Acts 17:18
Some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also were conversing with him. Some said, “What does this babbler want to say?” Others said, “He seems to be advocating foreign deities,” because he preached Jesus and the resurrection.
Diskutonin me të edhe disa filozofë epikurianë dhe stoikë. Disa thoshnin: “Vallë ç’do të thotë ky llafazan”. Dhe të tjerë thoshnin: “Ai duket se është një kasnec i perëndivë të huaja”, sepse u shpall atyre Jezusin dhe ringjalljen.
Bulus zuro nin among anan dursuzu inanin wa dinin so iliru kitene nilemong na anit yinnamu. anite wa din yichi Among Epicorion, among iyichananin Stoiks. Inanin wa belin Bulus ku ilemong na inin yinnam, inin tiringhe iyeri ame yinnamu. Among woro nin natimine “nafo adinbellu kutellẹ kona tiyirimuba”. Inin woro bar na Bulus wa dinbelu nanin Isa naku amini nafita adimun ilai tutun.
| فَقَابَلَهُ قَوْمٌ مِنَ ٱلْفَلَاسِفَةِ ٱلْأَبِيكُورِيِّينَ وَٱلرِّوَاقِيِّينَ، وَقَالَ بَعْضٌ: «تُرَى مَاذَا يُرِيدُ هَذَا ٱلْمِهْذَارُ أَنْ يَقُولَ؟». وَبَعْضٌ: «إِنَّهُ يَظْهَرُ مُنَادِيًا بِآلِهَةٍ غَرِيبَةٍ». لِأَنَّهُ كَانَ يُبَشِّرُهُمْ بِيَسُوعَ وَٱلْقِيَامَةِ. |
| وَجَرَتْ مُنَاقَشَةٌ بَيْنَهُ وَبَيْنَ بَعْضِ الْفَلاَسِفَةِ الأَبِيقُورِيِّينَ وَالرِّوَاقِيِّينَ. وَلَمَّا وَجَدُوا أَنَّهُ يُبَشِّرُ بِيَسُوعَ وَالْقِيَامَةِ مِنَ الْمَوْتِ قَالَ بَعْضُهُمْ: «مَاذَا يَعْنِي هَذَا الْمُدَّعِي الأَحْمَقُ بِكَلاَمِهِ؟» وَقَالَ آخَرُونَ: «يَبْدُو أَنَّهُ يُنَادِي بِآلِهَةٍ غَرِيبَةٍ». |
| ܘܐܦ ܦܝܠܤܘܦܐ ܕܡܢ ܝܘܠܦܢܗ ܕܐܦܝܩܘܪܤ ܘܐܚܪܢܐ ܕܡܬܩܪܝܢ ܤܛܘܐܝܩܘ ܕܪܫܝܢ ܗܘܘ ܥܡܗ ܘܐܢܫ ܐܢܫ ܡܢܗܘܢ ܐܡܪܝܢ ܗܘܘ ܡܢܐ ܨܒܐ ܗܢܐ ܡܠܩܛ ܡܠܐ ܘܐܚܪܢܐ ܐܡܪܝܢ ܗܘܘ ܕܐܠܗܐ ܢܘܟܪܝܐ ܡܟܪܙ ܡܛܠ ܕܠܝܫܘܥ ܘܠܩܝܡܬܗ ܡܟܪܙ ܗܘܐ ܠܗܘܢ |
Քանի մը Եպիկուրեան եւ Ստոյիկեան փիլիսոփաներ ալ կը խորհրդակցէին իրեն հետ: Ոմանք կ՚ըսէին. «Ի՞նչ ըսել կ՚ուզէ այս սերմնաքաղը»: Ուրիշներ ալ կ՛ըսէին. «Կը թուի թէ օտար աստուածներու քարոզիչ է». որովհետեւ կ՚աւետէր անոնց Յիսուսը եւ յարութիւնը:
তাতে ইপিকূৰী আৰু স্তোয়িকী দর্শন-শাস্ত্রৰ দার্শনিক কেইজনমানে পৌলৰ লগত তর্ক-যুদ্ধত লিপ্ত হ’ল। কিছুমানে ক’লে, “এই জনে বকবকাই কি কবলৈ বিচাৰিছে?” আন কোনোবাই ক’লে, “ই দেখিছোঁ কোনোবা বিদেশী দেৱতাবোৰৰ কথা প্রচাৰ কৰিছে।” কাৰণ পৌলে যীচু আৰু তেওঁৰ পুনৰুত্থানৰ বিষয়ে কৈ আছিল।
Epikürçü və Stoist fəlsəfi cərəyanından olanların bəziləri onunla mübahisəyə girişdi. Kimisi deyir: «Bu boşboğaz nə demək istəyir?» Kimisi də deyir: «Deyəsən bu yad allahların təbliğatçısıdır». Çünki Paul İsa və dirilmə ilə bağlı Müjdəni yaymaqda idi.
Dila kange Abikuriyawam nob nyomkab wabkang kange co. Kangumbo yiki “Nyewo niwo tokker nyeu ki tok kiye?” kangembo yiki “Cin cerkan ni kange wo co nubo ti na bwang ten fulendo fwereu,” Wori ci tok ker Yeesu roti kange kwenka ceko tuweu.
Orduan Epicuriano eta Stoiciano philosopho batzu disputatzen ciraden harequin: eta batzuc erraiten çutén, Cer erran nahi du edasle hunec? Eta bercéc cioiten, Iainco arrotzén eracusle dela dirudi: ceren Iesus denuntiatzen baitzerauen eta resurrectionea.
Eno olelesu dunu fi ilia dio amo Ebigiulia: ne amola Sidouigi, ili amola Bolo, da gilisili fofada: su. Mogili ilia amane sia: i, “Amo gasa fi dadousa dunu da adi sia: dasula: ?” Be eno dunu da bu adole i, “Amabela: ? E da ‘gode’ liligi hisu amo ilia hou olelesala: ?” Bolo da Yesu Gelesu Ea hou amola Ea wa: legadosu hou, amo olelebeba: le, ilia agoane sia: dasu.
আবার ইপিকুরের ও স্তোয়িকীরের কয়েক জন দার্শনিক পৌলের সাথে তর্ক বিতর্ক করতে লাগল। আবার কেউ কেউ বলল, “এ বাচালটা কি বলতে চায়?” আবার কেউ কেউ বলল, ওকে অন্য দেবতাদের প্রচারক বলে মনে হয়; কারণ তিনি যীশু ও পুনরুত্থান বিষয়ে সুসমাচার প্রচার করতেন।
একদল এপিকুরীয় ও স্তোয়িকীয় দার্শনিক তাঁর সঙ্গে তর্কবিতর্কে করতে লাগল। তাদের মধ্যে কয়েকজন জিজ্ঞাসা করল, “এই বাচাল লোকটি কী বলতে চাইছে?” অন্যেরা মন্তব্য করল, “একে বিদেশি দেবতাদের প্রচারক বলে মনে হচ্ছে।” তাদের একথা বলার কারণ হল, পৌল যীশুর সুসমাচার ও পুনরুত্থানের কথা প্রচার করছিলেন।
किछ इपिकूरी ते किछ स्तोईकी उस्ताद तैस सेइं बेंस केरने लगे, ते तैन मरां किछ ज़ोने लगे, “बकवादी कुन ज़ोनू चाते?” ते किछ ज़ोने लगे, “ए त होरि देबतां केरो पतो देनेबालो भोइ सकते, किजोकि पौलुस यीशुएरो ते कने ज़ींते भोनेरी खुशखबरी शुनातो थियो।”
तालू सै गुरू जड़े इपिकूरी कने स्तोईकी करी के जाणे जांदे थे, इना चे कुछ उसला बेहस करणा लग्गे, कने केईयां बोलया, ऐ बकवास करणे बाला क्या बोलणा चांदा है? पर दुजयां बोलया, ऐ कुसी होरसी देशे दे देवतयां दा प्रचारक लग्गा दा है, क्योंकि सै यीशु दा कने मरयां चे जिन्दा होणे दा शुभसमाचार सुणादां था।
ସେତି ଏପିକୁର ଆର୍ ସ୍ତଇକାର୍ କଃତିଗଟ୍ ଗୁରୁମଃନ୍ ହେଁ ତାର୍ସଃଙ୍ଗ୍ କଃତା କାଟାକାଟି ଅଃଉତିରିଲାୟ୍ ଆର୍ କେକେ କୟ୍ଲାୟ୍ “ଏ ବୁତେକ୍ କଃତା କଃଉ କାୟ୍ରି କଃଉଁକେ ମଃନ୍କଃରୁଲା?” ଆର୍ କେକେ କୟ୍ଲାୟ୍, “ସେ ବିଦେସି ଦେବ୍ତା ମଃନାର୍ ପର୍ଚାର୍ କଃରୁଲା ବଃଲି ଜାଣାହଃଳୁଲି ।” କାୟ୍ତାକ୍ ବଃଲେକ୍ ପାଉଲ୍ ଜିସୁ ମଃରି ଉଟ୍ଲା କଃତା ପର୍ଚାର୍ କଃର୍ତିରିଲା ବଃଲି କୟ୍ଲାୟ୍ ।
Epikorosotsnat Istokotsi eteets bog danetuwots b́ maants waatni bomooshfoni. Ik ikuwots «Ooshiyiruwan eeg etee b́geyi?» bo etor, k'oshuwotsmó «Handr ik'uwots janga arefee b́ keewiri? boetiri, man boetiruwere P'awlos Iyesusnat k'irotse b́tuwi doo shishi keewi jango b́ danitsoshe.
Niki ngame bari bi to rhimren gban, wa babi Epikurean mba Stoic, ba zontu wu sen nyu niwu. Bari ba tre ndi, “A ngye wa ndi wu gbla nyu treyi si son hla?” Bari ba tre “A rju ndji biwa ba yo ndi du ba ye hu mri Irji wa bana to tumana,” nitu a sia dbu bla tre ndindi nitu Yesu mba ta sh'me ni kwu ma.
Тоже и някои от Епикурейските и Стоическите философи се препираха с него; и едни рекоха: Какво иска да каже тоя празнословец? а други: види се, че е проповедник на чужди богове: защото проповядваше Исуса и възкресението.
Apan ang pipila sa mga pilosopong Epicureo ug Estoico nasugatan usab niya. Ug ang pipila miingon, “Unsa ang buot isulti niining tabian nga tawo?” Ang uban miingon, “Daw mura siyag magsasangyaw sa lain nga mga dios,” tungod kay nagsangyaw siya mahitungod kang Jesus ug ang pagkabanhaw.
Ug iyang gikaasdang usab ang pipila sa mga pilosopo nga mga Epicureo ug mga Estoico. Ug may nangutana nga nag-ingon, "Unsa man kahay buot isulti niining tawong tigpamunit ug kahibalo?" Ang uban nanag-ingon, "Kini siya daw usa ka tigmantalag mga dios nga dumuloong" kay iya man ugod nga gimantala si Jesus ug ang pagkabanhaw.
Ya palo ni y manmalate gui finanagüe y Epicureo yan Estoicosija, managuaguat yan güiya, ya palo ilegñija: Jafa cumequeilegña este na caducon cuicuentos? Otro palo ilegñija: Buente mannae notisia y nuebo na yuus; sa jasangane sija as Jesus, yan y quinajulo talo.
ᎩᎶᏃ ᎢᏳᎾᏍᏗ ᎠᏂᎦᏔᎿᎭᎢ ᎠᏂᏈᎫᎳ ᎠᎴ ᎠᏂᏍᏙᎢᎦ ᎬᏩᎵᏃᎮᏔᏅᎩ; ᎢᎦᏛᏃ ᎯᎠ ᏄᏂᏪᏒᎩ; ᎦᏙ ᎤᏚᎵ ᎤᏛᏗᏱ ᎯᎠ ᏄᏰᎸᏛᎾ ᎦᏬᏂᏍᎩ; ᎠᏂᏐᎢᏃ ᎯᎠ; ᏅᏩᎾᏓᎴ ᏴᏫ ᏧᎾᏤᎵ ᎦᎸᎳᏗ ᎠᏁᎯ ᏗᎦᎾᏄᎪᏫᏍᎩ ᏅᏩᏍᏗ; ᏅᏓᎦᎵᏍᏙᏗᏍᎬᎩ ᏓᎵᏥᏙᏁᎲᎢ ᏥᏌ ᎠᎴ ᏗᎴᎯᏐᏗ ᎨᏒ ᎤᎬᏩᎵ.
Gulu la Aepikureya ndi Astoiki, anthu anzeru, anayamba kutsutsana naye. Ena a iwo anafunsa kuti, “Kodi wolongololayu akufuna kunena chiyani?” Enanso anati, “Akuoneka ngati akulalikira milungu yachilendo.” Iwo ananena zimenezi chifukwa Paulo amalalikira Uthenga Wabwino wa Yesu ndi kuuka kwa akufa.
Epikurih ja, Stok sajae naw ani ngcuhpüikie. Avang he naw, “Hin ia am ngtäh xaki naw i pyen hlüki ni?” ami ti. Avang he naw, Jesuha mawng ja thawhnak bea mawng a pyena phäha, “Pe kcea ka mhnama mawng pyenki am ni aw” ami ti.
To naah amtukhaih bang palungha Epikuria hoi Stoik kaminawk mah anih ih lok to aek o. Thoemto kaminawk mah, Hae lokpung kami mah tih lok maw thuih han a koeh toeng? tiah a naa o. Kalah kaminawk mah, Anih loe kalah sithawnawk ni a thuih, tiah a naa o: Pawl mah Jesu kawng hoi angthawk lethaih lok to thuih pae pongah ni, to tiah a thuih o.
A lak vaengah Epikouri neh Satoiko kah poeksoemkung rhoek long khaw anih te a loepdak uh. Te dongah a ngen loh, “Olom loh banim thui a ngaih he. A tloe rhoek loh, “Kholong kah sungrhai aka thuikung i ti. Jesuh neh thohkoepnah ni a phong,” a ti uh.
A lak vaengah Epikouri neh Satoiko kah poeksoemkung rhoek long khaw anih te a loepdak uh. Te dongah a ngen loh, “Olom loh banim thui a ngaih he.” A tloe rhoek loh, “Kholong kah sungrhai aka thuikung i ti. Jesuh neh thohkoepnah ni a phong,” a ti uh.
Cawh Epikuria ingkaw Stoik thlakcyikhqi mi ce oelh qu uhy. Cekkhqi anglakawhkaw thlang vang ing, “Vawhkaw ak so thlang ing ve ikaw nu ti ak kqawn lawt?” tina uhy. Thlang vang tloek ing, “Qap chang nakaw khawsa akawngkhqi ni ak kqawn namih hy ve,” tina uhy. Paul ing Jesu ak awithang leek ingkaw thawh tlaihnaak akawng ak kqawn dawngawh cemyihna ce tina uhy.
Tua zawkciang in thu ngaisun thiam Epicurean te le Stoic te taw ki mu uh hi. Taciang pawlkhat te in, hi a papau sia bang son ziam? a dang pawlkhat te zong in, hisia pa sia ngamdang te pathian te thu son hi tu hi, ci uh hi: banghangziam cile Paul in amate tung ah Jesus le a thawkikna thu son hi.
Hitichun Epicurean le Stoic chihgilna nei miho toh akinel'un, chuin Yeshua le athodoh chung chang thudol aseiyin ahile, amahon, “Hiche kamtam pa hin ipi hetkhah lou thukhat asei ham?” atiuvin, amaho lah a konkhat chun, “Hetphah lou pathen thu asei hile akilome,” atiuvin ahi.
Epikurian hnukkâbangnaw hoi Satoiknaw nihai, Pawl hoi a kâdei awh. A tangawn ni hete tami ni bangmouh a deingai aw ati awh. A tangawn ni teh ramlouknaw e cathut kong vai a dei aw ati awh. Hettelah tinae teh Pawl teh Jisuh hoi boutthawnae kong a pâpho dawk doeh.
