2-Corinthians 10:10
For, “His letters”, they say, “are weighty and strong, but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech is despised.”
Sepse dikush thotë: “Letrat e tij janë të ashpra dhe të fuqishme, kurse paraqitja e tij trupore është e dobët, dhe fjala e tij ka pak peshë”.
Bara amung din belun ''iyert me din ziu nin likr, bara na iyarnu adi nin nagan ba uliru na me lien ulazu ba “
| لِأَنَّهُ يَقُولُ: «ٱلرَّسَائِلُ ثَقِيلَةٌ وَقَوِيَّةٌ، وَأَمَّا حُضُورُ ٱلْجَسَدِ فَضَعِيفٌ، وَٱلْكَلَامُ حَقِيرٌ». |
| فَمِنْكُمْ مَنْ يَقُولُ: «رَسَائِلُهُ شَدِيدَةُ اللَّهْجَةِ وَقَوِيَّةٌ؛ أَمَّا حُضُورُهُ الشَّخْصِيُّ فَضَعِيفٌ، وَكَلاَمُهُ مُحْتَقَرٌ». |
| ܡܛܠ ܕܐܝܬ ܐܢܫܐ ܕܐܡܪܝܢ ܕܐܓܪܬܐ ܝܩܝܪܢ ܘܚܤܝܢܢ ܡܐܬܝܗ ܕܝܢ ܕܓܘܫܡܐ ܟܪܝܗ ܘܡܠܬܗ ܫܝܛܐ |
քանի որ կ՚ըսեն. «Անոր նամակները ծանր ու հզօր են, բայց անոր մարմնական ներկայութիւնը տկար է, եւ իր խօսքը՝ անարգ»:
কিয়নো কিছুমান ব্যক্তিয়ে কয়, “তেখেতৰ পত্ৰবোৰ গুৰুত্ৱপূর্ণ আৰু শক্তিযুক্ত, কিন্তু শাৰীৰিকভাৱে তেখেত দূৰ্বল আৰু তেখেতৰ বাক্য শুনা অযোগ্য৷”
Mənim barəmdə deyirlər ki, «onun məktubları ciddi və təsirlidir, özünü görəndə isə zəhmsiz, nitqi də heçdir».
Ka-ngem nob yiti ki, bifumer chero kibikwan kange neeka taiyek, di mo too chori mwini man kibi kwan, ker chero kebo na nuwaka che.
Ecen epistolác (dioite) graue dirade eta borthitz, baina gorputzaren presentiá flaccu, eta hitza gaichto.
Dunu afae da amane sia: mu, “Bolo da gasa bagade amola ougi bagade, meloa dedene iasisa. Be e da ninima doaga: sea, e da gasa hame ba: sa amola ea sia: da hamedei agoane ba: sa.”
কিছু লোক বলে, “পৌলের চিঠিগুলো গুরুত্বপূর্ণ এবং শক্তিশালী, কিন্তু শরীরের দিক থেকে তিনি দুর্বল এবং তাঁর কথা শোনার উপযুক্ত নয়।”
কারণ কেউ কেউ বলে, “তাঁর পত্রগুলি তো গুরুভার ও শক্তিশালী, কিন্তু উপস্থিত ব্যক্তি হিসেবে তিনি প্রভাবহীন ও তাঁর কথাবার্তাও গুরুত্বহীন।”
किजोकि किछ लोक ज़ोतन, “कि तैसेरी चिट्ठी त ज़रूरिन ते अस्सर केरने बैलिन; पन ज़ैखन हेरतन, त तै कमज़ोर मैन्हु आए, ते तैसेरां भाषाना बेकारन।”
क्योंकि तुहांजो चे कुछ लोक बोलदे न, “पौलुसे दियां चिठियां गंभीर कने प्रभावशाली न; पर जालू दिखदे न, तां बोलदे न सै कमजोर माणु है कने उदियां गल्लां बेकार न।”
କାୟ୍ତାକ୍ବଃଲେକ୍ ସେମଃନ୍ କଃଉତି, “ପାଉଲାର୍ ଚିଟିସଃବୁ ବଃଡେ ହିତା ଆର୍ ସଃକାତ୍, ମଃତର୍ ମୁଏଁ ତାର୍ ଗଃଗାଳ୍ ଦୁର୍ବୁଳ୍ ଆର୍ ତାର୍ କଃତା ହଲ୍ୟା ।”
Ik ikuwots «P'awlos woshwots mangtswotsnat kup'knee, bí b́tookon noonton b́wotormó maawke, b́ noon keew keewonwere k'awntsalke» etiirunee.
Indi bari batre, “Vuvu ma wa ha bahei ni sesre, U ta to a kumama. Lan tere na wa u yo sur wu wo ba na”
Понеже, казват някои, посланията му са строги и силни, но личното му присъствие е слабо и говоренето нищожно.
Kay ang pipila ka mga tawo misulti, “Ang iyang mga sulat tinuod ug gamhanan, apan huyang siya sa lawasnon. Ang iyang mga pulong dili angay paminawon.”
Kay sila magakanayon, "Ang iyang mga sulat maisugon ug makagagahum, apan mahuyang ang iyang pagkatawo, ug dili matagad ang iyang panulti."
ᏕᎪᏪᎵᏍᎬᏰᏃ ᏗᎦᎨᏗᏳ ᎠᎴ ᏧᎵᏂᎩᏗᏳ, ᎤᏙᎯᏳ, ᎠᎾᏗᎭ; ᎠᏰᎸᏍᎩᏂ ᏲᏪᎳᏗᏙᎭ ᎠᏩᎾᎦᎳᎯᏳ, ᎦᏬᏂᏍᎬᏃ ᎬᏕᎰᏙᏗᏉ.
Pakuti ena amati, “Makalata ake ndi awukali ndi amphamvu koma maonekedwe a thupi lake ndi wosagwira mtima ndipo mayankhulidwe ake ndi achabechabe.”
Uyaw naw, “Pawluha cayuk he yüh u lü kyanki he, amät mi hlawnga a awm üng a ktha am kyan lü a ngthu pyen pi amdang ni,” tiki.
Nihcae mah, Pawl ih capatnawk loe hmuen kazit ah oh moe, thacak; toe a takpum loe thacak ai kami ah oh, a thuih ih lok loe avanghaih tidoeh om ai, tiah thuih o.
Capat long tah a rhih kahlak la rhaprhap a thui. Tedae pumsa kah a lonah tah tattloel la om tih a olka tah a hnaelcoe pah.
Capat long tah a rhih kahlak la rhaprhap a thui. Tedae pumsa kah a lonah tah tattloel la om tih a olka tah a hnaelcoe pah.
Thlang pynoet ing, Anih a capatkhqi kqih nawh ak tha awm hlai hy, ak thlang pum ingtaw thlang awm am noeng nawh ak awih kqawnkhqi awm kawna am awm hy,” ti uhy.
Banghangziam cile amate in, a laithak sia ngit a, vang nei hi; ahihang a pumpi sia eite kung a om ciang in thaneam hi, taciang a kampau te zong mannung ngawl hi, ci uh hi.
Ajeh iham itileh mi phabep in, “Paul lekhathot hohi thugil tah ahin chule thanei tah ahi, hinla ama hi thalhom ahi chule athusei hojong pannabei ahi bouve,” atiuve.
Bangkongtetpawiteh, Pawl e canaw teh ari teh bahu a tawn ei, ama kâhmo awh toteh a tha kayoun e hoi a pâpho e hai banghai bari hane kawi awmhoeh ka tet e tami na o awh.
因为有人说：“他的信又沉重又厉害，及至见面，却是气貌不扬，言语粗俗的。”
因為有人說：「他的信又沉重又厲害，及至見面，卻是氣貌不揚，言語粗俗的。」
有人说：“他的信严厉又强硬，但他本人却其貌不扬，不善言辞。”
因為有人說：「他的書信的確嚴厲而又強硬，但他本人在時卻軟弱無能，言語又空洞可輕。」
Pakuŵa ŵandu ŵane akuti, “Ikalata i che Paolo ili yachikali yaili ni maloŵe gakutopela, nambo nsyene jo pakuŵaga noweji akuŵa mundu jwakulepetala, ni pakukunguluka, maloŵe gao gakuŵa gangali chindu.”
