notorio che quel bue per addietro fosse uso di cozzare, e il padrone di esso non l'ha guardato, restituisca egli del tutto bue per bue; ma il morto sia suo.
Ma se è notorio che il bue cozzava gia prima e il suo padrone non lo ha custodito, egli dovrà dare come indennizzo bue per bue e la bestia morta gli apparterrà.
Se poi è noto che quel bue era già da tempo uso cozzare, e il suo padrone non l’ha tenuto rinchiuso, questi dovrà pagare bue per bue, e la bestia morta sarà sua.
然どその牛素より衝ことをなす者なること知をるにその主これを守りおかざりしならばその人かならず牛をもて牛を償ふべし但しその死たる者は己の有となるべし
あるいはその牛が以前から突く癖のあることが知られているのに、その持ち主がこれを守りおかなかったならば、その人は必ずその牛のために牛をもって償わなければならない。しかし、その死んだ獣は彼のものとなるであろう。
Hianagi ko'ma pazive'anuti'ma ha'ma nehania bulimakao afumofo venafo'ma antahi'neno keginafima onte'nenigeno, rumofo bulimakao afu'ma ahefrisiana, anama frisia bulimakao afu'mofo venafo'na ete bulimakao afuteti nona huno miza senenteno fri'nesia bulimakao afura erigahie.
ಇಲ್ಲವೆ ಆ ಎತ್ತು ಮೊದಲಿನಿಂದಲೂ ಹಾಯುವಂಥದ್ದೇ ಎಂದು ತಿಳಿದಿದ್ದರೂ, ಅದರ ಯಜಮಾನನು ಅದನ್ನು ಕಟ್ಟಿಹಾಕದೆ ಹೋಗಿದ್ದರೆ, ಎತ್ತಿಗೆ ಎತ್ತನ್ನು ಖಂಡಿತವಾಗಿ ಬದಲುಕೊಡಬೇಕು. ಆದರೆ ಸತ್ತ ಪಶುವನ್ನು ಅವನು ತೆಗೆದುಕೊಳ್ಳಬಹುದು.
ಆದರೆ ಆ ಎತ್ತು ಮೊದಲಿನಿಂದಲೂ ಹಾಯುವಂಥದ್ದೇ ಎಂದು ಅದರ ಯಜಮಾನನಿಗೆ ತಿಳಿದಿದ್ದರೂ ಅದನ್ನು ಕಟ್ಟಿಹಾಕದೇ ಹೋದದ್ದರಿಂದ ಅವನು ಎತ್ತಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಯಾಗಿ ಎತ್ತನ್ನು ಖಂಡಿತವಾಗಿ ಬದಲು ಕೊಡಬೇಕು. ಆದರೆ ಸತ್ತ ಎತ್ತನ್ನು ತಾನೇ ತೆಗೆದುಕೊಳ್ಳಬಹುದು.
그 소가 본래 받는 버릇이 있는 줄을 알고도 그 임자가 단속하지 아니하였으면 그는 소로 소를 갚을 것이요 죽은 것은 그의 차지가 될지니라
그 소가 본래 받는 버릇이 있는 줄을 알고도 그 임자가 단속하지 아니하였으면 그는 소로 소를 갚을 것이요 죽은 것은 그의 차지가 될지니라
Tusruktu fin eteyuk lah cow mukul soko inge lungsena anwuk, ac mwet se natu ah tiana kalsalak, el enenu in sang soko cow mukul ma moul in akfalye nu sin mwet se natu cow soko ma misa ah.
ئەگەر زانراش کە گایەکە پێشتر قۆچوەشێن بووە و خاوەنەکەی لە پشتیرەکە بەندی نەکردووە، ئەوا خاوەن گا قۆچوەشێنەکە دەبێت گایەک لە جێی گایەک بدات و تەنها گایە مردارەوەبووەکەش وەربگرێت.