还有伊壁鸠鲁和斯多亚两门的学士，与他争论。有的说：“这胡言乱语的要说什么？”有的说：“他似乎是传说外邦鬼神的。”这话是因保罗传讲耶稣与复活的道。
還有伊壁鳩魯和斯多亞兩門的學士，與他爭論。有的說：「這胡言亂語的要說甚麼？」有的說：「他似乎是傳說外邦鬼神的。」這話是因保羅傳講耶穌與復活的道。
有些伊壁鸠鲁派和斯多亚派的哲学家也同他争论。他们想知道：“这个人到底想要干什么？”由于保罗谈论了耶稣和复活，所以还有人认为：“他似乎是在宣讲外族的神。”
有幾個伊壁鴆魯派和斯多噶派的哲士同他爭論，有的說：「這個饒舌多言的人想說什麼﹖」有的說：「看來他是個外國鬼神的宣傳者」──因為保祿宣講耶穌及復活的福音。
Ŵandu ŵaŵalijigenye lunda lwa Chiepikulo ni Chisitoiki ŵatesile makani ni che Paolo. Ŵane ŵatite, “Ana ujinga chi wakuusala mundu ju?” Ŵane ŵatite, “Akuwoneka mpela akulalichila ngani ja achiminungu achalendo.” Ŵatite yeleyo pakuŵa che Paolo ŵaliji nkulalichila ngani ji Che Yesu ni yatite kusyuka,
ϩⲁⲛⲟⲩⲟⲛ ⲇⲉ ⳿ⲉⲃⲟⲗϧⲉⲛ ⲛⲓⲉⲡⲓⲕⲟⲩⲣⲓⲟⲥ ⲛⲉⲙ ⲛⲓ⳿ⲥⲧⲟⲓⲭⲟⲥ ⳿ⲙⲫⲓⲗⲟⲥⲟⲫⲟⲥ ⲛⲁⲩϯ ⲟⲩⲃⲏϥ ⲟⲩⲟϩ ϩⲁⲛⲕⲉⲭⲱⲟⲩⲛⲓ ⲛⲁⲩϫⲱ ⳿ⲙⲙⲟⲥ ϫⲉ ⲟⲩ ⲡⲉⲧⲉϥⲟⲩⲱϣ ⳿ⲉϫⲟϥ ⳿ⲛϫⲉ ⲡⲁⲓ⳿ⲥⲡⲉⲣⲙⲟⲗⲟⲅⲟⲥ ϩⲁⲛⲕⲉⲭⲱⲟⲩⲛⲓ ⲇⲉ ⲛⲁⲩϫⲱ ⳿ⲙⲙⲟⲥ ϫⲉ ⲟⲩⲣⲉϥϩⲓⲱⲓϣ ⲡⲉ ⳿ⲛⲧⲉ ϩⲁⲛⲇⲉⲙⲱⲛ ⳿ⲛϣⲉⲙⲙⲟ ϫⲉ ⲛⲁϥϩⲓⲱⲓϣ ⲛⲱⲟⲩ ⲡⲉ ⳿ⲛⲒⲏ̅ⲥ̅ ⲛⲉⲙ ⲧⲉϥ⳿⳿ⲁⲛⲁⲥⲧⲁⲥⲓⲥ.
ϩⲟⲓⲛⲉ ⲇⲉ ϩⲉⲛⲉⲡⲓⲕⲟⲩⲣⲓⲟⲥ ⲙⲫⲓⲗⲟⲥⲟⲫⲟⲥ ⲙⲛ ⲛⲉⲥⲧⲟⲓⲕⲟⲥ ⲉⲩϯⲧⲱⲛ ⲛⲙⲙⲁϥ ⲡⲉ ⲁⲩⲱ ⲛⲉⲣⲉϩⲟⲓⲛⲉ ϫⲱ ⲙⲙⲟⲥ ϫⲉ ⲉⲣⲉⲡⲉⲓⲥⲁ ⲛϣⲁϫⲉ ϫⲱ ⲙⲙⲟⲥ ϫⲉ ⲟⲩ ϩⲉⲛⲕⲟⲟⲩⲉ ⲇⲉ ⲡⲉϫⲁⲩ ϫⲉ ⲉϥⲧⲁϣⲉⲟⲓϣ ⲛϩⲉⲛⲛⲟⲩⲧⲉ ⲛⲃⲣⲣⲉ ⲉⲃⲟⲗ ϫⲉ ⲛⲉϥⲉⲩⲁⲅⲅⲉⲗⲓⲍⲉ ⲛⲓⲥ ⲁⲩⲱ ⲛⲧⲁⲛⲁⲥⲧⲁⲥⲓⲥ ⲛⲛⲉⲧⲙⲟⲟⲩⲧ
ϩⲟⲓ̈ⲛⲉ ⲇⲉ ϩⲉⲛⲉⲡⲓⲕⲟⲩⲣⲓⲟⲥ ⲙ̅ⲫⲓⲗⲟⲥⲟⲫⲟⲥ. ⲙⲛ̅ⲛⲉⲥⲧⲟⲓ̈ⲕⲟⲥ (ⲛ)ⲉⲩϯⲧⲱⲛ ⲛⲙ̅ⲙⲁϥ ⲡⲉ. ⲁⲩⲱ ⲛⲉⲣⲉϩⲟⲓ̈ⲛⲉ ϫⲱ ⲙ̅ⲙⲟⲥ ϫⲉ ⲉⲣⲉⲡⲉⲓ̈ⲥⲁⲛϣⲁϫⲉ ϫⲱ ⲙ̅ⲙⲟⲥ ϫⲉ ⲟⲩ. ϩⲉⲛⲕⲟⲟⲩⲉ ⲇⲉ ⲡⲉϫⲁⲩ ϫⲉ ⲉϥⲧⲁϣⲉⲟⲓ̈ϣ ⲛ̅ϩⲉⲛⲛⲟⲩⲧⲉ ⲛ̅ⲃⲣ̅ⲣⲉ. ⲉⲃⲟⲗ ϫⲉ ⲛⲉϥⲉⲩⲁⲅⲅⲉⲗⲓⲍⲉ ⲛ̅ⲓ̅ⲥ̅ ⲁⲩⲱ ⲛ̅ⲧⲁⲛⲁⲥⲧⲁⲥⲓⲥ ⲛ̅ⲛⲉⲧⲙⲟⲟⲩⲧ.
ϨⲀⲚⲞⲨⲞⲚ ⲆⲈ ⲈⲂⲞⲖ ϦⲈⲚⲚⲒⲈⲠⲒⲔⲞⲨⲢⲒⲞⲤ ⲚⲈⲘ ⲚⲒⲤⲦⲞⲒⲬⲞⲤ ⲘⲪⲒⲖⲞⲤⲞⲪⲞⲤ ⲚⲀⲨϮ ⲞⲨⲂⲎϤ ⲞⲨⲞϨ ϨⲀⲚⲔⲈⲬⲰⲞⲨⲚⲒ ⲚⲀⲨϪⲰ ⲘⲘⲞⲤ ϪⲈ ⲞⲨ ⲠⲈⲦⲈϤⲞⲨⲰϢ ⲈϪⲞϤ ⲚϪⲈⲠⲀⲒⲤⲠⲈⲢⲘⲞⲖⲞⲄⲞⲤ ϨⲀⲚⲔⲈⲬⲰⲞⲨⲚⲒ ⲆⲈ ⲚⲀⲨϪⲰ ⲘⲘⲞⲤ ϪⲈ ⲞⲨⲢⲈϤϨⲒⲰⲒϢ ⲠⲈ ⲚⲦⲈϨⲀⲚⲆⲈⲘⲰⲚ ⲚϢⲈⲘⲘⲞ ϪⲈ ⲚⲀϤϨⲒⲰⲒϢ ⲚⲰⲞⲨ ⲠⲈ ⲚⲒⲎⲤⲞⲨⲤ ⲚⲈⲘ ⲦⲈϤⲀⲚⲀⲤⲦⲀⲤⲒⲤ.
Dobacivahu mu i neki od epikurejskih i stoičkih filozofa. Jedni su govorili: “Što bi htjela reći ta čavka?” Drugi pak: “Navješćuje, čini se, neke tuđe bogove.” Jer navješćivaše Isusa i uskrsnuće.
Tedy někteří z Epikureů a Stoických mudrců hádali se s ním. A někteří řekli: I co tento žváč chce povědíti? Jiní pak: Zdá se býti cizích bohů zvěstovatel. Nebo jim o Ježíšovi a o z mrtvých vstání vypravoval.
Tedy někteří z epikureů a stoických mudráků hádali se s ním. A někteří řekli: I co tento žváč chce povědíti? Jiní pak pravili: Zdá se býti nějakých cizích bohů zvěstovatel. Neb jim o Ježíšovi a o z mrtvých vstání vypravoval.
Tak se dostal do hovoru i s aténskými filozofy, epikurejci a stoiky, a vyprávěl jim o Ježíšovi, který vstal z mrtvých. Někteří ho okřikovali: „Neposlouchejte toho žvanila!“ale druhé to začalo zajímat. Říkali: „To bude nějaké nové náboženství.“Atéňané i lidé, kteří tam přicházeli studovat, byli totiž velice zvědaví a posedlí touhou povědět nebo uslyšet něco nového a neobvyklého. Vzali Pavla mezi sebe, dovedli ho na řečniště zvané Areopag a požádali ho, aby jim pověděl něco více o tom novém učení plném překvapujících myšlenek.
Men også nogle af de epikuræiske og stoiske Filosoffer indlode sig i Ordstrid med ham; og nogle sagde: ""Hvad vil denne Ordgyder sige?"" men andre: ""Han synes at være en Forkynder af fremmede Guddomme;"" fordi han forkyndte Evangeliet om Jesus og Opstandelsen.
Men ogsaa nogle af de epikuræiske og stoiske Filosoffer indlode sig i Ordstrid med ham; og nogle sagde: „Hvad vil denne Ordgyder sige?‟ men andre: „Han synes at være en Forkynder af fremmede Guddomme; ‟ fordi han forkyndte Evangeliet om Jesus og Opstandelsen.
Men ogsaa nogle af de epikuræiske og stoiske Filosoffer indlode sig i Ordstrid med ham; og nogle sagde: „Hvad vil denne Ordgyder sige?‟ men andre: „Han synes at være en Forkynder af fremmede Guddomme; ‟ fordi han forkyndte Evangeliet om Jesus og Opstandelsen.
କେତେଟା ଏପିକିଉରିଆନ୍ ଆରି ଟଇକ୍ ସିକିଆ ଦେବା ଗୁରୁମନର୍ ସଙ୍ଗ୍ ଦଦାପେଲା ଅଇଲାଇ । ସେମନର୍ ବିତ୍ରେଅନି କେତେ ଲକ୍ କଇଲାଇ, “ଏ ବକୁଆ ବଡ୍ପନିଆ, କାଇଟା କଇବାକେ ଚେସ୍ଟା କଲାନି?” ବିନ୍ ଲକ୍ମନ୍ କଇଲାଇ, “ବିନ୍ ଦେସେ ରଇବା ଦେବ୍ତାମନର୍ ବିସଇ, ସେ ଜାନାଇଲାନି ପାରା ଲାଗ୍ଲାନି ।” ଜିସୁ ଆରି ତରେକ୍ ଜିବନ୍ ଅଇ ଉଟ୍ଲା ବିସଇ ପାଉଲ୍ ଜାନାଇବାଟା ସୁନି ସେମନ୍ ଏନ୍ତି କଇଲାଇ ।
Jorieko moko mag Epikurio kod Stoiko nochako mino kode wach. Moko kuomgi nopenjo niya, “Angʼo ma jawach thoreni temo wacho?” To moko nowacho niya, “Chal ka gima oyalo kuom nyiseche moko ma welo.” Negiwacho kamano nikech Paulo ne yalo kuom Yesu kendo kuom chier.
Pesi abalabo bamwi baba Epikuliya abasongo ba Sitoyiki bakaswanana aawe. Bamwi bakaamba kuti, “Niinzi ooyu utakwe makani ncheezya kwaamba?” Bamwi bakati, “Ulangika aanga nguumwi ooyo wwiita bantu kuti batobela baleza benzu, nkambo wakali kuluula makani mabotu aatala a Jesu abubuke.
En sommigen van de Epikureische en Stoische wijsgeren streden met hem; en sommigen zeiden: Wat wil toch deze klapper zeggen? Maar anderen zeiden: Hij schijnt een verkondiger te zijn van vreemde goden; omdat hij hun Jezus en de opstanding verkondigde.
Ook enige epicurische en stoïsche wijsgeren vielen hem aan. Sommigen zeiden: Wat heeft die praatjesmaker eigenlijk te vertellen? Anderen: Hij schijnt een prediker van vreemde goden te zijn! Want hij had Jesus en de opstanding verkondigd.
En sommigen van de Epikureische en Stoische wijsgeren streden met hem; en sommigen zeiden: Wat wil toch deze klapper zeggen? Maar anderen zeiden: Hij schijnt een verkondiger te zijn van vreemde goden; omdat hij hun Jezus en de opstanding verkondigde.
And also some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers encountered him. And some said, Whatever does this babbler want to say? But others, He seems to be a proclaimer of strange deities, because he brought the good news-Jesus and the resurrection.
Some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also were conversing with him. Some said, “What does this babbler want to say?” Others said, “He seems to be advocating foreign deities,” because he preached Jesus and the resurrection.
And certain also of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers encountered him. And some said, What would this babbler say? others, He seemeth to be a setter forth of strange gods: because he preached Jesus and the resurrection.
And some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers disputed with him; and some said: What can this babbler possibly wish to say? Others said: He seems to be a proclaimer of strange demons: for he preached to them Jesus and the Resurrection.
Some Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also began to debate with him. Some of them asked, “What is this babbler trying to say?” Others said, “He seems to be advocating foreign gods.” They said this because Paul was proclaiming the good news of Jesus and the resurrection.
And some of those who were supporters of the theories of the Epicureans and the Stoics, had a meeting with him. And some said, What is this talker of foolish words saying? And others, He seems to be a preacher of strange gods: because he was preaching of Jesus and his coming back from the dead.
Some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also conversed with him. Some said, “What is this babbler trying to say?” But others said, “He seems to be a proclaimer of foreign deities.” (They said this because he was preaching the good news about Jesus and the resurrection.)
Now certain Epicurean and Stoic philosophers were arguing with him. And some were saying, “What does this sower of the Word want to say?” Yet others were saying, “He seems to be an announcer for new demons.” For he was announcing to them Jesus and the Resurrection.
But some also of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers attacked him. And some said, What would this chatterer say? and some, He seems to be an announcer of foreign demons, because he announced the glad tidings of Jesus and the resurrection [to them].
And certain philosophers of the Epicureans and of the Stoics disputed with him; and some said: What is it, that this word sower would say? But others: He seemeth to be a setter forth of new gods; because he preached to them Jesus and the resurrection.
Then certain philosophers, both Epicureans and Stoics, encountered him. Some said, “What might this idea-scavenger want to say?” Others said, “He seems to be a proclaimer of foreign deities”—because he was preaching Jesus and the resurrection.
Some Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also argued with him. “What is he going on about?” they wondered. Others concluded, “He seems to be teaching about some foreign gods,” because he was speaking about Jesus and the resurrection.
Then certaine Philosophers of the Epicures, and of the Stoickes, disputed with him, and some sayde, What will this babler say? Others sayde, He seemeth to be a setter forth of straunge gods (because hee preached vnto them Iesus, and the resurrection.)
And certain ones of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers interviewed him, and some continued to say, What would this babbler wish to say? and others said, He seems to be the propagator of strange divinities: because he was preaching the gospel of Jesus, and the resurrection.
Then certain of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers attacked him: and some said, What will this chattering fellow say? but others, He seemeth to be a preacher of foreign deities, because he preached to them Jesus and the resurrection.
But some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers encountered him; and some said, What would this babler say? and others, He seemeth to be a proclaimer of foreign deities: because he preached to them Jesus and the resurrection.
Then certain philosophers of the Epicureans, and of the Stoicks, encountered him. And some said, What will this babbler say? other some, He seemeth to be a setter forth of strange gods: because he preached unto them Jesus, and the resurrection.
Then certain philosophers of the Epicureans, and of the Stoicks, encountered him. And some said, What will this babbler say? other some, He seems to be a setter forth of strange gods: because he preached to them Jesus, and the resurrection.
Then certain philosophers of the Epicureans, and of the Stoicks, encountered him. And some said, What will this babbler say? other some, He seemeth to be a setter forth of strange gods: because he preached unto them Jesus, and the resurrection.
Then certain philosophers of the Epicureans, and of the Stoicks, encountered him. And some said, What will this babbler say? other some, He seemeth to be a setter forth of strange mighty ones: because he preached unto them Yahushua, and the resurrection.
Then certain philosophers of the Epicureans, and of the Stoicks, encountered him. And some said, What will this babbler say? other some, He seemeth to be a setter forth of strange gods: because he preached unto them Jesus, and the resurrection.
Then certain philosophers of the Epicureans, and of the Stoicks, encountered him. And some said, What will this babbler say? other some, He seems to be a proclaimer of strange gods: because he preached unto them Jesus, and the resurrection.
And certain of the Epicurean and of the Stoic philosophers, were meeting together to see him, and some were saying, “What would this seed picker wish to say?” And others, “He seems to be an announcer of strange demons”; because he proclaimed to them Jesus and the resurrection as good news,
A few of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also encountered him again and again. Some were saying, "What has this beggarly fellow to say?" Others said, "He seems to be a setter forth of strange gods," because he preached Jesus and the resurrection.
Some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also were conversing with him. Some said, "What does this babbler want to say?" Others said, "He seems to be advocating foreign deities," because he preached Yeshua and the resurrection.
Some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also were conversing with him. Some said, "What does this babbler want to say?" Others said, "He seems to be advocating foreign deities," because he preached Jesus and the resurrection.
Some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also were conversing with him. Some said, "What does this babbler want to say?" Others said, "He seems to be advocating foreign deities," because he preached Jesus and the resurrection.
Some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also were conversing with him. Some said, "What does this babbler want to say?" Others said, "He seems to be advocating foreign deities," because he preached Jesus and the resurrection.
Some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also were conversing with him. Some said, "What does this babbler want to say?" Others said, "He seems to be advocating foreign deities," because he preached Jesus and the resurrection.
Some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also were conversing with him. Some said, "What does this babbler want to say?" Others said, "He seems to be advocating foreign deities," because he preached Yeshua and the resurrection.