ϫⲉ ⲛⲓⲉⲡⲓⲥⲧⲟⲗⲏ ⲙⲉⲛ ⲡⲉϫⲁϥ ⲥⲉϩⲟⲣϣ ⲟⲩⲟϩ ⲥⲉϫⲟⲣ ϯⲡⲁⲣⲟⲩⲥⲓⲁ ⲇⲉ ⳿ⲛⲧⲉ ⲡⲓⲥⲱⲙⲁ ⲟⲩⲁⲥⲑⲉⲛⲏⲥ ⲧⲉ ⲟⲩⲟϩ ⲡⲓⲥⲁϫⲓ ϣⲏϣ.
ϫⲉ ⲛⲉⲡⲓⲥⲧⲟⲗⲏ ⲙⲉⲛ ⲡⲉϫⲁϥ ϩⲟⲣϣ ⲁⲩⲱ ⲥⲉϭⲙϭⲟⲙ ⲧⲡⲁⲣϩⲟⲩⲥⲓⲁ ⲇⲉ ⲙⲡⲉϥⲥⲱⲙⲁ ϭⲟⲟⲃ ⲁⲩⲱ ⲡⲉϥϣⲁϫⲉ ⲥⲟϣϥ
ϫⲉ ⲛⲉⲡⲓⲥⲧⲟⲗⲏ ⲙⲉⲛ ⲡⲉϫⲁϥ ϩⲟⲣϣ̅. ⲁⲩⲱ ⲥⲉϭⲙ̅ϭⲟⲙ. ⲧⲡⲁⲣϩⲟⲩⲥⲓⲁ ⲇⲉ ⲙ̅ⲡⲉϥⲥⲱⲙⲁ ϭⲟⲟⲃ. ⲁⲩⲱ ⲡⲉϥϣⲁϫⲉ ⲥⲟϣϥ̅.
ϪⲈ ⲚⲒⲈⲠⲒⲤⲦⲞⲖⲎ ⲘⲈⲚ ⲤⲈϨⲞⲢϢ ⲞⲨⲞϨ ⲤⲈϪⲞⲢ ϮⲠⲀⲢⲞⲨⲤⲒⲀ ⲆⲈ ⲚⲦⲈⲠⲒⲤⲰⲘⲀ ⲞⲨⲀⲤⲐⲈⲚⲎ ⲤⲦⲈ ⲞⲨⲞϨ ⲠⲒⲤⲀϪⲒ ϢⲎϢ.
Jer “poslanice su, kaže, stroge i snažne, ali tjelesna nazočnost nemoćna i riječ bezvrijedna”.
Nebo listové prý jsou těžcí a mocní, ale přítomnost osobná jest mdlá, a řeč chaterná.
Nebo listové jeho (dí někdo) jsou těžcí a mocní, ale přítomnost osobná jest mdlá, a řeč chaterná.
„Nevšímejte si jeho dopisů, “říkají někteří, „je to jen plané vyhrožování. Až přijde, poznáte sami, že není proč se ho bát. Slabšího kazatele jste ještě neslyšeli.“
thi Brevene, siger man, ere vægtige og stærke, men hans legemlige Nærværelse er svag, og hans Tale intet værd.
thi Brevene, siger man, ere vægtige og stærke, men hans legemlige Nærværelse er svag, og hans Tale intet værd.
thi Brevene, siger man, ere vægtige og stærke, men hans legemlige Nærværelse er svag, og hans Tale intet værd.
ମାତର୍ ତମ୍କେ ଲେକ୍ଲାବେଲେ ଦମ୍କାଇ କରି ଲେକ୍ଲିନି ବଲି କେତେଲକ୍ କଇଲାଇନି । ମାତର୍ ତମର୍ ସଙ୍ଗ୍ ରଇଲାବେଲେ ମୁଇ ଦୁର୍ବଲ୍ ଅଇକରି ମର୍ କଇଲା ପଦ୍ କାଇ ମୁଲିଅ ନାଇ ପାରା ରଇଲା ।
Nikech jomoko kuomu wacho niya, “Barupene nigi teko kendo wuoyo mager, to ka en kodwa to onenore ngʼama yomyom, kendo koyalo to wechene onge gi teko.”
Nkaambo bamwi bantu, “Magwalo akwe alisungwete a changuzu, pele bube bwamubili mbuteteete. Majwi akwe tayeeleli kwaaswilila.”
Want de brieven (zeggen zij) zijn wel gewichtig en krachtig; maar de tegenwoordigheid des lichaams is zwak, en de rede is verachtelijk.
Want, zo heet het: de brieven zijn gewichtig en krachtig, maar zijn persoonlijk optreden is zwak, zijn spreken onbeduidend.
Want de brieven (zeggen zij) zijn wel gewichtig en krachtig; maar de tegenwoordigheid des lichaams is zwak, en de rede is verachtelijk.
Because, The letters, he says, are indeed weighty and powerful, but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech is disdained.
For, “His letters”, they say, “are weighty and strong, but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech is despised.”
For, His letters, they say, are weighty and strong; but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech of no account.
For his letters, says one, are weighty and powerful, but his bodily presence is weak, and his style of speech contemptible.
For some say, “His letters are weighty and forceful, but his physical presence is unimpressive, and his speaking is of no account.”
For his letters, they say, have weight and are strong; but in body he is feeble, and his way of talking has little force.
For, “His letters,” they say, “are weighty and strong, but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech amounts to nothing.”
For they say: “His epistles, indeed, are weighty and strong. But his bodily presence is weak, and his speech is contemptible.”
because his letters, he says, [are] weighty and strong, but his presence in the body weak, and his speech naught.
(For his epistles indeed, say they, are weighty and strong; but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech contemptible, )
Because some say, “His letters are ‘heavy’ and forceful, but his physical presence is weak, and his speech can be disdained.”
People say, “His letters are tough and severe, but in person he's feeble, and he's a useless speaker.”
For the letters, sayeth hee, are sore and strong, but his bodily presence is weake, and his speache is of no value.
Because they say, His letters are indeed weighty and powerful; but the presence of his body is weak, and his speech contemptible.
For his letters indeed, say they, are weighty and forcible, but his bodily presence is feeble, and his speech contemptible.
for his letters, say they, are weighty and powerful, but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech contemptible.
For [his] letters, say they, [are] weighty and powerful; but [his] bodily presence [is] weak, and [his] speech contemptible.
For his letters, say they, are weighty and powerful; but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech contemptible.
For his letters, say they, are weighty and powerful; but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech contemptible.
For his letters, say they, are weighty and powerful; but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech contemptible.
For his letters, say they, are weighty and powerful; but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech contemptible.
For his letters, say they, are weighty and powerful; but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech (logos) contemptible.
“because the letters indeed,” says one, “[are] weighty and strong, and the bodily presence weak, and the speech despicable.”
"His letters indeed," says one, "are mighty and forcible, but his personality is weak, and his speech contemptible."
For, "His letters," they say, "are weighty and strong, but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech is despised."
For, "His letters," they say, "are weighty and strong, but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech is despised."
For, "His letters," they say, "are weighty and strong, but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech is despised."
For, "His letters," they say, "are weighty and strong, but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech is despised."
For, "His letters," they say, "are weighty and strong, but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech is despised."
For, "His letters," they say, "are weighty and strong, but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech is despised."
For his letters, saith one, are weighty and strong; but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech contemptible.
For people say ‘His letters are impressive and vigorous, but his personal appearance is insignificant and his speaking contemptible.’
For people say “His letters are impressive and vigorous, but his personal appearance is insignificant and his speaking contemptible.”
For, His letters, they say, are weighty and strong; but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech of no account.
Because, The letters, it is true (saith one), are weighty and strong, but, the presence of the body, is weak, and, the discourse, contemptible; —
For the letters indeed they say [are] weighty and strong, however the presence of the body weak and the speech ignored.
that/since: since the/this/who epistle on the other hand to assert weighty and strong the/this/who then coming the/this/who body weak and the/this/who word to reject
For there are men who say, His epistles are weighty and forcible; but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech contemptible.
For there are some who say, His epistles are weighty and forcible, but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech contemptible.
[I say that] because some people are saying, “[When Paul writes] letters, he says severe things [in order to make you obey him], but when he is here with you, [people look at him and say] he is weak, and he certainly is not a skillful speaker.”
For people say “His letters are impressive and vigorous, but his personal appearance is insignificant and his speaking contemptible.”
For some people say, “His letters are serious and powerful, but physically he is weak. His words are not worth listening to.”