Sin autem sciebat quod bos cornupeta esset ab heri et nudiustertius, et non custodivit eum dominus suus: reddet bovem pro bove, et cadaver integrum accipiet.
Sin autem sciebat quod bos cornupeta esset ab heri et nudiustertius, et non custodivit eum dominus suus: reddet bovem pro bove, et cadaver integrum accipiet.
Sin autem sciebat quod bos cornupeta esset ab heri et nudiustertius, et non custodivit eum dominus suus: reddet bovem pro bove, et cadaver integrum accipiet.
Sin autem sciebat quod bos cornupeta esset ab heri et nudiustertius, et non custodivit eum dominus suus: reddet bovem pro bove, et cadaver integrum accipiet.
sin autem sciebat quod bos cornipeta esset ab heri et nudius tertius et non custodivit eum dominus suus reddet bovem pro bove et cadaver integrum accipiet
Sin autem sciebat quod bos cornupeta esset ab heri et nudiustertius, et non custodivit eum dominus suus: reddet bovem pro bove, et cadaver integrum accipiet.
Bet ja tas bijis zināms, ka tas vērsis papriekš bijis badīgs, un viņa kungs to nav sargājis, tad lai vērsi pret vērsi atdod, bet to maitu lai patur.
Kasi soki eyebani ete ngombe yango emesana kobeta bato maseke, bongo nkolo na yango abateli yango malamu te; wana asengeli kofuta ngombe mpo na ngombe, mpe ngombe ya kokufa ekokoma ya ye.
Oba singa seddume eyo ng’emanyiddwa nga ntomezitomezi, naye nannyini yo nga tagiggalira mu lugo lwayo, ateekwa asasule seddume olwa seddume, yo enfu eneebanga yiye.
Kanefa raha fantatra fa omby zatra nanoto hatramin’ ny teo aloha iny, koa tsy niaro azy ny tompony, dia hanonitra omby ho solon’ ny omby tokoa izy; ary ny maty dia ho azy.
Fe naho nifohiñe te lili’ i añombey ty mandronje, fe tsy kinala’ i tompo’ey am-pahetse, le havaha’ i tompo’ey añombe i añombey vaho aze i matey.
അല്ലെങ്കിൽ ആ കാളയ്ക്ക് കുത്തുന്ന ശീലം ഉണ്ടെന്ന് അറിഞ്ഞിട്ടും ഉടമസ്ഥൻ അതിനെ സൂക്ഷിക്കാതിരുന്നു എങ്കിൽ അവൻ കാളയ്ക്കു പകരം കാളയെ കൊടുക്കണം; എന്നാൽ ചത്തുപോയതു അവനുള്ളതായിരിക്കണം.
അല്ലെങ്കിൽ ആ കാള മുമ്പെ തന്നേ കുത്തുന്നതു എന്നു അറിഞ്ഞിട്ടും ഉടമസ്ഥൻ അതിനെ സൂക്ഷിക്കാതിരുന്നു എങ്കിൽ അവൻ കാളെക്കു പകരം കാളയെ കൊടുക്കേണം; എന്നാൽ ചത്തുപോയതു അവന്നുള്ളതായിരിക്കേണം.
എന്നാൽ, ആ കാള കുത്തുന്ന ശീലം ഉള്ളതാണെന്ന് അറിഞ്ഞിട്ടും മൃഗത്തിന്റെ ഉടമ അതിനെ സൂക്ഷിക്കാതിരുന്നതാണെങ്കിൽ അയാൾ ചത്തമൃഗത്തെ എടുത്തുകൊണ്ട്; മൃഗത്തിനുപകരം മൃഗത്തെ കൊടുക്കണം.
परंतु तो बैल पूर्वीपासून मारका आहे हे ठाऊक असून मालकाने त्यास बांधून ठेवले नाही, तर त्याने बैलाबद्दल बैल द्यावा व मरण पावलेला बैल त्याचा व्हावा.