And some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also conversed with him. And some said, What doth this babbler mean to say? and others, He seemeth to be a setter forth of foreign gods; because he brought the glad tidings of Jesus and the resurrection.
Among others, some Epicurean and Stoic Philosophers joined issue with him. Some asked ‘What is this prater wanting to make out?’, while others said ‘He seems to be a preacher of foreign Deities.’ (This was because he was telling the good news about Jesus and the resurrection).
Among others, some Epicurean and Stoic Philosophers joined issue with him. Some asked “What is this prater wanting to make out?”, while others said “He seems to be a preacher of foreign Deities.” (This was because he was telling the good news about Jesus and the resurrection).
And certain also of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers encountered him. And some said, What would this babbler say? other some, He seemeth to be a setter forth of strange gods: because he preached Jesus and the resurrection.
But, certain both of the Epicurean and of the Stoic philosophers, were encountering him; and some were saying—What might this picker-up-of-scraps wish to be saying? And, others—Of foreign demons, he seemeth to be a declarer: because, of Jesus and the Resurrection, he was announcing the joyful tidings.
Some then also of the Epicureans and (of the *k) Stoics philosophers were encountering him; And some were saying; What maybe would intend babbler this to say? Others however; Of foreign gods he seems a proclaimer to be; because Jesus and the resurrection (to them *k) he was evangelising.
one then and the/this/who Epicurean and (the/this/who *k) Stoic philosopher to ponder/confer it/s/he and one to say which? if to will/desire the/this/who babbler this/he/she/it to say the/this/who then foreign demon to think proclaimer to exist that/since: since the/this/who Jesus and the/this/who resurrection (it/s/he *k) to speak good news
and the philosophers also who were of the doctrine of Epikuros, and others who were called Estoiku, disputed with him. And some of them said, What willeth this accumulator of words? And others said, He preaches foreign gods; because Jeshu and his resurrection he preached unto them.
And also philosophers of the sect of Epicureans, and others who were called Stoics, disputed with him. And one and another of them said: What doth this word-monger mean? Others said: He announceth foreign deities; because he preached to them Jesus and his resurrection.
Paul met some teachers who liked to talk about what people should believe. [People called] some of them Epicureans and [they called] others Stoics. They told Paul [what they believed], and they asked him [what he believed. Then] some of them said [to one another], “This ignorant person is just talking nonsense [RHQ]!” Others said, “[We(exc) think] that he is teaching people about (foreign gods/[new] gods that we [(exc)] have not heard about).” They said that because Paul was telling them that Jesus [had died and] had become alive again [afterwards. They had not heard that message before].
Among others, some Epicurean and Stoic Philosophers joined issue with him. Some would ask “What is this prater wanting to make out?”, while others would say “He seems to be a Preacher of foreign Deities.” (This was because he was telling the Good News about Jesus and the Resurrection).
Certayne philosophers of ye Epicures and of ye stoyckes disputed with him. And some ther were which sayde: what will this babler saye. Other sayd: he semeth to be a tydynges bringer of newe devyls because he preached vnto them Iesus and the resurreccion.
But also some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers encountered him. Some said, “What is this babbler trying to say?” Others said, “He seems to be one who calls people to follow strange gods,” because he was proclaiming Jesus and the resurrection.
Then certain philosophers of the Epicureans, and of the Stoics, encountered him. And some said, What will this babbler say? some others, He seemeth to be a setter-forth of strange gods: because he preached to them Jesus, and the resurrection.
Then certain philosophers of the Epicureans, and of the Stoics, encountered him. And some said, What will this babbler say? some others, He seemeth to be a setter forth of strange gods: because he preached to them Jesus, and the resurrection.
A few of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also encountered him. Some of them asked, "What has this beggarly babbler to say?" "His business," said others, "seems to be to cry up some foreign gods." This was because he had been telling the Good News of Jesus and the Resurrection.
Some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also were conversing with him. Some said, “What does this babbler want to say?” Others said, “He seems to be advocating foreign deities,” because he preached Jesus and the resurrection.
Some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also were conversing with him. Some said, “What does this babbler want to say?” Others said, “He seems to be advocating foreign deities,” because he preached Jesus and the resurrection.
Some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also were conversing with him. Some said, “What does this babbler want to say?” Others said, “He seems to be advocating foreign deities,” because he preached Jesus and the resurrection.
Some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also were conversing with him. Some said, “What does this babbler want to say?” Others said, “He seems to be advocating foreign deities,” because he preached Jesus and the resurrection.
Some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also were conversing with him. Some said, “What does this babbler want to say?” Others said, “He seems to be advocating foreign deities,” because he preached Yeshua and the resurrection.
Some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also were conversing with him. Some said, “What does this babbler want to say?” Others said, “He seems to be advocating foreign deities,” because he preached Yeshua and the resurrection.
And summe Epeicureis, and Stoisens, and filosofris disputiden with hym. And summe seiden, What wole this sowere of wordis seie? And othere seiden, He semeth to be a tellere of newe fendis; for he telde to hem Jhesu, and the ayenrisyng.
And certain of the Epicurean and of the Stoic philosophers, were meeting together to see him, and some were saying, 'What would this seed picker wish to say?' and others, 'Of strange demons he doth seem to be an announcer;' because Jesus and the rising again he did proclaim to them as good news,
Kaj iuj el la Epikuranaj kaj Stoikaj filozofoj lin renkontis. Kaj unuj diris: Kion volus diri ĉi tiu vortŝutanto? aliaj diris: Li ŝajnas esti proklamanto de fremdaj diaĵoj; ĉar li predikis Jesuon kaj la releviĝon.
Paulo dzro nya me kple xexemenunyala gã aɖewo siwo woyɔna be Epikurea kple Stoiktɔwo hã. Wo dometɔ aɖewo bia be, “Nu kae nukpoloeƒola sia le didim be yeagblɔ?” Ɖewo gblɔ be, “Ewɔ abe dutamawuwo ŋue wòle nu ƒom le ene.” Wogblɔ esia, elabena Paulo nɔ nyanyui la gblɔm ku ɖe Yesu ƒe ku kple tsitretsitsi ŋuti.
Ja muutamat Epikurilaiset ja Stoalaiset philosophit riitelivät hänen kanssansa, ja muutamat sanoivat: mitä tämä lipilaari tahtoo sanoa? Mutta muut sanoivat: hän näkyy tahtovan outoja jumalia ilmoittaa: että hän saarnasi heille evankeliumia Jesuksesta ja ylösnousemisen kuolleista.
Ja muutamat epikurolaiset ja stoalaiset filosofit väittelivät hänen kanssansa; ja toiset sanoivat: "Mitähän tuo lavertelija oikein tahtoo sanoa?" Toiset taas sanoivat: "Näkyy olevan vieraiden jumalien julistaja", koska hän julisti heille evankeliumia Jeesuksesta ja ylösnousemuksesta.
Sommigen nu van de Epikureïsche en Stoïcijnsche wijsgeeren twistten met hem en sommigen zeiden: Wat wil die klapper toch zeggen– En anderen zeiden: Hij schijnt een verkondiger van vreemde goden te zijn! omdat hij Jezus en de verrijzenis predikte.
Or quelques philosophes épicuriens et stoïciens ayant conféré avec lui, les uns disaient: " Que nous veut ce semeur de paroles? " D'autres, l'entendant prêcher Jésus et la résurrection, disaient: " Il paraît qu'il vient nous annoncer des divinités étrangères. "
Quelques-uns des philosophes épicuriens et stoïciens s'entretenaient aussi avec lui. Les uns disaient: « Que veut dire ce bavard? » D'autres ont dit: « Il semble prôner des divinités étrangères », car il prêchait Jésus et la résurrection.
Et quelques-uns aussi des philosophes épicuriens et des philosophes stoïciens s’en prirent à lui; et les uns disaient: Que veut dire ce discoureur? et d’autres: Il semble annoncer des divinités étrangères; parce qu’il leur annonçait Jésus et la résurrection.
Et quelques-uns d'entre les Philosophes Epicuriens et d'entre les Stoïciens, se mirent à parler avec lui, et les uns disaient: que veut dire ce discoureur? et les autres disaient: il semble être annonciateur de dieux étrangers; parce qu'il leur annonçait Jésus et la résurrection.
Quelques philosophes épicuriens et stoïciens discouraient aussi avec lui, et plusieurs disaient: Que veut dire ce semeur de paroles? Et d’autres: Il paraît annoncer des dieux nouveaux; parce qu’il leur annonçait Jésus et la résurrection.
Quelques philosophes épicuriens et stoïciens se mirent à parler avec lui. Et les uns disaient: Que veut dire ce discoureur? D’autres, l’entendant annoncer Jésus et la résurrection, disaient: Il semble qu’il annonce des divinités étrangères.
Or quelques philosophes épicuriens et stoïciens ayant conféré avec lui, les uns disaient: « Que nous veut ce semeur de paroles? » D’autres, l’entendant prêcher Jésus et la résurrection, disaient: « Il paraît qu’il vient nous annoncer des divinités étrangères. »
Quelques philosophes épicuriens et des stoïciens conférèrent avec lui: quelques-uns disaient: «Que veut bien dire ce discoureur?» et d'autres: «Il paraît que c'est un prédicateur de divinités étrangères; » parce que Paul leur annonçait Jésus et la résurrection.
Et quelques philosophes épicuriens et stoïciens conféraient avec lui; et les uns disaient: Que veut dire ce discoureur? Et les autres: Il semble qu'il annonce des divinités étrangères. Car il leur annonçait la bonne nouvelle de Jésus et de la résurrection.
d'un autre côté, quelques philosophes, tant épicuriens que stoïciens, conféraient aussi avec lui, et quelques-uns disaient: « Que veut donc dire ce bavard? » et d'autres: « Il paraît que c'est un prédicateur de divinités étrangères; » parce qu'il annonçait Jésus et la résurrection.
Entre autres, il fut entrepris par quelques philosophes épicuriens et stoïciens. «Que veut donc dire ce radoteur?» disaient les uns. «C'est, paraît-il, un prêcheur de nouveaux dieux», disaient les autres, parce que Paul leur annonçait l'Évangile de Jésus et la résurrection.
Quelques philosophes épicuriens et stoïciens conféraient aussi avec lui. Les uns disaient: Que veut dire ce discoureur? Et d'autres: Il semble annoncer des divinités étrangères. — car Paul leur annonçait Jésus et la résurrection. —
Ehaaththaiqorossene Isxoykke geetettiza eranchata bagga gididayiti Phawulossako shiiqidi izara hasa7ettida. Istta issi issi asati “hayssi lommi7u lommi7ay ay gaana kooyze?” gida. Baggati qasse Yesussa gishine hayqqope iza denththa mishshirachcho izi sabbakishin siyidi “heyssi hara orraththa eeqqata gish yootiza milattes” gida.
Auch einige epikureische und stoische Philosophen ließen sich mit ihm ein. Die einen sprachen: "Was will denn dieser Schwätzer sagen?" Andere meinten: "Er scheint ein Verkündiger ausländischer Gottheiten zu sein." Denn er verkündigte ihnen Jesus und die Auferstehung.
Dabei gerieten einige epikuräische und stoische Weltweise mit ihm zusammen, und manche sagten: "Was mag wohl dieser Schwätzer sagen wollen?" Andere: "Er scheint ein Herold fremder Gottheiten zu sein." Er verkündete nämlich die frohe Botschaft von Jesus und die Auferstehung.
Aber auch etliche der epikuräischen und stoischen Philosophen griffen ihn an; und etliche sagten: Was will doch dieser Schwätzer sagen? andere aber: Er scheint ein Verkündiger fremder Götter [W. Dämonen] zu sein, weil er ihnen das Evangelium von Jesu und der Auferstehung verkündigte.
Aber auch etliche der epikuräischen und stoischen Philosophen griffen ihn an; und etliche sagten: Was will doch dieser Schwätzer sagen? andere aber: Er scheint ein Verkündiger fremder Götter zu sein, weil er [ihnen] das Evangelium von Jesu und der Auferstehung verkündigte.
Es banden aber auch etliche von den epikureischen und stoischen Philosophen mit ihm an, und einige sagten: was will denn dieser Schwätzer sagen? andere aber: er scheint ein Verkünder fremder Götter zu sein; weil er nämlich den Jesus und die Auferstehung verkündete.
Etliche aber der Epikurer und Stoiker Philosophen zankten mit ihm; und etliche sprachen: Was will dieser Lotterbube sagen? Etliche aber: Es siehet, als wollte er neue Götter verkündigen. Das machte, er hatte das Evangelium von Jesu und von der Auferstehung ihnen verkündigt.
Etliche aber der Epikurer und Stoiker Philosophen stritten mit ihm. Und etliche sprachen: Was will dieser Lotterbube sagen? Etliche aber: Es sieht, als wolle er neue Götter verkündigen. (Das machte, er hatte das Evangelium von Jesu und von der Auferstehung ihnen verkündigt.)
Aber auch einige epikureische und stoische Philosophen ließen sich mit ihm ein, und manche sagten: »Was fällt denn diesem Schwätzer ein zu behaupten?« Andere aber meinten: »Er scheint ein Verkünder fremder Gottheiten zu sein« – er verkündigte nämlich die Heilsbotschaft von Jesus und von der Auferstehung.
Aber etliche der epikureischen und stoischen Philosophen maßen sich mit ihm; und etliche sprachen: Was will doch dieser Krächzer sagen? Andere aber: Er scheint ein Verkündiger fremder Götter zu sein! weil er ihnen das Evangelium von Jesus und der Auferstehung verkündigte.
Etliche aber der Epikureer und der stoischen Philosophen stritten sich mit ihm, und einige sagten: Was will doch dieser Schwätzer da; andere: Er will fremde Götter bei uns ankündigen; weil er ihnen von Jesus und der Auferstehung predigte.
Nakĩo gĩkundi kĩa Aepikurio na Asitoiko, arutani a ũũgĩ, makĩambĩrĩria gũkararania nake. Amwe ao makĩũria atĩrĩ, “Mũndũ ũyũ wa mũhuhu arageria kuuga atĩa?” Nao andũ arĩa angĩ makiuga atĩrĩ, “Nĩ ta mũndũ ũrahunjia ũhoro wa ngai ngʼeni.” Moigaga ũguo tondũ Paũlũ aahunjagia Ũhoro Mwega wa Jesũ o na wa kũriũka gwake.
Eppiqoroosanne Istoyke geetettiya cugetappe issi issi eranchchoti Phawuloosara palamidosona. Enttafe issoti issoti, “Ha yooyamay ay odanaw koyii?” yaagidosona. Harati Phawuloosi Yesuusabaanne hayqoppe I denddidayssa banttaw odida gisho, “Ooratha xoossatabaa odiya daanees” yaagidosona.
Yaa yanfodanba n den ŋoa Epikule bangi ma bi tianba leni sitoyisieninba ya bangima yaaba tianba den taani ki nia leni polo ki tua. O maciandaano ne bua ki yedi be? Bi tianba n den gba ke o maadi Jesu labaali ŋamo leni bi tinkpiba gua fiima yeni, bi den tua: Li nani o maadi bucianni yaa maama yo!
Ama Epikiriani yeni Stihisiani nba gbabanda bo kpagi'o. ke bi tianbi yedi: «o maciandaano bua maadi be i?» ke bi tianba tua ke: «li naani o kelima o bo wangi ba yesu yeni mi bi tinkpienba findnma.
τινες δε και των επικουρειων και των στοικων φιλοσοφων συνεβαλλον αυτω και τινες ελεγον τι αν θελοι ο σπερμολογος ουτος λεγειν οι δε ξενων δαιμονιων δοκει καταγγελευς ειναι οτι τον ιησουν και την αναστασιν ευηγγελιζετο
Τινές δε των Επικουρίων και των Στωϊκών φιλοσόφων συνήρχοντο εις λόγους μετ' αυτού, και οι μεν έλεγον· Τι θέλει τάχα ο σπερμολόγος ούτος να είπη; οι δέ· Ξένων θεών κήρυξ φαίνεται ότι είναι· διότι εκήρυττε προς αυτούς τον Ιησούν και την ανάστασιν.
τινες δε των επικουρειων και των στοικων φιλοσοφων συνεβαλλον αυτω και τινες ελεγον τι αν θελοι ο σπερμολογος ουτος λεγειν οι δε ξενων δαιμονιων δοκει καταγγελευς ειναι οτι τον ιησουν και την αναστασιν ευηγγελιζετο αυτοις
τινεσ δε και των επικουρειων και των στοικων φιλοσοφων συνεβαλλον αυτω και τινεσ ελεγον τι αν θελοι ο σπερμολογοσ ουτοσ λεγειν οι δε ξενων δαιμονιων δοκει καταγγελευσ ειναι οτι τον ιησουν και την αναστασιν ευηγγελιζετο
τινὲς δὲ τῶν Ἐπικουρείων καὶ τῶν Στοϊκῶν φιλοσόφων συνέβαλλον αὐτῷ, καί τινες ἔλεγον· τί ἂν θέλοι ὁ σπερμολόγος οὗτος λέγειν; οἱ δέ· ξένων δαιμονίων δοκεῖ καταγγελεὺς εἶναι· ὅτι τὸν Ἰησοῦν καὶ τὴν ἀνάστασιν εὐηγγελίζετο αὐτοῖς.