For [his] letters (say they) [are] weighty and powerful; but [his] bodily presence [is] weak, and [his] speech contemptible.
For his letters, say they, are weighty and powerful; but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech contemptible.
For they say "His letters are authoritative and forcible, but his personal presence is unimpressive, and as for eloquence, he has none."
For, “His letters”, they say, “are weighty and strong, but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech is despised.”
For, “His letters”, they say, “are weighty and strong, but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech is despised.”
For, “His letters”, they say, “are weighty and strong, but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech is despised.”
For, “His letters”, they say, “are weighty and strong, but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech is despised.”
For, “His letters”, they say, “are weighty and strong, but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech is despised.”
For, “His letters”, they say, “are weighty and strong, but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech is despised.”
for thei seien, That epistlis ben greuouse and stronge, but the presence of the bodi is feble, and the word worthi to be dispisid.
'because the letters indeed — saith one — [are] weighty and strong, and the bodily presence weak, and the speech despicable.'
Ĉar, oni diras, liaj leteroj estas gravaj kaj fortaj; sed lia korpa aspekto estas malforta, kaj lia parolo malŝatinda.
Mia dometɔ aɖewo gblɔ be, “Ne ele adzɔge la, eyae wòŋlɔa agbalẽ nɔa ŋɔdzi kple vɔvɔ̃ dom na ame, gake ne eya ŋutɔ va la, megatea ŋu gblɔa nya mawo dometɔ aɖeke o, ke boŋ eƒoa nu abe ɖevi ene.”
Sillä lähetyskirjat (sanovat he) ovat raskaat ja väkevät, mutta ruumiillinen läsnäolemus on heikko ja puhe on ylönkatsottu.
Sillä hänen kirjeensä ovat, sanotaan, kyllä mahtavat ja pontevat, mutta ruumiillisesti läsnäollessaan hän on heikko, eikä hänen puheensa ole minkään arvoista.
— want de brieven, zeggen zij, zijn wel krachtig en gewichtig, maar de tegenwoordigheid des lichaams is zwak en het woord is verachtelijk
Car " ses lettres, dit-on, sont sévères et fortes; mais, quand il est présent, c'est un homme faible et sa parole est méprisable. " —
Car, disent-ils, « ses lettres ont du poids et de la force, mais sa présence corporelle est faible, et sa parole est méprisée ».
Car ses lettres, dit-on, sont graves et fortes, mais sa présence personnelle est faible et sa parole méprisable.
Car mes Lettres (disent-ils) sont bien graves et fortes, mais la présence du corps est faible, et la parole est méprisable.
Parce que, dit-on, ces lettres sont graves et fortes; mais, quand il est présent, il paraît chétif de corps et vulgaire de langage:
Car, dit-on, ses lettres sont sévères et fortes; mais, présent en personne, il est faible, et sa parole est méprisable.
Car « ses lettres, dit-on, sont sévères et fortes; mais, quand il est présent, c’est un homme faible et sa parole est méprisable. » —
On dit en effet: «Ses lettres sont pleines d'autorité et de force, mais, quand on le voit, c'est un homme flasque, et sa parole n'impose pas.»
Car ses lettres, dit-on, sont sévères et fortes; mais quand il est présent, sa personne est faible, et sa parole méprisable.
On dit en effet: « ses lettres sont, il est vrai, sévères et fortes, mais, quand il est présent, sa personne est faible et sa parole méprisée. »
«Ses lettres, dit-on, sont sévères, sont énergiques, mais, quand il est là, c'est un homme faible, et sa parole est bien peu de chose.»
Ses lettres, dit-on, sont impérieuses et sévères; mais, quand il est présent, sa personne est faible, et sa parole inspire la pitié.
Oone erizay isii issi asati “Phawulosa kiitati dexxone wolqamako; giddo attin izi nu achan diza wode izi laafako; Iza hasa7ayka leqettidaziko” gizaazi gidana.
"Seine Briefe" — so sagt man ja — "sind wuchtig und entschieden; seine äußere Erscheinung aber macht keinen Eindruck, und reden kann er gar nicht."
"Die Briefe", sagt man ja, "sind wuchtig und kräftig, doch sein persönliches Auftreten ist schwächlich, und gar nichts ist sein Vortrag."
Denn die Briefe, sagt man, [O. er] sind gewichtig und kräftig, aber die Gegenwart des Leibes ist schwach und die Rede verächtlich.
Denn die Briefe, sagt man, sind gewichtig und kräftig, aber die Gegenwart des Leibes ist schwach und die Rede verächtlich.
Sagen sie doch: die Briefe, die sind wohl hart und streng; wenn er aber leibhaftig da ist, ist er schwach und seine Rede will nichts heißen.
Denn die Briefe (sprechen, sie) sind schwer und stark; aber die Gegenwärtigkeit des Leibes ist schwach und die Rede verächtlich.
Denn die Briefe, sprechen sie, sind schwer und stark; aber die Gegenwart des Leibes ist schwach und die Rede verächtlich.
Denn »seine Briefe«, sagt man, »sind allerdings wuchtig und kraftvoll, aber sein persönliches Auftreten ist schwächlich, und reden kann er gar nicht«.
Denn die Briefe, sagt einer, sind nachdrücklich und stark, aber die leibliche Gegenwart ist schwach und die Rede verächtlich.
Denn die Briefe, sagt einer, sind gewichtig und nachdrücklich, aber die leibliche Gegenwart ist schwach und die Rede kraftlos.
Nĩgũkorwo andũ amwe moigaga atĩrĩ, “Marũa make marĩ na ũritũ mũingĩ, na marĩ na hinya, no rĩrĩa arĩ hamwe na ithuĩ-rĩ, ti mũndũ ũngĩtĩĩka, nayo mĩario yake nĩ ya tũhũ.”
Issi issi asay, “Phawuloosa dabddaabbey deexonne wolqqaama, shin iya som77on be7iya wode I daaburanchcho; iya odaykka pathenna” yaagosona.
Kelima bi nitianba tua: Polo maadi o tila nni leni u paalu, ama, o yaa ye ti siiga oo pia fidu ba kuli. o maama naa pia gbamanu ba kuli.
Kelima bi tianba yedi: Polo tila mɔni paaa ki gɔ pia u paaciamu. Ama o ya ye ti siiga wani o tie tadimo ki gɔ k pia fuoma
οτι αι μεν επιστολαι φησιν βαρειαι και ισχυραι η δε παρουσια του σωματος ασθενης και ο λογος εξουθενημενος
Διότι αι μεν επιστολαί, λέγει τις, είναι βαρείαι και ισχυραί, η δε παρουσία του σώματος ασθενής και ο λόγος εξουθενημένος.
οτι αι μεν επιστολαι φησιν βαρειαι και ισχυραι η δε παρουσια του σωματος ασθενης και ο λογος εξουθενημενος
οτι αι μεν επιστολαι φησιν βαρειαι και ισχυραι η δε παρουσια του σωματοσ ασθενησ και ο λογοσ εξουθενημενοσ
ὅτι αἱ μὲν ἐπιστολαί, φησί, βαρεῖαι καὶ ἰσχυραί, ἡ δὲ παρουσία τοῦ σώματος ἀσθενὴς καὶ ὁ λόγος ἐξουθενημένος.
ὅτι Αἱ ἐπιστολαὶ μέν, φησίν, βαρεῖαι καὶ ἰσχυραί, ἡ δὲ παρουσία τοῦ σώματος ἀσθενὴς καὶ ὁ λόγος ἐξουθενημένος.
ὅτι Αἱ ⸂ἐπιστολαὶ μέν, φησίν, βαρεῖαι καὶ ἰσχυραί, ἡ δὲ παρουσία τοῦ σώματος ἀσθενὴς καὶ ὁ λόγος ἐξουθενημένος.
οτι αι μεν επιστολαι φησιν βαρειαι και ισχυραι η δε παρουσια του σωματος ασθενης και ο λογος εξουθενημενος
Ὅτι, “Αἱ ἐπιστολαὶ μέν”, φησίν, “βαρεῖαι καὶ ἰσχυραί, ἡ δὲ παρουσία τοῦ σώματος ἀσθενὴς, καὶ ὁ λόγος ἐξουθενημένος.”
οτι αι μεν επιστολαι φησιν βαρειαι και ισχυραι η δε παρουσια του σωματος ασθενης και ο λογος εξουθενημενος
Ὅτι, Αἱ μὲν ἐπιστολαί, φησί, βαρεῖαι καὶ ἰσχυραί· ἡ δὲ παρουσία τοῦ σώματος ἀσθενής, καὶ ὁ λόγος ἐξουθενημένος.