သို့​ရာ​တွင်​နွား​ပိုင်​ရှင်​က​မိ​မိ​၏​နွား​သည်​ဝှေ့ တတ်​ကြောင်း​ကို​သိ​လျက်​နှင့် ချည်​နှောင်​၍​မ ထား​ခဲ့​လျှင်​နွား​သေ​အ​တွက်​နွား​တစ်​ကောင် ကို​အ​စား​လျော်​၍​နွား​သေ​ကို​ပိုင်​စေ။
၎င်းနည်းနွားသည် အထက်က ခွေ့ဘူးကြောင်းကို၊ နွားရှင်သိလျက်နှင့် မချည်မနှောင် အလွတ် ထားလျှင်၊ နွားသေကောင်ကို ကိုယ်တိုင်ယူရမည်။ ထိုနွားတကောင်အတွက် တကောင်ကို အမှန်လျော်ရမည်။
၎င်း နည်းနွားသည် အထက် က ခွေ့ ဘူးကြောင်းကို ၊ နွား ရှင် သိ လျက်နှင့် မ ချည် မနှောင် အလွတ် ထားလျှင်၊ နွားသေ ကောင်ကို ကိုယ်တိုင် ယူ ရမည်။ ထိုနွား တကောင်အတွက် တ ကောင်ကို အမှန်လျော် ရမည်။
Otiia ki te mea i mohiotia he kau wero ia no mua, a kahore i tiakina e tona ariki, me utu e ia te kau ki te kau; a mana te mea mate.
Kodwa nxa kusaziwa ukuthi inkunzi ivele ilomkhuba wokuhlaba ezinye, kodwa umnikazi engayivaleli esibayeni, umnikazi kumele ahlawule isifuyo ngesinye isifuyo, njalo isifuyo esifileyo sizakuba ngesakhe.”
Kumbe uba kusaziwa ukuthi inkabi ibijwayele ukuhlaba mandulo, kodwa umniniyo engayilondolozanga, uzabhadala lokubhadala inkabi ngenkabi, kodwa efileyo izakuba ngeyakhe.
तर त्यस गोरुको विगतमा पनि हान्‍ने बानी रहेछ र त्यसको मालिकले त्यसलाई बाँधेर राखेको रहेनछ भनी थाहा हुन आयो उसले गोरुको सट्टा गोरु तिर्नुपर्छ अनि मरेको पशु त्यसको मालिकको हुनेछ ।
Men er det vitterlig at det er en okse som før har pleid å stange, og dens eier ikke passer på den, da skal han gi en annen okse isteden, men det døde dyr skal være hans.
Men er det kunnigt at uksen var olm, og eigaren ikkje hev agta honom, so skal han gjeva ein ukse i staden, og sjølv hava den daude.
ମାତ୍ର ଗୋରୁ ପୂର୍ବେ ବିନ୍ଧୁଥିବାର ଜାଣି ଯଦି ତାʼର ସ୍ୱାମୀ ତାକୁ ସାବଧାନରେ ରଖି ନ ଥାଏ, ତେବେ ସେ ଗୋରୁ ପରିଶୋଧରେ ଗୋରୁ ଅବଶ୍ୟ ଦେବ, ମାତ୍ର ମୃତ ଗୋରୁ ତାହାର ନିଜର ହେବ।
Yoo qotiyyoon sun durumaanuu amala horii waraanuu qabaachuun isaa beekamee garuu waan abbaan isaa isa eeggachuu dideef abbaan qotiyyoo sanaa qooda qotiyyoo, qotiyyoo haa baasu; qotiyyoon duʼe sun immoo kan isaa haa taʼu.