τινὲς δὲ καὶ τῶν Ἐπικουρίων καὶ Στοϊκῶν φιλοσόφων συνέβαλλον αὐτῷ, καί τινες ἔλεγον Τί ἂν θέλοι ὁ σπερμολόγος οὗτος λέγειν; οἱ δέ· Ξένων δαιμονίων δοκεῖ καταγγελεὺς εἶναι· ὅτι τὸν Ἰησοῦν καὶ τὴν ἀνάστασιν εὐηγγελίζετο.
τινὲς δὲ καὶτῶν Ἐπικουρείων ⸀καὶ Στοϊκῶν φιλοσόφων συνέβαλλον αὐτῷ, καί τινες ἔλεγον· Τί ἂν θέλοι ὁ σπερμολόγος οὗτος λέγειν; οἱ δέ· Ξένων δαιμονίων δοκεῖ καταγγελεὺς εἶναι· ὅτι τὸν Ἰησοῦν καὶ τὴν ἀνάστασιν εὐηγγελίζετο.
τινες δε των επικουρειων και των στωικων φιλοσοφων συνεβαλλον αυτω και τινες ελεγον τι αν θελοι ο σπερμολογος ουτος λεγειν οι δε ξενων δαιμονιων δοκει καταγγελευς ειναι οτι τον ιησουν και την αναστασιν αυτοις ευηγγελιζετο
Τινὲς δὲ καὶ τῶν Ἐπικουρείων καὶ Στοϊκῶν φιλοσόφων συνέβαλλον αὐτῷ, καί τινες ἔλεγον, “Τί ἂν θέλοι ὁ σπερμολόγος οὗτος λέγειν;” Οἱ δέ, “Ξένων δαιμονίων δοκεῖ καταγγελεὺς εἶναι”· ὅτι τὸν ˚Ἰησοῦν καὶ τὴν ἀνάστασιν εὐηγγελίζετο.
τινες δε των επικουρειων και των στωικων φιλοσοφων συνεβαλλον αυτω και τινες ελεγον τι αν θελοι ο σπερμολογος ουτος λεγειν οι δε ξενων δαιμονιων δοκει καταγγελευς ειναι οτι τον ιησουν και την αναστασιν αυτοις ευηγγελιζετο
Τινὲς δὲ καὶ τῶν Ἐπικουρείων καὶ τῶν Στοϊκῶν φιλοσόφων συνέβαλλον αὐτῷ. Καί τινες ἔλεγον, Τί ἂν θέλοι ὁ σπερμολόγος οὗτος λέγειν; Οἱ δέ, Ξένων δαιμονίων δοκεῖ καταγγελεὺς εἶναι· ὅτι τὸν Ἰησοῦν καὶ τὴν ἀνάστασιν εὐηγγελίζετο.
τινες δε των επικουρειων και των στωικων φιλοσοφων συνεβαλλον αυτω και τινες ελεγον τι αν θελοι ο σπερμολογος ουτος λεγειν οι δε ξενων δαιμονιων δοκει καταγγελευς ειναι οτι τον ιησουν και την αναστασιν αυτοις ευηγγελιζετο
Τινὲς δὲ τῶν Ἐπικουρείων καὶ τῶν Στωϊκῶν φιλοσόφων συνέβαλλον αὐτῷ. Καί τινες ἔλεγον, Τί ἂν θέλοι ὁ σπερμολόγος οὗτος λέγειν; Οἱ δέ, Ξένων δαιμονίων δοκεῖ καταγγελεὺς εἶναι· ὅτι τὸν Ἰησοῦν καὶ τὴν ἀνάστασιν αὐτοῖς εὐηγγελίζετο.
τινες δε των επικουρειων και των στωικων φιλοσοφων συνεβαλλον αυτω και τινες ελεγον τι αν θελοι ο σπερμολογος ουτος λεγειν οι δε ξενων δαιμονιων δοκει καταγγελευς ειναι οτι τον ιησουν και την αναστασιν αυτοις ευηγγελιζετο
τινες δε των επικουρειων και των στωικων φιλοσοφων συνεβαλλον αυτω και τινες ελεγον τι αν θελοι ο σπερμολογος ουτος λεγειν οι δε ξενων δαιμονιων δοκει καταγγελευς ειναι οτι τον ιησουν και την αναστασιν αυτοις ευηγγελιζετο
τινὲς δὲ καὶ τῶν Ἐπικουρείων καὶ Στοϊκῶν φιλοσόφων συνέβαλλον αὐτῷ· καί τινες ἔλεγον, Τί ἂν θέλοι ὁ σπερμολόγος οὗτος λέγειν; Οἱ δέ, Ξένων δαιμονίων δοκεῖ καταγγελεὺς εἶναι· ὅτι τὸν Ἰησοῦν καὶ τὴν ἀνάστασιν εὐηγγελίζετο.
τινες δε και των επικουρειων και στοικων φιλοσοφων συνεβαλλον αυτω και τινες ελεγον τι αν θελοι ο σπερμολογος ουτος λεγειν οι δε ξενων δαιμονιων δοκει καταγγελευς ειναι οτι τον ιησουν και την αναστασιν ευηγγελιζετο
τινες δε και των επικουρειων και των στωικων φιλοσοφων συνεβαλον αυτω και τινες ελεγον τι αν θελοι ο σπερμολογος ουτος λεγειν οι δε ξενων δαιμονιων δοκει καταγγελευς ειναι οτι τον ιησουν και την αναστασιν ευηγγελιζετο
τινὲς δὲ καὶ τῶν Ἐπικουρίων καὶ Στοϊκῶν φιλοσόφων συνέβαλλον αὐτῷ, καί τινες ἔλεγον· τί ἂν θέλοι ὁ σπερμολόγος οὗτος λέγειν; οἱ δέ, ξένων δαιμονίων δοκεῖ καταγγελεὺς εἶναι, ὅτι τὸν Ἰησοῦν καὶ τὴν ἀνάστασιν εὐηγγελίζετο.
ଉଡ଼ିରୁଆ “ଏପିକ୍ୟୁରିଆନ୍ ଆରି ସ୍ତୋୟିକ୍” ପାଟ୍ ଗୁରୁଇଂ ଏତେ ମେଇଂନେ ଜୁକ୍ତାଜୁକ୍ତି ଡିଂଆର୍କେ । ମେଇଂ ବିତ୍ରେ ଉଡ଼ିରୁଆ ବାଲିର୍ଆର୍କେ “ଆକେନ୍ ନିର୍ବୁଦି ରେମୁଆଁ ମେଁନେ ବାଲିର୍ନେ ନ୍ସା ଚେସ୍ଟା ଡିଂଡିଂକେ?” ବିନ୍ଣ୍ଡ୍ରେ ବାଲିର୍ଆର୍କେ “ବିଦେସ୍ନେ ଦେବ୍ତାଇଂନେ ବିସୟ୍ରେ ମେଁ ବାସଙ୍ଗ୍ ଡିଂନେ ସୁଗୁଆ ଜାନା ପଡ଼େଡିଂକେ ।” ଜିସୁ ଆରି ମେଁନେ ଗୁଏଃଚେ ତଃଡ଼୍ୟାଃକ୍ନେ ବିସୟ୍ରେ ପାଉଲ୍ ପର୍ଚାର୍ ଡିଂଡିଂକ୍ନେ ଅଁଚେ ମେଇଂ ଦେକ୍ ବାସଙ୍ଗ୍ଆର୍କେ ।
ત્યારે એપીકયુરી તથા સ્ટોઈક (મત માનનારા) પંડિતોમાંના કેટલાક તેની સામા થયા, તેઓમાંના કેટલાકે કહ્યું કે, આ ગુપ્ત વાત પ્રગટ કરનાર શું કહેવા માગે છે? બીજા કેટલાકે કહ્યું કે, પારકા ઈશ્વરને પ્રગટ કરનારો દેખાય છે; કેમ કે તે ઈસુ તથા પુનરુત્થાન વિષે (નું વચન) પ્રગટ કરતો હતો.
Kèk filozòf ki t'ap swiv prensip patizan Epiki yo ak patizan Zenon yo t'ap pale avèk li. Gen ladan yo ki t'ap di: Kisa paladò sa a vle di la a? Gen lòt moun ki t'ap di: Gen lè l'ap pale sou yon lòt kalite bondye. Yo t'ap di sa paske Pòl t'ap pale yo sou Jezi, li t'ap di yo ki jan mò yo gen pou yo leve vivan ankò.
Anplis, kèk nan filosòf Epikiryen ak Stoyik yo t ap diskite avè l. Kèk t ap di: “Kisa mesye ki renmen pale anpil sa a ta vle di?” Lòt yo t ap di: “Li sanble ke l ap pwoklame kèk lòt kalite dye etranje” —akoz ke li t ap preche Jésus ak rezirèksyon an.
फेर इपिकूरी अर स्तोईकी उपदेशकां म्ह तै कुछे उसतै तर्क करण लाग्गे, अर कुछां नै कह्या, “यो बकवादी के कहणा चाहवै सै?” पर दुसरयां नै कह्या, “वो दुसरे देवत्यां का प्रचारक दिक्खै सै” क्यूँके वो यीशु का अर पुनरुत्थान का सुसमाचार सुणावै था।
Wata ƙungiyar Afikuriya da kuma masu bin ussan ilimin Sitoyik suka fara gardama da shi. Waɗansunsu suka ce, “Mene ne mai surutun nan yake ƙoƙarin faɗi?” Waɗansu suka ce, “Kamar yana wa’azin baƙin alloli ne.” Sun faɗa haka ne domin Bulus yana wa’azin labari mai daɗi game da Yesu da kuma tashin matattu.
Amma wadan su Abikuriyawa da masana sun yi karo da shi. Wadansun su na cewa, ''Menene wannan sakaren ke cewa?'' Wadansu kuma sun ce, ''Da alama mai wa'azi ne na wasu alloli dabam,'' domin yana wa'azin Yesu da tashin sa daga matattu.
Hoopaapaa aku la ia ia kekahi poe akeakamai o ka poe Epikoureio, a me ka poe Setoiko. A i mai la kekahi poe, Heaha ka mea a keia haukae e olelo mai ai? I mai la kekahi, Me he kanaka e hai ana i na akua e keia; no ka mea, ua hai i mai la no oia ia Iesu ia lakou, a me ke alahouana.
| בין האנשים הרבים שאיתם התווכח היו גם פילוסופים אפיקורסים וסטואיים. כששמעו את דבריו של פולוס על תקומתו של ישוע מן המתים, הגיבו:”הוא סתם פטפטן!“או,”הוא עושה תעמולה לדת חדשה כלשהי!“ |
| וגם מקצת הפילוסופים מתלמידי אפיקורוס ומחברת האסטוא התגרו בו ויש אשר אמרו מה יאמר המפטפט הלז ואחרים אמרים כפי הנראה הוא מגיד אלהי נכר יען כי בשר אתם את ישוע ואת התחיה׃ |
तब इपिकूरी और स्तोईकी दार्शनिकों में से कुछ उससे तर्क करने लगे, और कुछ ने कहा, “यह बकवादी क्या कहना चाहता है?” परन्तु दूसरों ने कहा, “वह अन्य देवताओं का प्रचारक मालूम पड़ता है,” क्योंकि वह यीशु का और पुनरुत्थान का सुसमाचार सुनाता था।
कुछ ऍपीक्यूरी और स्तोइकवादी दार्शनिक भी उनसे बातचीत करते रहे. उनमें से कुछ आपस में कह रहे थे, “क्या कहना चाहता है यह खोखला बकवादी?” कुछ अन्यों ने कहा, “ऐसा लगता है वह कुछ नए देवताओं का प्रचारक है!” क्योंकि पौलॉस के प्रचार का विषय था मसीह येशु और पुनरुत्थान.
Némelyek pedig az epikureus és sztoikus filozófusok közül összeakadtak vele. Néhányan azt mondták: „Mit akarhat ez a csacsogó mondani?“Mások meg: „Idegen istenségek hirdetőjének látszik“, mivel Jézust és a feltámadást hirdette.
Némelyek pedig az epikureus és stoikus filozófusok közül összeakadtak ő vele. És némelyek mondának: Mit akarhat ez a csacsogó mondani? Mások meg: Idegen istenségek hirdetőjének látszik. Mivelhogy a Jézust és a feltámadást hirdeti vala nékik.
Þá tóku nokkrir Epíkúringar og Stóuspekingar að þrátta við hann. Þegar hann sagði þeim frá Jesú og upprisu hans, sögðu sumir: „Hvaða rugl er nú þetta!“og aðrir: „Þú ert að boða einhverja ókunna guði.“
Ya na ụfọdụ ndị Epikuri na ndị Stoịk bụ ndị ọkachamara na-arụrịta ụka. Ndị ụfọdụ na-asị, “gịnị ka onye ekwurekwu a ga-ekwu?” Ndị ọzọ sịrị, “ọ dịka onye na-ekwusa ụmụ mmụọ ndị ala ọzọ.” Ha kwuru nke a nʼihi na ọ na-ekwusa oziọma banyere Jisọs na mbilite nʼọnwụ ya.
Ngem adda met dagiti Epicureo ken Estoico a managbiruk iti pudno a nakasalaw kenkuana. Ket kinuna dagiti dadduma, “Ania ti padpadasen nga ibaga daytoy a salawasaw?” Ket kinuna dagiti dadduma, “Kasla mangaskasaba isuna maipanggep iti saan nga am-ammo a dios,” gapu ta ikaskasabana ti maipanggep kenni Jesus ken ti panagungar.
Guru-guru aliran Epikuros dan aliran Stoa berdebat juga dengan dia. Beberapa dari mereka berkata, "Orang ini tahu apa? Pengetahuannya hanya sedikit, tetapi ia banyak mulut!" Beberapa yang lainnya berkata, "Rupanya ia memberitakan tentang dewa-dewa bangsa lain." Mereka berkata begitu, karena Paulus berbicara tentang Yesus dan tentang hidup kembali sesudah mati.
Beberapa ahli filsafat dari golongan Epikuros dan Stoa mulai berdebat dengan Paulus. “Apa yang pengoceh ini bicarakan?” tanya mereka. Yang lain menyimpulkan, “Dia tampaknya mengajar tentang dewa-dewa asing,” sebab Paulus berbicara tentang Yesus dan kebangkitan-Nya.
Dan juga beberapa ahli pikir dari golongan Epikuros dan Stoa bersoal jawab dengan dia dan ada yang berkata: "Apakah yang hendak dikatakan si peleter ini?" Tetapi yang lain berkata: "Rupa-rupanya ia adalah pemberita ajaran dewa-dewa asing." Sebab ia memberitakan Injil tentang Yesus dan tentang kebangkitan-Nya.
Lalu beberapa ahli filsafat dari aliran Epikuros dan Stoa mulai berdebat dengan Paulus. Beberapa di antara mereka berkata, “Ajaran si pembual itu tidak masuk akal.” Dan yang lain berkata, “Sepertinya dia menawarkan dewa-dewa asing.” Mereka berkata seperti itu karena Paulus memberitakan tentang Yesus, khususnya bahwa Yesus hidup kembali dari kematian.
Kuiti ang'wi a alingi nia a Aepikureo ni Astoiko akamukungiilya. Ni auya akaligitya, “Ingi ki ntuni ukukiligitya uyu u muligitya nu mudabu? iAuya akaligitya, “Yigeelekile ukutanantya nkani niang'wa Itunda muziila.” ku nsoko ukutanantya nkani yang'wa Yesu nu wiukigwa.
Ed alcuni de' filosofi Epicurei, e Stoici, conferivan con lui. Ed alcuni dicevano: Che vuol dire questo cianciatore? E gli altri: Egli pare essere annunziatore di dii stranieri; perciocchè egli evangelizzava loro Gesù, e la risurrezione.
Anche certi filosofi epicurei e stoici discutevano con lui e alcuni dicevano: «Che cosa vorrà mai insegnare questo ciarlatano?». E altri: «Sembra essere un annnunziatore di divinità straniere»; poiché annunziava Gesù e la risurrezione.
E anche certi filosofi epicurei e stoici conferivan con lui. E alcuni dicevano: Che vuol dire questo cianciatore? E altri: Egli pare essere un predicatore di divinità straniere; perché annunziava Gesù e la risurrezione.
Are Abikuriya nan sitokiya anu poko aje wa dusa wa hiri wa tonno ani ce ni Bulus. Unu igizo nyanini unu ipirkan igeme mazini ubo me? Aye unu gusa, aye unu gusa mazini bo utize anice ni mare makiri unu tisa niza ni Yesu nan uhira amu cau.