οτι αι μεν επιστολαι φησιν βαρειαι και ισχυραι η δε παρουσια του σωματος ασθενης και ο λογος εξουθενημενος
Ὅτι, Αἱ μὲν ἐπιστολαί, φησί, βαρεῖαι καὶ ἰσχυραί· ἡ δὲ παρουσία τοῦ σώματος ἀσθενής, καὶ ὁ λόγος ἐξουθενημένος.
οτι αι μεν επιστολαι φησιν βαρειαι και ισχυραι η δε παρουσια του σωματος ασθενης και ο λογος εξουθενημενος
οτι αι μεν επιστολαι φησιν βαρειαι και ισχυραι η δε παρουσια του σωματος ασθενης και ο λογος εξουθενημενος
ὅτι Αἱ ἐπιστολαὶ μέν, φησίν, βαρεῖαι καὶ ἰσχυραί, ἡ δὲ παρουσία τοῦ σώματος ἀσθενὴς καὶ ὁ λόγος ἐξουθενημένος.
οτι αι επιστολαι μεν φησιν βαρειαι και ισχυραι η δε παρουσια του σωματος ασθενης και ο λογος εξουθενημενος
οτι αι μεν επιστολαι φησιν βαρειαι και ισχυραι η δε παρουσια του σωματος ασθενης και ο λογος εξουθενημενος
ὅτι, αἱ ἐπιστολαὶ μέν, φησίν, βαρεῖαι καὶ ἰσχυραί, ἡ δὲ παρουσία τοῦ σώματος ἀσθενὴς καὶ ὁ λόγος ἐξουθενημένος.
ଜାଣ୍ଡେ ଜାଣ୍ଡେ ବାସଙ୍ଗ୍ଆର୍ଏ “ପାଉଲ୍ନେ ଚିଟିଇଂ ବାଦେକେ ରକମ୍ ବାରି ଗୁଆକେ ରକମ୍ ମାତର୍ ନେ ଏତେ ଲେଃକେଲା ମେଁନେ ଗାଗ୍ଡ଼େ ରୁଗଚ୍ୟା ତ୍ନାମ୍ୟାକେ ବାରି ମେଁନେ ସାମୁଆଁ ଦଦ୍ୟା ରକମ୍ ଲାଗେଏ ।”
કેમ કે તેઓ કહે છે કે, ‘તેના પત્રો ભારે તથા કડક છે; પણ તે પોતે શરીરે નબળો અને તેનું બોલવું દમ વગરનું છે.
Gen moun ki di: Lè Pòl ap ekri nou, li rèd konsa, li sevè. Men, lè li la nan mitan nou li tou dou. Ata pale li pa ka pale.
Paske, yo di: “Lèt li yo lou e dyanm, men prezans pèsonèl li pa enpresyonan ditou, e jan li pale vrèman meprizab.”
क्यूँके थारे म्ह तै कई माणस कहवै सै, “की मेरी सारी चिट्ठी तो भोत कठोर अर असरदार सै; पर जिब मै आम्नै-साम्नै मिलु सूं, तो मै कमजोर अर बोल्लण म्ह बेकार लाग्गू सूं।”
Gama waɗansu suna cewa, “Wasiƙunsa suna da nauyi da kuma ƙarfi, amma kuwa in ka gan shi, ba shi da wani kwarjini, maganarsa kuma ba kome ba ce.”
Domin wadansu mutane na cewa, “Wasikunsa na da iko da firgitarwa, amma in ka gan shi kumama ne. Kalmominsa ba abin saurare ba ne.”
Ke olelo ae la lakou, Ua koikoi a ua ikaika kana mau palapala; aka, ua palupalu kona kino ma ke kokoke, a o kana olelo ana, oia ke hoowahawahaia.
| ”אל תשימו לב למכתביו של פולוס“, אומרים אחדים מכם.”הוא אמנם נשמע מרשים ותקיף, אך בבואו אלינו אישית תראו שהוא חלש ודיבורו אינו משכנע.“ |
| כאמרם הן האגרות קשות הנה וחזקות אבל הגוף בהיותו לנגדנו חלוש הוא וניבו נבזה׃ |
क्योंकि वे कहते हैं, “उसकी पत्रियाँ तो गम्भीर और प्रभावशाली हैं; परन्तु जब देखते हैं, तो कहते है वह देह का निर्बल और वक्तव्य में हलका जान पड़ता है।”
मेरे विषय में कुछ का कहना है, “उसके पत्र महत्वपूर्ण और प्रभावशाली तो होते हैं किंतु उसका व्यक्तित्व कमजोर है तथा बातें करना प्रभावित नहीं करता.”
Mert azt mondják, hogy levelei súlyosak és kemények, de megjelenése erőtlen, és beszéde gyarló.
Mert, úgy mondják, a levelei ugyan súlyosak és kemények; de a maga jelenvolta erőtelen, és beszéde silány.
„Kærið ykkur kollótt um þessi bréf hans, “segja sumir. „Hann er að vísu stórorður en það er ekkert að marka. Þegar hann kemur, þá getið þið séð að þar er ekki stórmenni á ferð og lélegri predikara þekkjum við ekki!“
Nʼihi na ha na-asị, “Akwụkwọ ozi ya dị arọ dịkwa ike, ma na mmadụ, ma nʼọdịdị ya na mmadụ adịghị ike, okwu ọnụ ya bụkwa ihe na-abaghị uru.”
Ta ibagbaga dagiti dadduma a tattao, “Naganetget ken nabileg dagiti sursuratna, ngem nakapuy met ti bagina. Saan a napateg a denggen dagiti sasaona.”
Orang berkata, "Surat-surat Paulus itu tegas dan berwibawa, tetapi kalau ia sendiri berada di tengah-tengah kita, pribadinya lemah dan kata-katanya tidak berarti apa-apa!"
Orang-orang berkata, “Surat-suratnya keras dan berat, tetapi secara pribadi dia lemah, dan dia pembicara yang tidak berguna.”
Sebab, kata orang, surat-suratnya memang tegas dan keras, tetapi bila berhadapan muka sikapnya lemah dan perkataan-perkataannya tidak berarti.
Saya mengatakan itu karena ada yang pernah berkata, “Paulus menulis surat dengan tegas dan keras. Tetapi saat bertatap muka, dia lunak dan sama sekali tidak pandai bicara.”
Kuite antu ang'wi elunga, “Ibada yakwe itaki hange ikete ngulu, kuite nuanso munegetu ekumuili Inkani yakwe singa inonee kutegeligwa.”
Perciocchè, ben sono, dice [alcuno], le lettere gravi e forti; ma la presenza del corpo [è] debole, e la parola dispregevole.
Perché «le lettere - si dice - sono dure e forti, ma la sua presenza fisica è debole e la parola dimessa».
Difatti, dice taluno, ben sono le sue lettere gravi e forti; ma la sua presenza personale è debole, e la sua parola è cosa da nulla.
Barki aye wa gusa, “Unyetike umeme unyinza anu biyyau bi ni kara.” Inki wa ira mani ma zoo me in maye mariri ahira anabu ba, tize me ti zo me uguna awuzi katuma in tini.
彼らは言ふ『その書は重くかつ強し、その逢ふときの容貌は弱く、言は鄙し』と。
人は言う、「彼の手紙は重味があって力強いが、会って見ると外見は弱々しく、話はつまらない」。
彼らは言います。「パウロの手紙は重みがあって力強いが、実際に会ったばあいの彼は弱々しく、その話しぶりは、なっていない。」
――即ち彼等は云ふ、其書簡こそ厳しく且強けれ、面前には身は弱く談話は拙しと、――
ଇନିଆସନ୍ଗାମେଣ୍ଡେନ୍ ଲାଙ୍ଲେନ୍ନେ ଗାମ୍ତଜି, “ପାଓଲନ୍ ଆ ସିଟିଲୋଙ୍ ଆଇଡିଡନ୍ ଆ ବର୍ନେଜି ଲଗିନ୍ଡମ୍ ଆରି ବୋର୍ସାଡମ୍, ବନ୍ଡ ଗନିୟ୍ଗିୟ୍ଲୋଙନ୍ ଆନିନ୍ ଇନ୍ନିଙ୍ ବପ୍ପୁ ତଡ୍ ରାଙ୍ଡାତେ ଆରି ଆ ବର୍ନେଞ୍ଜି ଇନ୍ନିଙ୍ ତଡ୍ ଡିସୟ୍ଲଙ୍ତନ୍ ।”
Rumal cher e kꞌo jujun kakibꞌij: Sibꞌalaj kꞌax katzijon pa taq ri uwuj, pune are kaqil chiwinaqil man kꞌo ta uchuqꞌabꞌ xuqujeꞌ are kachꞌawik man jeꞌl taj kataqik.