ਅਥਵਾ ਜੇ ਇਹ ਜਾਣਿਆ ਗਿਆ ਕਿ ਉਹ ਪਿੱਛੇ ਵੀ ਮਾਰ-ਕਾਟ ਹੁੰਦਾ ਦੀ ਪਰ ਉਸ ਦੇ ਮਾਲਕ ਨੇ ਉਸ ਨੂੰ ਨਹੀਂ ਸਾਂਭਿਆ ਤਾਂ ਉਹ ਜ਼ਰੂਰ ਘਾਟਾ ਭਰੇ ਅਤੇ ਬਲ਼ਦ ਦੇ ਵੱਟੇ ਬਲ਼ਦ ਦੇਵੇ ਅਤੇ ਉਹ ਲੋਥ ਉਹ ਦੀ ਹੋਵੇਗੀ।
اما اگر معلوم بوده باشد که آن گاو قبل از آن شاخ زن می‌بود، وصاحبش آن را نگاه نداشت، البته گاو به عوض گاو بدهد و میته از آن او باشد.
ولی اگر گاوی که زنده مانده، سابقهٔ شاخ زنی داشته و صاحبش آن را نبسته باشد، باید گاو زنده‌ای به عوض گاو کشته بدهد و گاو کشته شده را برای خود بردارد.
Ale jeźliby to było wiadomo, że on wół bódł przedtem, a nie miał go pod strażą pan jego, koniecznie odda wołu za wołu, a zdechłego sobie weźmie.
Ale jeśli było wiadomo, że ten wół bódł przedtem, a jego właściciel nie pilnował go, musi oddać wołu za wołu, a zdechłe [zwierzę] będzie należeć do niego.
Mas se era notório que o boi era chifrador desde o passado, e seu dono não o houver guardado, pagará boi por boi, e o morto será seu.
Mas se foi notorio que aquelle boi d'antes era escorneador, e seu dono não o guardou, certamente pagará boi por boi; porém o morto será seu
Mas se foi notório que aquele boi de antes era escorneador, e seu dono não o guardou, certamente pagará boi por boi; porém o morto será seu
Ou se for sabido que o touro tinha o hábito de chifrar no passado, e seu dono não o manteve dentro, ele certamente pagará touro por touro, e o animal morto será seu próprio animal.
Дар, дакэ се штия кэ боул авя обичей май ынаинте сэ ымпунгэ, ши стэпынул луй ну л-а ынкис, стэпынул ачеста сэ дя боу пентру боу, яр боул чел морт сэ-л я ел.
а если известно было, что вол бодлив был и вчера и третьего дня, но хозяин его быв извещен о сем не стерег его, то должен он заплатить вола за вола, а убитый будет его.
Ако ли се знало да је во пре био бодач па га није чувао господар његов, да да вола за вола, а убијени нека буде њему.
Ako li se znalo da je vo prije bio bodaè pa ga nije èuvao gospodar njegov, da da vola za vola, a ubijeni neka bude njemu.
Kunyange zvakadaro, kana zvakanga zvichizivikanwa kuti hando iyi yagara ine tsika yokutunga, asi muridzi akasaipfigira mudanga, muridzi anofanira kuripa chipfuwo nechipfuwo, uye chipfuwo chafa chichava chake.
аще же знаемь есть вол, яко бодлив есть прежде вчерашняго и третияго дне, и глаголаша господину его, и той не заключит его: да отдаст вола за вола, мертвый же ему да будет.
Ali če je bilo znano, da je imel vol navado v preteklem času bosti, pa ga njegov lastnik ni imel zaprtega, naj zagotovo plača vola za vola, mrtvi pa naj bo njegov.
Ama haddii dibiga lagu yiqiin inuu markii hore wax geeso ku mudi jiray, oo uusan qofkii lahaa xidhin, markaas hubaal waa inuu dibi dibi ku bixiyaa, oo neefka dhintayna waa inuu isagu lahaado.
Mas si era notorio que el buey era acorneador de ayer y antes de ayer, y su dueño no lo hubiere guardado, pagará buey por buey, y el muerto será suyo.