斯てエピクロス派ならびにストア派の哲學者 數人これと論じあひ、或 者らは言ふ『この囀る者なにを言はんとするか』或 者らは言ふ『かれは異なる神々を傳ふる者の如し』是はパウロがイエスと復活とを宣べたる故なり。
エピクロス派やストア派の哲学者たちの幾人かとも語り合った。ある者たちは言った，「このおしゃべりは何を言いたいのだろうか」。 ほかの者たちは言った，「異国の神々を宣伝しているらしい」。彼がイエスと復活について宣教していたからである。
また、エピクロス派やストア派の哲学者数人も、パウロと議論を戦わせていたが、その中のある者たちが言った、「このおしゃべりは、いったい、何を言おうとしているのか」。また、ほかの者たちは、「あれは、異国の神々を伝えようとしているらしい」と言った。パウロが、イエスと復活とを、宣べ伝えていたからであった。
エピクロス派とストア派の哲学者たちも幾人かいて、パウロと論じ合っていたが、その中のある者たちは、「このおしゃべりは、何を言うつもりなのか。」と言い、ほかの者たちは、「彼は外国の神々を伝えているらしい。」と言った。パウロがイエスと復活とを宣べ伝えたからである。
時にエピクリアン及びストイック派の哲學者數人、之と論じ合ひけるが、或人は、此囀人は何を云ふ者ぞ、と云ひ、或人は、彼は新しき鬼神を告ぐる者の如し、と云ひ居たり、是パウロがイエズスと復活との福音を彼等に告ぐればなり。
ସିଲତ୍ତେ ଏପିକୁରିଅନ୍ ଡ ସ୍ତୋୟିକ ଞନଙ୍ତିୟ୍ମରଞ୍ଜି ବୟନ୍ ପାଓଲନ୍ ଅଲ୍ଞାଙ୍ତମେଞ୍ଜି, ଆରି, ଲାଙ୍ଲେନ୍ନେ ଗାମେଞ୍ଜି, “କେନ୍ ଆ ଉଲ୍ଲୁନ୍ ଆ ମନ୍ରା ଇନି ବର୍ତନାୟ୍ ଗାମ୍ତେ?” ଆରି ଲାଙ୍ଲେନ୍ନେ ଗାମେଞ୍ଜି, “ଇନ୍ଲେନ୍ ଅଣ୍ଡ୍ରଙ୍ ଜନାବନ୍ ଆ ସନୁମ୍ଜି ଆ ବର୍ନେ ଆନିନ୍ ବର୍ତନ୍ ଅନ୍ତମ୍ ଅବ୍ଡିସୟ୍ତବୋ ।” ଇନିଆସନ୍ଗାମେଣ୍ଡେନ୍ ପାଓଲନ୍ ଜିସୁନ୍ ଡ ୟନର୍ମେଙନ୍ ଆ ବର୍ନେ ଆରପ୍ପୁଙ୍ବରେନ୍, ଆନିଞ୍ଜି ଏତ୍ତେଲେ ବର୍ରଞ୍ଜି ।
Xuchꞌoꞌqꞌ uwach ri kichomanik ri achyabꞌ epicúreo xuqujeꞌ estoico. ri sibꞌalaj kꞌo ketaꞌmabꞌal. Xutzijoj ri Jesús xuqujeꞌ ri ukꞌastajibꞌal wach chike, ri winaq are xkita ri xubꞌij, ri Pablo xkibꞌij: ¿Jas karaj kubꞌij we tzijonel laj achi rukꞌ ri jaljoj taq uchomanik? Nikꞌaj winaq xkibꞌij: Are kutzijoj kibꞌiꞌ e dios rech juleꞌ taq tinimit chik.
Anahu kna huno mago'a Epikurien vahe'ene, Stoik vahe'mo'zanena vahe'mofo nomani'zama rezagane'zama negaza vahe'mo'za (Filosofa) kehakare hunentageno mago'amo'za anage hu'za antahi'naze, nankna ke ama neginagi vahe'mo'a hunaku nehie? Ruga'amo'za hu'za, agra ru anumzanku nehia nere. Na'ankure Jisasi agi agenkene, fripinti'ma oti'nea Knare Musenkegu hu'naze.
ಆದರೆ ಎಪಿಕೂರಿಯರು ಹಾಗೂ ಸ್ತೋಯಿಕರು ಎಂಬ ತತ್ವಜ್ಞಾನಿಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ಸಹ ಕೆಲವರು ಅವನೊಂದಿಗೆ ವಾಗ್ವಾದ ಮಾಡಲು ಪ್ರಾರಂಭಿಸಿ, “ಈ ಬಾಯಿಬಡುಕ ಏನು ಹೇಳಬೇಕೆಂದಿದ್ದಾನೆ?” ಎಂದರು. ಇನ್ನೂ ಕೆಲವರು, “ಅವನು ವಿದೇಶದ ದೇವರುಗಳ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಪ್ರಸ್ತಾಪಿಸುವಂತೆ ತೋರುತ್ತದೆ,” ಎಂದರು. ಏಕೆಂದರೆ ಅವನು ಯೇಸುವನ್ನು ಮತ್ತು ಪುನರುತ್ಥಾನವನ್ನು ಕುರಿತ ಸುವಾರ್ತೆ ಸಾರುತ್ತಿದ್ದನು.
ಇದಲ್ಲದೆ ಎಪಿಕೂರಿಯನ್ನರು, ಸ್ತೋಯಿಕರು ಎಂಬ ತತ್ವವಿಚಾರಕರಲ್ಲಿ ಕೆಲವರು ಅವನ ಸಂಗಡ ಚರ್ಚೆಮಾಡಿದರು. ಅವರಲ್ಲಿ ಕೆಲವರು; “ಈ ವಾಚಾಳಿ ಏನು ಹೇಳ ಬೇಕೆಂದಿದ್ದಾನೆ?” ಅಂದರು. ಅವನು ಯೇಸುವಿನ ವಿಷಯವಾಗಿ ಮತ್ತು ಸತ್ತವರು ಎದ್ದು ಬರುವರೆಂಬುದರ ಕುರಿತು ಸಾರುತ್ತಿದ್ದುದರಿಂದ; “ಇವನು ಅನ್ಯದೇಶದ ದೇವರುಗಳನ್ನು ಪ್ರಚಾರಮಾಡುವವನಾಗಿ ಕಂಡುಬರುತ್ತಾನೆಂದು” ಬೇರೆ ಕೆಲವರು ಹೇಳಿದರು.
Mbe nawe abhasomi abhandi abha Waepikureo na Wastoiko bhamulubha. Abhandi nibhaika,”nichinuki chinu kaika omwaiki unu mulela? Abhandi mbhaika,” ejibhonekana kalasha emisango ja Nyamuanga mgenyi” kwa insonga kalasha emisango jo bhusuluko bha Yesu.
Pu leino avanghana luhala ava epikuli nava sitoiki vakhamweideikha. Pu avange vakhata, “Inchova khinu kheikhi uyu unchofi uteta? Avange vakhata, “ivonekha ukhuta ilumbeileila inongwa inchaminguluve inongwa ncha Yeisu nu vunchukha.
Lakini baadhi jha bhanafalisafa bha Bhaepikureo ni Bhastoiko bhakan'kabili. Ni bhangi bhakajobha, “Kiki kyaaka kijobha munu ojho n'jobhajhi n'dele? Bhangi bhakajobha, “Jhibhonekana ihubiri habari jha K'yara n'hesya” kwandabha ihubiri habari jha Yesu ni ufufuo.
어떤 에비구레오와 스도이고 철학자들도 바울과 쟁론할새 혹은 이르되 이 말장이가 무슨 말을 하고자 하느뇨 하고 혹은 이르되 이방신들을 전하는 사람인가보다 하니 이는 바울이 예수와 또 몸의 부활 전함을 인함이러라
어떤 에비구레오와 스도이고 철학자들도 바울과 쟁론할새 혹은 이르되 이 말장이가 무슨 말을 하고자 하느뇨 하고 혹은 이르되 이방 신들을 전하는 사람인가보다 하니 이는 바울이 예수와 또 몸의 부활 전함을 인함이러라
Oasr pac kutu mwet luti ke u se pangpang mwet Epicurus ac mwet Stoic elos wi pac alein nu sel. Kutu selos siyuk mu, “Mea mwet filanginkas se inge fahk uh?” Ac kutu mwet uh topuk, “El luman kaskas ke kutu god lun mutanfahl saya.” Elos fahk ouinge mweyen Paul el luti ke Jesus oayapa ke sifil moulyak uh.
Kono hape bamwi ba li tutite ba Ma epikulia ni ma Sitoiki ni bali kopanya naye. Mi bamwi nibati, “Uzu yo wamba ahulu u lika ku tii nzi? Bamwi ni bati,” Uboneka kuba muluti wa milimu iseni kubonwa, “kakuti abali kuluta za Jesu ni za ku buuka.
| کۆمەڵێک فەیلەسوفی ئەپیکوری و ستۆیکی گفتوگۆیان لەگەڵی دەکرد. هەندێکیان دەیانگوت: «ئەم چەنەبازە دەیەوێت چی بڵێت؟» هەندێکی دیکەشیان دەیانگوت: «دیارە بانگەواز بۆ چەند خوداوەندێکی نامۆ دەکات،» چونکە باسی عیسا و زیندووبوونەوەی دەکرد. |
ଏଚରଜା଼ଣା ଏପିକୁରିୟା ଇଞ୍ଜାଁ ସ୍ତୟିକ୍ ଜା଼ପ୍ନି ଗୂର୍କା ତଲେ ଏ଼ୱାରି ରୁଜୁବାଡ଼ି ଆ଼ତେ । ଏ଼ୱାରି ବିତ୍ରାଟି ଏଚରଜା଼ଣା ଏଲେଇଚେରି, “ଈ ବୁଦି ହିଲାଆ ହା଼ଡାଁକା଼ଣ୍ଡୁ ଏ଼ନାଆଁ ୱେସାଲି ଅଣ୍ପିମାନେସି?” ଅ଼ଡ଼େ ଏଚରଜା଼ଣା ଏଲେଇଚେରି, “ଏ଼ୱାସି ପୁନାଆତି ପେ଼ଣ୍କାତି କାତା ୱେହ୍ନିଲେହେଁ ୱେସିମାନେସି;” ଇଚିହିଁ ଏ଼ୱାସି ଜୀସୁ ଅ଼ଡ଼େ ତାନି ୱେଣ୍ତେ ନିଙ୍ଗିତି କାତାତି ନେହିଁ କାବ୍ରୁ ୱେ଼କ୍ହି ମାଚେସି ।
Quidam autem epicurei et stoici philosophi disserebant cum eo, et quidam dicebant: Quid vult seminiverbius hic dicere? Alii vero: Novorum dæmoniorum videtur annuntiator esse: quia Jesum et resurrectionem annuntiabat eis.
Quidam autem Epicurei, et Stoici philosophi disserebant cum eo, et quidam dicebant: Quid vult seminiverbius hic, dicere? Alii vero: Novorum dæmoniorum videtur annunciator esse: quia Iesum, et resurrectionem annunciabat eis.
Quidam autem Epicurei, et Stoici philosophi disserebant cum eo, et quidam dicebant: Quid vult seminiverbius hic, dicere? Alii vero: Novorum dæmoniorum videtur annunciator esse: quia Iesum, et resurrectionem annunciabat eis.
Quidam autem epicurei et stoici philosophi disserebant cum eo, et quidam dicebant: Quid vult seminiverbius hic dicere? Alii vero: Novorum dæmoniorum videtur annuntiator esse: quia Jesum et resurrectionem annuntiabat eis.
quidam autem epicurei et stoici philosophi disserebant cum eo et quidam dicebant quid vult seminiverbius hic dicere alii vero novorum daemoniorum videtur adnuntiator esse quia Iesum et resurrectionem adnuntiabat eis
Quidam autem Epicurei, et Stoici philosophi disserebant cum eo, et quidam dicebant: Quid vult seminiverbius hic, dicere? Alii vero: Novorum daemoniorum videtur annunciator esse: quia Iesum, et resurrectionem annunciabat eis.
Un kādi no Epikureju un Stoīku gudriem ar viņu sarunājās; un kādi sacīja: “Ko šis pļāpa grib runāt?” Un citi: “Šis izliekās kā svešu dievu sludinātājs;” tāpēc ka viņš tiem Jēzu un to augšāmcelšanos sludināja.
Ndambo ya bato ya mayele oyo balandaka malakisi ya Epikire mpe ya Zenon bakomaki kotiana tembe na ye. Bamoko batunaki: — Moto oyo ya makelele alingi koloba nini? Bamosusu balobaki: — Tomoni lokola nde azali kolobela banzambe ya bapaya! Balobaki bongo mpo ete Polo azalaki koteya Sango Malamu na tina na Yesu mpe lisekwa kati na bakufi.
तब इपिकूरी अऊर स्तोईकी देखन वालो म सी कुछ ओको सी तर्क-वितर्क करन लग्यो, अऊर कुछ न कह्यो, “यो बकवास करन वालो का कहनो चाहवय हय?” पर दूसरों न कह्यो, “ऊ दूसरों देवता को प्रचारक मालूम पड़य हय” कहालीकि ऊ यीशु को अऊर जीन्दो होन को सुसमाचार सुनावत होतो।
Abamu ku bayigiriza bakagezimunnyu Aba Epikuliyo ne Abasutoyiiko ne batandika okuwakana naye. Bwe yabuulira ku Yesu n’okuzuukira kw’abafu ne bagamba nti, “Aloota buloosi,” n’abalala nti, “Waliwo eddiini empya etali ya wano gy’ayimbirira.”
तेबे इपिकूरी और स्तोईकी ज्ञानिया बीचा ते कई जणे तेस साथे बईस करने लगे और बऊत जणेया बोलेया, “ये बकवासी क्या बोलणा चाओआ?” पर ओरी बोलेया, “ये ओरी देवतेया रा प्रचार करने वाल़ा लगोआ, कऊँकि ये यीशुए रा और दुबारा जिऊँदा ऊणे रा सुसमाचार सुणाओआ।”
Ary ny olon-kendry sasany tamin’ ny Epikoreana sy ny Stoika nanohitra azy koa, ka hoy ny sasany: Inona no tian’ io mpibedibedy io holazaina? Ary hoy kosa ny sasany: Toa mitory andriamani-baovao izy, satria Jesosy sy ny fitsanganan’ ny maty no notoriny.
Nifanaontsy ama’e ka o mpikaro-kihitse amo Epikoreo naho amo Stoikao. Hoe ty ila’e: Ino ty ho volañe’ ty mpangaradadake tìa? Hoe ka ty ila’e: Hoe t’ie mpitalily ndrañahare hafa, amy t’ie nitaroñe Iesoà naho i fivañonambelo’ey.
എപ്പിക്കൂര്യരും സ്തോയിക്കരും ആയ തത്വജ്ഞാനികളിൽ ചിലർ അവനോട് വാദിച്ചു: “ഈ വായാടി എന്ത് പറവാൻ പോകുന്നു?” എന്ന് ചിലരും അവൻ യേശുവിനെയും പുനരുത്ഥാനത്തെയും പ്രസംഗിക്കകൊണ്ട്: “ഇവൻ അന്യദേവതകളെ ഘോഷിക്കുന്നവൻ എന്ന് തോന്നുന്നു” എന്നു മറ്റുചിലരും പറഞ്ഞു.
എപ്പിക്കൂൎയ്യരും സ്തോയിക്കരും ആയ തത്വജ്ഞാനികളിൽ ചിലർ അവനോടു വാദിച്ചു: ഈ വിടുവായൻ എന്തു പറവാൻ പോകുന്നു എന്നു ചിലരും അവൻ യേശുവിനെയും പുനരുത്ഥാനത്തെയും പ്രസംഗിക്കകൊണ്ടു: ഇവൻ അന്യദേവതകളെ ഘോഷിക്കുന്നവൻ എന്നു തോന്നുന്നു എന്നു മറ്റു ചിലരും പറഞ്ഞു
എപ്പിക്കൂര്യരും സ്റ്റോയിക്കരുമായ ഒരുകൂട്ടം തത്ത്വചിന്തകന്മാർ അദ്ദേഹത്തോടു തർക്കിച്ചു. “എന്താണ് ഈ വിടുവായൻ പറയാൻ ആഗ്രഹിക്കുന്നത്?” എന്നു ചിലർ ചോദിച്ചു. “ഇയാൾ അന്യദൈവങ്ങളെ പ്രചരിപ്പിക്കുന്നവൻ ആണെന്നു തോന്നുന്നു,” മറ്റുചിലർ അഭിപ്രായപ്പെട്ടു. അദ്ദേഹം യേശുക്രിസ്തുവിനെയും പുനരുത്ഥാനത്തെയുംപറ്റിയുള്ള സുവിശേഷം പ്രസംഗിച്ചതുകൊണ്ടാണ് അവർ ഇതെല്ലാം പറഞ്ഞത്.
Epicure amadi Stoic-ki mahei masing heiba kharagasu mahakka yetnarammi. Makhoi kharana hanglak-i. “Pang-ngangda ngangba asina haininglabasi karino?” Atoppasingna khumlak-i, “Mahakna miramgi laisinggi maramda sandokpa malli.” Paul-na Jisugi amadi Ibungona hinggatkhibagi maramda sandokpagi maramna makhoina masi haibani.
तेव्हा एपिकूरपंथी व स्तोयिकपंथी ह्यांच्याबरोबर कित्येक तत्वज्ञांनी त्यास विरोध केला, कित्येक म्हणाले, “हा बडबड्या काय बोलतो?” दुसरे म्हणाले, “हा परक्या दैवतांची घोषणा करणारा दिसतो” कारण येशू व पुनरुत्थान ह्याविषयीच्या सुवार्तेची तो घोषणा करीत असे.