Na'ankure mago'amo'za amanage nehaze, Poli'a avontafepina hankave ke kreneramino, tavure'ma ne-eno'a, akoheno kea nehige'za, amnege nehie hu'za nehaze.
“ಅವನ ಪತ್ರಗಳು ತೀಕ್ಷ್ಣವಾಗಿಯೂ ಶಕ್ತಿಯುತವಾಗಿಯೂ ಇವೆ. ಆದರೆ ಅವನು ಎದುರು ಬಂದಾಗ ನಿರ್ಬಲನೂ ಕೆಲಸಕ್ಕೆ ಬಾರದ ಮಾತುಗಳನ್ನಾಡುವವನೂ ಆಗಿದ್ದಾನೆ,” ಎಂದು ಕೆಲವರು ಹೇಳುತ್ತಾರೆ.
“ಅವನಿಂದ ಬಂದ ಪತ್ರಿಕೆಗಳು ಕಠೋರವಾದವುಗಳೂ, ಪ್ರಬಲವಾದವುಗಳೂ ಆಗಿವೆ. ಆದರೆ ದೈಹಿಕವಾಗಿ ಅವನು ದುರ್ಬಲನು ಅವನ ಮಾತುಗಳು ನಿಂದಾತ್ಮಕವಾದವುಗಳೆಂದು ಕೆಲವರು ಹೇಳುತ್ತಾರಲ್ಲಾ.”
Kwo kubha abhanu abhaika ati, “Jinyalubha jae jikomee na jina amanaga, Nawe chinyamubhili omwene mulenga. No bwaika bwae bhuteile okubhutegelesha.”
Ulwakhuva avange avanu vita, “Ikhalata ncha mwene chihoma khange nchilinamaka, ulwakhuva umwene khimbili indekhedekhe. Amamenyu agaamwene gielondiwa ukhugaapulihincha.
Kwa ndabha baazi ya bhanu bhijobha nahee, “Nyalaka sya muene sikali na siyele ni nghofo, ila kup'hetela mbhele muene ni zaifu. Malobhigha muene ghilondehe kughapelekesya.”
저희 말이 그 편지들은 중하고 힘이 있으나 그 몸으로 대할 때는 약하고 말이 시원치 않다 하니
저희 말이 그 편지들은 중하고 힘이 있으나 그 몸으로 대할 때는 약하고 말이 시원치 않다 하니
Oasr mwet ac fahk, “Leta lal Paul uh upa ac ku, tusruktu pacl el muta yorosr, el munas ac kas lal uh wangin sripa!”
Chokuti bamwi bantu ba ti, “Mañolo a kwe a hambiliza ni ziho, kono cha mazimo u fokwele. Manzwi a kwe kaswanelwi ku tekelezwa.”
| لەوانەیە هەندێک بڵێن: «نامەکان قورس و بەهێزن، بەڵام ئامادەبوونی خۆی لاوازە و قسە بەتاڵە.» |
“ଏଚରଜା଼ଣା ଏଲେଇନେରି, ପା଼ୱୁଲ ତାନି ଆ଼କୁ ରା଼ଚିନାଟି ଅଦିକାରା ଅ଼ଡ଼େ କାଜା ବା଼ଡ଼୍ୟୁ ଗାଟାଇ, ସାମା ମା଼ ତଲେ ଆଙ୍ଗାତା ମାନାଟି ଏ଼ୱାସି ବା଼ଡ଼୍ୟୁ ହିଲାଆଗାଟାସି ଅ଼ଡ଼େ ତାନି କାତା ବାରେ ଉଜେଏତାୟି ।”
quoniam quidem epistolæ, inquiunt, graves sunt et fortes: præsentia autem corporis infirma, et sermo contemptibilis:
quoniam quidem epistolæ, inquiunt, graves sunt et fortes: præsentia autem corporis infirma, et sermo contemptibilis:
quoniam quidem epistolæ, inquiunt, graves sunt et fortes: præsentia autem corporis infirma, et sermo contemptibilis:
quoniam quidem epistolæ, inquiunt, graves sunt et fortes: præsentia autem corporis infirma, et sermo contemptibilis:
quoniam quidem epistulae inquiunt graves sunt et fortes praesentia autem corporis infirma et sermo contemptibilis
quoniam quidem epistolae, inquiunt, graves sunt et fortes: praesentia autem corporis infirma, et sermo contemptibilis:
Jo tie saka, ka tās grāmatas gan ir svarīgas un stipras, bet tas cilvēks pats klāt būdams nespēcīgs un viņa valoda nievājama.
Pamba te bato mosusu balobaka: « Mikanda na ye ezalaka makasi mpe ebangisaka; kasi soki ye moko azali elongo na biso, azalaka na ye moto ya bolembu mpe maloba na ye ezalaka tina te. »
कहालीकि हि कह्य हंय, “ओकी चिट्ठियां त गम्भीर अऊर प्रभावशाली हंय; पर जब ऊ आगु होवय हय, त ऊ शरीर कमजोर अऊर बोलन म हल्को जान पड़य हय।”
Kubanga agamba nti, “Ebbaluwa ze ddala nzito era z’amaanyi, naye okubaawo kwe mu mubiri kunafu, n’okwogera kwe kunyoomebwa.”
कऊँकि तुसा बीचा ते कुछ लोक बोलोए, “तेसरी चिट्ठिया तो दमदार और असरदार ए; पर जेबे देखोए तो से शरीरो रा कमजोर और बोलणे रे अल़का जाणोआ।”
Fa ny epistiliny, hoy izy, dia mavesatra sy mahery; fa malemy kosa ny fanatrehan’ ny tenany, ary tsinontsinona ny teniny.
Peha’e naho maozatse o taratasi’eo, hoe ty ila’e, f’ie mavo-vintañe te miatreke naho sirikaeñe o filañonaña’eo.
എന്തെന്നാൽ അവന്റെ കത്തുകൾ ഗൗരവവും ശക്തിയുള്ളതും തന്നെ; എന്നാൽ ശാരീരികസാന്നിദ്ധ്യമോ ബലഹീനവും സംസാരം നിന്ദ്യവുമത്രെ എന്നു ചിലർ പറയുന്നുവല്ലോ.
അവന്റെ ലേഖനങ്ങൾ ഘനവും ഊറ്റവും ഉള്ളവ തന്നേ; ശരീരസന്നിധിയോ ബലഹീനവും വാക്കു നിന്ദ്യവുമത്രേ എന്നു ചിലർ പറയുന്നുവല്ലോ.
“അദ്ദേഹത്തിന്റെ ലേഖനങ്ങൾ ഘനഗംഭീരവും കരുത്തുറ്റതുമാണ്, എന്നാൽ ശാരീരികസാന്നിധ്യം മതിപ്പുതോന്നാത്തതും സംസാരം കഴമ്പില്ലാത്തതുമാണ്” എന്നു ചിലർ പറയുന്നല്ലോ.
Maramdi kanagumba kharana hai, “Paul-gi chithisingdi sathi amasung saphu kanlli, adubu masa oina eikhoiga leiminnaba matamdadi mahak solli amadi mahakki wadi karisu natte.”
कारण ते म्हणतात की, “त्यांची पत्रे गंभीर व जोरदार असतात, पण तो शरीराने अशक्त आहे आणि त्याचे बोलणे ऐकण्याच्या लायकीचे नसते.”
ଚିମିନ୍ ହଡ଼କ କାଜିୟାଃ, “ପାଉଲୁସ୍ଆଃ ଚିଠିକ ପୁରାଃ ହାସୁଆନ୍ଗିଆ ଆଡଃ କେଟେୟାନ୍ଗିୟା, ମେନ୍ଦ ଇନିଃ ଆବୁଲଃ ତାଇକେନ୍ ଇମ୍ତା ହଡ଼୍ମରେ କା ପେଡ଼େୟାନ୍ ଆଡଃ ଆୟାଃ କାଜିକ ସାମାଗି ଲେକା ଆଟ୍କାରଃ ତାଇକେନା ।”
Pabha bhananji bhakutinji, “Bhaluwa ya a Pauli inakalipa na ishikola malobhe ga topa, ikabhe bhayene bhabhaga na uwe bhakakola makangala, nkali malobhe gabho gakakola mashili.”