Pero si se sabe que el buey ha herido repetidamente a personas con sus cuernos, y su dueño ha sido advertido pero aún no lo tiene bajo control, debe pagar una compensación completa, buey por buey; pero el dueño puede quedarse con el animal muerto”.
O si se sabe que el toro tenía la costumbre de corneado en el pasado, y su dueño no lo ha guardado, pagará ciertamente toro por toro, y el animal muerto será suyo.
Pero si era notorio que el buey era corneador desde antes, y su dueño no lo encerró, pagará buey por buey, y el buey muerto será suyo.
Mas si era notorio que el buey era acorneador de ayer y anteayer, y su dueño no lo hubiere guardado, pagará buey por buey, y el muerto será suyo.
Mas si era notorio que el buey era acorneador de ayer y antes de ayer, y su dueño no lo hubiere guardado, pagará buey por buey, y el muerto será suyo.
Pero si es sabido que el buey frecuentemente ha hecho tal daño en el pasado, y su dueño no lo ha mantenido bajo control, tendrá que dar buey por buey; y la bestia muerta será suya.
Mas si era notorio que el buey acorneaba desde tiempo atrás y su dueño faltó en custodiarlo, este resarcirá el daño: buey por buey; mas el (buey) muerto será suyo.
Lakini kama ilijulikana kama ng'ombe alikuwa na tabia ya kupiga hapo awali, na mmiliki wake hakumfunga ndani, hakika lazima alipe ng'ombe kwa ng'ombe, na mnyama aliye kufa atakuwa wake.
Hata hivyo, kama ikifahamika kwamba fahali huyo alikuwa na tabia ya kupiga kwa pembe na mwenyewe hakumfunga, ni lazima mwenye fahali alipe mnyama kwa mnyama, na mnyama aliyekufa atakuwa wake.
Var det däremot känt att oxen förut hade vanan att stångas, men tog hans ägare ändå icke vara på honom, så skall han ersätta oxe med oxe, men den döda kroppen skall vara hans.
Var det vetterligit, att oxen var tillförene van att stångas, och hans herre icke bevarade honom; då skall han gifva en oxa för den andra, och behålla kroppen.
Var det däremot känt att oxen förut hade vanan att stångas, men tog hans ägare ändå icke vara på honom, så skall han ersätta oxe med oxe, men den döda kroppen skall vara hans.
O kung kilala, na ang baka ay dating manunuwag sa panahong nakaraan, at hindi kinulong ng may-ari; ay tunay ngang magbabayad siya, ng baka kung baka, at ang patay na hayop ay magiging kaniyang sarili.
Pero kung nalaman na ang baka ay may ugaling nanunuwag sa nakaraan, at hindi ito kinulong ng may-ari, dapat siguraduhin siyang magbayad ng baka para sa baka at ang namatay na hayop ay magiging kaniyang pag-aari.
அந்த மாடு முன்பே முட்டுகிற மாடென்று அதின் எஜமான் அறிந்தும், அதைக் கட்டிவைக்காமல் இருந்தால், அவன் மாட்டுக்கு மாட்டைக் கொடுக்கவேண்டும்; செத்ததோ அவனுடையதாக வேண்டும்.
ஆனாலும் அது வழக்கமாக முட்டுகிற எருது என்று உரிமையாளன் அறிந்திருந்தும் அதைக் கட்டிவைக்காதிருந்ததால், உரிமையாளன் எருதுக்கு எருது கொடுக்கவேண்டும். செத்தப்போன எருதோ தண்டம் செலுத்தியவனுக்குரியதாகும்.
అయితే ఆ ఎద్దు ఇతరులను పొడుస్తుంది అని ఇంతకు ముందు దాని యజమానికి తెలిసి కూడా అతడు దాన్ని అదుపు చేయకపోతే వాడు తప్పకుండా ఎద్దుకు బదులు ఎద్దును ఇవ్వాలి, చనిపోయిన ఎద్దు అతనిది అవుతుంది.