ଏନ୍ତେ ଚିମିନ୍ ଇପିକୁରିୟାନ୍ ଆଡଃ ସ୍ତୋୟିକ୍ ଇତୁ ହଡ଼କଲଃ ପାଉଲୁସ୍ଆଃ କାପ୍ଜି ହବାୟାନା । ଇନ୍କୁଏତେ ଚିମିନ୍ ହଡ଼କ କାଜିକେଦା, “ନିଃ ମିଆଁଦ୍ ବେଗାର୍ ଚିହ୍ନାଁର୍ ହଡ଼, ଚିନାଃକ କାଜି ନାଙ୍ଗ୍ ସାନାଙ୍ଗ୍ତାନାଏ?” ଏଟାଃକ କାଜିକେଦା, “ଏଟାଃ କା ସାରିକାନ୍ ବଙ୍ଗାକଆଃ ବିଷାଏରେ ଇନିଃ ଉଦୁବ୍ତାନ୍ ଲେକାଏ ଆଟ୍କାରଃତାନା ।” ଇନ୍କୁ ନେ'ଲେକା କାଜିକେଦାକ ଚିଆଃଚି ଇନିଃ ୟୀଶୁ ଆଡଃ ଆୟାଃ ଜୀଉବିନିରିଦ୍ ବିଷାଏରେୟାଃ ସୁକୁକାଜିକେ ଉଦୁବ୍ତାଇକେନା ।
Na bhananji bhakagulangaga majiganyo ga a Epikulo na a Ashitoiki gubhataukenje. Bhananji bhalinkutinji, “Bhapinga bheleketa nndi bhangumbabha?” Bhananji gubhashiteanje, “Paabhoneka mbuti bhanalunguya ga ashi nnungu bha shijeni.” Pabha a Pauli bhatendaga lunguya ga a Yeshu na ga yuka.
ဧပိကုရုနှင့်သတောအိပ်ဟုခေါ်သော အတွေးအခေါ်ပညာရှင်အချို့တို့သည်လည်း ပေါလုနှင့်အချေအတင်ဆွေးနွေးကြ၏။ ထို သူအချို့တို့က ``ဤစကားအိုးသည်အဘယ် အရာကိုပြောဆိုနေပါသနည်း'' ဟုဆိုကြ၏။ အခြားသူများက ``သူသည်လူမျိုးခြားတို့၏ နတ်ဘုရားများအကြောင်းကို ပြောဆိုနေဟန် တူ၏'' ဟုဆိုကြ၏။ ထိုသူတို့ဤသို့ပြောကြ ခြင်းမှာပေါလုသည်သခင်ယေရှုအကြောင်း နှင့် သေခြင်းမှရှင်ပြန်ထမြောက်ခြင်းအကြောင်း တို့ကိုဟောပြောနေသောကြောင့်ဖြစ်၏။-
ထိုအခါ ဧပိကုရုတပည့်တို့နှင့် သတောအိတ် ပညာရှိအချို့တို့ သည် ပေါလုနှင့် ဆိုင်ပြိုင်၍၊ အချို့က၊ ဤမရေရသောလူသည် အဘယ်သိုပပြောချင်သနည်းဟု ဆို၏။ အချို့ကလည်း၊ ဤသူသည် တကျွန်းတနိုင်ငံ နတ်ဘုရားတို့၏ အကြောင်းကို ဟောပြောသောသူ ဖြစ်ဟန်ရှိသည်ဟုဆို၏။ ဆိုသည်အကြောင်းကား၊ ပေါလုသည် ယေရှု၏ တရားနှင့်ထမြောက်ခြင်း တရားတည်းဟူသော ဧဝံဂေလိတရားကို ဟောသတည်း။
ထိုအခါ ဧပိကုရု တပည့်တို့နှင့် သတောအိတ် ပညာရှိ အချို့ တို့ သည် ပေါလု နှင့်ဆိုင်ပြိုင် ၍၊ အချို့ က၊ ဤ မရေရ သောလူသည် အဘယ်သို့ ပြော ချင် သနည်းဟု ဆို ၏။ အချို့ကလည်း၊ ဤသူသည် တစ်ကျွန်း တစ်နိုင်ငံနတ် ဘုရားတို့၏ အကြောင်းကို ဟောပြော သောသူ ဖြစ် ဟန် ရှိသည်ဟုဆို၏။ ဆိုသည်အကြောင်း ကား၊ ပေါလုသည် ယေရှု ၏ တရားနှင့် ထမြောက် ခြင်း တရားတည်းဟူသောဧဝံဂေလိတရားကို ဟော သတည်း။
A ka ngangare ki a ia etahi tohunga o nga Epikureana, o nga Toika. Ko etahi i mea, he aha ta tenei tangata korerorero e mea nei? i mea etahi, Me te mea he kaiwhakapuaki ia i etahi atua tauhou: mo tana kauwhau i a Ihu, i te aranga, ki a ratou.
Titia Epicurean aru Stoic khan laga pondit kunba ahi kene tai logot kotha lagi thakise, aru kunba koise, etu ke najana manu ki kobole mon kori ase? Dusra koise tai dusra jaga laga dhorom manu ase, kelemane tai Jisu laga kotha aru jee utha laga kotha prochar kori ase.
Epikuria nok hah nyia Stoik nyootsootte nep ih Pool damdi daanmui rumta. Mararah ih cheng rumta, “Arah ih tiim uh lajat kaadi tiim jengte jengla?” Wahoh loong ah ih ngaak baatta, “Mideek mikaan Rangte tiit ta baat ha nih.” Arah jengkhaap ah Pool ih Jisu nyia ngaaksaat tiit baat kano li rumta.
Ixuku lezazi zama-Ephikhuri lamaStoyikhi laphikisana laye. Abanye babo babuza bathi, “Uwumani lolu luzama ukuthini kanti?” Abanye bathi, “Kungathi utshumayela ngonkulunkulu bezizweni.” Bakutsho lokhu ngoba uPhawuli wayetshumayela izindaba ezinhle ngoJesu langokuvuka kwabafileyo.
Labathile kuzo izazi zamaEpikuri lamaStoyiki baphikisana laye. Labanye bathi: Uwumane lolu lufuna ukuthini? Kodwa abanye bathi: Kungathi ungotshumayela onkulunkulu bezizweni; ngoba ngevangeli watshumayela kubo uJesu lokuvuka kwabafileyo.
Lakini baadhi ya Banafalsafa ba Baepikureo na Wetoiko batibakabili. Benge babaya, “Namani chaakilongela yolo mlongelaji nchunu? Benge babaya, “Ibonekana atihubiri habari ya nnongo mgeni,” kwa sababu ahubiria habari ya Yesu na ufufuo.
तर त्यहाँ कतिजना एपिक्युरी र स्तोइकी दार्शनिकहरूसँग पनि उनको विवाद भयो । र केहीले यसो भने, “यो बकबकेले के भन्न खोज्दैछ?” अरूहरूले भने, “ऊ त विदेशी देवताहरूको प्रचारक जस्तो देखिन्छ ।” किनभने उनले येशू र उहाँको पुनरुत्थानको बारेमा प्रचार गर्दै थिए ।
Vandu vevalanda mawuliwu ga Epikulo na Stoiki vakotini nayu. Ndi vangi vakajova, “Igana kujova kyani muyimu uyu?” Hinu vangi vakajova, “Ikokosela vachapanga vachiyehe.” Ndava Pauli avakokosela malovi ga kumvala Yesu na kuyuka,
Nogen av de epikureiske og stoiske visdomslærere innlot sig også i ordskifte med ham, og nogen sa: Hvad mener vel denne ordgyder? Andre igjen sa: Han synes å være en som forkynner utenlandske guddommer det var fordi han forkynte evangeliet om Jesus og opstandelsen.
Han diskuterte også med noen av filosofene, både epikureere og stoikere. Men da Paulus fortalte dem om Jesus og sa at han hadde stått opp fra de døde, sa noen:”Hva er dette for slags underlige ideer han har snappet opp? Hva mener han?” Andre sa:”Han forsøker å prakke på oss en fremmed religion.”
Nokre av dei epikureiske og stoiske vismennerne gav seg i ordskifte med honom, og sume sagde: «Kva er det denne ordgytaren vil segja?» Men andre sagde: «Han synest vera talsmann for framande guddomar; » - for han forkynte deim evangeliet um Jesus og uppstoda.
ସେଥିରେ ଏପିକୂୂରୀୟ ଓ ସ୍ତୋୟିକ ଦର୍ଶନଶାସ୍ତ୍ରର କେତେକ ଦାର୍ଶନିକ ମଧ୍ୟ ତାହାଙ୍କ ସହିତ ବାଦାନୁବାଦ କରିବାକୁ ଲାଗିଲେ, ପୁଣି, କେହି କେହି କହିଲେ, ଏ ବାଚାଳଟା କଅଣ କହିବାକୁ ଇଚ୍ଛା କରୁଅଛି? ଆଉ କେହି କେହି କହିଲେ, ସେ ଅଜଣା ଦେବତାମାନଙ୍କର ପ୍ରଚାରକ ହେଲା ପରି ଜଣାଯାଉଅଛି; କାରଣ ସେ ଯୀଶୁ ଓ ପୁନରୁତ୍ଥାନ ବିଷୟକ ସୁସମାଚାର ପ୍ରଚାର କରୁଥିଲେ।
Gareen falaasamtoota Efiiqoroosiitii fi Istoʼiki tokkos isaan falmaa ture; isaan keessaa tokko tokko, “Namichi legellegaan kun maal jedha?” jedhan. Warri kaan immoo, “Inni waaʼee waaqota ormaa labsa fakkaata” jedhan. Phaawulos waaʼee Yesuusii fi waaʼee duʼaa kaʼuu lallabaa tureetii.
ਅਪਿਕੂਰੀ ਅਤੇ ਸਤੋਇਕੀ ਸ਼ਾਸਤਰੀਆਂ ਵਿੱਚੋਂ ਵੀ ਕੁਝ ਉਸ ਨਾਲ ਵਾਦ-ਵਿਵਾਦ ਕਰਨ ਲੱਗੇ ਅਤੇ ਕਈਆਂ ਨੇ ਆਖਿਆ ਕਿ ਇਹ ਬਕਵਾਦੀ ਕੀ ਆਖਣਾ ਚਾਹੁੰਦਾ ਹੈ? ਕਈ ਬੋਲੇ ਜੋ ਇਹ ਤਾਂ ਪਰਾਏ ਦੇਵਤਿਆਂ ਦਾ ਦੱਸਣ ਵਾਲਾ ਕੋਈ ਹੈ ਕਿਉਂ ਜੋ ਉਹ ਯਿਸੂ ਦੀ ਅਤੇ ਉਸ ਦੇ ਜੀ ਉੱਠਣ ਦੀ ਖੁਸ਼ਖਬਰੀ ਸੁਣਾਉਂਦਾ ਸੀ।
ହେବେଣ୍ଡାଂ “ଏପିକୁରିୟ ଆରି ସ୍ତୟିକ” କେତେକ୍ ହୁଡ଼୍ନାକାର୍ ପା ତା ହୁଦାଂ କାତାବାର୍ତା କିଦେଙ୍ଗ୍ ଲାଗାତାର୍, ଆରେ ଇନେର୍ ଇନେର୍ ଇଚାର୍, “ଇ କାଡ଼୍ଦେ ଇନାକା ଇଞ୍ଜେଙ୍ଗ୍ ଇଚା କିନାନା?” ଆରେ ଇନେର୍ ଇନେର୍ ଇଚାର୍, ହେୱାନ୍ ପୁଦାଙ୍ଗ୍ତି ବିସ୍ରେ ପର୍ଚାର୍ କିନାକାନ୍ ଲାକେ ପୁନ୍ୟାନାତା । ଇନାକିଦେଂକି ହେୱାନ୍ ଜିସୁ ଆରି ଆରେ ନିଂନାକା ବିସ୍ରେନି ନେକ୍ରିକାବୁର୍ ପର୍ଚାର୍ କିଜ଼ି ମାଚାନ୍ ହେୱାର୍ ଇଦାଂ ଇଚାର୍
| اما بعضی از فلاسفه اپیکوریین و رواقیین با اوروبرو شده، بعضی میگفتند: «این یاوهگو چه میخواهد بگوید؟» و دیگران گفتند: «ظاهر واعظ به خدایان غریب است.» زیرا که ایشان را به عیسی و قیامت بشارت میداد. |
| گروهی از فیلسوفان اپیکوری و رواقی نیز به مباحثه با او پرداختند. برخی از آنان میپرسیدند: «این مردِ پُرحرف سعی دارد چه بگوید؟» بعضی نیز میگفتند: «گویا میخواهد از خدایان بیگانه دفاع کند.» ایشان این حرفها را میزدند، چون پولس خبر خوش عیسی و قیامت را اعلان میکرد. |
Wamonga wawafatiti falisafa ya Epikuru na Staiku walikakatala na yomberi. Wamonga watakuliti, “Kafira kutakula shishi ayu mtuwa visoweru?” Toziya Paulu kaweriti kankubwera kuusu Yesu na kuusu uzyuka, wamonga watakuliti, “lwonikana handa kankubwera kuusu milungu wa shihenja.”
A saunpadak en Epikurios o Stoik kai ap akamai ong i o akai indada: Da paupaulap men et men inda? O akai indada: Likamata i saunpadak en kot en wai akan aki a padaki ong irail rongamau en Iesus o en aramas ar pan maureda.
A jaunpadak en Epikurioj o Jtoik kai ap akamai on i o akai indada: Da paupaulap men et men inda? O akai indada: Likamata i jaunpadak en kot en wai akan aki a padaki on irail ronamau en Iejuj o en aramaj ar pan maureda.
Tedy niektórzy z Epikurejczyków i Stoików filozofowie spierali się z nim, a niektórzy mówili: Cóż wżdy ten plotkarz mówić chce? A drudzy: Zdaje się być opowiadaczem obcych bogów; bo im Jezusa i zmartwychwstanie opowiadał.
Byli wśród nich filozofowie ze szkoły epikurejskiej i stoickiej, którzy rozmawiali między sobą: —O czym ten gaduła chce nam powiedzieć? —Chyba głosi jakieś nowe bóstwa—mówili drudzy, Paweł mówił bowiem o Jezusie i zmartwychwstaniu.
Wtedy niektórzy z filozofów epikurejskich i stoickich spierali się z nim. Jedni mówili: Co chce powiedzieć ten nowinkarz? A inni: Zdaje się, że jest zwiastunem obcych bogów. Głosił im bowiem Jezusa i zmartwychwstanie.
E alguns dos filósofos epicureus e estoicos discutiam com ele; e uns diziam: O que quer dizer este tagarela? E outros: Parece que ele é pregador de deuses estranhos. Porque ele lhes anunciava o Evangelho de Jesus e a ressurreição.
E alguns dos philosophos epicureos e estoicos contendiam com elle; e uns diziam: Que quer dizer este paroleiro? E outros: Parece que é prégador de deuses estranhos. Porque lhes annunciava a Jesus e a resurreição.
E alguns dos filósofos epicureos e estoicos contendiam com ele; e uns diziam: Que quer dizer este paroleiro? E outros: Parece que é pregador de deuses estranhos. Porque lhes anunciava a Jesus e a ressurreição.
Paulo deparou com alguns professores que gostavam de falar sobre aquilo que as pessoas deveriam crer. [As pessoas chamavam ]alguns deles de “epicureus” e [chamavam ]outros de “estóicos”. Eles explicaram a Paulo [aquilo que acreditavam ]e lhe perguntaram [o que ele acreditava. Então ]alguns deles disseram [uns aos outros: ]“Esse ignorante está dizendo somente bobagem [RHQ]!” Outros disseram: “[Parece-nos ](excl) que ele está ensinando sobre deuses [estrangeiros/novos ]que nós (excl) desconhecemos”. Eles disseram isso porque Paulo lhes dizia que [Jesus tinha morrido e ]que tinha voltado à vida [depois de morrer. Eles nunca tinham ouvido aquela mensagem.]
Alguns filósofos epicureus e estoicos também discutiam com ele. Eles perguntavam: “Sobre o que ele está falando?” Outros concluíam: “Ele parece estar ensinando sobre alguns deuses estrangeiros.” Diziam isso porque Paulo estava falando sobre Jesus e sobre a ressurreição.
Alguns dos filósofos epicureus e estóicos também estavam conversando com ele. Alguns diziam: “O que este tagarela quer dizer?”. Outros disseram: “Ele parece estar defendendo divindades estrangeiras”, porque ele pregou Jesus e a ressurreição.
Лэса дэнас дума коисавэ философоря — эпикурейцоря и стоикоря. Екх пушэнас: — Со кадва шыбало камэл тэ пхэнэл? Ай авэр пхэнэнас: — Вов пхэнэл амэнди пала авэр дэвла, — колэсти со Павло роспхэнэлас Радосаво Лав палав Исусо и Жундимос.
Лэґа дэдумане койсавэ ирвалэ мануша — эпикурейцуря тай стоикуря. Екх мануша пхученас: — Со кадэва башлимури камэл тэ пхэнэ? Авэр пхэнэнас: — Амэнди сикавэлпэ, со вов дэдумэл пала аврэпхуякэрэн дэвлэн, — колэсти со Павло дэдуманя Бахтало Лав пала Исусо тай Отджюндивимо.