``ပေါလု၏စာများသည်ပြင်းထန်၍အာဏာ ပါသည့်စာများဖြစ်၏။ သို့သော်ငါတို့ရှေ့မှောက် ၌မူသူသည်သတ္တိကြောင်သူ၊ အဟောအပြော ညံ့သူဖြစ်သည်'' ဟုပြောဆိုသူရှိလိမ့်မည်။-
အကြောင်းမူကား၊ ထိုသူ၏ စာသည် လေးလံသောစာ၊ တန်ခိုးနှင့် ပြည့်စုံသောစာဖြစ်၏။ ကိုယ်တိုင် ရှိလျှင်မူကား၊ သတ္တိမရှိသောသူ၊ အချည်းနှီးသော စကားကို ပြောသောသူဖြစ်သည်ဟုဆိုတတ်သောသူရှိ၏။
အကြောင်းမူကား ၊ ထိုသူ၏ စာ သည် လေးလံ သောစာ၊ တန်ခိုးနှင့် ပြည့်စုံသော စာဖြစ် ၏။ ကိုယ်တိုင် ရှိ လျှင်မူကား ၊ သတ္တိမရှိ သောသူ၊ အချည်းနှီး သော စကား ကို ပြောသောသူဖြစ်သည်ဟုဆိုတတ် သောသူရှိ၏။
Ko ana pukapuka hoki, e ai ki ta ratou, he taimaha, he kaha; ko tona tinana ia i a ia i konei he ngoikore, ko tana korero he korekore noa iho.
Kilekoile, apuni kunba khan koi, “Tai laga chithi khan bhari thake aru joborjosti kore, kintu tai gaw pora to komjur ase, aru tai laga kotha eku daam nai.”
Mararah ih liiha “Pool le ah echeh echaan, enoothong heteewah ah hephuuphu seng damdoh ang haano, heh larook lata ih hoonla, eno heh jengkhaap ah tiimju tah angka!”
Ngoba abanye bathi, “Izincwadi zakhe zilesisindo lomfutho kodwa yena uqobo uyeyiseka lakukhulumayo kufana leze.”
Ngoba kuthiwa: Incwadi zakhe zinzima zilamandla; kodwa ubukhona bomzimba wakhe bubuthakathaka, lokukhuluma kwakhe kudelelekile.
Kwa yelo baadhi ya bandu ubaya, “Barua zake zibile kale na zibile ni ngupu, lakini mu'yega ywembe ni dhaifu. Maneno gake yastahili kwaa yowanika.”
तर केही मानिसहरू भन्छन्, “त्यसका पत्रहरू गम्भीर र शक्तिशाली छन्, तर त्यो शारीरिक रूपमा कमजोर छ । त्यसका वचनहरू सुन्न योग्यका छैनन् ।”
Mundu ihotola kujova, “Balua za Pauli zikali na zigegii malovi gegitopa, nambu Pauli mwene peivya pamonga na tete ndi mundu mpoli na hati peilongela malovi gaki ndi ngati lepi chindu.”
For brevene, sier de, er myndige og djerve; men det legemlige nærvær er skrøpelig, og hans tale aktes for intet.
Noen hos dere sier:”Brevene hans er fulle av autoritet og kraft, men når han dukker opp i egen person, er han feig, svak og ikke mye å høre på.”
For brevi, segjer dei, er myndige og djerve, men det likamlege nærværet er veikt, og talen ikkje vyrd.
କାରଣ କେତେକେ କହନ୍ତି, ତାହାର ପତ୍ରସବୁ ଗୁରୁଭାବପୂର୍ଣ୍ଣ ଓ ଶକ୍ତିଯୁକ୍ତ, ମାତ୍ର ସାକ୍ଷାତରେ ତାହାର ଶରୀର ଦୁର୍ବଳ ଓ ତାହାର ବାକ୍ୟ ତୁଚ୍ଛନୀୟ।
Namoonni tokko tokko, “Ergaan isaa ulfaataa fi cimaa dha; inni yeroo qaamaan argamutti garuu dadhabaa dha; dubbiin isaas tuffatamaa dha” jedhu.
ਕਿਉਂ ਜੋ ਉਹ ਕਹਿੰਦੇ ਹਨ ਕਿ ਉਸ ਦੀਆਂ ਪੱਤ੍ਰੀਆਂ ਤਾਂ ਭਾਰੀਆਂ ਅਤੇ ਤਕੜੀਆਂ ਹਨ ਪਰ ਆਪ ਸਰੀਰ ਨਾਲ ਮੌਜੂਦ ਹੋ ਕੇ ਕਮਜ਼ੋਰ ਹੈ ਅਤੇ ਉਸ ਦਾ ਬਚਨ ਤੁੱਛ ਹੈ।
ଇନାକିଦେଂକି “ଇନେର୍ ଇନେର୍ ଇନାର୍, ତାଦି ପାଉଲ୍ତି ଆକିଂ ସବୁ ହାର୍ଦିକିଂ ଆରି ଗାଜା ସାକ୍ତି, ମତର୍ ମେହାଣ୍ତ ତା ଗାଗାଡ଼୍ ନାଦାର୍ ଆରି ତା ବଚନ୍ ବାନ୍ୟା ।”
| زیرامی گویند: «رساله های او گران و زورآور است، لیکن حضور جسمی او ضعیف و سخنش حقیر.» |
| زیرا بعضی میگویند: «نامههایش سنگین و پرقدرت است، اما حضورش ضعیف و موعظههایش بیارزش است!» |
Toziya muntu hakalongi, “Hamba zya Paulu zikalipa na ziwera na ujumbi utopera, kumbiti mweni pakawera na twenga, kawoneka kalegilegi na visoweru vyakuwi shintu ndiri.”
Pwe irail me inda: Kisin likau kan me kasampwal o manaman, a sansal en pali war a me luet, o a padak me mal kot.
Pwe irail me inda: Kijin likau kan me kajampwal o manaman, a janjal en pali war a me luet, o a padak me mal kot.
Albowiem mówią: Listy ważne są i potężne, ale ciała obecność niepotężna jest i mowa niepłatna.
Niektórzy mówią o mnie: „W listach jest odważny i surowy, w rzeczywistości zaś jest słabeuszem i kiepskim mówcą”.
[Mówią] bowiem: Listy ważkie są i mocne, ale gdy się zjawia osobiście, [jest] słaby, a [jego] mowa godna pogardy.
Porque eles dizem que as cartas são em verdade graves e fortes, mas a presença do corpo é fraca, e a palavra desprezível.
Porque as cartas, dizem, são graves e fortes, mas a presença do corpo é fraca, e a palavra desprezivel.
Porque as cartas, dizem, são graves e fortes, mas a presença do corpo é fraca, e a palavra desprezível.
[Digo isso] porque algumas pessoas estão dizendo, “[Quando Paulo escreve] suas cartas, ele diz coisas severas [para obrigar vocês a obedecê-lo ], mas quando ele se acha aqui presente com vocês, [as pessoas o contemplam e dizem que] ele é fraco, e que não é com certeza um talentoso orador”.
As pessoas dizem: “As cartas dele são rudes e severas. No entanto, pessoalmente, ele é fraco e, ao falar, suas palavras são um fracasso.”
Pois, “Suas cartas”, dizem, “são pesadas e fortes, mas sua presença corporal é fraca, e seu discurso é desprezado”.
„Де фапт”, зик ей, „епистолеле луй сунт ку греутате ши плине де путере, дар кынд есте де фацэ ел ынсушь, есте моале, ши кувынтул луй н-аре ничо греутате.”
Căci “scrisorile lui”, spun ei, “sunt grele și puternice, dar prezența lui trupească este slabă, iar vorbirea lui este disprețuită”.
Te atahori naa ra olaꞌ rae, “Afiꞌ tao-afiꞌ mo Paulus. Te mae susuran manaseliꞌ ma deres o, te mete ma nema aon, eni mana male-maꞌaꞌ, ma oꞌolan o nda naꞌena koasa sa.”