Pea kapau ʻe ʻilo, naʻe faʻa tui ʻe he pulu ʻi muʻa, pea naʻe ʻikai noʻotaki ia ʻe heʻene ʻeiki; ko e moʻoni te ne totongi ʻae pulu ʻaki ʻae pulu; pea ʻe ʻaʻana ʻae pulu mate.
Eğer boğanın saldırgan olduğu ve sahibinin ona sahip çıkmadığı biliniyorsa, boğaya karşılık boğa verecek ve ölü hayvan kendisine kalacaktır.”
Na sɛ aboa no taa sisi na ne wura no abu nʼani agu so de a, ɛno de, sikakyɛ biara remma; na mmom, ɔbarima a ne nantwi wɔ hɔ no betua nantwi a wawu no ho ka nyinaa na wafa no.
Na sɛ aboa no pempem dada na sɛ ne wura no abu nʼani agu so deɛ a, ɛnneɛ, sika mu kyɛ biara remma; na mmom, ɔbarima a ne nantwie wɔ hɔ no bɛtua nantwie a wawu no ho ka nyinaa na wafa no.
А коли буде відо́ме, що віл був битли́вим і вчо́ра й третього дня, а власник його не пильнував його, то конче нехай відшкоду́є вола за того вола, а забитий буде йому.
और अगर मा'लूम हो जाए कि उस बैल की पहले से सींग मारने की 'आदत थी और उसके मालिक ने उसे बाँध कर नहीं रख्खा, तो उसे क़तई' बैल के बदले बैल देना होगा और वह मरा हुआ जानवर उसका होगा।
لېكىن كالىنىڭ ئىلگىرىدىن ئۈسىدىغان ئادىتى بارلىقى ئېنىق تۇرۇپ، ئىگىسى ئۇنى باغلىماي قويۇۋەتكەن بولسا، ئۇنداقتا ئۈسكۈچى كالىنىڭ ئىگىسى كالىغا كالا تۆلەپ بەرسۇن، ئۆلۈك كالا ئۇنىڭ بولسۇن.
Лекин калиниң илгиридин үсидиған адити барлиғи ениқ туруп, егиси уни бағлимай қоювәткән болса, ундақта үскүчи калиниң егиси калиға кала төләп бәрсун, өлүк кала униң болсун.
Lékin kalining ilgiridin üsidighan aditi barliqi éniq turup, igisi uni baghlimay qoyuwetken bolsa, undaqta üsküchi kalining igisi kaligha kala tölep bersun, ölük kala uning bolsun.
Lekin kalining ilgiridin üsidiƣan aditi barliⱪi eniⱪ turup, igisi uni baƣlimay ⱪoyuwǝtkǝn bolsa, undaⱪta üsküqi kalining igisi kaliƣa kala tɵlǝp bǝrsun, ɵlük kala uning bolsun.
Nếu người chủ đã tỏ tường trước rằng bò mình có tật hay báng, mà không lo cầm giữ, chủ phải lấy bò thường bò, nhưng bò chết sẽ về phần người.
Nếu người chủ đã tỏ tường trước rằng bò mình có tật hay báng, mà không lo cầm giữ, chủ phải lấy bò thường bò, nhưng bò chết sẽ về phần người.
Nhưng nếu ai đã biết bò mình có tật hay húc mà vẫn không nhốt nó lại, thì người này phải đem bò đền bò, và được giữ con bò chết.”
Ṣùgbọ́n tí ó bá ti di ìgbà gbogbo tí akọ màlúù náà máa ń kan òmíràn, tí olówó rẹ̀ kò sì mú un so, olówó rẹ̀ yóò san ẹran dípò ẹran. Ẹran tí ó kú yóò sì jẹ́ tirẹ̀.
Verse Count = 212

< Exodus 21:36 >