Уний дин филозофий епикуриень ши стоичь ау интрат ын ворбэ ку ел. Ши уний зичяу: „Че вря сэ спунэ палавраӂиул ачеста?” Алций, кынд л-ау аузит кэ вестеште пе Исус ши ынвиеря, зичяу: „Паре кэ вестеште ниште думнезей стрэинь.”
Unii dintre filosofii epicurieni și stoici stăteau de asemenea de vorbă cu el. Unii ziceau: “Ce vrea să spună acest bălăcar?”. Alții au spus: “Se pare că susține zeități străine”, pentru că l-a predicat pe Isus și învierea.
Ana naselu-nataa no meser hira mia babꞌanggi karuaꞌ sia kota naa, naeni babꞌanggiꞌ Epikuros no babꞌanggiꞌ Stoa. Ana olaꞌ soꞌal Yesus nae, Ana nasodꞌa baliꞌ ena ma, hambu ruma puras miru, rae “Puuh! Mana ombon koson ra baꞌi na!” Ma ruma raꞌaeꞌeiꞌ rae, “Wueh! Atahori ia nae naꞌasusuuꞌ hita fo songgo sira lamatua feaꞌ nara!”
Некоторые из эпикурейских и стоических философов стали спорить с ним; и одни говорили: “что хочет сказать этот суеслов?”, а другие: “кажется, он проповедует о чужих божествах”, потому что он благовествовал им Иисуса и воскресение.
Lelo Abhefalsafa abha Waepikureo na Waestoiko bhabhalila na bhanje bhabhinji. Bhaga unu umuntu ayanga zyenu uduvya bhamo bhaga, abhoneha alumbilila ezya Ngulubhi ujeni,” alumbilila ezya Yesu nu luzyuho.
Epicurean le Stoic minchupungei lâia khomin an inkhalpuia. Senkhat chu, “Hi mûr thiempa hin imo misîr rang a bôk hi?” an tia. Adangngeiin chu, “Ram dang pathienngei chong a misîr rang ani hi,” Paul, Jisua le inthoinôkna. misîr sika ani.
kintvipikUrIyamatagrahiNaH stoyikIyamatagrAhiNazca kiyanto janAstena sArddhaM vyavadanta| tatra kecid akathayan eSa vAcAlaH kiM vaktum icchati? apare kecid eSa janaH keSAJcid videzIyadevAnAM pracAraka ityanumIyate yataH sa yIzum utthitiJca pracArayat|
কিন্ত্ৱিপিকূৰীযমতগ্ৰহিণঃ স্তোযিকীযমতগ্ৰাহিণশ্চ কিযন্তো জনাস্তেন সাৰ্দ্ধং ৱ্যৱদন্ত| তত্ৰ কেচিদ্ অকথযন্ এষ ৱাচালঃ কিং ৱক্তুম্ ইচ্ছতি? অপৰে কেচিদ্ এষ জনঃ কেষাঞ্চিদ্ ৱিদেশীযদেৱানাং প্ৰচাৰক ইত্যনুমীযতে যতঃ স যীশুম্ উত্থিতিঞ্চ প্ৰচাৰযৎ|
কিন্ত্ৱিপিকূরীযমতগ্রহিণঃ স্তোযিকীযমতগ্রাহিণশ্চ কিযন্তো জনাস্তেন সার্দ্ধং ৱ্যৱদন্ত| তত্র কেচিদ্ অকথযন্ এষ ৱাচালঃ কিং ৱক্তুম্ ইচ্ছতি? অপরে কেচিদ্ এষ জনঃ কেষাঞ্চিদ্ ৱিদেশীযদেৱানাং প্রচারক ইত্যনুমীযতে যতঃ স যীশুম্ উত্থিতিঞ্চ প্রচারযৎ|
ကိန္တွိပိကူရီယမတဂြဟိဏး သ္တောယိကီယမတဂြာဟိဏၑ္စ ကိယန္တော ဇနာသ္တေန သာရ္ဒ္ဓံ ဝျဝဒန္တ၊ တတြ ကေစိဒ် အကထယန် ဧၐ ဝါစာလး ကိံ ဝက္တုမ် ဣစ္ဆတိ? အပရေ ကေစိဒ် ဧၐ ဇနး ကေၐာဉ္စိဒ် ဝိဒေၑီယဒေဝါနာံ ပြစာရက ဣတျနုမီယတေ ယတး သ ယီၑုမ် ဥတ္ထိတိဉ္စ ပြစာရယတ်၊
kintvipikUrIyamatagrahiNaH stOyikIyamatagrAhiNazca kiyantO janAstEna sArddhaM vyavadanta| tatra kEcid akathayan ESa vAcAlaH kiM vaktum icchati? aparE kEcid ESa janaH kESAnjcid vidEzIyadEvAnAM pracAraka ityanumIyatE yataH sa yIzum utthitinjca pracArayat|
किन्त्विपिकूरीयमतग्रहिणः स्तोयिकीयमतग्राहिणश्च कियन्तो जनास्तेन सार्द्धं व्यवदन्त। तत्र केचिद् अकथयन् एष वाचालः किं वक्तुम् इच्छति? अपरे केचिद् एष जनः केषाञ्चिद् विदेशीयदेवानां प्रचारक इत्यनुमीयते यतः स यीशुम् उत्थितिञ्च प्रचारयत्।
કિન્ત્વિપિકૂરીયમતગ્રહિણઃ સ્તોયિકીયમતગ્રાહિણશ્ચ કિયન્તો જનાસ્તેન સાર્દ્ધં વ્યવદન્ત| તત્ર કેચિદ્ અકથયન્ એષ વાચાલઃ કિં વક્તુમ્ ઇચ્છતિ? અપરે કેચિદ્ એષ જનઃ કેષાઞ્ચિદ્ વિદેશીયદેવાનાં પ્રચારક ઇત્યનુમીયતે યતઃ સ યીશુમ્ ઉત્થિતિઞ્ચ પ્રચારયત્|
kintvipikūrīyamatagrahiṇaḥ stoyikīyamatagrāhiṇaśca kiyanto janāstena sārddhaṁ vyavadanta| tatra kecid akathayan eṣa vācālaḥ kiṁ vaktum icchati? apare kecid eṣa janaḥ keṣāñcid videśīyadevānāṁ pracāraka ityanumīyate yataḥ sa yīśum utthitiñca pracārayat|
kintvipikūrīyamatagrahiṇaḥ stōyikīyamatagrāhiṇaśca kiyantō janāstēna sārddhaṁ vyavadanta| tatra kēcid akathayan ēṣa vācālaḥ kiṁ vaktum icchati? aparē kēcid ēṣa janaḥ kēṣāñcid vidēśīyadēvānāṁ pracāraka ityanumīyatē yataḥ sa yīśum utthitiñca pracārayat|
kintvipikUrIyamatagrahiNaH stoyikIyamatagrAhiNashcha kiyanto janAstena sArddhaM vyavadanta| tatra kechid akathayan eSha vAchAlaH kiM vaktum ichChati? apare kechid eSha janaH keShA nchid videshIyadevAnAM prachAraka ityanumIyate yataH sa yIshum utthiti ncha prachArayat|
ಕಿನ್ತ್ವಿಪಿಕೂರೀಯಮತಗ್ರಹಿಣಃ ಸ್ತೋಯಿಕೀಯಮತಗ್ರಾಹಿಣಶ್ಚ ಕಿಯನ್ತೋ ಜನಾಸ್ತೇನ ಸಾರ್ದ್ಧಂ ವ್ಯವದನ್ತ| ತತ್ರ ಕೇಚಿದ್ ಅಕಥಯನ್ ಏಷ ವಾಚಾಲಃ ಕಿಂ ವಕ್ತುಮ್ ಇಚ್ಛತಿ? ಅಪರೇ ಕೇಚಿದ್ ಏಷ ಜನಃ ಕೇಷಾಞ್ಚಿದ್ ವಿದೇಶೀಯದೇವಾನಾಂ ಪ್ರಚಾರಕ ಇತ್ಯನುಮೀಯತೇ ಯತಃ ಸ ಯೀಶುಮ್ ಉತ್ಥಿತಿಞ್ಚ ಪ್ರಚಾರಯತ್|
កិន្ត្វិបិកូរីយមតគ្រហិណះ ស្តោយិកីយមតគ្រាហិណឝ្ច កិយន្តោ ជនាស្តេន សាទ៌្ធំ វ្យវទន្ត។ តត្រ កេចិទ៑ អកថយន៑ ឯឞ វាចាលះ កិំ វក្តុម៑ ឥច្ឆតិ? អបរេ កេចិទ៑ ឯឞ ជនះ កេឞាញ្ចិទ៑ វិទេឝីយទេវានាំ ប្រចារក ឥត្យនុមីយតេ យតះ ស យីឝុម៑ ឧត្ថិតិញ្ច ប្រចារយត៑។
കിന്ത്വിപികൂരീയമതഗ്രഹിണഃ സ്തോയികീയമതഗ്രാഹിണശ്ച കിയന്തോ ജനാസ്തേന സാർദ്ധം വ്യവദന്ത| തത്ര കേചിദ് അകഥയൻ ഏഷ വാചാലഃ കിം വക്തുമ് ഇച്ഛതി? അപരേ കേചിദ് ഏഷ ജനഃ കേഷാഞ്ചിദ് വിദേശീയദേവാനാം പ്രചാരക ഇത്യനുമീയതേ യതഃ സ യീശുമ് ഉത്ഥിതിഞ്ച പ്രചാരയത്|
କିନ୍ତ୍ୱିପିକୂରୀଯମତଗ୍ରହିଣଃ ସ୍ତୋଯିକୀଯମତଗ୍ରାହିଣଶ୍ଚ କିଯନ୍ତୋ ଜନାସ୍ତେନ ସାର୍ଦ୍ଧଂ ୱ୍ୟୱଦନ୍ତ| ତତ୍ର କେଚିଦ୍ ଅକଥଯନ୍ ଏଷ ୱାଚାଲଃ କିଂ ୱକ୍ତୁମ୍ ଇଚ୍ଛତି? ଅପରେ କେଚିଦ୍ ଏଷ ଜନଃ କେଷାଞ୍ଚିଦ୍ ୱିଦେଶୀଯଦେୱାନାଂ ପ୍ରଚାରକ ଇତ୍ୟନୁମୀଯତେ ଯତଃ ସ ଯୀଶୁମ୍ ଉତ୍ଥିତିଞ୍ଚ ପ୍ରଚାରଯତ୍|
ਕਿਨ੍ਤ੍ਵਿਪਿਕੂਰੀਯਮਤਗ੍ਰਹਿਣਃ ਸ੍ਤੋਯਿਕੀਯਮਤਗ੍ਰਾਹਿਣਸ਼੍ਚ ਕਿਯਨ੍ਤੋ ਜਨਾਸ੍ਤੇਨ ਸਾਰ੍ੱਧੰ ਵ੍ਯਵਦਨ੍ਤ| ਤਤ੍ਰ ਕੇਚਿਦ੍ ਅਕਥਯਨ੍ ਏਸ਼਼ ਵਾਚਾਲਃ ਕਿੰ ਵਕ੍ਤੁਮ੍ ਇੱਛਤਿ? ਅਪਰੇ ਕੇਚਿਦ੍ ਏਸ਼਼ ਜਨਃ ਕੇਸ਼਼ਾਞ੍ਚਿਦ੍ ਵਿਦੇਸ਼ੀਯਦੇਵਾਨਾਂ ਪ੍ਰਚਾਰਕ ਇਤ੍ਯਨੁਮੀਯਤੇ ਯਤਃ ਸ ਯੀਸ਼ੁਮ੍ ਉੱਥਿਤਿਞ੍ਚ ਪ੍ਰਚਾਰਯਤ੍|
කින්ත්විපිකූරීයමතග්රහිණඃ ස්තෝයිකීයමතග්රාහිණශ්ච කියන්තෝ ජනාස්තේන සාර්ද්ධං ව්යවදන්ත| තත්ර කේචිද් අකථයන් ඒෂ වාචාලඃ කිං වක්තුම් ඉච්ඡති? අපරේ කේචිද් ඒෂ ජනඃ කේෂාඤ්චිද් විදේශීයදේවානාං ප්රචාරක ඉත්යනුමීයතේ යතඃ ස යීශුම් උත්ථිතිඤ්ච ප්රචාරයත්|
கிந்த்விபிகூரீயமதக்³ரஹிண: ஸ்தோயிகீயமதக்³ராஹிணஸ்²ச கியந்தோ ஜநாஸ்தேந ஸார்த்³த⁴ம்’ வ்யவத³ந்த| தத்ர கேசித்³ அகத²யந் ஏஷ வாசால: கிம்’ வக்தும் இச்ச²தி? அபரே கேசித்³ ஏஷ ஜந: கேஷாஞ்சித்³ விதே³ஸீ²யதே³வாநாம்’ ப்ரசாரக இத்யநுமீயதே யத: ஸ யீஸு²ம் உத்தி²திஞ்ச ப்ரசாரயத்|
కిన్త్విపికూరీయమతగ్రహిణః స్తోయికీయమతగ్రాహిణశ్చ కియన్తో జనాస్తేన సార్ద్ధం వ్యవదన్త| తత్ర కేచిద్ అకథయన్ ఏష వాచాలః కిం వక్తుమ్ ఇచ్ఛతి? అపరే కేచిద్ ఏష జనః కేషాఞ్చిద్ విదేశీయదేవానాం ప్రచారక ఇత్యనుమీయతే యతః స యీశుమ్ ఉత్థితిఞ్చ ప్రచారయత్|
กินฺตฺวิปิกูรียมตคฺรหิณ: โสฺตยิกียมตคฺราหิณศฺจ กิยนฺโต ชนาเสฺตน สารฺทฺธํ วฺยวทนฺตฯ ตตฺร เกจิทฺ อกถยนฺ เอษ วาจาล: กึ วกฺตุมฺ อิจฺฉติ? อปเร เกจิทฺ เอษ ชน: เกษาญฺจิทฺ วิเทศียเทวานำ ปฺรจารก อิตฺยนุมียเต ยต: ส ยีศุมฺ อุตฺถิติญฺจ ปฺรจารยตฺฯ
ཀིནྟྭིཔིཀཱུརཱིཡམཏགྲཧིཎཿ སྟོཡིཀཱིཡམཏགྲཱཧིཎཤྩ ཀིཡནྟོ ཛནཱསྟེན སཱརྡྡྷཾ ཝྱཝདནྟ། ཏཏྲ ཀེཙིད྄ ཨཀཐཡན྄ ཨེཥ ཝཱཙཱལཿ ཀིཾ ཝཀྟུམ྄ ཨིཙྪཏི? ཨཔརེ ཀེཙིད྄ ཨེཥ ཛནཿ ཀེཥཱཉྩིད྄ ཝིདེཤཱིཡདེཝཱནཱཾ པྲཙཱརཀ ཨིཏྱནུམཱིཡཏེ ཡཏཿ ས ཡཱིཤུམ྄ ཨུཏྠིཏིཉྩ པྲཙཱརཡཏ྄།
| کِنْتْوِپِکُورِییَمَتَگْرَہِنَح سْتویِکِییَمَتَگْراہِنَشْچَ کِیَنْتو جَناسْتینَ سارْدّھَں وْیَوَدَنْتَ۔ تَتْرَ کیچِدْ اَکَتھَیَنْ ایشَ واچالَح کِں وَکْتُمْ اِچّھَتِ؟ اَپَرے کیچِدْ ایشَ جَنَح کیشانْچِدْ وِدیشِییَدیواناں پْرَچارَکَ اِتْیَنُمِییَتے یَتَح سَ یِیشُمْ اُتّھِتِنْچَ پْرَچارَیَتْ۔ |
kintvipikuuriiyamatagrahi. na. h stoyikiiyamatagraahi. na"sca kiyanto janaastena saarddha. m vyavadanta| tatra kecid akathayan e. sa vaacaala. h ki. m vaktum icchati? apare kecid e. sa jana. h ke. saa ncid vide"siiyadevaanaa. m pracaaraka ityanumiiyate yata. h sa yii"sum utthiti nca pracaarayat|
А неки од Епикуроваца и од стојичких мудраца препираху се с њим; и једни говораху: Шта хоће овај беспослица? А други: Види се као да хоће нове богове да проповеда. Јер им проповедаше јеванђеље о Исусу и о васкрсењу.
A neki od Epikurovaca i od Stojièkijeh mudaraca prepirahu se s njim; i jedni govorahu: šta hoæe ovaj besposlica? A drugi: vidi se kao da hoæe nove bogove da propovijeda. Jer im propovijedaše jevanðelje o Isusu i o vaskrseniju.
Mme ba kopana le batlhalefi bangwe ba Bapikuria le Basetoika. Erile fa a ba bolelela kaga Jesu le kaga tsogo ya gagwe ba re, “Ke molori,” kgotsa, “O leka go dirisa tumelo ya seeng.”
Zvino dzimwe nyanzvi dzekufunga dzeVaEpikuro nedzeVaStoiko dzakaita nharo naye. Vamwe ndokuti: Uyu mubvotomoki anoda kurevei? Asi vamwe vakati: Anenge muparidzi wevamwari vekumwe; nokuti neevhangeri wakavaparidzira Jesu nekumuka.