Так как некто говорит: в посланиях он строг и силен, а в личном присутствии слаб, и речь его незначительна, -
Shila bhamo abhantu bhayanga, “Enkalata zwane hali na zilinamaha, lelo eshebele umwahale zaifu. Enjengo zwakwe sezihwaziwa atejelezewe.”
Tumakhatin, “Paul lekhamuthuonngei hi chu ana le ânngar ani, aniatachu ei kôm a omin chu ânzala, a chongngei khom ite nimak!” tîng an tih.
tasya patrANi gurutarANi prabalAni ca bhavanti kintu tasya zArIrasAkSAtkAro durbbala AlApazca tucchanIya iti kaizcid ucyate|
তস্য পত্ৰাণি গুৰুতৰাণি প্ৰবলানি চ ভৱন্তি কিন্তু তস্য শাৰীৰসাক্ষাৎকাৰো দুৰ্ব্বল আলাপশ্চ তুচ্ছনীয ইতি কৈশ্চিদ্ উচ্যতে|
তস্য পত্রাণি গুরুতরাণি প্রবলানি চ ভৱন্তি কিন্তু তস্য শারীরসাক্ষাৎকারো দুর্ব্বল আলাপশ্চ তুচ্ছনীয ইতি কৈশ্চিদ্ উচ্যতে|
တသျ ပတြာဏိ ဂုရုတရာဏိ ပြဗလာနိ စ ဘဝန္တိ ကိန္တု တသျ ၑာရီရသာက္ၐာတ္ကာရော ဒုရ္ဗ္ဗလ အာလာပၑ္စ တုစ္ဆနီယ ဣတိ ကဲၑ္စိဒ် ဥစျတေ၊
tasya patrANi gurutarANi prabalAni ca bhavanti kintu tasya zArIrasAkSAtkArO durbbala AlApazca tucchanIya iti kaizcid ucyatE|
तस्य पत्राणि गुरुतराणि प्रबलानि च भवन्ति किन्तु तस्य शारीरसाक्षात्कारो दुर्ब्बल आलापश्च तुच्छनीय इति कैश्चिद् उच्यते।
તસ્ય પત્રાણિ ગુરુતરાણિ પ્રબલાનિ ચ ભવન્તિ કિન્તુ તસ્ય શારીરસાક્ષાત્કારો દુર્બ્બલ આલાપશ્ચ તુચ્છનીય ઇતિ કૈશ્ચિદ્ ઉચ્યતે|
tasya patrāṇi gurutarāṇi prabalāni ca bhavanti kintu tasya śārīrasākṣātkāro durbbala ālāpaśca tucchanīya iti kaiścid ucyate|
tasya patrāṇi gurutarāṇi prabalāni ca bhavanti kintu tasya śārīrasākṣātkārō durbbala ālāpaśca tucchanīya iti kaiścid ucyatē|
tasya patrANi gurutarANi prabalAni cha bhavanti kintu tasya shArIrasAkShAtkAro durbbala AlApashcha tuchChanIya iti kaishchid uchyate|
ತಸ್ಯ ಪತ್ರಾಣಿ ಗುರುತರಾಣಿ ಪ್ರಬಲಾನಿ ಚ ಭವನ್ತಿ ಕಿನ್ತು ತಸ್ಯ ಶಾರೀರಸಾಕ್ಷಾತ್ಕಾರೋ ದುರ್ಬ್ಬಲ ಆಲಾಪಶ್ಚ ತುಚ್ಛನೀಯ ಇತಿ ಕೈಶ್ಚಿದ್ ಉಚ್ಯತೇ|
តស្យ បត្រាណិ គុរុតរាណិ ប្រពលានិ ច ភវន្តិ កិន្តុ តស្យ ឝារីរសាក្ឞាត្ការោ ទុព៌្ពល អាលាបឝ្ច តុច្ឆនីយ ឥតិ កៃឝ្ចិទ៑ ឧច្យតេ។
തസ്യ പത്രാണി ഗുരുതരാണി പ്രബലാനി ച ഭവന്തി കിന്തു തസ്യ ശാരീരസാക്ഷാത്കാരോ ദുർബ്ബല ആലാപശ്ച തുച്ഛനീയ ഇതി കൈശ്ചിദ് ഉച്യതേ|
ତସ୍ୟ ପତ୍ରାଣି ଗୁରୁତରାଣି ପ୍ରବଲାନି ଚ ଭୱନ୍ତି କିନ୍ତୁ ତସ୍ୟ ଶାରୀରସାକ୍ଷାତ୍କାରୋ ଦୁର୍ବ୍ବଲ ଆଲାପଶ୍ଚ ତୁଚ୍ଛନୀଯ ଇତି କୈଶ୍ଚିଦ୍ ଉଚ୍ୟତେ|
ਤਸ੍ਯ ਪਤ੍ਰਾਣਿ ਗੁਰੁਤਰਾਣਿ ਪ੍ਰਬਲਾਨਿ ਚ ਭਵਨ੍ਤਿ ਕਿਨ੍ਤੁ ਤਸ੍ਯ ਸ਼ਾਰੀਰਸਾਕ੍ਸ਼਼ਾਤ੍ਕਾਰੋ ਦੁਰ੍ੱਬਲ ਆਲਾਪਸ਼੍ਚ ਤੁੱਛਨੀਯ ਇਤਿ ਕੈਸ਼੍ਚਿਦ੍ ਉਚ੍ਯਤੇ|
තස්ය පත්රාණි ගුරුතරාණි ප්රබලානි ච භවන්ති කින්තු තස්ය ශාරීරසාක්ෂාත්කාරෝ දුර්බ්බල ආලාපශ්ච තුච්ඡනීය ඉති කෛශ්චිද් උච්යතේ|
தஸ்ய பத்ராணி கு³ருதராணி ப்ரப³லாநி ச ப⁴வந்தி கிந்து தஸ்ய ஸா²ரீரஸாக்ஷாத்காரோ து³ர்ப்³ப³ல ஆலாபஸ்²ச துச்ச²நீய இதி கைஸ்²சித்³ உச்யதே|
తస్య పత్రాణి గురుతరాణి ప్రబలాని చ భవన్తి కిన్తు తస్య శారీరసాక్షాత్కారో దుర్బ్బల ఆలాపశ్చ తుచ్ఛనీయ ఇతి కైశ్చిద్ ఉచ్యతే|
ตสฺย ปตฺราณิ คุรุตราณิ ปฺรพลานิ จ ภวนฺติ กินฺตุ ตสฺย ศารีรสากฺษาตฺกาโร ทุรฺพฺพล อาลาปศฺจ ตุจฺฉนีย อิติ ไกศฺจิทฺ อุจฺยเตฯ
ཏསྱ པཏྲཱཎི གུརུཏརཱཎི པྲབལཱནི ཙ བྷཝནྟི ཀིནྟུ ཏསྱ ཤཱརཱིརསཱཀྵཱཏྐཱརོ དུརྦྦལ ཨཱལཱཔཤྩ ཏུཙྪནཱིཡ ཨིཏི ཀཻཤྩིད྄ ཨུཙྱཏེ།
| تَسْیَ پَتْرانِ گُرُتَرانِ پْرَبَلانِ چَ بھَوَنْتِ کِنْتُ تَسْیَ شارِیرَساکْشاتْکارو دُرْبَّلَ آلاپَشْچَ تُچّھَنِییَ اِتِ کَیشْچِدْ اُچْیَتے۔ |
tasya patraa. ni gurutaraa. ni prabalaani ca bhavanti kintu tasya "saariirasaak. saatkaaro durbbala aalaapa"sca tucchaniiya iti kai"scid ucyate|
Јер су посланице, вели, тешке и јаке, а кад је телом пред нама, слаб је, и реч његова не ваља ништа.
Jer su poslanice, veli, teške i jake, a kad je tijelom pred nama, slab je, i rijeè njegova ne valja ništa.
Bangwe ba re, “Se tshwenyegeng ka dikwalo tsa gagwe. O utlwala a le selo sengwe, mme gotlhe ke modumo fela. Fa a tsena fa lo tlaa bona gore ga go na sepe se segolo ka ga gagwe, ebile ga lo ise lo ke lo utlwe moreri yo o bokoa jaaka ene”.
Nokuti vanoti: Tsamba dzake dzinorema uye dzine simba; asi kuvapo kwemuviri kune utera nekutaura kwake kunozvidzika.
Nokuti vamwe vanoti, “Tsamba dzake dzina mashoko makukutu uye dzine chisimba, asi iye pachake haatyisi uye kutaura kwake hakuna maturo.”
Яко послания убо, рече, тяжка и крепка, а пришествие тела немощно, и слово уничиженно:
Kajti [za] njegova pisma, pravijo, [da] so tehtna in vplivna, toda njegova telesna prisotnost je šibka in njegov govor zaničevanja vreden.
Ker so listovi, velí, težki in jaki, ali ko je s telesom nazoči, slab je in beseda mu nič ne velja.
Mobambi mulambangeti, “Makalata akame alema kayi nangofu, nomba ndabanga pakati penu ndemutolo kayi maswi ngonkute kwamba aliya ncito.”
Waayo, waxay yidhaahdaan, Warqadihiisu culays iyo xoog bay leeyihiin, laakiin joogidda jidhkiisu way tabardaran tahay, oo hadalkiisana waa la fududaystaa.
Porque a la verdad, dicen, las cartas son graves y fuertes; mas la presencia corporal flaca, y la palabra menospreciable.
La gente dice: “Sus cartas son duras y severas, pero en persona es débil, y es un orador inútil”.
Porque, “Sus cartas”, dicen, “son pesadas y fuertes, pero su presencia corporal es débil, y su discurso es despreciado.”
Porque ciertamente dicen: Las epístolas son pesadas y fuertes, pero la presencia corporal es débil, y la palabra, despreciable.
Porque a la verdad, dice él, las cartas suyas son graves y fuertes; mas su presencia corporal endeble, y la palabra de menospreciar.
Porque á la verdad, dicen, las cartas son graves y fuertes; mas la presencia corporal flaca, y la palabra menospreciable.
Porque á la verdad, dicen, las cartas [son] graves y fuertes; mas la presencia corporal flaca, y la palabra menospreciable.
Porque sus cartas, dicen, son duras y fuertes; pero en persona es débil no impresiona a nadie en su manera de hablar.
porque: “Sus cartas, dicen, son graves y fuertes; mas su presencia corporal es débil, y su palabra despreciable”—
Kwa vile baadhi ya watu husema, “Nyaraka zake ni kali na zina nguvu, lakini kimwili yeye ni dhaifu. Maneno yake hayastahili kusikilizwa.”
Mtu anaweza kusema: “Barua za Paulo ni kali na zenye maneno mazito, lakini yeye mwenyewe anapokuwa pamoja nasi ni mtu dhaifu, na hata anapoongea maneno yake ni kama si kitu.”
Kwa maana wanasema, “Nyaraka zake ni nzito na zenye nguvu, lakini ana kwa ana ni dhaifu na kuzungumza kwake ni kwa kudharauliwa.”
Ty man säger ju: "Hans brev äro väl myndiga och stränga, men när han kommer själv, uppträder han utan kraft, och på hans ord aktar ingen."
Ty brefven, säga de, äro svår och stark; men lekamliga närvarelsen är svag, och orden föraktelig.
Ty man säger ju: »Hans brev äro väl myndiga och stränga, men när han kommer själv, uppträder han utan kraft, och på hans ord aktar ingen.»
Sapagka't, sinasabi nila, Ang kaniyang mga sulat, ay malaman at mabisa; datapuwa't ang anyo ng kaniyang katawan ay mahina, at ang kaniyang pananalita ay walang kabuluhan.
Dahil sinasabi ng ibang tao, “Ang kaniyang mga sulat ay mahalaga at makapangyarihan, ngunit ang kaniyang katawan ay mahina. Ang kaniyang mga salita ay hindi karapat-dapat na pakinggan.”
Ako nvgonv minre, “Paul gv siti lvknam mv achialvbv haachihaak nambv ridu, vbvritola vdwlo nw ngonua nyidumbv lvkobv ribamdobam redw, nw goyu nvgobv ridu, okv ninyigv minam gaam vdwv oguguka kaama.”
அவனுடைய கடிதங்கள் கடினமானவையும் பலமும் உள்ளவைகள்; சரீரத்தின் தோற்றமோ பலவீனமும், வசனம் அற்பமாகவும் இருக்கிறது என்கிறார்களே.
ஏனெனில், “அவனுடைய கடிதங்கள் கடுமையும், கண்டிப்பும் நிறைந்தவை. ஆனால் அவன் நேரில் எங்களுடன் பேசும்போதோ, அவன் தோற்றத்தில் கவர்ச்சியில்லாது இருப்பதோடு, அவனுடைய பேச்சும் எடுபடாது” என்று என்னைக் குறித்துச் சிலர் சொல்கிறார்கள்.
కొందరు ఇలా అంటారు, “అతని ఉత్తరాలు గంభీరంగా బలీయంగా ఉన్నాయి, కానీ శరీరం బలహీనం, మాటలు చప్పగా ఉంటాయి.”
He ʻoku nau pehē, “Ko [ʻene ]ngaahi tohi ʻoku mamafa mo mālohi; ka ʻoku ha vaivai mai [hono ]sino, pea ko [ʻene ]lea ʻoku kovi.”
Çünkü bazıları, “Mektupları ağır ve etkilidir, ama kişisel varlığı etkisiz, konuşma yeteneği de sıfır” diyormuş.
Obi bɛka se, “Paulo nkrataa mu nsɛm no yɛ yaw nanso sɛ ɔba yɛn nkyɛn a, ɔyɛ bɔkɔɔ na ne nsɛm nso nka hwee!”
Obi bɛka sɛ, “Paulo nkrataa mu nsɛm no yɛ ya nanso sɛ ɔba yɛn nkyɛn nso a, ɔyɛ bɔkɔɔ na ne nsɛm nso nka hwee!”
Адже [дехто] каже: «Його листи вагомі та сильні, але коли приходить особисто, то він слабкий і слова його незначні».
„Бо листи його — кажуть — важкі́ та міцні́, але особисто присутній — слабий, а мова його незначна́“,
бо послання (його) скажуть, важкі і кріпкі, а присутність тїла немочна і слово мизерне, -
क्यूँकि कुछ लोग कहते हैं कि पौलुस के ख़त तो अलबत्ता असरदार और ज़बरदस्त हैं लेकिन जब ख़ुद मौजूद होता है तो कमज़ोर सा मा'लूम होता है और उसकी तक़रीर लचर है।
| چۈنكى بەزىلەر: «ئۇنىڭ خەتلىرى دەرۋەقە ۋەزىنلىك ھەم كۈچلۈك؛ لېكىن ئۇ يېتىپ كەلگەندە سالاپەتسىز، گېپىنىڭ تۇتامى يوق بولىدۇ» دېيىشىدۇ. |
чүнки бәзиләр: «Униң хәтлири дәрвәқә вәзинлик һәм күчлүк; лекин у йетип кәлгәндә салапәтсиз, гепиниң тутами йоқ болиду» дейишиду.
chünki beziler: «Uning xetliri derweqe wezinlik hem küchlük; lékin u yétip kelgende salapetsiz, gépining tutami yoq bolidu» déyishidu.
qünki bǝzilǝr: «Uning hǝtliri dǝrwǝⱪǝ wǝzinlik ⱨǝm küqlük; lekin u yetip kǝlgǝndǝ salapǝtsiz, gepining tutami yoⱪ bolidu» deyixidu.
Có người nói rằng các thơ của người nặng lời và bạo mạnh; nhưng đến khi có mặt thì người yếu đuối và lời nói chẳng có giá gì.
Có người nói rằng các thơ của người nặng lời và bạo mạnh; nhưng đến khi có mặt thì người yếu đuối và lời nói chẳng có giá gì.
Vì có người nói: “Lời Phao-lô viết trong thư thật đanh thép, mạnh bạo, nhưng đến khi gặp mặt, chỉ thấy một người yếu ớt, nói năng tầm thường!”
ulwakuva avaanhu vamonga viiti “ikalata sa Paulo sili na masio amakali kange sili ni ngufu, looli kim'bili umwene nsila ngufu. amasio gha mwene namaghana kupulikisia”
Bila bankaka beti tubanga ti: “Minkanda miandi zitu midi ayi ngolomidi vayi widi mutu wulebakana enati niandi veka widi yeto va kimosi ayi mambu keta yoluka masi kadi mfunu ko.”
Nítorí wọ́n wí pé, “Ìwé rẹ wúwo, wọn sì lágbára; ṣùgbọ́n ní ti ara ìrísí rẹ̀ jẹ aláìlera, ọ̀rọ̀ rẹ kò níláárí.”
Verse Count = 331