Boka ravakachenjera ravaEpikuro navaStoiki rakaita nharo naye. Vamwe vavo vakabvunza vakati, “Ko, uyu mutauri wezvisina maturo ari kuedza kuti kudii?” Vamwe vakati, “Anenge ari kudzidzisa nezvavamwari vokumwe.” Vakareva izvi nokuti Pauro akanga achiparidza mashoko akanaka ezvaJesu uye nezvokumuka kwavakafa.
Нецыи же от епикур и от стоик философ стязахуся с ним: и нецыи глаголаху: что убо хощет суесловивый сей глаголати? Инии же: чуждих богов мнится проповедник быти: яко Иисуса и воскресение благовествоваше им.
Potem so mu ugovarjali neki filozofi izmed epikurejcev in izmed stoikov. In nekateri so rekli: »Kaj hoče povedati ta blebetavec?« Drugi nekako: »Zdi se, da je oznanjevalec tujih bogov, « ker jim je oznanjal Jezusa in vstajenje.
Nekteri od Epikurejskih in Stojskih modrijanov so so pa prepirali ž njim; in eni so govorili: Kaj hoče ta kvasé povedati? a drugi: Zdi se, da je oznanjevalec tujih bogov: ker jim je Jezusa in vstajanje oznanjeval.
Bantu ba mano nabambi bamulikoto lyalikukwiweti Epikuleya, neba Sitoyiki, balatotekeshana ne Paulo, nabambi balikwambeti, “Inga mbutuma iyi yapamulomo cisa ilelekeshenga kwamba cani?” Nabambi kayi balikwambeti, “Uyu lanyumfwikingeti lakambaukunga sha balesa bensu mbotuteshi kuno.” Balikwambeco pakwinga Paulo, walikukambauka Mulumbe Waina ulambanga sha Yesu ne shakupunduka kubafu.
Waxaana la kulmay isagii kuwo ka mid ah faylosuufiinta Ebikuriyiin iyo Istoo'ikiin ah. Qaar baa waxay yidhaahdeen, Ninkan dawdarka ihi muxuu odhan doonaa? Qaar kalena waxay yidhaahdeen, Wuxuu u eg yahay nin ilaahyo qalaad wax ka sheega; maxaa yeelay, wuxuu dadkii ku wacdiyey Ciise iyo sarakicidda.
Y algunos filósofos de los epicúreos y de los estoicos, disputaban con él; y unos decían: ¿Qué quiere decir este palabrero? Y otros: Parece que es predicador de nuevos dioses; porque les predicaba a Jesús y la resurrección.
Algunos filósofos epicúreos y estoicos también discutían con él. “¿De qué habla este hombre?” Se preguntaban. Y otros concluían: “Parece que enseña sobre dioses extranjeros”, porque hablaba sobre Jesús y la resurrección.
También conversaban con él algunos filósofos epicúreos y estoicos. Algunos decían: “¿Qué quiere decir este charlatán?”. Otros dijeron: “Parece que aboga por deidades extranjeras”, porque predicaba a Jesús y la resurrección.
También algunos de los filósofos epicúreos y estoicos debatían con él. Algunos decían: ¿Qué quiere decir este charlatán? Y otros: Parece ser predicador de dioses extraños, porque les predicaba a Jesús y la resurrección.
También algunos de los filósofos epicúreos y estoicos disputaban con él. Algunos decían: “¿Qué quiere decir este siembra-palabras?” Y otros: “Parece que es pregonador de dioses extranjeros”, porque les anunciaba a Jesús y la resurrección.
Y algunos filósofos de los Epicúreos y de los Estóicos disputaban con él; y unos decían: ¿Qué quiere decir este palabrero? Y otros: Parece que es predicador de nuevos dioses; porque les predicaba a Jesús, y la resurrección.
Y algunos filósofos de los Epicúreos y de los Estóicos, disputaban con él; y unos decían: ¿Qué quiere decir este palabrero? Y otros: Parece que es predicador de nuevos dioses: porque les predicaba á Jesús y la resurrección.
Y algunos filósofos de los Epicureos y de los Estóicos disputaban con él; y unos decian: ¿Qué quiere decir este palabrero? Y otros: Parece que es predicador de nuevos dioses; porque les predicaba á Jesus, y la resurreccion.
Y algunos de los partidarios de las teorías de los epicúreos y los estoicos se reunieron con él. Y algunos dijeron: ¿De qué habla este charlatan? Y otros, parece ser un predicador de dioses extranjeros: porque él estaba predicando acerca de Jesús y su resurrección.
Lakini baathi ya Wanafalsafa wa Waepikureo na Wastoiko wakamkabili. Na wengine wakasema, “Ni nini anachokisema huyu mwongeaji mchanga? Wengine wakasema, “inaonekana anahubiri habari ya mungu mgeni,” kwasababu anahubiri habari ya Yesu na ufufuo.
Wengine waliofuata falsafa ya Epikuro na Stoiki walibishana naye. Wengine walisema, “Anataka kusema nini huyu bwanamaneno?” Kwa kuwa Paulo alikuwa anahubiri juu ya Yesu na juu ya ufufuo, wengine walisema, “Inaonekana kama anahubiri juu ya miungu ya kigeni.”
Kisha baadhi ya Waepikureo na Wastoiko wenye falsafa wakakutana naye. Baadhi yao wakasema, “Je, huyu mpayukaji anajaribu kusema nini?” Wengine wakasema, “Inaonekana anasema habari za miungu ya kigeni.” Walisema haya kwa sababu Paulo alikuwa anahubiri habari njema kuhusu Yesu na ufufuo wa wafu.
Också några filosofer, dels av epikuréernas skola, dels av stoikernas, gåvo sig i ordskifte med honom. Och somliga sade: "Vad kan väl denne pratmakare vilja säga?" Andra åter: "Han tyckes vara en förkunnare av främmande gudar." De evangelium om Jesus och om uppståndelsen.
Och någre Philosophi, nämligade Epicureer och Stoiker, begynte kämpas med honom. Och somlige sade: Hvad vill denne sqvallraren säga? Och somlige sade: Det synes som han ville förkunna några nya gudar; derföre att han förkunnade dem Evangelium om Jesu, och uppståndelsen.
Också några filosofer, dels av epikuréernas skola, dels av stoikernas, gåvo sig i ordskifte med honom. Och somliga sade: »Vad kan väl denne pratmakare vilja säga?» Andra åter: »Han tyckes vara en förkunnare av främmande gudar.» De sade så, eftersom han förkunnade evangelium om Jesus och om uppståndelsen.
At ilan naman sa mga pilosopong Epicureo at Estoico ay nakipagtalo sa kaniya. At sinabi ng ilan, Anong ibig sabihin ng masalitang ito? binagabag ang mga iba, Parang siya'y tagapagbalita ng mga ibang dios: sapagka't ipinangangaral niya si Jesus at ang pagkabuhay na maguli.
Ngunit mayroong din mga pilosopong Epicureo at Estoico na kaniyang nakaharap. At may mga nagsabi, “Ano ang nais sabihin ng madaldal na ito?” sabi ng iba, “Parang mangangaral siya ng ibang diyos,” dahil nangangaral siya tungkol kay Jesus at nang muling pagkabuhay.
Ipikurian gv meego okv stoik gv tamsarnvnyi larmi sito, mintoku, “so nyi si oguka chima hv ogugo mindu nvdw. Hv ogugo mintv dvnvdw?” Kvvbiv minto, “Hv mintv doonvgo ngonua kvvbi Pwknvyarnv meego,” ogulvgavbolo Paul minjito bunua Jisu gv lvkwng lo okv ninyigv sinam lokv turkur kunama.
அப்பொழுது எப்பிக்கூரர்களும் ஸ்தோயிக்கர்களுமான ஞானிகளில் சிலர் அவனோடுகூட வாக்குவாதம்பண்ணினார்கள். சிலர்: இந்த வாயாடி என்ன பேசப்போகிறான் என்றார்கள். சிலர்: இவன் அந்நிய தேவதைகளை அறிவிக்கிறவனைப்போல இருக்கிறான் என்றார்கள். அவன் இயேசுவையும் உயிர்த்தெழுதலையும் அவர்களுக்குப் போதித்ததினால் அப்படிச் சொன்னார்கள்.
எப்பிக்கூர், ஸ்தோயிக்கர் எனப்பட்ட சில தத்துவஞானிகள் பவுலுடன் விவாதிக்கத் தொடங்கினார்கள். அவர்களில் சிலர், “இந்த வாயாடி என்ன சொல்ல விரும்புகிறான்?” என்றார்கள். மற்றவர்கள், “இவன் வேறு தெய்வங்களைப்பற்றி அறிவிக்கிறான் போலும்” என்றார்கள். பவுல் இயேசுவைப் பற்றியும், உயிர்த்தெழுதலைப் பற்றியும் நற்செய்தியைப் பிரசங்கித்ததினால், அவர்கள் இப்படிச் சொன்னார்கள்.
ఎపికూరీయుల స్తోయికుల వర్గానికి చెందిన కొంతమంది తత్వవేత్తలు అతనితో వాదించారు. కొంతమంది, “ఈ వాగుడుకాయ చెప్పేది ఏమిటి” అని చెప్పుకున్నారు. అతడు యేసుని గూర్చీ, చనిపోయిన వారు తిరిగి బ్రతకడం గూర్చీ ప్రకటించాడు కాబట్టి మరి కొంత మంది, “ఇతడు మనకు తెలియని దేవుళ్ళను ప్రచారం చేస్తున్నాడు” అని చెప్పుకున్నారు.
Pea naʻe toki fetaulaki mo ia ʻae kau fiepoto [ʻoe faʻahinga ]ʻo ʻEpikulio, mo Sitoiko. Pea pehē ʻe he niʻihi, “Ko e hā ʻoku lau ʻe he palau na?” Pea pehē ʻe he niʻihi, “ʻOku matamata fakahā ʻotua foʻou ia:” koeʻuhi naʻa ne malangaʻaki kiate kinautolu ʻa Sisu, mo e toetuʻu.
Epikürcü ve Stoacı bazı filozoflar onunla atışmaya başladılar. Kimi, “Bu lafebesi ne demek istiyor?” derken, kimi de, “Galiba yabancı ilahların haberciliğini yapıyor” diyordu. Çünkü Pavlus, İsa'yla ve dirilişle ilgili Müjde'yi duyuruyordu.
Afei, ɔne Epikurofo ne Stoikfo anyansafo bi nso gyee akyinnye. Ebinom kae se, “Na dɛn na nnabrabani yi pɛ sɛ ɔkyerɛ yi?” Afoforo nso kae se, “Ɛyɛ sɛ ɔreka anyame afoforo bi ho asɛm.” Nea enti a wɔkaa eyi ne sɛ, na Paulo reka Yesu Kristo ne ne wusɔre ho asɛm.
Afei, ɔne Epikurofoɔ ne Stoikfoɔ anyansafoɔ bi nso gyee akyinnyeɛ. Ebinom kaa sɛ, “na ɛdeɛn na ɔtoatoafoɔ yi pɛ sɛ ɔkyerɛ yi?” Afoforɔ nso kaa sɛ, “Ɛsɛ deɛ ɔreka anyame afoforɔ bi ho asɛm.” Deɛ enti a wɔkaa yei ne sɛ, na Paulo reka Yesu Kristo ne ne wusɔreɛ ho asɛm.
Деякі філософи з епікурейців та стоїків почали сперечатися з ним. Одні з них говорили: ―Що хоче сказати цей базіка? Інші казали: ―Здається, він звіщає чужих богів! Це тому, що він проповідував Добру Звістку про воскресіння Ісуса.
А дехто з філо́софів епікуре́їв та сто́їків сперечалися з ним. Одні говорили: „Що́ то хоче сказати оцей пустомо́в?“А інші: „Здається, він проповідник чужих богів“, бо він їм звіща́в Єва́нгелію про Ісуса й воскре́сення.
Деякі ж з Фидософів Епикуреїв та Стоїків змагали ся з ним; і одні казали: Що хоче сей балакайло сказати? инші ж: Здаєть ся, буде проповідником чужих богів, - бо благовіствував їм Ісуса та воскресеннє.
और चन्द इपकूरी और स्तोइकी फ़ैलसूफ़ उसका मुक़ाबिला करने लगे कुछ ने कहा, ये बकवासी क्या कहना चाहता है? औरों ने कहा ये ग़ैर मा'बूदों की ख़बर देने वाला मा'लूम होता है इस लिए कि वो ईसा और क़यामत की ख़ुशख़बरी देता है।
| «ئېپىكۇرلار» ۋە «ستوئىكلار» دەپ ئاتالغان بەزى پەيلاسوپلارمۇ ئۇنىڭ بىلەن مۇنازىرىلىشىشكە باشلىدى. ئۇلاردىن بەزىلەر: ــ بۇ بىلەرمەن پوچى نېمە دەپ جۆيلۈۋاتىدۇ؟ ــ دېيىشتى. يەنە بەزىلەر پاۋلۇسنىڭ ئەيسا ۋە ئادەملەرنىڭ ئۆلۈمدىن تىرىلدۈرۈلىدىغانلىقى ھەققىدىكى خۇش خەۋەرنى جاكارلىغانلىقىدىن: ــ ئۇ يات ئىلاھلارنىڭ تەرغىباتچىسى ئوخشايدۇ! ــ دېيىشتى. |
«Епикурлар» вә «Стоиклар» дәп аталған бәзи пәйласопларму униң билән муназирилишишкә башлиди. Улардин бәзиләр: — Бу биләрмән почи немә дәп җөйлүватиду? — дейишти. Йәнә бәзиләр Павлусниң Әйса вә адәмләрниң өлүмдин тирилдүрүлидиғанлиғи һәққидики хуш хәвәрни җакалиғанлиғидин: — У ят илаһларниң тәрғибатчиси охшайду! — дейишти.
«Épikurlar» we «Stoiklar» dep atalghan bezi peylasoplarmu uning bilen munazirilishishke bashlidi. Ulardin beziler: — Bu bilermen pochi néme dep jöylüwatidu? — déyishti. Yene beziler Pawlusning Eysa we ademlerning ölümdin tirildürülidighanliqi heqqidiki xush xewerni jakarlighanliqidin: — U yat ilahlarning terghibatchisi oxshaydu! — déyishti.
«Epikurlar» wǝ «Stoiklar» dǝp atalƣan bǝzi pǝylasoplarmu uning bilǝn munazirilixixkǝ baxlidi. Ulardin bǝzilǝr: — Bu bilǝrmǝn poqi nemǝ dǝp jɵylüwatidu? — deyixti. Yǝnǝ bǝzilǝr Pawlusning Əysa wǝ adǝmlǝrning ɵlümdin tirildürülidiƣanliⱪi ⱨǝⱪⱪidiki hux hǝwǝrni jakarliƣanliⱪidin: — U yat ilaⱨlarning tǝrƣibatqisi ohxaydu! — deyixti.
Có mấy nhà triết học về phái Epicuriens và phái Stociens cũng cãi lẽ với người. Kẻ thì hỏi: Người già mép nầy muốn nói gì đó? Người thì nói: Người dường như giảng về các thần ngoại quốc (vì Phao-lô truyền cho chúng về Đức Chúa Jêsus và sự sống lại).
Có mấy nhà triết học về phái Epicuriens và phái Stociens cũng cãi lẽ với người. Kẻ thì hỏi: Người già mép nầy muốn nói gì đó? Người thì nói: Người dường như giảng về các thần ngoại quốc (vì Phao-lô truyền cho chúng về Ðức Chúa Jêsus và sự sống lại).
Các triết gia phái Hưởng Lạc và phái Khắc Kỷ cũng tranh luận với ông. Khi Phao-lô giảng giải về Chúa Giê-xu và sự sống lại của Ngài thì họ hỏi: “Con vẹt kia muốn nói gì đây?” Người khác đáp: “Hình như ông ấy tuyên truyền cho các thần ngoại quốc.”
Looli vamo ava Falsafa ava ku va Waepikureo nava Wastoiko vakapela. Navange vakaati, “Kye kiki kino ijova unjovaji un'debe? Avenge vakaati, “Jihufia idalikila imola ja Nguluve umesia,” ulwakuuva idalikila imola ija Yesu na kusyuka.
Ndambu yi batu bankaka baba mu dikabu di Baepikuli ayi dikabu di Basitoyika, bafindana yandi ziphaka. Bankaka batuba: —Kiololoko kioki mbi kantuba e? Vayi bankaka batuba ti: —Tumueni ti niandi wulembo longi zinzambi banzenza! Bayolukila bobo mu diambu di Polo kaba nlonga nsamu wu Yesu ayi wu mfulukulu yi bafua.
Nínú àwọn ọ̀jọ̀gbọ́n Epikure ni àti tí àwọn Stoiki kó tì í. Àwọn kan si ń wí pé, “Kín ni aláhesọ yìí yóò rí wí?” Àwọn mìíràn sì wí pé, “Ó dàbí oníwàásù àjèjì òrìṣà, wọ́n sọ èyí nítorí Paulu ń wàásù ìròyìn ayọ̀ nípa Jesu àti àjíǹde fún wọn.”
Verse Count = 336
